Part of
Enabling Human Conduct: Studies of talk-in-interaction in honor of Emanuel A. Schegloff
Edited by Geoffrey Raymond, Gene H. Lerner and John Heritage
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 273] 2017
► pp. 1554
References
Caudwell, C
1938Studies in a Dying Culture. London: John Lane.Google Scholar
Damasio, A. R
1994Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain. New York: G.P. Putnam.Google Scholar
Egbert, M
1996 “Context-sensitivity in Conversation Analysis: Eye Gaze and the German Repair Initiator ‘Bitte’.” Language in Society 25(4): 587–612. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1997a “Some Interactional Achievements of Other-initiated Repair in Multiperson Conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 27: 611–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1997b “Schisming: The Collaborative Transformation from a Single Conversation to Multiple Conversations.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 30(1): 1–51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garfinkel, H
1967Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Goffman, E
1961 “Fun in Games.” Pp. 15–81 in Encounters: Two Studies in the Sociology of Interaction, Indiannapolis: The Bobbs-Merrill Company.Google Scholar
1963Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
1967Interaction Ritual: Essays in Face to Face Behavior. Garden City, New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
1974Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
1976 “Replies and Responses.” Language in Society 5: 257–313. (Reprinted in Goffman, 1981. 5–77.) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1981Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Goodwin, C
1995 “Co-constructing Meaning in Conversations with an Aphasic Man.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 28(3): 233–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Habermas, J
1970 “Toward a Theory of Communicative Competence.” Pp. 114–148 in Recent Sociology No. 2, edited by H. P. Dreitzel. New York: Macmillian.Google Scholar
Hayashi, M
1999 “Where Grammar and Interaction Meet: A Study of Co-Participant Completion in Japanese Conversation.” Human Studies 22(2/4): 475–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hayashi, M. and Mori, J
1998 “Co-construction in Japanese Revisited: We Do ‘Finish Each Other’s Sentences’.” Pp. 77–93 in Japanese/Korean Linguistics, Vol. 7, edited by N. Akatsuka, H. Hoji and S. Iwasaki. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
Hayashi, M., Mori, J. and Takagi, T
frth. “Contingent Achievement of Co-Tellership in a Japanese Conversation.” Pp. 00–00 in The Language of Turn and Sequence edited by C. E. Ford, B. A. Fox and S. A. Thompson Oxford Oxford University Press
Heeschen, C. and Schegloff, E.A
1999 “Agrammatism, Adaptation Theory, Conversation Analysis: On the Role of So-Called Telegraphic Style in Talk-in-Interaction.” Aphasiology 13(4/5):365–405. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heeschen, C. and Schegloff, E. A
2001 frth. “Aphasic Agrammatism as Interactional Artifact and Achievement.” Pp. 00–00 in The Situation of Language in Brain Damaged Persons: Conversation and language impairment, edited by C. Goodwin. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jefferson, G
1973 “A Case of Precision Timing in Ordinary Conversation: Overlapped Tag-Positioned Address Terms in Closing Sequences.” Semiotica 9: 47–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1974 “Error Correction as an Interactional Resource.” Language in Society 2: 181–199. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1988 “On the Sequential Organization of Troubles-Talk in Ordinary Conversation.” Social Problems 35(4): 418–441. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1989 “Preliminary Notes on a Possible Metric which Provides for a ‘Standard Maximum’ Silences of Approximately One Second in Conversation.” Pp. 166–196 in Conversation: An Interdiscipoinary Perspective, edited by D. Roger and P. Bull. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
1993 [1983] “Caveat Speaker: Preliminary Notes on Recipient Topic-shift Implicature.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 26(1): 1–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, G. and Lee, J. R. L
1981 “The Rejection of Advice: Managing the Problematic Convergence of a ‘Troubles-Telling’ and a ‘Service Encounter’.” Journal of Pragmatics 5: 399–422. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jones, J
1962On Aristotle and Greek Tragedy. London: Chatto & Windus.Google Scholar
Kim, K.-h
1993 “Other-Initiated Repair Sequences in Korean Conversation as Interactional Resources.” Pp. 3–18 in Japanese/Korean Linguistics, Vol. 3, edited by S. Choi. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
1999 “Phrasal Unit Boundaries and Organization of Turns and Sequences in Korean Conversation.” Human Studies. DOI logo
Lerner, G. H. and Takagi, T
1999 “On the Place of Linguistic Resources in the Organization of Talk-in-Interaction: A Co-Investigation of English and Japanese Grammatical Practices.” Journal of Pragmatics 30: 49–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lindström, A. B
1994 “Identification and Recognition in Swedish Telephone Conversation Openings.” Language in Society 23(2): 231–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moerman, M
1977 “The Preference for Self-Correction in a Tai Conversational Corpus.” Language 53(4): 872–882. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1988Talking Culture: Ethnography and Conversation Analysis. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ochs, E., Schegloff, E. A. and Thompson, S
(ed.) 1996Interaction and Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Park, Y.-Y
1998 “A Discourse Analysis of Contrastive Connectives in English, Korean and Japanese Conversation: With Special Reference to the Context of Dispreferred Responses.” Pp. 277–300 in Discourse Markers, edited by A. Jucker and Y. Ziv. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sacks, H
