Chapter published in:
Current Issues in Intercultural Pragmatics
Edited by Istvan Kecskes and Stavros Assimakopoulos
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 274] 2017
► pp. 33–52

Chapter 2
“Western” Grice?

Lying in a cross-cultural dimension

| Johannes Gutenberg Universität Mainz
Lying is a cognitive ability serving the deception of interlocutors. Following Grice (1989), we can say that lying violates the first maxim of Quality. Yet there are scholars who argue that the “Western” (rationalist, individualistic) view of Grice cannot account for the social and cultural variation we find in non-Western cultures (e.g., Danziger 2010). This article discusses a number of arguments for and against “Western” Grice and argues that the universalist view of the first maxim of Quality is compatible with social and cultural variation.
Keywords: collectivism, deception, individualism, lying, maxim of Quality
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.A general definition of lying
  • 3.Investigating lying from a cross-cultural perspective
    • 3.1Standard situations of lying
      • 3.1.1Greetings
      • 3.1.2Refusal by untruthful excuses
      • 3.1.3Pedagogical contexts
    • 3.2Values associated with lying
      • 3.2.1Truthfulness and honesty
      • 3.2.2Modesty and face-saving
      • 3.2.3Narration and humor
      • 3.2.4Antisocial goals, e.g. gossip
      • 3.2.5Prosocial goals
  • 4.Is the Gricean approach ethnocentric?
  • 5.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 14 June 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.274.03mei
References
Adenzato, Mauro, and Rita B. Ardito
1999 “The Role of Theory of Mind and Deontic Reasoning in the Evolution of Deception.” In Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, ed. by Martin Hahn, and Scott C. Stoness, . 7–12. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Barnes, John A.
1994 A Pack of Lies: Towards a Sociology of Lying. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Benton, Matthew A.
forthcoming. “Gricean Quality.” Noûs. Crossref
Bergmann, Jörg R.
1993 Discreet Indiscretions: The Social Organization of Gossip. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Blum, Susan D.
2005 “Five Approaches to Explaining ‘Truth’ and ‘Deception’ in Human Communication.” Journal of Anthropological Research 61: 289–315. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007 Lies that Bind: Chinese Truth, other Truths. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope
2002 “Everyone Has To Lie in Tzeltal.” In Talking to Adults: The Contribution of Multiparty Discourse to Language Acquisition, ed. by Shoshana Blum-Kulka, and Catherine E. Snow, 241–275. Mahwa, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Chen, Rong, Chunmai Hu, and Lin He
2013 “ Lying between English and Chinese: An Intercultural Comparative Study.” Intercultural Pragmatics 10: 375–401. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cole, Shirley A. N.
1996 “Semantic Prototypes and the Pragmatics of Lie Across Cultures.” The LACUS Forum 23: 475–483Google Scholar
Coleman, Linda, and Paul Kay
1981 “Prototype Semantics: The English Verb lie.” Language 57: 26–44. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Danziger, Eve
2010 “On Trying and Lying: Cultural Configurations of Grice’s Maxim of Quality.” Intercultural Pragmatics 7: 199–219. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
du Boulay, Juliet
1976 “Lies, Mockery and Family Integrity.” In Mediterranean Family Structures, ed. by John George Peristiany, 389–406. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Duranti, Alessandro
1993 “Truth and Intentionality: An Ethnographic Critique.” Cultural Anthropology 8: 215–245. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eichelberger, Julie
2012 A Semantic and Pragmatic Analysis of the Spanish Word Lie: Implications and Applications for the Second Language Learner. MA Thesis: Baylor University.Google Scholar
Erat, Sanjiv, and Uri Gneezy
2012 “White Lies.” Management Science 58: 723–733. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fallis, Don
2012 “Lying as a Violation of Grice’s First Maxim of Quality.” Dialectica 66: 563–581. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gilsenan, Michael
1976 “Lying, Honor and Contradiction.” In Transaction and Meaning: Directions in the Anthropology of Exchange and Symbolic Behaviour, ed. by Bruce Kapferer, 191–219. Philadelphia: Institute for the Study of Human Issues.Google Scholar
Grice, H. Paul
1989 “Logic and Conversation.” In Studies in the Way of Words, Herbert Paul Grice, 22–40. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, Edward T.
1976 Beyond Culture. New York: Anchor.Google Scholar
Hardin, Karol J.
2010 “The Spanish Notion of Lie: Revisiting Coleman and Kay.” Journal of Pragmatics 42: 3199–3213. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kecskes, Istvan
2013 Intercultural Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lapinski, Maria Knight, and Levine, Timothy R.
2000 “Culture and Information Manipulation Theory: The Effects of Self-construal and Locus of Benefit on Information Manipulation.” Communication Studies 51: 55–73. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Kang
2013 “Little Liars: Development of Verbal Deception in Children.” Child Development Perspectives 7: 91–96. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey
2014 The Pragmatics of Politeness. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Locke, John L.
2010 Eavesdropping: An Intimate History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McCornack, Steven
2014 “Information Manipulation Theory 1.” In Encyclopedia of Deception (Vol. 2), ed. by Timothy R. Levine, 507–509. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
Meibauer, Jörg
2006 “Implicature.” In Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics (Vol. 5; 2nd edition), ed. by Edward K. Brown. 568–580. Oxford: Elsevier. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012 “Pragmatic Evidence, Context, and Story Design: An Essay on Recent Developments in Experimental Pragmatics.” Language Sciences 34: 768–776. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014 Lying at the Semantics-Pragmatics Interface. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nishimura, Fumiko
2011 Lying: Strategies to Manage Undesirable Communicative Situations in Japan and New Zealand. PhD Dissertation, University of Waikato. Available at: http://​hdl​.handle​.net​/10289​/5835 (accessed 4 April 2016)
Ochs Keenan, Eleanor
1976 “The Universality of Conversational Postulates.” Language in Society 5: 67–80. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey
1975 “Everyone Has To Lie.” In Sociocultural Dimensions of Language Use, ed. by Mary Sánches, and Ben G. Blount. 57–80. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Seiter, John S., Jon Bruschke, and Chunsheng Bai
2002 “The Acceptability of Deception as a Function of Perceiver’s Culture, Deceiver’s Intention, and Deceiver-Deceived Relationship.” Western Journal of Communication 66: 158–180. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Spence, Sean A., Mike D. Hunter, Tom F. D. Farrow, Russell D. Green, David H. Leung, Catherine J. Hughes, and Ganesan Venkatasubramanian
2004 “A Cognitive Neurobiological Account of Deception: Evidence from Functional Neuroimaging.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 359: 1755–1762. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sweetser, Eve E.
1987 “The Definition of Lie.” In Cultural Models in Language and Thought, ed. by Dorothy Holland, and Naomi Quinn, 3–66. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Terkourafi, Marina
to appear): “Lying and Politeness.” In The Oxford Handbook of Lying ed. by Jörg Meibauer Oxford Oxford University Press
Vincent Marelli, Jocelyne
2004 Words in the Way of Truth. Truthfulness, Deception, Lying across Cultures and Disciplines. Napoli: Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane.Google Scholar
Wang, Xiao-lei, Ronan Bernas, and Philippe Eberhard
2012 “When a Lie is Not a Lie: Understanding Chinese Working-class Mothers’ Moral Teaching and Moral Conduct.” Social Development 21: 68–87. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yum, June Ock
1988 “The Impact of Confucianism on Interpersonal Relationships and Communication Patterns in East Asia.” Communication Monographs 55: 374–388. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Meibauer, Jörg
2018. The Linguistics of Lying. Annual Review of Linguistics 4:1 ► pp. 357 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 march 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.