Part of
Implicitness: From lexis to discourse
Edited by Piotr Cap and Marta Dynel
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 276] 2017
► pp. 3766
References
Bhat, Darbhe N.S
2004Pronouns. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bosch, Peter
1988 “Representing and Accessing Focussed Referents.” Language and Cognitive Processes 3: 207–232. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1995The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Corbett, Greville G
1991Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davis, W. A.
1998Implicature. Intention, Convention, and Principle in the Failure of Gricean Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davis, Wayne A
2003Meaning, Expression, and Thought. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2005Nondescriptive Meaning and Reference. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016a “Pronouns and Neo-Gricean Pragmatics.” In Interdisciplinary Studies in Pragmatics, Culture and Society, ed. by Alessandro Capone and Jacob Mey, 137–78. Cham: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016b “A Theory of Saying Reports.” In Indirect Reports and Pragmatics: Interdisciplinary Studies, ed. by Alessandro Capone, Ferenc Kiefer, and Franco Lo Piparo, 36–50. Cham: Springer DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davis, W. A.
2013Indexicals and de Se Attitudes. In Attitudes ‘de Se’: Linguistics, Epistemology, Metaphysics. ed. by. N. Feit and A. Capone, 29–58. . Palo Alto, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
2014Implicature. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. ed. by. E. N. Zalta, Palo Alto, CA: CSLI Publications. [URL]Google Scholar
Davis, Wayne A
2016c) “Implicature.” In The Oxford Handbook of Pragmatics ed. by Sanford Goldberg Oxford Oxford University Press DOI logo
2016d) Irregular Negatives, Implicatures, and Idioms. Cham: Springer. DOI logo
forthcoming) “The Property Theory and de se Attitudes.” In Reference and Representation in Thought and Language ed. by Maria de Ponte Oxford Oxford University Press
Dinneen, Francis P
1967An Introduction to General Linguistics. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
Grice, Herbert P
1989Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Harley, Heidi
2006English Words: A Linguistic Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Horn, Laurence R
1989A Natural History of Negation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Huang, Yan
2004 “Anaphora and the Pragmatics-Syntax Interface.” In The Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. by Laurence R. Horn, and Gregory Ward, 288–314. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
2006 “Anaphora, Cataphora, Exophora, Logophoricity.” In Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, 2nd Ed., ed. by Keith Brown, 231–240. Amsterdam: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014Pragmatics (2nd Edition). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kullavanijaya, Pranee
2005 “Pro-forms.” In Encyclopedia of Linguistics, ed. by Philipp Strazny, 877–878. New York: Fitzroy Dearborn.Google Scholar
Lepore, Ernie, and Matthew Stone
2015Imagination and Convention: Distinguishing Grammar and Inference in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C
2000Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lyons, John
1977Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Michael, Ian
1970English Grammatical Categories and the Tradition to 1800. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Montgomery, Michael, and Joseph S. Hall
2004Dictionary of Smoky Mountain English. Knoxville, TN: University of Tennessee Press.Google Scholar
Neale, Stephen
1992 “Paul Grice and the Philosophy of Language.” Linguistics and Philosophy 15: 509–559. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perry, John
1979The Problem of the Essential Indexical. Noûs 13:3–21. Reprinted in Meaning and Truth, ed. John Garfield and Michael Kiteley, 613-627. New York: Paragon House, 1991. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Potts, Christopher
2004The Logic of Conventional Implicatures. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007 “Into the Conventional-Implicature Dimension.” Philosophy Compass 2: 665–679. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, and Jan Svartvik
1985A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Saxena, Anju
2006 “Pronouns.” In Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics (2nd ed.), ed. by Keith Brown, 131–133. Amsterdam: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schiffer, Stephen
1972Meaning. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Searle, John
1975 “Indirect Speech Acts.” In Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts, ed. by Peter Cole, and Jerry L. Morgan, 59–82. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Sportiche, Dominique
2003 “Pronouns: Pronominals.” In International Encyclopedia of Linguistics (2nd ed.), ed. by William J. Frawley, 407–409. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wales, Katie
1996Personal Pronouns in Present-Day English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wiese, Bernd
1983 “Anaphora by Pronouns.” Linguistics 21: 373–417. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Davis, Wayne A.
2017. Ideo- and Auto-reflexive Quotation. In The Semantics and Pragmatics of Quotation [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 15],  pp. 303 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.