1972a “An Initial Investigation of the Usability of Conversational Materials for Doing Sociology.” Pp. 31–74 in Studies in Social Interaction, edited by D. N. Sudnow. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
1972b “On the Analyzability of Stories by Children.” Pp. 325–345 in Directions in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication, edited by J. J. Gumperz and D. Hymes. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
1974 “An Analysis of the Course of a Joke’s Telling in Conversation.” Pp. 337–353 in Explorations in the Ethnography of Speaking, edited by R. Bauman and J. Sherzer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1992Lectures on Conversation. Two Volumes. Edited by G. Jefferson with Introductions by E.A. Schegloff . Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A
1960The Moral Temper of Literary Criticism, 1930–1960. Unpublished Masters Thesis. Department of Sociology, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
1963 “Toward a Reading of Psychiatric Theory.” Berkeley Journal of Sociology 8: 61–91.Google Scholar
1968 “Sequencing in Conversational Openings.” American Anthropologist 70: 1075–1095. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1979 “The Relevance of Repair for Syntax-for-Conversation.” Pp. 261–288 in Syntax and Semantics 12: Discourse and Syntax, edited by T. Givon. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1980 “Preliminaries to Preliminaries: ‘Can I Ask You a Question’.” Sociological Inquiry 50: 104–152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1987 “Analyzing Single Episodes of Interaction: An Exercise in Conversation Analysis.” Social Psychology Quarterly 50 No.2: 101–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1988 “Goffman and the Analysis of Conversation.” Pp. 89–135 in Erving Goffman: Exploring the Interaction Order, edited by P. Drew and A. Wootton. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
1990 “On the Organization of Sequences as a Source of “Coherence” in Talk-in-Interaction.” Pp. 51–77 in Conversational Organization and its Development., edited by B. Dorval. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Co.Google Scholar
1991a “Conversation Analysis and Socially Shared Cognition.” Pp. 150–171 in Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition, edited by L. Resnick, J. Levine and S. Teasley. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1991b“Reflections on Talk and Social Structure.” Pp. 44–70 in Talk and Social Structure, edited by D. Boden and D. H. Zimmerman. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
1992a “Repair after next turn: the last structurally provided place for the defence of intersubjectivity in conversation.” American Journal of Sociology 95(5): 1295–1345. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1992b “To Searle on Conversation: A Note in Return.” Pp. 113–28 in (On) Searle on Conversation, edited by John R. Searle, et al.. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1992c “Introduction, Volume 1.” Pp. ix–lxii in Harvey Sacks: Lectures on Conversation, edited by G. Jefferson. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
1993 “Reflections on Quantification in the Study of Conversation.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 26(1): 99–128. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1995a “Discourse as an Interactional Achievement III: The Omnirelevance of Action.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 28(3): 185–211. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1995bSequence Organization. Department of Sociology, UCLA, ms.Google Scholar
1996a “Confirming Allusions: Toward an Empirical Account of Action.” American Journal of Sociology 104(1): 161–216. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1996b “Issues of Relevance for Discourse Analysis: Contingency in Action, Interaction and Co-Participant Context.” Pp. 3–38 in Computational and Conversational Discourse: Burning Issues – An Interdisciplinary Account, edited by E. H. Hovy and D. Scott. Heidelberg: Springer Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1997a “Whose Text? Whose Context?Discourse & Society 8(2): 165–87. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1997b “Practices and Actions: Boundary cases of other-initiated repair.” Discourse Processes 23: 499–545. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1997c “Third Turn Repair.” Pp. 31–40 in Towards a Social Science of Language: Papers in Honor of William Labov. Volume 2: Social Interaction and Discourse Structures, edited by G. R. Guy, C. Feagin, D. Schiffrin and J. Baugh. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1999 “On Sacks on Weber on Ancient Judaism: Introductory Notes and Interpretive Resources.” Theory, Culture and Society 16(1): 1–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001 frth. “Conversation Analysis and “Communication Disorders”.” Pp. 00–00 in The Situation of Language in Brain Damaged Patients: Conversation and language impairment., edited by C. Goodwin. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A., Ochs, E. and Thompson, S. A
1996 “Introduction.” Pp. 1–51 in Interaction and Grammar, edited by E. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff and S. A. Thompson. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schütz, A
(1964) “Making Music Together.” Pp. 159–78 in Collected Papers, Volume II: Studies in Social Theory. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sorjonen, M
1996 “On Repeats and Responses in Finnish Conversations.” Pp. 277–327 in Interaction aqnd Grammar, edited by E. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff and S. A. Thompson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tanaka, H
Wu, R.-J. R
1997 “Transforming Participation Frameworks in Multi-Party Mandarin Conversation: The Use of Discourse Particles and Body Behavior.” Issues in Applied Linguistics 8: 97–118.Google Scholar