Cover not available
Part of
The Dynamics of Political Discourse: Forms and functions of follow-ups
Edited by Anita Fetzer, Elda Weizman and Lawrence N. Berlin
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 259] 2015
► pp. 141–169

Online follow-ups as evaluative reactions to two visits of the Argentinian president to the United States

ORCID logo | Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Argentina
| Universidad de Belgrano, Argentina
The purpose of this contribution is to present the results of a study that looks at the online follow-ups produced as reactions to a series of different speech activities carried out by the president of Argentina during her visit to the USA in September 2012. Through the analysis of a corpus made up of 200 postings published in Spanish in different Internet forums and blogs, we look at some of the linguistic resources exploited by the participants to show either agreement or disagreement with the president’s statements in her public addresses, with her government’s overall performance, and with the ideas expressed by other online participants. The functional meaning of utterances, the lexico-grammatical and semantic characteristics as well as the discourse resources which contribute to meaning making are qualitatively examined from a socio-pragmatic perspective, and on the basis of Appraisal Theory (Martin and White 2005) and the study of projection, both developed within the Systemic Functional Linguistics Theory. This investigation allowed us to identify the linguistic strategies favoured by the participants to make evaluative judgments and to introduce other voices into this type of computer-mediated communication.
Published online: 27 August 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.259.06gra
References (35)
References
Atifi, Hassan and Michel Marcoccia. 2012. “Follow-Ups in Online Political Discussions”. In Proceedings of the ESF Strategic Workshop on Follow-ups across Discourse Domains: A Cross-cultural Exploration of their Forms and Functions, ed. by Anita Fetzer, Elda Weizman, and Elisabeth Reber, 22–34.Wüzburg: Wüzburg University. [online]. URL: [URL]Google Scholar
Bassett, Elizabeth H., and Kate O’Riordan. 2002. “Ethics of Internet Research: Contesting the Human Subjects Research Model.” Ethics and Information Technology 4: 233–247. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baym, Nancy. 1996. “Agreements and Disagreements in a Computer-Mediated Discussion.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 29: 315–345. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bolander, Brook. 2012. “Disagreements and Agreements in Personal/Diary Blogs: A Closer Look at Responsiveness.” Journal of Pragmatics 44 (12): 1607–1622. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Language and Power in Blogs. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bull, Peter. 2012. “Follow-Ups in Broadcast Political Discourse: Speeches, Interviews and Parliamentary Questions.” In Proceedings of the ESF Strategic Workshop on Follow-Ups across Discourse Domains: A Cross-cultural Exploration of their Forms and Functions, ed. by Anita Fetzer, Elda Weizman, and Elisabeth Reber, 35–47. Wüzburg: Wüzburg University. [online]. URL: [URL]Google Scholar
Coulthard, Malcom and David Brazil. 1992. “Exchange Structure.” In Advances in Spoken Discourse Analysis, ed. by Malcom Coulthard, 50–78. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Du Bois, John W. 2007. “The Stance Triangle.” In Stancetaking in Discourse, ed. by Robert Englebreton, 139–182. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Edmonson, Willis. 1981. Spoken Discourse. A model for Analysis. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Eggins, Suzanne, and Diana Slade. 1997. Analysing Casual Conversation. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Fetzer, Anita. 2012. “Quotations in monoglossic and dialogic political discourse”. In Proceedings of the ESF Strategic Workshop on Follow-Ups across Discourse Domains: A Cross-cultural Exploration of their Forms and Functions, ed. by Anita Fetzer, Elda Weizman, and Elisabeth Reber, 72–86. Wüzburg: Wüzburg University [online]. URL: [URL]Google Scholar
