Article published in:
Evidentiality Revisited: Cognitive grammar, functional and discourse-pragmatic perspectives
Edited by Juana I. Marín-Arrese, Gerda Haßler and Marta Carretero
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 271] 2017
► pp. 195223
Aikhenvald, Alexandra
2004Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2007 “Information Source and Evidentiality: What Can we Conclude?Italian Journal of Linguistics – Rivista di Linguistica 19 (1): 209–227.Google Scholar
Anderson, Lloyd B.
1986 “Evidentials, Paths of Change, and Mental Maps: Typologically Regular Asymmetries.” In Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology, ed. by Wallace Chafe, and Johanna Nichols, 273–312. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Besnard, Anne-Laure
this volume). “ BE likely to and BE expected to, Epistemic modality or Evidentiality? Markers of (non)commitment in newspaper discourse”.
Bhatia, Vijay K.
2004Worlds of Written Discourse: A Genre-based View. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Boye, Kasper
2012Epistemic Meaning: A Crosslinguistic and Functional-Cognitive Study. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary, and Kira Hall
2005 “Identity and Interaction: A Sociocultural Linguistic Approach.” Discourse Studies 7 (4–5): 585–614. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chafe, Wallace
1986 “Evidentiality in English Conversation and Academic Writing.” In Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology, ed. by Wallace Chafe, and Johanna Nichols, 261–272. New York: Ablex.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace, and Johanna Nichols
(eds.) 1986Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Chilton, Paul
2014aLanguage, Space and Mind: The Conceptual Geometry of Linguistic Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014b “Frames of Reference and the Linguistic Conceptualization of Time: Present and Future.” In Time. Language, Cognition and Reality, ed. by Kasia M. Jaszczolt, and Louis de Saussure, 236–258. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cornillie, Bert, Juana I. Marín-Arrese, and Björn Wiemer
2015 “Evidentiality and the Semantics–pragmatics Interface. An Introduction.” Belgium Journal of Linguistics 29: 1–18.Google Scholar
Cruschina, Silvio, and Eva-Maria Remberger
2008 “Hearsay and Reported Speech: Evidentiality in Romance.” Rivista di Grammatica Generativa 33: 95–116.Google Scholar
De Haan, Ferdinand
2007 “Raising as Grammaticalization: The Case of Germanic SEEM-verbs.” Italian Journal of Linguistics – Rivista di Linguistica 19 (1): 129–150.Google Scholar
Dendale, Patrick, and Liliane Tasmowski
2001 “Introduction: Evidentiality and Related Notions.” Journal of Pragmatics 33 (3): 339–348. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele, and Elena Smirnova
2010Evidentiality in German. Linguistic Realization and Regularities in Grammaticalization. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gisborne, Nikolas, and Jasper Holmes
2007 “A History of English Evidential Verbs of Appearance.” English Language & Linguistics 11 (1): 1–29. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Givon, Thomas
1989Mind, Code, and Context: Essays in Pragmatics. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Hidalgo Downing, Laura
this volume) “Evidential and Epistemic Stance Strategies in Scientific Communication: A Corpus Study of Semi-formal and Expert Publications”.
Johnstone, Barbara
2007 “Linking Identity and Dialect through Stancetaking.” In Stancetaking in Discourse, ed. by Robert Englebretson, 49–68. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lampert, Günther
2011 “ Seem: Evidential, Epistemic, or What Else? A Study in Cognitive Semantics.” International Journal of Cognitive Linguistics 2 (1): 1–24Google Scholar
Lampert, Günther, and Martina Lampert
2010 “Where Does Evidentiality Reside? Notes on (Alleged) Limiting Cases: Seem and Be like .” STUF – Language Typology and Universals 63 (4): 308–321. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W.
1991Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Volume 2. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
2009Investigations in Cognitive Grammar. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
this volume). “Evidentiality in Cognitive Grammar.”
Lyons, John
1977Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Marín-Arrese, Juana I.
2011 “Effective vs. Epistemic Stance and Subjectivity in Political Discourse: Legitimising Strategies and Mystification of Responsibility.” In Critical Discourse Studies in Context and Cognition, ed. by Chris Hart, 193–223. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013 “Stancetaking and Inter/Subjectivity in the Iraq Inquiry: Blair vs. Brown.” In English Modality: Core, Periphery and Evidentiality, ed. by Juana I. Marín-Arrese, Marta Carretero, Jorge Arús and Johan van der Auwera, 411–445. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015a “Epistemic Legitimisation and Inter/subjectivity in the Discourse of Parliamentary and Public Enquiries.” Critical Discourse Studies 12 (3): 261–278. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015b “Epistemicity and Stance: A Cross-linguistic Study of Epistemic Stance Strategies in Journalistic Discourse in English and Spanish. A Cross-linguistic Perspective.” Discourse Studies 17 (2): 210–225. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017 “Stancetaking and Inter/Subjectivity in Journalistic Discourse: The Engagement system revisited.”In Evaluation in Media Discourse: European perspectives, ed. by Ruth Breeze, and Inés Olza, 21–48. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Marín-Arrese, Juana and Marta Carretero
2014 “The Expression of Evidentiality and Epistemic Modality in English and other European Languages: A Cross-linguistic Study of must and deber(de) .” In Linguistic Insights: Studies on Languages, ed. by Isabel de la Cruz Cabanillas, and Cristina Tejedor Martínez, 336–346. Alcalá de Henares: Universidad de Alcalá de Henares.Google Scholar
Nuckolls, Janis, and Lev Michael
(eds.) 2014Evidentiality in Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nuyts, Jan.
