Cover not available
Part of
Current Issues in Intercultural Pragmatics
Edited by István Kecskés and Stavros Assimakopoulos
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 274] 2017
► pp. 275–296

Chapter 12
Development of pragmatic routines by Japanese learners in a study abroad context

| Meiji University
This study investigates the extent to which a group of Japanese learners of English (JEs) developed pragmatic routines during a one-semester study visit in the U.S., with a focus on the factors that facilitated or impeded the development. Sixteen JEs completed a multimedia elicitation task (MET), which contains 24 scenarios, pre- and post-study abroad, together with 18 native speakers of English (NEs), who provided baseline data. It was found that the JEs developed only a few routines related to thanking. Further analysis revealed that the main impeding factors were dependence on familiar expressions, transfer from the first language, syntactic complexity, and sociopragmatic dissonance, as well as insufficient input and output opportunities. The findings imply that exposure to the target language for one semester alone is insufficient for the development of pragmatic routines.
Keywords: formulaic language, pragmatic routines, study abroad, facilitating and impeding factors
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Method
    • 2.1Participants
    • 2.2Instruments
    • 2.3Procedure
    • 2.4Data analysis
  • 3.Results and discussion
    • 3.1Development of routines by JEs through study abroad
    • 3.2Factors affecting development of routines by JEs
  • 4.Conclusion
  • References
  • Appendix
Published online: 14 June 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.274.13osu
References (33)
References
Bardovi-Harlig, Kathleen. 2009. “Conventional Expressions as a Pragmalinguistic Resource: Recognition and Production of Conventional Expressions in L2 Pragmatics.” Language Learning 59: 755–795. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. “Proficiency, Length of Stay, and Intensity of Interaction and the Acquisition of Conventional Expressions in L2 Pragmatics.” Intercultural Pragmatics 8: 347–384. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. “Formulas, Routines, and Conventional Expressions in Pragmatics Research.” Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 32: 206–227. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. “On Saying the Same Thing: Issues in the Analysis of Conventional Expressions in L2 Pragmatics.” Pragmatics & Language Learning 13, 191–211.Google Scholar
Barron, Anne. 2003. Acquisition in Interlanguage Pragmatics. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beebe, Leslie M., Tomoko Takahashi, and Robin Uliss-Weltz. 1990. “Pragmatic Transfer in ESL Refusals.” In Developing Communicative Competence in a Second Language, ed. by Robin Scarcella, Elaine S. Andersen, and Stephen D. Krashen, 55–73. New York: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, Julianne House, and Gabriele Kasper (eds). 1989. Cross-cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Coulmas, Florian. 1981. Conventional Routine, Exploration in Standardized Communication Situations and Prepatterned Speech. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
. 1989. Language Adaptation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Eisenstein, Miriam, and Jean Bodman. 1986. “‘I very much appreciate:’ Expressions of Attitude by Native and Non-native Speakers of American English.” Applied Linguistics 7: 167–185. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1993. “Expressing Gratitude in American English.” In Interlanguage Pragmatics, ed. by Gabriele Kasper, and Shoshana Blum-Kulka, 64–81. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Erman, Britt, and Beatrice Warren. 2000. “The Idiom Principle and the Open-choice Principle.” Text – Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse 20: 29–62.Google Scholar
Félix-Brasdefer, J. César. 2004. “Interlanguage Refusals: Linguistic Politeness and Length of Residence in the Target Community.” Language Learning 54: 587–653. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. “Data Collection Methods in Speech Act Performance: DCTs, Role Plays, and Verbal Reports.” In Speech Act Performance, Theoretical, Empirical, and Methodological Issues, ed. by Eva Usó-Juán, and Alicia Martínes-Flor, 41–56. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foster, Pauline. 2001. “Rules and Routines: A Consideration of their Role in the Task-based Language Production of Native and Non-native Speakers.” In Researching Pedagogical Tasks, Second Language Learning, Teaching and Testing, ed. by Martin Bygate, Peter Skehan, and Merrill Swain, 75–93. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Fukushima, Saeko. 1990. “Offers and Requests: Performance by Japanese Learners of English.” World Englishes 9: 317–325. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
House, Juliane. 1989. “‘Oh excuse me please…:’ Apologising in a Foreign Language.” In Englisch als Sweitsprache, ed. by Bernhard Kettemann, Peter Bierbaumer, Alwin Fill, and Annemarie Karpf, 303–328. Tubingen: Narr.Google Scholar
. 1996. “Developing Pragmatic Fluency in English as a Foreign Language, Routines and Metapragmatic Awareness.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 18: 225–252. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kasper, Gabriele, and Shoshana Blum-Kulka. 1993. “Interlanguage Pragmatics: Introduction.” In Interlanguage Pragmatics, ed. by Gabriele Kasper, and Shoshana Blum-Kulka, 3–17. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kecskes, Istvan. 2000. “Conceptual Fluency and the Use of Situation-bound Utterances.” Links & Letters 7: 145–161.Google Scholar
Nakai, Motohiro. 2004. “Pragmatic Transfers in Interlanguage Expressions of Gratitude in the Age of World Englishes.” The Journal of Institute for Language and Education Research 21: 167–184.Google Scholar
Nattinger, James R., and Janette S. DeCarrico. 1992. Lexical Phrases and Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Roever, Carsten. 2005. Testing EFL Pragmatics, Development and Validation of a Web-based Assessment Battery. Berlin: Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rose, Kenneth R., and Reiko Ono. 1995. “Eliciting Speech Act Data in Japanese: The Effect of Questionnaire Type.” Language Learning 45: 191–223. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sasaki, Miyuki. 1998. “Investigating EFL Students’ Production of Speech Acts: A Comparison of Production Questionnaires and Role Plays.” Journal of Pragmatics 30: 457–484. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scarcella, Robin C.. 1979. “Watch up!” Working Papers in Bilingualism 19: 79–88.Google Scholar
Schauer, Gila A.. 2004. “‘May you speak louder maybe?’ Interlanguage Pragmatic Development in Requests.” In EUROSLA Yearbook, vol.4, ed. by Susan H. Foster-Cohen, Michael Sharwood Smith, Antonella Sorace, and Mitsuhiko Ota, 253–273. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
2009. Interlanguage Pragmatic Development: The Study Abroad Context. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Norbert, and Ronald Carter. 2004. “Formulaic Sequences in Action: An Introduction.” In Formulaic Sequences: Acquisition, Processing and Use, ed. by Norbert Schmitt, 1–22. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia, John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taguchi, Naoko. 2013. “Production of Routines in L2 English, Effect of Proficiency and Study-abroad Experience.” System 41: 109–121. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wood, David. 2010. “Lexical Clusters in an EAP Textbook Corpus.” In Perspectives on Formulaic Language, Acquisition and Communication, ed. by David Wood, 88–106. London/ New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
. 2012. Formulaic Language and Second Language Speech Fluency, Background, Evidence and Classroom Applications. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Wray, Alison. 2008. Formulaic Language: Pushing the Boundaries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (7)

