Part of
Focus on Additivity: Adverbial modifiers in Romance, Germanic and Slavic languagesEdited by Anna-Maria De Cesare and Cecilia Andorno
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 278] 2017
► pp. 23–44
Edited by Anna-Maria De Cesare and Cecilia Andorno
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 278] 2017
► pp. 23–44
Chapter 1Syntax and semantics of additive focus markers from a cross-linguistic perspective
A tentative assessment of the state of the art
Looking back on three decades of research on focus markers, I will make a cautious attempt to give an overview over this rich set of relevant publications, trying to identify and distinguish general trends, important results, open questions, obvious gaps and errors. I will provide further evidence for the view that focus markers interact with the information structure of a sentence or text, i.e. with a structured proposition or text segment analyzed in terms of focus and scope by extending this analysis also to the relevant “discourse markers”. A comparative analysis of data from various languages reveals the most frequent parameters of variation in the identification of the focus and scope of a focus marker. Finally, I will show that cross-linguistic generalizations in the relevant domain are only possible if the comparison is restricted to a certain core group of markers.
Keywords: focus marker, focus, scope, discourse markers, verum focus, comparability, cross-linguistic generalizations, semantic map
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Basic properties reconsidered
- 2.1Positional variability
- 2.2Interaction with information structure (focus and scope)
- 3.Comparability
- 4.Parameters of variation
- 4.1Marking the focus
- 4.2Marking scope
- 5.Discourse markers as a special case of focus markers
- 6.Recent comparative and typological studies
- 7.Summary and conclusion
-
Acknowledgements -
Notes -
References
References
Anscombre, Jean-Claude, and Oswald Ducrot
1976 “L’argumentation dans la langue”. Langages 10/42: 5–27. 
Blakemore, Diana
1987 Semantic Constraints on Relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.
Bühring, Daniel, and Katharina Hartmann
2001 “The syntax and semantics of focus-sensitive particles in German”. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 19: 229–281.
Coppock, Elizabeth, and David I. Beaver
2014 “Principles of exclusive muddle”. Journal of Semantics 31: 371–432.
Creissels, Denis
2015 “Polysemy patterns involving non-scalar additive particles in Subsaharan languages: the coordinative connection”. Paper given at the annual conference of the SLE, Leiden. [URL] [accessed January 2017]
Culioli, Antoine
2002 “À propos de même”. Langue Française 133/1: 16–27.
De Cesare, Anna Maria
2015 “Defining Focusing Modifiers in a cross-linguistic perspective. A discussion based on English, German, French and Italian.” In Adverbs – Functional and Diachronic Aspects, ed. by Karin Pittner, Daniela Elsner, and Fabian Barteld (eds.), 47–81. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: Benjamins.
De Cesare, Anna Maria, and Davide Garassino
2015 “On the status of exhaustiveness in cleft sentences: An empirical and cross-linguistic study of English also-/only-clefts and Italian anche-/solo-clefts”. Folia Linguistica 49/1: 1–56.
Fiedler, Ines, and Henok Wondimu Tadesse
2015 “On the relationship between additive and topic markers with special reference to African languages”. Paper given at the annual conference of the SLE, Leiden.
Forker, Diana
2015 “Towards a typology for additive markers”. Lingua 180: 69–100.
Garachana, Mar
2016 “Oui, monsieur Junqueras, solo que en Francia ustedes no se comerían un rosco. Exclusividad e interacción en la expresión de la contraargumentación”. Paper given at a conference on concessivity in Freiburg, June 23–24, 2016.
Gast, Volker, and Christoph Rzymski
2015 “Towards a corpus-based analysis of evaluative scales associated with even
.” Linguistik Online 71/2: 153–173.
Gast, Volker, and Johan van der Auwera
2011 “Scalar additive operators in the languages of Europe”. Language 87: 2–54.
Giannakidou, Anastasia
2007 “The landscape of even
”. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 25: 39–81.
Hartmann, Katarina, and Malte Zimmermann
2007 “Focus strategies in Chadic: The case of tangale revisited”. Studia Linguistica 61/2: 95–129.
Haspelmath, Martin
2010 “Comparative concepts and descriptive categories in cross-linguistic studies”. Language 86/3: 663–687.
