Cover not available
Part of
The Dynamics of Political Discourse: Forms and functions of follow-ups
Edited by Anita Fetzer, Elda Weizman and Lawrence N. Berlin
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 259] 2015
► pp. 245–273

‘When you came into office you said that your government would be different’

Forms and functions of quotations in mediated political discourse

| University of Augsburg, Germany

The goal of this chapter is to analyse the forms and communicative functions of quotations as follow-ups in mediated political discourse where they are used strategically to achieve the following goals: (1) intensify the force of an argument, (2) demonstrate ideological coherence or non-coherence, (3) construct, reconstruct and deconstruct the credibility of self and others, and (4) express alignment and disalignment. On a more global level, quotation contribute to the construal of interdiscursitivity by beckoning the addressees out of the on-going discourse into a more or less specified prior discourse and back again, thus following-up on what has been mentioned before. In interviews, they are used to challenge the argumentative coherence and credibility of a politician (and her/his party). In British Prime Minister’s Questions and in speeches, they are used to provide relevant background information against which the deconstruction of the opponent’s ideological coherence and the reconstruction of ideological coherence of self are based.

Published online: 27 August 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.259.10fet
References
Austin, John L
1971 How to Do Things with Words. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brendel, Elke, Jörg Meibauer and Markus Steinbach
2011 “Exploring the Meaning of Quotation.” In Understanding Quotation, ed. by Elke Bredel, Jörg Meibauer and Markus Steinbach, 1–33. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope and Stephen C. Levinson
1987 Politeness. Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Buchstaller, Isabelle
2013 Quotatives: New Trends and Sociolinguistic Implications. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Buchstaller, Isabelle and Ingrid Van Alphen
2012 “Introductory Remarks on New and Old Quotatives. In Quotatives. Cross-Linguistic and Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives, ed. by Isabelle Buchstaller and Ingrid Van Alphen, xi–xxx. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clayman, Steven
1995 “Defining Moments, Presidential Debates, and the Dynamics of Quotability.” Journal of Communication 45(3): 118–146. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clayman, Steven and John Heritage
2002 The News Interview. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duranti, Alessandro
2006 “Narrating the Political Self in a Campaign for U.S. Congress.” Language in Society 35: 467–497.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman
2001 New Labour, New Language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fetzer, Anita
2000 “Negotiating validity claims in political interviews.” TEXT 20(4): 1–46.Google Scholar
2011 “ ‘Here is the Difference, Here is the Passion, Here is the Chance to be Part of a Great Change’: Strategic Context Importation in Political Discourse.” In Context and Contexts: Parts meet Whole?, ed. by Anita Fetzer and Etsuko Oishi, 115–146. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 “Contexts in Interaction: Relating Pragmatic Wastebaskets.” In What is a Context? Linguistic Approaches and Challenges, ed. by Rita Finkbeiner, Jörg Meibauer and Petra Schumacher, 105–127. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 “The Multilayered and Multifaceted Nature of Political Discourse.” The Pragmatics of Political Discourse. Explorations across Cultures, ed. by Anita Fetzer, 1–18. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014 ““Judge us on what we do”: The Strategic Use of Collective we in Political Discourse.” In Constructing Collectivity: ‘We’ across Languages and Contexts, ed. by Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou, 331–350. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fetzer, Anita and Bull, Peter
2012 “Doing Leadership in Political Speech: Semantic Processes and Pragmatic Inferences.” Discourse & Society 23(2): 127–144. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving
1981 Forms of Talk. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
1986 Frame Analysis. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Greatbatch, David
1988 “A Turn-Taking System for British News Interviews.” Language in Society 17: 401–430. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grice, Herbert Paul
1975 “Logic and Conversation.” In Syntax and Semantics, ed. by Peter Cole and Jerry L. Morgan, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gumperz, John J
1992 “Contextualization and Understanding.” In Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, ed. by Alessandro Duranti and Charles Goodwin, 229–252. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Günthner, Susanne
2005 “Narrative reconstructions of past experiences. Adjustments and modifications in the process of recontextualising a past experience”. In Narrative Interaction, ed. by Uta Quasthoff and Tabea Becker, 285–301. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen
1987 Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey
1983 Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C
1979 “Activity Types and Language.” Linguistics 17: 365–399. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1988 “Putting Linguistics on a Proper Footing: Explorations in Goffman’s Concepts of Participation.” In Erving Goffman: Exploring the Interaction Order, ed. by Paul Drew and Anthony Wootton, 161–227. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Livnat, Zohar
2012 “Follow-Ups in a Loose Argumentative Context: The Pragmatic Effectiveness of Figurative Analogy.” In Proceedings of the ESF Strategic Workshop on Follow-Ups Across Discourse Domains: A Cross-Cultural Exploration of Their Forms and Functions, Würzburg (Germany), 31 May – 2 June 2012, ed. by Anita Fetzer, Elda Weizman and Elisabeth Reber, 165–177. Würzburg: Universität Würzburg 2012 – [online]. URL: [URL] URN: urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-71656.Google Scholar
Luckmann, Thomas
1995 “Interaction Planning and Intersubjective Adjustment of Perspectives by Communicative Genres.” In Social Intelligence and Interaction, ed. by Ester Goody, 175–188. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meierkord, Christiane and Anita Fetzer
2002 “Introduction: Sequence, Sequencing, Sequential Organization and Sequentiality.” In Rethinking Sequentiality: Linguistics Meets Conversational Interaction, ed. by Anita Fetzer and Christiane Meierkord, 1–33. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pafel, Jürgen
2011 “Two dogmas on Quotation.” In Understanding Quotation, ed. by Elke Bredel, Jörg Meibauer and Markus Steinbach, 249–276. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Searle, John R
1969 Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1995 The Construction of Social Reality. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Sinclair, John and Malcolm Coulthard
1975 Towards an Analysis of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun
1980 Macrostructures. Hillsdale, NJ: Earlbaum.Google Scholar
Weinberger, David
2011 Too Big to Know: Rethinking Knowledge Now that the Facts aren’t the Facts, Experts are Everywhere, and the Smartest person in the Room is the Room. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Weizman, Elda and Marcelo Dascal
1991 “On Clues and Cues: Strategies of Text-Understanding.” Journal of Literary Semantics 20(1): 18–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 9 other publications

