Syntax and semantics of additive focus markers from a cross-linguistic perspective
A tentative assessment of the state of the art
Ekkehard König | Freie Universität Berlin | Universität Freiburg
Looking back on three decades of research on focus markers, I will make a cautious attempt to give an overview over this rich set of relevant publications, trying to identify and distinguish general trends, important results, open questions, obvious gaps and errors. I will provide further evidence for the view that focus markers interact with the information structure of a sentence or text, i.e. with a structured proposition or text segment analyzed in terms of focus and scope by extending this analysis also to the relevant “discourse markers”. A comparative analysis of data from various languages reveals the most frequent parameters of variation in the identification of the focus and scope of a focus marker. Finally, I will show that cross-linguistic generalizations in the relevant domain are only possible if the comparison is restricted to a certain core group of markers.
Anscombre, Jean-Claude, and Oswald Ducrot. 1976. “L’argumentation dans la langue”. Langages 10/42: 5–27.
Blakemore, Diana. 1987. Semantic Constraints on Relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.
Bühring, Daniel, and Katharina Hartmann. 2001. “The syntax and semantics of focus-sensitive particles in German”.Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 19: 229–281.
Coppock, Elizabeth, and David I. Beaver. 2014. “Principles of exclusive muddle”. Journal of Semantics 31: 371–432.
Creissels, Denis. 2015. “Polysemy patterns involving non-scalar additive particles in Subsaharan languages: the coordinative connection”. Paper given at the annual conference of the SLE, Leiden. [URL] [accessed January 2017]
Culioli, Antoine. 2002. “À propos de même”. Langue Française 133/1: 16–27.
De Cesare, Anna Maria, and Davide Garassino. 2015. “On the status of exhaustiveness in cleft sentences: An empirical and cross-linguistic study of English also-/only-clefts and Italian anche-/solo-clefts”. Folia Linguistica 49/1: 1–56.
Fiedler, Ines, and Henok Wondimu Tadesse. 2015. “On the relationship between additive and topic markers with special reference to African languages”. Paper given at the annual conference of the SLE, Leiden.
Forker, Diana. 2015. “Towards a typology for additive markers”. Lingua 180: 69–100.
Garachana, Mar. 2016. “Oui, monsieur Junqueras, solo que en Francia ustedes no se comerían un rosco. Exclusividad e interacción en la expresión de la contraargumentación”. Paper given at a conference on concessivity in Freiburg, June 23–24, 2016.
Gast, Volker, and Christoph Rzymski. 2015. “Towards a corpus-based analysis of evaluative scales associated with even.” Linguistik Online 71/2: 153–173.
Gast, Volker, and Johan van der Auwera. 2011. “Scalar additive operators in the languages of Europe”. Language 87: 2–54.
Giannakidou, Anastasia. 2007. “The landscape of even”. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 25: 39–81.
Hartmann, Katarina, and Malte Zimmermann. 2007. “Focus strategies in Chadic: The case of tangale revisited”. Studia Linguistica 61/2: 95–129.
Haspelmath, Martin. 2010. “Comparative concepts and descriptive categories in cross-linguistic studies”. Language 86/3: 663–687.
Heine, Bernd. 2016. “Are there two different ways of approaching grammaticalization?”. Unpublished Ms. Cologne.
Herburger, Elena. 2000. What Counts: Focus and Quantification. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hole, Daniel. 2004. Focus and Background Marking in Mandarin Chinese. London: Routledge.
Hole, Daniel. 2013. “Focus particles and related entities in Vietnamese”. In Linguistics of Vietnamese. An International Survey, ed. by Hole, Daniel, and Elizabeth Löbel, 265–303. Berlin-Boston: Mouton de Gruyter.
Hole, Daniel. 2015. “A distributed syntax for evaluative ‘only’ sentences”. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 34/1: 43–77.
Jacobs, Joachim. 1983. Fokus und Skalen: Zur Syntax und Semantik der Gradpartikeln im Deutschen. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Karttunen, Frances, and Lauri Karttunen. 1977. “Even questions”. In Proceedings of the 7th Meeting of the North Eastern Linguistic Society, ed. by Judy A. Keglet al., 115–34. Cambridge (MA), MIT Press.
Kay, Paul. 1990. “Even”. Linguistics and Philosophy 13: 59–111.
König, Ekkehard. 1977. “Temporal and non-temporal uses of noch and schon in German”. Linguistics and Philosophy 1: 173–198.
König, Ekkehard. 1981. “The meaning of scalar particles in German”. In Words, Worlds, and Contexts, ed. by Hans-Jürgen Eickmeyer, and Hannes Rieser, 107–132. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
König, Ekkehard. 1982. “Scalar particles in German and their English equivalents”. In The Contrastive Grammar of English and German, ed. by Walter F. W. Lohnes, and Edwin A. Hopkins, 76–101. Ann Arbor: Karoma Publishers.
