The present paper presents the results of a corpus study of evidential and epistemic strategies as stance markers in two subgenres of scientific discourse, a sample of semi-formal publications (New Scientist) and one of expert publications (PubMed). First, an onomasiological approach to evidentiality and epistemic stance is adopted, following Marín-Arrese (2015b). Second, the evidential and epistemic strategies performed in the context of the two genres are discussed, following recent research which points to the need to explore this dimension (Mushin 2012; Nuckolls and Michael 2014). Results show that within the distinction between direct and indirect markers of evidentiality and epistemic stance, both samples show a preference for indirect strategies. Within the four categories of evidentiality and epistemic stance, the semi-formal corpus shows an overall significant higher frequency of indirect markers than the expert corpus. These differences reveal communicative discourse-pragmatic strategies which underlie the discipline specific conventions and interactive motivations in the two sub-genres.
1986 “Evidentials, Paths of Change, and Mental Maps: Typologically Regular Asymmetries.” In Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology, ed. by Wallace Chafe, and Joanna Nichols, 273–312. Norwood: Ablex.
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad, and Edward Finegan
1999The Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.
2012Epistemic Meaning: A Crosslinguistic and Functional-Cognitive Study. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Calsamiglia, Helena, and Teun A. Van Dijk
2004 “Popularization Discourse and Knowledge about the Genome.” Discourse & Society 15: 369–389.
1986 “Evidentiality in English Conversation and Academic Writing.” In Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology, ed. by Wallace Chafe, and Joanna Nichols, 261–272. New York: Ablex.
DuBois, John W.
2007 “The Stance Triangle.” In Stancetaking in Discourse, ed. by Robert Englebretson, 139–182. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
2014 “Reformulation and Recontextualization in Popularization Discourse.” Ibérica 27: 15–34
Hidalgo Downing, Laura
2013 “The Role of Negative-modal Synergies in Charles Darwin’s The Origin of Species.” In Evaluation in Discourse, ed. by Geoff Thompson, and Laura Alba-Juez, 259–279. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Horvitz, Herbert Robert
2003 “Nobel Lecture. Worms, Life and Death.” Biosci Rep Dev 23: 239–303.
Hunston, Susan, and Geoff Thompson
(eds.)2000Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kerr, John. F., Andrew H. Wyllie, and Alastair R. Currie
1972 “Apoptosis: a Basic Biological Phenomenon with Wide-ranging Implications in Tissue Kinetics.” Br J Cancer Dev 26: 239–257.
Lockshin, Richard A., and Jacques Beaulaton
1964 “Programmed Cell Death.” Life Sci Dev 15: 1549–1565.
Marín-Arrese, Juana I.
2013 “Stancetaking and Inter-subjectivity in the Iraq Inquiry. Blair vs. Brown.” In English Modality: Core, Periphery and Evidentiality, ed. by Juana I. Marín-Arrese, Marta Carretero, Jorge Arús Hita, and Johan van der Auwera, 411–445. Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
Marín-Arrese, Juana I.
2015a “Epistemic Legitimisation and Inter/subjectivity in the Discourse of Parliamentary and Public Enquiries.” Critical Discourse Studies 12 (3): 261–278.
Marín Arrese, Juana I.
2015b “Epistemicity and Stance: A Cross-linguistic Study of Epistemic Stance Strategies in Journalistic Discourse in English and Spanish.” Discourse Studies 17 (2): 210–225.
Martin, James, and Peter White
2005The Language of Evaluation. Appraisal in English. New York: Palgrave.
2004 “The Use of Popular Science Articles in Teaching Scientific Literacy.” English for Specific Purposes 23: 379–396.
2014 “Modals in the Construction of Research Articles: A Cross-disciplinary Perspective.” Ibérica 27: 143–164.
2015 “Stance Adverbials in Research Writing.” Ibérica 29: 35–62.
2013 “A Corpus-based Analysis of Evidentiality in Popularised Scientific Discourse.” Unpublished Master paper submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of “Master in de Taal- en Letterkunde: Engels – Spaans”. University of Ghent.
2004 “Epistemic and Dialectic Pathway to Knowledge, Meaning and Language Advancement.” LSP & Professional Communication 4 (1): 69–88.
2011 “Inter-subjectivity, Cognition, Nature and Multimedia Representations: Modal Categories in Professional Discourse.” LSP & Professional Communication 2 (1): 16–43.
2010Meaning, Discourse and Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2023. Evidential Text Units in Russian Research Articles. In Science and Global Challenges of the 21st Century – Innovations and Technologies in Interdisciplinary Applications [Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 622], ► pp. 135 ff.
2023. Seem and Appear and Their Norwegian Verbal Counterparts: A Cross-Register Contrastive Study. English Studies 104:1 ► pp. 173 ff.
Huang, Jinyi & Jinjun Wang
2021. Evidentiality in science from specialization to popularization: A case study of COVID-19 texts. Journal of World Languages 7:1 ► pp. 124 ff.
Ruskan, Anna, Helen Hint, Djuddah Arthur Joost Leijen & Jolanta Šinkūnienė
2023. Lithuanian academic discourse revisited: Features and patterns of scientific communication. Open Linguistics 9:1
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 7 september 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.