Goodwin, Marjorie Harness. 2006. The Hidden Life of Girls: Games of Stance, Status, and Exclusion.Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Granato, Luisa. 1996. Estructura discursiva de la entrevista radial. La Plata: Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación, Universidad Nacional de La Plata.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A.K., and Christian Matthiessen. 2004. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Hoffman, Christian R. 2012. Cohesive Profiling. Meaning and Interaction in Personal Blogs. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Janney, Richard, W. 2012. “Columbine Revisited: Follow-Ups and the Fractalizations of Events in the Modern Media.” In Proceedings of the ESF Strategic Workshop on Follow-Ups across Discourse Domains: A Cross-cultural Exploration of their Forms and Functions, ed. by Anita Fetzer, Elda Weizman, and Elisabeth Reber, 134–150. Wüzburg: Wüzburg University [online]. URL: [URL]Google Scholar
Johansson, Marjut. 2012. “Editorial and its Comments: Follow-Ups in a Discussion Forum.” In Proceedings of the ESF Strategic Workshop on Follow-Ups across Discourse Domains: A Cross-cultural Exploration of their Forms and Functions, ed. by Anita Fetzer, Elda Weizman, and Elisabeth Reber, 151–164. Wüzburg: Wüzburg University [online]. URL: [URL]Google Scholar
Johnson, Thomas, Weiwu Zhang, Shannon Bichard, and Trent Seltzer. 2011. “United We Stand? Online Social Network Sites and Civic Engagement”. In A Networked Self. Identity, Community, and Culture on Social Network Sites, ed. by Zizi Papacharissi, 185–222. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jones, Rodney. 2004. “The Problem of Context in Computer-Mediated Communication.” In Discourse and Technology, ed. by Philip Lavine and Ron Scollon, 20–33. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Kerbrat-Orecchioni, Catherine. 1995. Les interactions verbales. Tome I (10th edition). Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
Kozinets, Robert. 2010. Netnography. Doing Ethnographic Research Online. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1972. Language in the Inner City: Studies in Black English Vernacular. Philadelphia: University of Philadelphia Press.Google Scholar
Labov, William and Joshua Waletsky. 1967. “Narrative Analysis. Oral Versions of Narrative Experiences.” In Essays on the Verbal and Visual Arts, ed. by June Helm, 12–44. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Landert, Daniela, and Andreas H. Jucker. 2011. “Private and Public in Mass Media Communication: From Letters to the Editor to Online Commentaries.” Journal of Pragmatics 43: 1422–1434. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, James R. 1992. English Text: System and Structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, James R., and David Rose. 2003. Working with Discourse. Meaning beyond the Clause. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Martin James R., and Peter White. 2005. The Language of Evaluation. Appraisal in English. London and New York: Palgrave Mackmillan.Google Scholar
Neurauter-Kessels, Manuela. 2013. Impoliteness in Cyberspace: Personally Abusive Reader Responses in Online News Media. PhD. Thesis, University of Zurich, Switzerland. Available at [URL]Google Scholar
Protection of Human Subjects, US Federal Code Title 45, Section 46. 2009, available online at: [URL] (accessed 8 October 2012)
Searle, John R. 1969. Speech Acts. An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. London and New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, John, and Malcom Coulthard. 1978 [1975]. Towards and Analysis of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sivenkova, Maria. 2012. “Metacommunicative Follow-Ups in British, German and Russian Political Webchats and Blogs.” In Proceedings of the ESF Strategic Workshop on Follow-Ups across Discourse Domains: A Cross-cultural Exploration of their Forms and Functions, ed. by Anita Fetzer, Elda Weizman, and Elisabeth Reber, 248–262. Wüzburg: Wüzburg University [online]. URL: [URL]Google Scholar
Tsui, Amy B.M. 1994. English Conversation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tucker, Gordon. 1998. The Lexicogrammar of Adjectives. A Systemic Functional Approach to Lexis. London and New York: Cassell.Google Scholar
Warner, Michael. 2002. Publics and Counterpublics. New York: Zone Books. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Thompson, Rachel G. A., Ebenezer Agbaglo & Mohammed Yakub
2024. “…you were reared”: Response Comments on Verbal Attacks in Political Discourse on GhanaWeb. Emerging Media DOI logo
Shukrun-Nagar, Pnina
2020. “Hero, genius, king and Messiah”. In The Discourse of Indirectness [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 316], ► pp. 59 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.