Part of
The Dynamics of Political Discourse: Forms and functions of follow-upsEdited by Anita Fetzer, Elda Weizman and Lawrence N. Berlin
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 259] 2015
► pp. 141–169
Edited by Anita Fetzer, Elda Weizman and Lawrence N. Berlin
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 259] 2015
► pp. 141–169
Online follow-ups as evaluative reactions to two visits of the Argentinian president to the United States
The purpose of this contribution is to present the results of a study that looks at the online follow-ups produced as reactions to a series of different speech activities carried out by the president of Argentina during her visit to the USA in September 2012. Through the analysis of a corpus made up of 200 postings published in Spanish in different Internet forums and blogs, we look at some of the linguistic resources exploited by the participants to show either agreement or disagreement with the president’s statements in her public addresses, with her government’s overall performance, and with the ideas expressed by other online participants. The functional meaning of utterances, the lexico-grammatical and semantic characteristics as well as the discourse resources which contribute to meaning making are qualitatively examined from a socio-pragmatic perspective, and on the basis of Appraisal Theory (Martin and White 2005) and the study of projection, both developed within the Systemic Functional Linguistics Theory. This investigation allowed us to identify the linguistic strategies favoured by the participants to make evaluative judgments and to introduce other voices into this type of computer-mediated communication.
References
Atifi, Hassan and Michel Marcoccia
2012 “Follow-Ups in Online Political Discussions”. In Proceedings of the ESF Strategic Workshop on Follow-ups across Discourse Domains: A Cross-cultural Exploration of their Forms and Functions, ed. by Anita Fetzer, Elda Weizman, and Elisabeth Reber, 22–34.Wüzburg: Wüzburg University. [online]. URL: [URL]
Bassett, Elizabeth H., and Kate O’Riordan
2002 “Ethics of Internet Research: Contesting the Human Subjects Research Model.” Ethics and Information Technology 4: 233–247. 
Baym, Nancy
1996 “Agreements and Disagreements in a Computer-Mediated Discussion.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 29: 315–345.
Bolander, Brook
2012 “Disagreements and Agreements in Personal/Diary Blogs: A Closer Look at Responsiveness.” Journal of Pragmatics 44 (12): 1607–1622.
Bull, Peter
2012 “Follow-Ups in Broadcast Political Discourse: Speeches, Interviews and Parliamentary Questions.” In Proceedings of the ESF Strategic Workshop on Follow-Ups across Discourse Domains: A Cross-cultural Exploration of their Forms and Functions, ed. by Anita Fetzer, Elda Weizman, and Elisabeth Reber, 35–47. Wüzburg: Wüzburg University. [online]. URL: [URL]
Coulthard, Malcom and David Brazil
1992 “Exchange Structure.” In Advances in Spoken Discourse Analysis, ed. by Malcom Coulthard, 50–78. London and New York: Routledge.
Du Bois, John W
2007 “The Stance Triangle.” In Stancetaking in Discourse, ed. by Robert Englebreton, 139–182. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Edmonson, Willis
1981 Spoken Discourse. A model for Analysis. London: Longman.
Eggins, Suzanne, and Diana Slade
1997 Analysing Casual Conversation. London: Equinox.
Fetzer, Anita
2012 “Quotations in monoglossic and dialogic political discourse”. In Proceedings of the ESF Strategic Workshop on Follow-Ups across Discourse Domains: A Cross-cultural Exploration of their Forms and Functions, ed. by Anita Fetzer, Elda Weizman, and Elisabeth Reber, 72–86. Wüzburg: Wüzburg University [online]. URL: [URL]
Goodwin, Marjorie Harness
2006 The Hidden Life of Girls: Games of Stance, Status, and Exclusion.Oxford: Blackwell.
Granato, Luisa
1996 Estructura discursiva de la entrevista radial. La Plata: Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación, Universidad Nacional de La Plata.
Halliday, Michael A.K., and Christian Matthiessen
2004 An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Arnold.
Hoffman, Christian R
Janney, Richard, W
2012 “Columbine Revisited: Follow-Ups and the Fractalizations of Events in the Modern Media.” In Proceedings of the ESF Strategic Workshop on Follow-Ups across Discourse Domains: A Cross-cultural Exploration of their Forms and Functions, ed. by Anita Fetzer, Elda Weizman, and Elisabeth Reber, 134–150. Wüzburg: Wüzburg University [online]. URL: [URL]
Johansson, Marjut
2012 “Editorial and its Comments: Follow-Ups in a Discussion Forum.” In Proceedings of the ESF Strategic Workshop on Follow-Ups across Discourse Domains: A Cross-cultural Exploration of their Forms and Functions, ed. by Anita Fetzer, Elda Weizman, and Elisabeth Reber, 151–164. Wüzburg: Wüzburg University [online]. URL: [URL]
Johnson, Thomas, Weiwu Zhang, Shannon Bichard, and Trent Seltzer
2011 “United We Stand? Online Social Network Sites and Civic Engagement”. In A Networked Self. Identity, Community, and Culture on Social Network Sites, ed. by Zizi Papacharissi, 185–222. New York: Routledge.
Jones, Rodney
2004 “The Problem of Context in Computer-Mediated Communication.” In Discourse and Technology, ed. by Philip Lavine and Ron Scollon, 20–33. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
Kerbrat-Orecchioni, Catherine
1995 Les interactions verbales. Tome I (10th edition). Paris: Armand Colin.
Kozinets, Robert
2010 Netnography. Doing Ethnographic Research Online. London: Sage.
Labov, William
1972 Language in the Inner City: Studies in Black English Vernacular. Philadelphia: University of Philadelphia Press.
Labov, William and Joshua Waletsky
1967 “Narrative Analysis. Oral Versions of Narrative Experiences.” In Essays on the Verbal and Visual Arts, ed. by June Helm, 12–44. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
Landert, Daniela, and Andreas H. Jucker
2011 “Private and Public in Mass Media Communication: From Letters to the Editor to Online Commentaries.” Journal of Pragmatics 43: 1422–1434.
Martin, James R
Martin, James R., and David Rose
2003 Working with Discourse. Meaning beyond the Clause. London: Continuum.
Martin James R., and Peter White
2005 The Language of Evaluation. Appraisal in English. London and New York: Palgrave Mackmillan.
Neurauter-Kessels, Manuela
2013 Impoliteness in Cyberspace: Personally Abusive Reader Responses in Online News Media. PhD. Thesis, University of Zurich, Switzerland. Available at [URL]
Protection of Human Subjects, US Federal Code Title 45, Section 46 2009, available online at: [URL] (accessed 8 October 2012)
Searle, John R
1969 Speech Acts. An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. London and New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sinclair, John, and Malcom Coulthard
1978 [1975] Towards and Analysis of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sivenkova, Maria
2012 “Metacommunicative Follow-Ups in British, German and Russian Political Webchats and Blogs.” In Proceedings of the ESF Strategic Workshop on Follow-Ups across Discourse Domains: A Cross-cultural Exploration of their Forms and Functions, ed. by Anita Fetzer, Elda Weizman, and Elisabeth Reber, 248–262. Wüzburg: Wüzburg University [online]. URL: [URL]
Tsui, Amy B.M
1994 English Conversation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tucker, Gordon
1998 The Lexicogrammar of Adjectives. A Systemic Functional Approach to Lexis. London and New York: Cassell.
Warner, Michael
2002 Publics and Counterpublics. New York: Zone Books.
Cited by
Cited by 1 other publications
Shukrun-Nagar, Pnina
2020. “Hero, genius, king and Messiah”. In The Discourse of Indirectness [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 316], ► pp. 59 ff. 
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 september 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.