Chapter published in:
Cultural Keywords in Discourse
Edited by Carsten Levisen and Sophia Waters
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 277] 2017
► pp. 211234
References

References

Allison, Anne
1991 “Japanese Mothers and Obentos: The Lunch-Box as Ideological State Apparatus.” Anthropological Quarterly 64 (4): 195–208. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006 “Cuteness as Japan’s Millennial Product.” In Pikachuu’s Global Adventure: The Rise and Fall of Pokemon. ed. by Tobin Joseph, 34–49. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Arima, Akie N.
2003 “Gender Stereotypes in Japanese Television Advertisements.” Sex Roles 49 (1/2): 81–90. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Asano-Cavanagh, Yuko
2013 “Understanding Japanese Culture through a Semantic Analysis of Kawaii ‘Cute’, itai ‘pitiful’ and ita-kawaii ‘pitifully trying to be cute’.” Proceedings of the 2012 Conference of the Australian Linguistic Society, Perth, Australia, 5–7 December 2012, edited by John Henderson, Marie-Eve Ritz and Celeste Rodriguez Louro, https://​sites​.google​.com​/site​/als2012uwa​/proceedings
2014 “Linguistic Manifestation of Gender Reinforcement through the Use of the Japanese Term Kawaii (‘cute’).” Gender and Language 8 (3): 341–359. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bell, Philip, and Marko Milic
2002 “Goffman’s Gender Advertisements Revisited: Combining Content Analysis with Semiotic Analysis.” Visual Communication 1 (2): 203–222. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Burdelski, Matthew, and Koji Mitsuhashi
2010 “ ‘She Thinks You’re Kawaii’: Socializing Affect, Gender, and Relationships in a Japanese Preschool.” Language in Society 39 (1): 65–93. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clancy, Patricia M.
1999 “The Socialization of Affect in Japanese Mother- Child Conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 31(11): 1397–1421. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Courtney, Alice E., and Sarah Wernick Locheretz
1971 “A Woman’s Place: An Analysis of the Roles Portrayed by Women in Magazine Advertisements.” Journal of Marketing Research 8: 92–95. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Doi, Takeo
1981The Anatomy of Dependence. Tokyo: Kodansha.Google Scholar
Dutcher, David P.
2009Imadoki no nihongo waei-jiten [Dictionary of today’s Japanese]. Tokyo: Kenkyusha.Google Scholar
Fiorentino, Robert, and David Poeppel
2007 “Compound Words and Structure in the Lexicon.” Language and Cognitive Processes 22 (7): 953–1000. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Frith, Katherine Toland, Hong Cheng, and Ping Shaw
2004 “Race and Beauty: A Comparison of Asian and Western Models in Woman’s Magazine Advertisements.” Sex Roles 50 (1/2): 53–61. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goddard, Cliff
ed. 2008Cross-Linguistic Semantics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
ed. 2011Semantic Analysis: A Practical Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
ed. 2012 “Semantic Primes, Semantic Molecules, Semantic Templates: Key Concepts in the NSM Approach to Lexical Typology.” Linguistics 50(3): 711–743. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goddard, Cliff, and Anna Wierzbicka
1994Semantic and Lexical Universals – Theory and Empirical Findings. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2002Meaning and Universal Grammar – Theory and Empirical Findings. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
2009 “Contrastive Semantics of Physical Activity Verbs: ‘Cutting’ and ‘Chopping’ in English, Polish, and Japanese.” Language Sciences 31: 60–96. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010 “Semantics and Cognition.” In Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014Words and Meanings. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Goffman, Erving 1979 Gender Advertisements. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Haramura, Kazuko
