Chapter published in:
Current Issues in Intercultural PragmaticsEdited by Istvan Kecskes and Stavros Assimakopoulos
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 274] 2017
► pp. 9–31
Chapter 1Determinacy, distance and intensity in intercultural communication
An emancipatory approach
Robert Crawshaw | Lancaster University
This paper seeks to make the case for a more empirical, situation-based approach to pragmatic analysis. It forms part of the recent move in pragmatics research away from the cross-cultural comparison of speech acts and neo-Gricean theoretical debates towards an analysis of real-life data based on the socio-cognitive and affective implications of inter-lingual conversational exchange. This approach is represented as ‘emancipatory’ in that it is highly contextually grounded and considers meaning from an ‘emergent’ perspective in which attempts at achieving mutual understanding are more or less effectively negotiated between participants. The notion of intention is called into question and emphasis is placed on the importance of metalinguistic commentary by interlocutors as an essential aid to interpreting transcriptions of previous exchanges. Close attention is given to linguistic features which define the attitudes and relationships between the participants: in this case, markers of ‘determinacy’, ‘distance’ and ‘intensity’.
Article outline
- 1.Pragmatics’ socio-cognitive turn
- 1.1The significant unit of conversational discourse is the ‘event’ or ‘episode’
- 1.2Meaning is not vested in intention
- 1.3Lexical meaning too is negotiated in context
- 1.4Co-operation and rapport are not universal principles
- 1.5The evidence lies in the data
- 2.The case study
- 2.1Methodology
- 2.2The data
- 2.2.1The entretien
- 2.2.1.1Determinacy
- 2.2.1.2Power/distance
- 2.2.2The témoignage
- 2.2.2.1Determinacy
- 2.2.2.2Power/distance
- 2.2.2.3Intensity
- 2.2.3The Journal
- 2.2.3.1Intensity
- 2.2.1The entretien
- 3.Conclusions
-
Notes -
References
Published online: 14 June 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.274.02cra
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.274.02cra
References
Bara, Bruno
Bargiela-Chiappini, Francesca, and Michael Haugh
Crawshaw, Robert, Jonathan Culpeper, and Julia Harrison
Culpeper, Jonathan
Gibbs, Raymond, and Markus Tendahl
Goffman, Erving
Hanks, William, Sachiko Ide, and Yasuhiro Katagiri
Haugh, Michael
Hedge
(n.d.). In Wikipedia. Available at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hedge (accessed 4 April 2016)
Malinowski, Bronislav
Meier, Ardith
Mondada, Lorenza
Spencer-Oatey, Helen
Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson
Van Dijk, Teun
Cited by
Cited by 3 other publications
Saft, Scott, Sachiko Ide & Kishiko Ueno
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 march 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.