Heine, Bernd
2016 “Are there two different ways of approaching grammaticalization?”. Unpublished Ms. Cologne.
Herburger, Elena
2000 What Counts: Focus and Quantification. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hole, Daniel
2004 Focus and Background Marking in Mandarin Chinese. London: Routledge.
2013 “Focus particles and related entities in Vietnamese”. In Linguistics of Vietnamese. An International Survey, ed. by Hole, Daniel, and Elizabeth Löbel, 265–303. Berlin-Boston: Mouton de Gruyter.
2015 “A distributed syntax for evaluative ‘only’ sentences”. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 34/1: 43–77.
Jacobs, Joachim
1983 Fokus und Skalen: Zur Syntax und Semantik der Gradpartikeln im Deutschen. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Karlsson, Fred
1983 Finnish Grammar. Helsinki: Söderström.
Karttunen, Frances, and Lauri Karttunen
1977 “Even questions”. In Proceedings of the 7th Meeting of the North Eastern Linguistic Society, ed. by Judy A. Kegl et al., 115–34. Cambridge (MA), MIT Press.
Kay, Paul
1990 “Even”. Linguistics and Philosophy 13: 59–111.
König, Ekkehard
1977 “Temporal and non-temporal uses of noch and schon in German”. Linguistics and Philosophy 1: 173–198.
1981 “The meaning of scalar particles in German”. In Words, Worlds, and Contexts, ed. by Hans-Jürgen Eickmeyer, and Hannes Rieser, 107–132. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
1982 “Scalar particles in German and their English equivalents”. In The Contrastive Grammar of English and German, ed. by Walter F. W. Lohnes, and Edwin A. Hopkins, 76–101. Ann Arbor: Karoma Publishers.
1991 The Meaning of Focus Particle. A Comparative Perspective. London: Routledge.
Reis, Marga
2005 “On the syntax of so-called focus particles in German – A reply to Bühring and Hartmann 2001”. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 23: 459–483.
Rooth, Mats
1985 “Association with Focus”. Doctoral Dissertation. University of Massachusetts.
Rullmann, Hotze
1997 “
Even, polarity, and scope”. In Papers in Experimental and Theoretical Linguistics, ed. by Martha Gibson, Grace Wiebe, and Gary Libben, 40–64. Department of Linguistics: University of Alberta.
Schwenter, Scott, and Richard Waltereit
2010 “Presupposition accommodation and language change”, in Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization, ed. by Kristin Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte, and Hubert Cuyckens, 75–102. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.
Taglicht, Josef
1984 Message and Emphasis. On Focus and Scope in English. London: Longman.
Zimmermann, Malte
2014 “Conventional vs. free association with focus: Insights from West African and South East Asian Languages”, Ms. University of Potsdam.
Cited by
Cited by 52 other publications
Amaral, Patrícia, Zuoyu Tian, Dylan Jarrett & Juan Escalona Torres
Beaver, David & Kristin Denlinger
2020. Negation and Presupposition. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 369 ff. 
Bohn, Manuel, Josep Call & Christoph J. Völter
2020. Evolutionary Precursors of Negation in Non-Human Reasoning. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 577 ff.
Breitbarth, Anne
2020. The Negative Cycle and Beyond. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 530 ff.
Christensen, Ken Ramshøj
2020. The Neurology of Negation. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 725 ff.
De Clercq, Karen
2020. Types of Negation. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 58 ff.
de Swart, Henriëtte
2020. Double Negation Readings. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 479 ff.
Delfitto, Denis
2020. Expletive Negation. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 255 ff.
Dwivedi, Veena D.
2020. Individual Differences in Processing of Negative Operators. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 713 ff.
Viviane Déprez & M. Teresa Espinal
2020. The Oxford Handbook of Negation,
Fleisher, Nicholas
2020. Calculating the Scope of Negation. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 269 ff.
Francis, Naomi & Sabine Iatridou
2020. Modals and Negation. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 285 ff.
Fălăuş, Anamaria
2020. Negation and Alternatives. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 333 ff.
Giannakidou, Anastasia
2020. Negative Concord and the Nature of Negative Concord Items. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 458 ff.