2010Itai hito ni nara-nai jibun hasshin-ryoku [Don't be someone itai: How to improve your communicativity]. Tokyo: Business-sha.Google Scholar
Hattori, Tadasu
2011 “ Webu o riyou-shi-ta kenkyuu-rei [Examples of research by means of websites].” Kouza IT to Nihongo-Kenkyuu (IT and Research on Japanese language): 89–136.Google Scholar
Hjorth, Larissa
2005 “Odours of Mobility: Mobile Phones and Japanese Cute Culture in the Asia-Pacific.” Journal of Intercultural Studies 26(1–2): 39–55. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hotta, Miho
2000 “Perceived Distribution of Opinions in Young Generation and Their Parents’ Generation Regarding Sex Roles.” The Japanese Journal of Psychology 70(6): 503–509. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ide, Sachiko
1989 “Formal Forms and Discernment: Two Neglected Aspects of Universals of Linguistic Politeness.” Multilingua 8 (2/3): 223–248. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1990 “How and Why Do Women Speak More Politely in Japanese.” In Aspects of Japanese Women’s Language, ed. by Schiko Ide, and Naomi H. McGloin, 63–79. Tokyo: Kuroshio Shuppan.Google Scholar
1992 “On the Notion of Wakimae: Toward an Integrated Framework of Linguistic Politeness.” Mosaic of Language: Essays in Honour of Professor Natsuko Okuda, pp. 298–305.Google Scholar
2006Wakimae no Goyouron [Pragmatics of wakimae]. Tokyo: Taishuukan Shoten.Google Scholar
2013 “Rethinking the Wakimae Aspect of Linguistic Politeness in Terms of Ba/Field Theory.” Paper presented at 13th International Pragmatics Conference, New Delhi, September 8–13.
Ishii-Kuntz, Masako, Katsuko Makino, Kuniko Kato, and Michiko Tsuchiya
2004 “Japanese Fathers of Preschoolers and Their Involvement in Child Care.” Journal of Marriage and Family 66: 779–791. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ito, Takane, and Yoko Sugioka
2002Go no shikumi to Go-keisei (Word Structure and Word Formation). Tokyo: Kenkyuusha.Google Scholar
Kadokawa Kokugo Jiten [Kadokawa Japanese language dictionary]
1986 Tokyo: Kadokawa Shoten.Google Scholar
Kageyama, Taro
1982 “Word Formation in Japanese.” Lingua 57: 215–268. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kageyama, Taro, and Yoko Yumoto
1997Go-keisei to gainen-kouzou (Word Formation and Structure). Kenkyuusha: Tokyo.Google Scholar
Kang, Mee-Eun
1997 “The Portrayal of Women’s Images in Magazine Advertisements: Goffman’s Gender Analysis Revisited.” Sex Roles 37 (11/12): 979–996. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kataoka, Kuniyoshi
1997 “Affect and Letter-Writing: Unconventional Conventions in Casual Writing by Young Japanese Women.” Language in Society 26: 103–136. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kawamura, Yuniya
2006 “Japanese Teens as Producers of Street Fashion.” Current Sociology 54 (5): 784–801. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kenkyusha's New Japanese-English Dictionary
2003 Tokyo: Kenkyusha.Google Scholar
Kinsella, Sharon
1995 “Cuties in Japan.” In Women, Media and Consumption in Japan, ed. by Lise Skov, and Brian Moeran, 220–254. Richmond, VA: Curzon.Google Scholar
Kondoh, Yasuhiro
2007 “Intaa-netto-jidai no yourei-shuushuu [Data collection in the internet era].” Gengo [Language] 36 (7): 62–69.Google Scholar
Koujien (Garden of Words)
1998 Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.Google Scholar
Lebra, Takie
1986 “Reciprocity and the Asymmetric Principle: An Analytical Reappraisal of the Japanese Concept of On .” In Japanese Culture and Behaviour, ed. by Takie Lebra, and William Lebra. 192–207. Honolulu: The University Press of Hawaii.Google Scholar
Lindner, Katharina
2004 “Images of Women in General Interest and Fashion Magazine Advertisements from 1955 to 2002.” Sex Roles 51 (7/8): 409–421. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Madge, Leila
1997 “Capitalizing on ‘Cuteness’: The Aesthetics of Social Relations in a New Postwar Japanese Order.” Japanstudien 9: 155–174. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McVeigh, Brian J.