2005 “The Modal Confusion: On Terminology and the Concepts behind it.” In Modality: Studies in form and function, ed. by Alex Klinge, and Henrik H. Müller, 5–38. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Plungian, Vladimir A.
2001 “The Place of Evidentiality within the Universal Grammatical Space.” Journal of Pragmatics 33: 349–357. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, John E.
2007Analysing Newspapers: An Approach from Critical Discourse Analysis. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, José and Wilbert Spooren
1996 “Subjectivity and Certainty in Epistemic Modality: A Study of Dutch Epistemic Modifiers”. Cognitive Linguistics 7 (3): 241–264. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Saussure, Louis de.
2014 “Perspectival Interpretations of Tenses.” In Time. Language, Cognition and Reality, ed. by Kasia M. Jaszczolt and Louis de Saussure, 46–69. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Saussure, Louis de, and Patrick Morency
2012 “A Cognitive-pragmatic View of the French Epistemic Future”. French Language Studies 22: 207–223. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Squartini, Mario
2004 “Disentangling Evidentiality and Epistemic Modality in Romance.” Lingua 114: 873–895. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008 “Lexical vs. Grammatical Evidentiality in French and Italian.” Linguistics 46 (5): 917–947. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sweetser, Eve
1982 “Root and Epistemic Modals: Causality in Two Worlds.” Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 8: 484–507.Google Scholar
Talmy, Len
1988 “Force Dynamics in Language and Cognition.” Cognitive Science 12: 40–100. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van der Auwera, Johan, and Vladimir Plungian
1998 “Modality’s Semantic Map”. Linguistic Typology 2 (1): 79–124. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vestergaard, Torben
2000 “From Genre to Sentence: The Leading Article and its Linguistic Realization.” In English Media Texts Past and Present, ed. by Friedrich Ungerer, 151–173. Amstersdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Viberg, Ake.
1983 “The Verbs of Perception: A Typological Study”. Linguistics 21 (1): 123–162. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
White, Peter R.R.
2012 “Exploring the Axiological Workings of ‘Reporter Voice’ News Stories – Attribution and Attitudinal Positioning”. Discourse, Context & Media 1: 57–67. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wiemer, Björn
2010 “Hearsay in European Languages: Toward an Integrative Account of Grammatical and Lexical Marking”. In Linguistic Realization of Evidentiality in European Languages, ed. by Gabriele Diewald, and Elena Smirnova, 59–129. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Willett, Thomas
1988 “A Cross-linguistic Survey of the Grammaticalization of Evidentiality”. Studies in Language 12: 51–97. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 8 other publications

Garachana, Mar & María Sol Sansiñena
2020.  Va a ser que no . Belgian Journal of Linguistics 34  pp. 87 ff. Crossref logo
Huang, Jinyi & Jinjun Wang
2021. Evidentiality in science from specialization to popularization: A case study of COVID-19 texts. Journal of World Languages 7:1  pp. 124 ff. Crossref logo
Jaakola, Minna
2021. Marking one’s own viewpoint: The Finnish evidential verb+kseni ‘as far as I understand’ construction. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 44:3  pp. 255 ff. Crossref logo
Marín Arrese, Juana I.
2018.  In Tense, Aspect, Modality, and Evidentiality [Studies in Language Companion Series, 197],  pp. 83 ff. Crossref logo
Marín-Arrese, Juana I.
2021.  In Corpora in Translation and Contrastive Research in the Digital Age [Benjamins Translation Library, 158],  pp. 234 ff. Crossref logo
Millar, Sharon, Rasmus Nielsen, Anna Vibeke Lindø & Klaus Geyer
2020. The use of hyperlinking as evidential practice in Danish online hate speech. Pragmatics and Society 11:2  pp. 241 ff. Crossref logo
Rosemeyer, Malte & María Sol Sansiñena
2022. How sentence type influences the interpretation of Spanish future constructions. Functions of Language 29:1  pp. 116 ff. Crossref logo
Ruskan, Anna & Marta Carretero
2021.  In Pragmatic Markers and Peripheries [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 325],  pp. 415 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 march 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.