Gianollo, Chiara
2020. Evolution of Negative Dependencies. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 546 ff.
Gianollo, Chiara
2020. The Morpho-Syntactic Nature of the Negative Marker. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 117 ff.
Grodzinsky, Yosef, Virginia Jaichenco, Isabelle Deschamps, María Elina Sánchez, Martín Fuchs, Peter Pieperhoff, Yonatan Loewenstein & Katrin Amunts
2020. Negation and the Brain. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 694 ff.
Hochmann, Jean-Rémy
2020. Cognitive Precursors of Negation in Preverbal Infants. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 589 ff.
Horn, Laurence R.
2020. Negation and Opposition. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 7 ff.
Horn, Laurence R.
2020. Neg-raising. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 199 ff.
Jasionytė-Mikučionienė, Erika
2021. Chapter 7. The Lithuanian focus particles net ‘even’ and tik ‘only’ and clause peripheries. In Pragmatic Markers and Peripheries [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 325], ► pp. 199 ff.
Joshi, Shrikant
2020. Affixal Negation. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 75 ff.
Kaup, Barbara & Carolin Dudschig
2020. Understanding Negation. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 635 ff.
Larrivée, Pierre
2020. The Role of Pragmatics in Negation Change. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 563 ff.
Martins, Ana Maria
2020. Metalinguistic Negation. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 349 ff.
Mayr, Clemens
2020. Intervention Effects with Negation. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 216 ff.
Moeschler, Jacques
2020. Negative Predicates. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 26 ff.
Muller, Hanna & Colin Phillips
2020. Negative Polarity Illusions. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 656 ff.
Papeo, Liuba & Manuel de Vega
2020. The Neurobiology of Lexical and Sentential Negation. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 740 ff.
Pearce, Elizabeth
2020. Negation and Constituent Ordering. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 152 ff.
Poletto, Cecilia
2020. The Possible Positioning of Negation. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 135 ff.
Prieto, Pilar & M. Teresa Espinal
2020. Negation, Prosody, and Gesture. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 677 ff.
Quer, Josep
2020. The Expression of Negation in Sign Languages. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 177 ff.
Ripley, David
2020. Denial. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 47 ff.
Romero, Maribel
2020. Form and Function of Negative, Tag, and Rhetorical Questions. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 235 ff.
Schein, Barry
2020. Negation in Event Semantics. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 301 ff.
Sánchez, Liliana & Jennifer Austin
2020. Negation in L2 Acquisition and Beyond. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 615 ff.
Thornton, Rosalind
2020. Negation and First Language Acquisition. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 599 ff.
Tortora, Christina & Frances Blanchette
2020. Negation in Non-Standard Varieties. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 515 ff.
Tovena, Lucia M.
2020. Negative Polarity Items. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 391 ff.
TROTZKE, ANDREAS & LAIA MAYOL
2021. Catalan focus markers as discourse particles. Journal of Linguistics 57:4 ► pp. 871 ff.
Tubau, Susagna
2020. Minimizers and Maximizers as Different Types of Polarity Items. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 407 ff.
van der Auwera, Johan & Olga Krasnoukhova
2020. The Typology of Negation. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 91 ff.
van der Wouden, Ton & Ad Foolen
2021. Chapter 2. Dutch pragmatic markers in the left periphery. In Pragmatic Markers and Peripheries [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 325], ► pp. 49 ff.
Wallage, Phillip
2020. Quantitative Studies of the Use of Negative (Dependent) Expressions. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 499 ff.
Weir, Andrew
2020. Negative Fragment Answers. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 441 ff.
Wolde, Elnora ten & Thomas Schwaiger
2022. Modification as a linguistic ‘relationship’: A just so problem in Functional Discourse Grammar. Open Linguistics 8:1 ► pp. 699 ff.
Zeijlstra, Hedde
2020. Negative Quantifiers. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 426 ff.
Ørsnes, Bjarne
2022. Focus particles as utterances – the case of German ausgerechnet!. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 54:2 ► pp. 133 ff.
[no author supplied]
2020. Abbreviations. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. xi ff.
[no author supplied]
2020. Copyright Page. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. iv ff.
[no author supplied]
2020. Introduction. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 1 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.