1996 “Commodifying Affection, Authority and Gender in the Everyday Objects of Japan.” Journal of Material Culture 1(3): 291–312. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2000 “How Hello Kitty Commodifies the Cute, Cool and Camp.” Journal of Material Culture 5 (2): 225–245. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Laura
2004 “You Are Doing Burikko!: Censoring/Scrutinizing Artificers of Cute Femininity in Japanese.” In Japanese Language, Gender, and Ideology, ed. by Shigeko Okamoto, and Janet S. Shibamoto Smith, 148–165. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nakamura, Keiko
2001 “Gender and Language in Japanese Preschool Children.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 34 (1): 15–43. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nakane, Chie
1973Japanese Society. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Ogino, Tsunao
2007 “Koupasu toshite no WWW kensaku no katsuyou [Use of WWW search as corpus].” Gengo [Language] 36 (7): 26–33.Google Scholar
Pauwels, Luc
2012 “A Multimodal Framework for Analyzing Websites as Cultural Expressions.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 17: 247–265. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Peeters, Bert
ed. 2006Semantic Primes and Universal Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sakurai, Takamasa
2009Sekai kawai kakumei [World kawaii revolution]. Tokyo: PHP Shinsho.Google Scholar
Shibamoto, Janet S.
1985Japanese Women’s Language. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi
1990The Languages of Japan. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Skov, Lise, and Brian Moeran
1995Women, Media, and Consumption in Japan. Hawaii: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Stevens, Carolyn S.
2011 “Touch: Encounters with Japanese Popular Culture.” Japanese Studies 31 (1): 1–10. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sugimoto, Yoshio
2010An Introduction to Japanese Society. New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Takarajimasha
Tamamura, Fumio
1997 “Fukugou-go no Imi [Meanings of compound words].” Nihongogaku [Japanese Linguistics] 7 (5): 295–304.Google Scholar
Tamura, Yasuo
2006 “Gendai Nihongo no fukugou-keiyoushi hasei- keiyoushi jougo-keiyoushi nit suite [Compound adjectives, derivative adjectives and reduplicated adjectives in Modern Japanese].” Hiroshima Daigaku Ryuugakusei Sentaa kiyou [Bulletin of International Center, Hiroshima University] 16: 13–20.Google Scholar
Tanomura, Tadaharu
2000 “Denshi-media de yourei o sagasu [Searching examples in electronic media].” Nihongogaku [Japanese Linguistics] 19 (6): 25–34.Google Scholar
Tobin, Joseph
ed. 2006Pikachuu’s Global Adventure: The Rise and Fall of Pokemon. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna
1991Cross-Cultural Pragmatics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
1992Semantics, Culture, and Cognition: Universal Human Concepts in Culture-Specific Configurations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
1994 “Emotion, Language, and Cultural Scripts.” In Emotion and Culture: Empirical Studies of Mutual Influence, ed. by Shinobu Kitayama, and Hazel Rose Markus, 133–196. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1997Understanding Cultures through Their Key Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
1999Emotions across Languages and Cultures: Diversity and Universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006English. New York: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010Experience, Evidence, and Sense. New York: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yamada, Haru
1997Different Games, Different Rules. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Yano, Christine R.
2009 “Wink on Pink: Interpreting Japanese Cute as It Grabs the Global Headlines.” The Journal of Asian Studies 68 (3): 681–688. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011 “Reach Out and Touch Someone: Thinking through Sanrio’s Social Communication Empire.” Japanese Studies 31(1): 23–36. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yomota, Inuhiko
2006“Kawaii” ron [Theory of “kawaii]. Tokyo: Chikuma Shinsho.Google Scholar
Yukawa, Sumiyuki and Masami Saito
2004 “Cultural Ideologies and Japanese Language and Gender Studies: A Theoretical Review.” In Japanese Language, Gender, and Ideology, ed. by Shigeko Okamoto, and Janet S. Shibamoto Smith, 23–37. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Gladkova, Anna & Jesús Romero-Trillo
2021. The linguistic conceptualization in folk aesthetics. International Journal of Language and Culture 8:1 Crossref logo
Miller, Laura & Carolyn S. Stevens
2021. From beautiful to cute. International Journal of Language and Culture 8:1 Crossref logo
Peeters, Bert
2020.  In Studies in Ethnopragmatics, Cultural Semantics, and Intercultural Communication,  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 07 may 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.