Fetzer, Anita
2018. “Our Chief Political Editor reads between the lines of the Chancellor’s Budget speech”. Internet Pragmatics 1:1 ► pp. 29 ff. DOI logo
Fetzer, Anita
2020. “The hon. Gentleman says this is rubbish; it is absolutely true”. In The Discourse of Indirectness [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 316], ► pp. 203 ff. DOI logo
Fetzer, Anita
2021. Chapter 7. Quotation, meta-data and transparency of sources in mediated political discourse. In The Pragmatics of Adaptability [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 319], ► pp. 143 ff. DOI logo
Fetzer, Anita & Peter Bull
2019. Quoting ordinary people in Prime Minister’s Questions1. In The Construction of ‘Ordinariness’ across Media Genres [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 307], ► pp. 73 ff. DOI logo
Fetzer, Anita & Elda Weizman
2018. ‘What I would say to John and everyone like John is ...’: The construction of ordinariness through quotations in mediated political discourse. Discourse & Society 29:5 ► pp. 495 ff. DOI logo
Reber, Elisabeth
2019. ‘Punch and Judy’ Politics? Embodying Challenging Courses of Action in Parliament. In Embodied Activities in Face-to-face and Mediated Settings, ► pp. 255 ff. DOI logo
Shukrun-Nagar, Pnina
2020. “Hero, genius, king and Messiah”. In The Discourse of Indirectness [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 316], ► pp. 59 ff. DOI logo
Weizman, Elda
2023. Recontextualization practices: A scale of directness. Frontiers in Communication 7 DOI logo
Xie, Chaoqun, Francisco Yus & Hartmut Haberland
2021. Introduction. In Approaches to Internet Pragmatics [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 318], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.