Cover not available
Part of
Gender, Language and the Periphery: Grammatical and social gender from the margins
Edited by Julie Abbou and Fabienne H. Baider
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 264] 2016
► pp. 25–46

Trying to change a gender-marked language

Classical vs. Modern Hebrew

Classical and Modern Hebrew are gender-marked in all morphological forms, and the rules of Hebrew syntax require gender agreement. Consequently, it is next to impossible to find a sentence without gender determination. Masculine content words are unmarked, while feminine words are derived from them. Masculine forms are also used generically, making them more visible than the feminine. Feminine function words, mainly pronouns, were used in classical periods for the masculine as well, leaving less specific features for the feminine. We could expect that feminist speakers would try to change this practice in Modern Hebrew despite the rigid linguistic structure. However, there have been only a few gender changes, mostly in one direction: using masculine, but not feminine forms, for both sexes. This article provides examples of this sociolinguistic change and explains why it has taken this direction.

Keywords: gender markedness, Hebrew, linguistic changes, masculinization
Published online: 16 December 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.264.02muc
References
Bendavid, Abba
1971 Biblical Hebrew and Mishnaic Hebrew vol. 2. Tel Aviv: Dvir. [Hebrew]Google Scholar
Bernstein, Deborah
1987 The Struggle for Equality: Urban Women Workers in Prestate Israeli Society. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Boroditsky, Lera, Lauden A. Schmidt, and Webb Phillips
2003 “Sex, Syntax, and Semantics.” In Language in Mind: Advances in the Study of Language and Cognition, ed. by Dedre Gentner, and Susan Goldin-Meadow, 61–80. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cameron, Deborah
1990 “Demythologizing Sociolinguistics: Why Language Does Not Reflect Society.” In Ideologies of Language, ed. by John E. Joseph, and Talbot J. Taylor, 79–96. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Corbett, Greville G
1991 Gender. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flaherty, Mary
2001 “How a Language Gender System Creeps into Perception.” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 32(1): 18–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gadish, Ronit
1998 “The Academy and the Speakers of Hebrew.” Leshonenu La’am 49(2): 58–64. [Hebrew]Google Scholar
Guiora, Alexander, Benjamin Beit-Hallahmi, Risto Fried, and Cecelia Yoder
1982 “Language Environment and Gender Identity Attainment.” Language Learning 32: 289–304. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hellinger, Marlis
1988 “Revising the Patriarchal Paradigm: Language Change and Feminist Language Politics.” In Language, Power and Ideology, ed. by Ruth Wodak, 273–288. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Horvits, Miri
1999 “First Person in Second Person: Discursive Analysis of a Pseudo Second Person Pronoun.” In Hebrew – A Living Language vol. 2, ed. by Rina Ben-Shahar, and Gideon Toury, 75–90. Tel Aviv: The Porter Institute. [Hebrew]Google Scholar
Izraeli, Dafna
1981 “The Zionist Women’s Movement in Palestine, 1911–1927 – A Sociological Analysis.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 7: 87–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, Andrea M
2004 Language Reform as Language Ideology: An Examination of Israeli Feminist Language Practice. PhD dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
Kantor, Hadassah, and Malka Muchnik
1999 “Marked and Unmarked Directives in Modern Hebrew.” In Contemporary Journalistic Language: Memorial Book to Mina Efron, ed. by Miri Horvits, 134–147. Tel-Aviv: Mofet. [Hebrew]Google Scholar
Khaznadar, Edwige
2002 Le Féminin à la Française: Académisme et Langue Française. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Kulick, Don
2010 “Humorless Lesbians”. In Femininity, Feminism and Gendered Discourse, ed. by Janet Holmes, and Meredith Marra, 59–83. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Press.Google Scholar
Livnat, Zohar
2006 “Gender Online in Hebrew: New Technology, Old Language.” In Corpus Linguistics and Gender: A Multilingual Analysis of an Electronic Corpus, ed. by Eva-Maria Thüne, Simona Leonardi, and Carla Bazzanella, 169–181. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Livnat, Zohar, and Illil Yatziv
2012 “Functional Changes of Person, Tense and Mood in Spoken Discourse.” In Studies in Modern Hebrew and Jewish Languages – In Honor of Ora Schwarzwald, ed. by Malka Muchnik, and Tsvi Sadan, 461–472. Jerusalem: Carmel. [Hebrew]Google Scholar
Malchiel, Zehava, and Nira Fradkin
1987 Equal Treatment for Boys and Girls in Textbooks. Jerusalem: The Ministry of Education. [Hebrew]Google Scholar
Meir, Irit
