Requests in American and British English

A contrastive multi-method analysis

| University of Oldenburg
HardboundAvailable
ISBN 9789027256706 | EUR 95.00 | USD 143.00
 
e-Book
ISBN 9789027266767 | EUR 95.00 | USD 143.00
 
This volume encompasses a thorough examination of the use of request strategies on two contrastive dimensions. On the cross-cultural dimension, it compares the use of British and American English request strategies in naturally occurring informal conversations. The conversational data are retrieved from the International Corpus of English (ICE) and the Santa Barbara Corpus of Spoken American English. On the methodological dimension, it systematically compares request strategies and their frequency distributions in the conversational data to questionnaire-based requests. Highlighting various instrument-induced effects, the volume challenges the validity of one of the most widely used and accepted data collection tools in pragmatics research, the DCT.

The extensive data analysis contained in the volume includes a wide range of linguistic variables including mitigating and aggravating modification strategies and their interaction with head act directness levels. While it focuses on the first-pair part, the book also offers an analysis of request responses from a cross-cultural perspective.

The findings of the study contribute new insights to research on requests, politeness, variational pragmatics, and general research methodology.

[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 265]  2016.  xvi, 264 pp.
Publishing status: Available
Table of Contents
“For those who are interested in language function this is a very compact, direct and well-reasoned monograph that provides extremely useful insights into the variation that exists in the realisation of requests across British and American English. Though the differences revealed are small, the endeavour itself is very useful and to be commended.”
Requests in American and British English is a fascinating study on requests from cross-cultural and methodological perspectives. It gives a wider, more general perspective on requests, and it is a model of advocating naturally occurring data in pragmatic studies. Considering its far-reaching implications for different research studies, the volume is highly recommended to scholars of pragmatics and those interested in language politeness, variational pragmatics and research methodologies.”
“Flöck’s book is a thought-provoking, well-structured and systematic work, highly recommendable to all researchers interested in requests, cross-cultural pragmatics and data gathering instruments. Her study will surely contribute to a deeper understanding of these three aspects by offering new insights to all of them.”
Cited by

Cited by 12 other publications

No author info given
2017. Publications Received. Language in Society 46:1  pp. 123 ff. Crossref logo
No author info given
2018.  In Compliments and Positive Assessments [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 289], Crossref logo
Baker, Olja
2021. Parliamentary directives in New Zealand and Bosnia and Herzegovina. Languages in Contrast 21:1  pp. 28 ff. Crossref logo
Berry, Sam
2019. Non-institutional learning technologies, risks and responsibilities: a critical discourse analysis of university artefacts. Research in Learning Technology 27:0 Crossref logo
Degenhardt, Julia
2021. Requests in Indian and Sri Lankan English. World Englishes Crossref logo
Flöck, Ilka & Ronald Geluykens
2018. Preference Organization and Cross-Cultural Variation in Request Responses: A Corpus-Based Comparison of British and American English. Corpus Pragmatics 2:1  pp. 57 ff. Crossref logo
Freytag, Vera
2020.  In Politeness in Professional Contexts [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 311],  pp. 199 ff. Crossref logo
Norrby, Catrin, Jan Lindström, Jenny Nilsson & Camilla Wide
2020.  In Handbook of Pragmatics [Handbook of Pragmatics, ],  pp. 201 ff. Crossref logo
Pichonnaz, David, Liliane Staffoni, Camille Greppin-Bécherraz, Isabelle Menia-Knutti & Veronika Schoeb
2021. “You Should Maybe Work Together a Little Bit”: Formulating Requests in Interprofessional Interactions. Qualitative Health Research 31:6  pp. 1094 ff. Crossref logo
Ruytenbeek, Nicolas
2020. Do indirect requests communicate politeness? An experimental study of conventionalized indirect requests in French email communication . Journal of Politeness Research 16:1  pp. 111 ff. Crossref logo
Schoppa, Dominik Jan
2022. Conceptualizing Illocutions in Context: A Variationist Perspective on the Meta-Illocutionary Lexicon. Corpus Pragmatics 6:1  pp. 63 ff. Crossref logo
ÇETİNAVCI, Uğur Recep
2020. Naturally occurring requests in Turkish: A case from an academic context. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics  pp. 285 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 march 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Subjects & Metadata
BIC Subject: CFG – Semantics, Pragmatics, Discourse Analysis
BISAC Subject: LAN009030 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / Pragmatics
ONIX Metadata
ONIX 2.1
ONIX 3.0
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number:  2016021085 | Marc record