Cited by seven other publications

Bardovi-Harlig, Kathleen & Yunwen Su
2023. Developing an empirically-driven aural multiple-choice DCT for conventional expressions in L2 pragmatics. Applied Pragmatics 5:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Kecskes, Istvan
2023. Formulaic Language and its Place in Intercultural Pragmatics. In The Socio-Cognitive Approach to Communication and Pragmatics [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 33], ► pp. 315 ff. DOI logo
Czerwionka, Lori & Sydney Dickerson
2022. Spanish and English compliment responses in discourse. Study Abroad Research in Second Language Acquisition and International Education 7:1 ► pp. 88 ff. DOI logo
Economidou-Kogetsidis, Maria & Nicola Halenko
2022. Developing spoken requests during UK study abroad. Study Abroad Research in Second Language Acquisition and International Education 7:1 ► pp. 23 ff. DOI logo
Sánchez Hernández, Ariadna
2022. Second language pragmatic development in study abroad contexts. Study Abroad Research in Second Language Acquisition and International Education 7:1 ► pp. 2 ff. DOI logo
Osuka, Naoko
2021. The Effect of Study-Abroad on Pragmatic Transfer. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics 44:1 ► pp. 3 ff. DOI logo
Schauer, Gila A.
2019. Literature Review. In Teaching and Learning English in the Primary School [English Language Education, 18], ► pp. 7 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.