Part of
The Dynamics of Political Discourse: Forms and functions of follow-ups
Edited by Anita Fetzer, Elda Weizman and Lawrence N. Berlin
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 259] 2015
► pp. 109140
Atifi, Hassan, and Michel Marcoccia
2006 “Television genre as an object of negotiation: a semio-pragmatic analysis of French political “television forum”. Journal of Pragmatics 38(2): 250–268. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baym, Nancy
1998 “The Emergence of On-Line Community”. In Cybersociety 2.0: Revisiting Computer-Mediated Communication and Community, ed. by Steven G. Jones, 35–68. Thousand Oaks: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bolander, Brook
2012 “Disagreements and agreements in personal/diary blogs: A closer look at responsiveness”. Journal of Pragmatics 44(12): 1607–1622. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ess, Charles
(ed.) 2002Ethical decision-making and Internet research: Recommndations from the aoir ethics working committee. Approved by AoIR, November 27, 2002. URL: [URL]Google Scholar
Fetzer, Anita, and Elda Weizman
(eds.) 2006 “Pragmatic Aspects of Political Discourse in the Media”. Journal of Pragmatics 38 (special issue).Google Scholar
Fetzer, Anita
2007“Challenges in political interviews: an intercultural analysis. In Political discourse in the media: cross-cultural perspectives, ed. by Anita Fetzer, and Gerda Lauerbach, 163–196. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fetzer, Anita, Elda Weizman, and Elisabeth Reber
2012, “Introduction”, In Proceedings of the ESF Strategic Workshop on Follow-Ups Across Discourse Domains: A Cross-Cultural Exploration of Their Forms and Functions, Würzburg (Germany), 31 May – 2 June 2012, ed. by Anita Fetzer, Elda Weizman, and Elisabeth Reber, 3–4. Würzburg: Universität Würzburg.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving
1981Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: Philadelphia University Press.Google Scholar
Greffet, Fabienne, and Stéphanie Wojcik
2008 “Parler politique…en ligne: une revue des travaux français et anglo-saxons”. Réseaux 150: 19–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hatter, Jeffrey Mark
2002The Application of Exchange Theory to Internet Relay Chat. MA Dissertation. Birmingham: Center for English Language Studies.Google Scholar
Herring, Susan C
1999 “Interactional coherence in CMC”. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 4(4). URL: [URL]Google Scholar
2004Computer-Mediated Discourse Analysis: An Approach to Researching Online Communities. In Designing for Virtual Communities in the Service of Learning, ed. by Sasha A. Barab, Rob Kling and James H. Gray, 338–376. Cambridge / New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herring, Susan C., Dieter Stein, and Tuija Virtanen
(eds.) 2013Handbook of pragmatics of computer-mediated communication. Berlin: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Larsson, Anders Olof, and Jakob Svensson
2014 “Politicians Online – Identifying Current Research Opportunities”. First Monday 19(4). URL: [URL] DOI: DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Livingstone, Sonia M., and Peter K. Lunt
1992 “Expert and lay participation in television debates: an analysis of audience discussion programs”. European Journal of Communication 7(1): 9–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mabi, Clément, and Anaïs Théviot
(eds.) 2014 “ S’engager sur Internet. Mobilisations numériques et pratiques politiques ”. Politiques de communication (special issue) 3.Google Scholar
Marcoccia, Michel
2004 “On-line Polylogues: conversation structure and participation framework in Internet Newsgroups”. Journal Of Pragmatics 36(1): 115–145. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mondada, Lorenza
1999 “Formes de séquentialité dans les courriels et les forums de discussion. Une approche conversationnelle de l’interaction sur Internet”. Apprentissage des Langues et Systèmes d’Information et de Communication 2(1): 3–25.Google Scholar
Monnoyer-Smith, Laurence
2011 “La participation en ligne, révélateur d'une évolution des pratiques politiques?Participations 1/1: 156–185. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roulet, Eddy, Antoine Auchlin, Jacques Moeschler, Christian Rubattel, and Marianne Schelling
1985L’Articulation du discours en français contemporain. Berne: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Rouquette, Sébastien
2002Vie et mort des débats télévisés. 1958–2000. Bruxelles: De Boeck.Google Scholar
Sinclair, John McHardy, and Malcolm Coulthard
1975Towards an Analysis of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sproull, Lee, and Sara Kiesler
1986 “Reducing social context cues: Electronic mail in organizational communications”. Management science 32(11): 1492–1512. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trognon, Alain
1999 “Eléments d’analyse interlocutoire”. In Apprendre dans l’interaction, ed. by Michel Gilly, Jean-Paul Roux and Alain Trognon, 69–94. Nancy, Presses Universitaires de Nancy.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 6 other publications

Fetzer, Anita
2018. “And you know, Jeremy, my father came from a very poor background indeed”. In The Discursive Construction of Identities On- and Offline [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 78],  pp. 227 ff. DOI logo
Fetzer, Anita
Molek-Kozakowska, Katarzyna & Jan Chovanec
2017. Media representations of the “other” Europeans. In Representing the Other in European Media Discourses [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 74],  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Shukrun-Nagar, Pnina
2020. “Hero, genius, king and Messiah”. In The Discourse of Indirectness [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 316],  pp. 59 ff. DOI logo
Weizman, Elda
2023. Recontextualization practices: A scale of directness. Frontiers in Communication 7 DOI logo
Weizman, Elda & Ayelet Kohn
2022. Resemblance in comments/posts interaction. Pragmatics and Society 13:5  pp. 861 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.