2008 “The Role of Prosody in Morphological Change: The Case of Hebrew Bound Numerals.” Language Variation and Change 20: 41–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miller, Megan, and Lori James
2009 “Is the Generic Pronoun He Still Comprehended as Excluding Women?” American Journal of Psychology 122(4): 483–496.Google Scholar
Mordechai, Anat
Forthcoming. Ambiguous Gender Identity and the Use of Language Variations. PhD dissertation, Bar-Ilan University.
Motschenbacher, Heiko
2010 Language, Gender and Sexual Identity: Poststructuralist Perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Muchnik, Malka
2012 “Is It Possible to Avoid Sexism in Hebrew?” In Studies in Modern Hebrew and Jewish Languages – In Honor of Ora Schwarzwald, ed. by Malka Muchnik, and Tsvi Sadan, 487–505. Jerusalem: Carmel. [Hebrew]Google Scholar
2013a “Language and Gender.” In Encyclopedia of Hebrew Language and Linguistics vol. 2, ed. by Geoffrey Khan, 17–20. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
2013b “Gender Variations in Hebrew.” In Gender-Linked Variation across Languages, ed. by Yousif Elhindi, and Theresa McGarry, 36–49. Champaign, IL: Common Ground.Google Scholar
2015 The Gender Challenge of Hebrew. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Ordan, Noam, and Shuly Wintner
2005 “Representing Natural Gender in Multilingual Databases.” International Journal of Lexicography 18(3): 357–370. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pauwels, Anne
1998 Women Changing Language. London; New York: Longman.Google Scholar
2003 “Linguistic Sexism and Feminist Linguistic Activism.” In The Handbook of Language and Gender, ed. by Janet Holmes, and Miriam Meyerhoff, 550–570. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pavlidou, Theodossia
2003 “Women, Gender and Modern Greek.” In Gender across Languages: The Linguistic Representation of Women and Men vol. 3, ed. by Marlis Hellinger, and Hadumod Bussmann, 175–199. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ravid, Dorit
1995 “Neutralization of Gender Distinction in Modern Hebrew Numerals.” Language Variation and Change 7: 79–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Romaine, Suzanne
1997 “Gender, Grammar, and the Space in between.” In Communicating Gender in Context, ed. by Helga Kotthoff, and Ruth Wodak, 51–76. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sa’ar, Amalia
2007 “Masculine Talk: On the Subconscious Use of Masculine Linguistic Forms among Hebrew- and Arabic-Speaking Women in Israel.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 32(2): 405–429. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwarzwald, Ora
2002 Studies in Hebrew Morphology. Tel Aviv: The Open University of Israel. [Hebrew]Google Scholar
Shilo, Margalit
2005 Princess or Prisoner? Jewish Women in Jerusalem 1840–1914. Waltham: Brandeis University Press.Google Scholar
Spender, Dale
1985 Man Made Language. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 2nd edition.Google Scholar
Sunderland, Jane
2004 Gendered Discourses. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tobin, Yishai, and Alison Stern-Perez
2009 “Linguistic Sign Systems Indicating Proximity and Remoteness in the ‘Troubled Talk’ of Israeli Bus Drivers who Experienced Terror Attacks.” Israel Studies in Language and Society 2(2): 144–168.Google Scholar
Tobin, Yishai
2001 “Gender Switch in Modern Hebrew.” In Gender across Languages: The Linguistic Representation of Women and Men vol. 1, ed. by Marlis Hellinger, and Hadumod Bussmann, 177–198. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 7 other publications

Cohen-Achdut, Miri & Leon Shor
2024. “Does being pretty help?”. Journal of Language and Politics 23:2 ► pp. 239 ff. DOI logo
Guellouz, Mariem
2016. Gender marking and the feminine imaginary in Arabic. In Gender, Language and the Periphery [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 264], ► pp. 47 ff. DOI logo
Hadjidemetriou, Chryso
2016. When She and He become It. In Gender, Language and the Periphery [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 264], ► pp. 227 ff. DOI logo
Kumar Kashyap, Abhishek
2016. The representation of gender in Bajjika grammar and discourse. In Gender, Language and the Periphery [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 264], ► pp. 165 ff. DOI logo
Nelson, Jessica Fae
2016. Lakota men’s and women’s speech. In Gender, Language and the Periphery [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 264], ► pp. 257 ff. DOI logo
O'Neill, Brittney
2021. He, (s)he/she, and they. Working papers in Applied Linguistics and Linguistics at York 1 ► pp. 16 ff. DOI logo
Weirich, Anna Christine
2016. “Moldovan” and feminist language politics. In Gender, Language and the Periphery [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 264], ► pp. 285 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.