Article published in:The Dynamics of Political Discourse: Forms and functions of follow-ups
Edited by Anita Fetzer, Elda Weizman and Lawrence N. Berlin
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 259] 2015
► pp. 87–107
Pragmatic strategies for follow-ups in US political debates
Political debating in the United States forms a type of pragmatic act with a recognizable script. Within that script, the nature of the debate presents itself as rife with examples of follow-ups (Sinclair and Coulthard 1975) whereby candidates react to challenges to their prior assertions by reasserting, justifying, and/or mitigating their original claims. Follow-ups can be identified sequentially or functionally, and emerge in the linguistic and interactional context both intra- or interdiscursively when, in the latter case, speakers are called upon to follow up on an assertion they made in an earlier political discourse (e.g., in a political speech or campaign advertisement); that is, the previous assertion has been entextualized in the latter discourse. Using the Multilayered Model of Context (Berlin 2007, 2011) as a framework to conduct a critical discourse analysis, pragmatic strategies are identified within selected debates which occurred during the final days of the 2010 US Midterm Elections. The integration of Positioning Theory (Harré and van Langenhove 1991, 1999) in the analysis also emerges as instructive in classifying those strategies as affirmative versus negative.
Published online: 27 August 2015
2010a “Florida Senate Debate: Transcript Part I – ABC News” (Transcribed byK. McCarthy). ABC News Blogs & Posts – ABC News 6 Oct 2010 Web 10 Oct 2011 <http://blogs.abcnews.com/george/2010/10/florida-senate-debate-transcript-part-i.html.
2010b “Florida Senate Debate: Transcript Part II – ABC News” (Transcribed byK. McCarthy). ABC News Blogs & Posts – ABC News 6 Oct 2010 Web 10 Oct 2011 <http://blogs.abcnews.com/george/2010/10/florida-senate-debate-transcript-part-ii.html.
Bakhtin, Mikhail Mikhailovich
Berlin, Lawrence N.
Chouliaraki, Lilie, and Norman Fairclough
2014 “Charlie Crist didn’t leave the Republican party because of racism. He left it because he couldn’t win a primary – The Washington Post.” The Washington Post – Blogs – The Fix 8 May 2014 <http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2014/05/08/charlie-crist-didnt-leave-the-republican-party-because-of-racism-he-left-it-because-he-couldnt-win-a-primary/.
Davies, Bronwyn, and Rom Harré
Halliday, Michael A.K.
1984 “Language as code and language as behavior: A systemic-functional interpretation of the nature and ontogenesis of dialogue.” In The Semiotics of Culture and Language: Volume I; Language as Social Semiotic, ed. by Robin P. Fawcett, Michael A.K. Halliday, Sydney M. Lamb, and Adam Makkai, 3–35. London and Wolfeboro, NH: Frances Pinter.
Harré, Rom, and Fathali Moghaddam
Harré, Rom, and Luk van Langenhove
Las Vegas Sun
2010 “Transcript of the Harry Reid-Sharron Angle debate, Oct. 14, 2010 – Friday, Oct. 15, 2010 | 6:56 a.m. – Las Vegas Sun.” Las Vegas Sun 15 Oct 2010 Web 10 Oct 2011 <http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2010/oct/15/transcript-harry-reid-sharron-angle-debate-6-pm-oc/.
Sinclair, John, and Malcolm Coulthard
2010 “Michele Bachmann and Tarryl Clark Debate in St. Cloud” (Cart provided by L. Richardson, Paradigm Reporting & Captioning). The Uptake 26 Oct 2010 Web 10 Oct 2011 <http://www.theuptake.org/2010/10/26/michele-bachmann-and-tarryl-clark-debate-in-st-cloud/.