König, Ekkehard. 1991. The Meaning of Focus Particle. A Comparative Perspective. London: Routledge.
Reis, Marga. 2005. “On the syntax of so-called focus particles in German – A reply to Bühring and Hartmann 2001”. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 23: 459–483.
Rooth, Mats. 1985. “Association with Focus”. Doctoral Dissertation. University of Massachusetts.
Rullmann, Hotze. 1997. “Even, polarity, and scope”. In Papers in Experimental and Theoretical Linguistics, ed. by Martha Gibson, Grace Wiebe, and Gary Libben, 40–64. Department of Linguistics: University of Alberta.
Schwenter, Scott, and Richard Waltereit. 2010. “Presupposition accommodation and language change”, in Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization, ed. by Kristin Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte, and Hubert Cuyckens, 75–102. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.
Taglicht, Josef. 1984. Message and Emphasis. On Focus and Scope in English. London: Longman.
Zimmermann, Malte. 2014. “Conventional vs. free association with focus: Insights from West African and South East Asian Languages”, Ms. University of Potsdam.
Cited by (53)
Cited by 53 other publications
Amaral, Patrícia, Zuoyu Tian, Dylan Jarrett & Juan Escalona Torres
2020. Calculating the Scope of Negation. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 269 ff.
Francis, Naomi & Sabine Iatridou
2020. Modals and Negation. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 285 ff.
Fălăuş, Anamaria
2020. Negation and Alternatives. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 333 ff.
Giannakidou, Anastasia
2020. Negative Concord and the Nature of Negative Concord Items. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 458 ff.
Gianollo, Chiara
2020. Evolution of Negative Dependencies. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 546 ff.
Gianollo, Chiara
2020. The Morpho-Syntactic Nature of the Negative Marker. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 117 ff.
Grodzinsky, Yosef, Virginia Jaichenco, Isabelle Deschamps, María Elina Sánchez, Martín Fuchs, Peter Pieperhoff, Yonatan Loewenstein & Katrin Amunts
2020. Negation and the Brain. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 694 ff.
Hochmann, Jean-Rémy
2020. Cognitive Precursors of Negation in Preverbal Infants. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 589 ff.
Horn, Laurence R.
2020. Negation and Opposition. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 7 ff.
Horn, Laurence R.
2020. Neg-raising. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 199 ff.
Joshi, Shrikant
2020. Affixal Negation. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 75 ff.
Kaup, Barbara & Carolin Dudschig
2020. Understanding Negation. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 635 ff.
Larrivée, Pierre
2020. The Role of Pragmatics in Negation Change. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 563 ff.
Martins, Ana Maria
2020. Metalinguistic Negation. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 349 ff.
Mayr, Clemens
2020. Intervention Effects with Negation. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 216 ff.
Moeschler, Jacques
2020. Negative Predicates. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 26 ff.
Muller, Hanna & Colin Phillips
2020. Negative Polarity Illusions. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 656 ff.
Papeo, Liuba & Manuel de Vega
2020. The Neurobiology of Lexical and Sentential Negation. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 740 ff.
Pearce, Elizabeth
2020. Negation and Constituent Ordering. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 152 ff.
Poletto, Cecilia
2020. The Possible Positioning of Negation. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 135 ff.
Prieto, Pilar & M. Teresa Espinal
2020. Negation, Prosody, and Gesture. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 677 ff.
Quer, Josep
2020. The Expression of Negation in Sign Languages. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 177 ff.
Ripley, David
2020. Denial. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 47 ff.
Romero, Maribel
2020. Form and Function of Negative, Tag, and Rhetorical Questions. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 235 ff.
Schein, Barry
2020. Negation in Event Semantics. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 301 ff.
Sánchez, Liliana & Jennifer Austin
2020. Negation in L2 Acquisition and Beyond. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 615 ff.
Thornton, Rosalind
2020. Negation and First Language Acquisition. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 599 ff.
Tortora, Christina & Frances Blanchette
2020. Negation in Non-Standard Varieties. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 515 ff.
Tovena, Lucia M.
2020. Negative Polarity Items. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 391 ff.
Tubau, Susagna
2020. Minimizers and Maximizers as Different Types of Polarity Items. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 407 ff.
van der Auwera, Johan & Olga Krasnoukhova
2020. The Typology of Negation. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 91 ff.
Wallage, Phillip
2020. Quantitative Studies of the Use of Negative (Dependent) Expressions. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 499 ff.
Weir, Andrew
2020. Negative Fragment Answers. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 441 ff.
Zeijlstra, Hedde
2020. Negative Quantifiers. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 426 ff.
[no author supplied]
2020. Abbreviations. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. xi ff.
[no author supplied]
2020. Copyright Page. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. iv ff.
[no author supplied]
2020. Introduction. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 1 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.