Cover not available
Part of
Implicitness: From lexis to discourse
Edited by Piotr Cap and Marta Dynel
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 276] 2017
► pp. 217–232

Chapter 10
Thematic silence as a speech act

| University of Haifa,
This chapter will discuss the speech act status of thematic silence, one of the four types of silence presented in Kurzon (2007). This type of silence is not strictly silence in the sense that someone is not talking where talk is expected. It refers to the non-mention of a topic by the speaker (“s/he is silent about” in contrast to “s/he is silent”). Despite its non-mention, the topic is often implicit and identifiable, since it is salient in one way or another. For example, in a speech or in a press interview, a politician does not mention, or refuses to refer to, a topic which may embarrass him/her, and this topic has recently been in the news. Assuming that intentional silence is as communicative as the linguistic ways of conveying implicit meaning, and has therefore some illocutionary force, the question asked is what kind of speech act the omitted discourse (utterance / sentence) may be. It will be argued that in discourses such as speeches, interviews, or narratives in general, the silence usually replaces an assertive speech act, though there may be instances in which the omitted speech act may be a directive or commissive, etc. speech act.
Keywords: silence, typology of silence, thematic silence, speech acts, conversation analysis, political speech
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Intentional and unintentional silence
  • 3.Implicit speech acts
    • 3.1Promise
    • 3.2Gratitude
    • 3.3Silent about
    • 3.4Refusals
  • 4.Thematic silence in a political speech
    • 4.1Election pledges
    • 4.2Miliband’s party conference speech 2014
    • 4.3Thematic silence in Miliband’s speech
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 30 June 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.276.10kur
References (18)
References
Aliakbari, Mohammad, and Mahsa Changizi. 2012. “On the Realization of Refusal Strategies by Persian and Kurdish Speakers”. International Journal of Intercultural Relations 36: 659–668. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Austin, John L. 1962. How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bara, Judith. 2005. “A Question of Trust: Implementing Party Manifestos.” Parliamentary Affairs 58: 585–599. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berger, Charles R. 2004. “Speechlessness: Causal Attributions, Emotional Features and Social Consequences.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology 23: 147–179. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Kim. 1990. “Explanations in Negative Messages. More Insight from Speech Act Theory.” Journal of Business Communication 27: 357–375. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chen, Hongyin J. 1996. “Cross-cultural Comparison of English and Chinese Metapragmatics in refusal.” Indiana University Manuscript, ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 408 860.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving, 1981. Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Kurzon, Dennis. 1986. It Is Hereby Performed…: Explorations in Legal Speech Acts. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. “Towards a Typology of Silence.” Journal of Pragmatics 39: 1673–1688. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. “Moment of Silence: Constitutional Transparency and Judicial Control.” International Journal for the Semiotics of Law 29: 195–209. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita. 1984. “Pursuing a Response.” In Structure of Social Action, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage, 152–163. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rallings, Colin. 1987. “The Influence of Election Programmes: Britain and Canada 1956-1979.” In Ideology, Strategy and Party Changes: Spatial Analyses of Post-War Election Programmes in 19 Democracies, ed. by Ian Budge, David Robertson, and David Hearl, 1–14. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson. 1974. “A Simplest Systematic for the Organization of Turn-taking for Conversation.” Language, 50: 696–735. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Searle, John R. 1975. “Indirect Speech Acts.” In Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts, ed. by Peter Cole, and Jerry L. Morgan, 59–82. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
. 1976. “A Classification of Illocutionary Acts.” Language in Society, 5: 1–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stone, Charles B., Alin Coman, Adam D. Brown, Jonathan Koppel, and William Hirst. 2012. “Toward a Science of Silence: The Consequences of Leaving a Memory Unsaid.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 7: 39–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tanck, Sharyl. 2002. “Speech Acts Sets of Refusal and Complaints: A Comparison of Native and Non-native English Speakers’ Production.” TESOL Working Papers ([URL] accessed September 1, 2015)Google Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun. 1977. Text and Context. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Kurzon, Dennis
2024. Changes in the Status and Nature of a Family Court Case. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique DOI logo
Bączkowska, Anna
2023. Implicit offensiveness from linguistic and computational perspectives: A study of irony and sarcasm. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 19:2 ► pp. 353 ff. DOI logo
Siyech, Mohammed Sinan & Akanksha Narain
2018. Beef-related Violence in India: An Expression of Islamophobia. Islamophobia Studies Journal 4:2 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.