Chapter published in:
Focus on Additivity: Adverbial modifiers in Romance, Germanic and Slavic languages
Edited by Anna-Maria De Cesare Greenwald and Cecilia Andorno
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 278] 2017
► pp. 137–154

Chapter 5. Processing additivity in Spanish

incluso vs. además

| DPKog / HULC Lab x Universität Heidelberg
| DPKog / HULC Lab x Universität Heidelberg
| DPKog / HULC Lab x Universität Heidelberg
| DPKog / HULC Lab x Universität Heidelberg

This paper offers an experimental analysis of how additive discourse relations are processed in Spanish. The processing data were obtained from an eye-tracking reading experiment on utterances in which the focus operator incluso ‘even’ and the additive connective además ‘furthermore’ were either absent or present. Incluso acts fundamentally on the level of the information structure, whereas además is generally found in argumentative relations. Results show that, despite some differences during semantic and syntactic integration, the presence of a discourse marker affects principally high-level processing. These results seem to underpin theoretical studies that claim for a mainly procedural meaning of discourse markers.

Keywords: incluso, information structure, además, argumentation, eye-tracking, additivity, procedural meaning
Published online: 24 August 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.278.05nad
References

References

Bazzanella, Carla
1995 “I segnali discorsivi”. In Grande grammatica italiana di consultazione, vol. III, ed. by Lorenzo Renzi, Giampaolo Salvi, and Anna Cardinaletti, 225–257. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Blakemore, Diane
1987 Semantic Constraints on Relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
2002 Relevance and Linguistic Meaning. The Semantics and Pragmatic of Discourse Marker. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Briz, Antonio
2008 “Introducción”. In Diccionario de partículas discursivas del español, coord. by Antonio Briz, Salvador Pons, and José Portolés, www​.dpde​.es.
Coulson, Seana, and Teenie Matlock
2009 “Cognitive science”. In Cognition and Pragmatics, ed. by Sandra Dominiek, Jan-Ola Ötsman, and Jef Verschueren, 86–109. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Domínguez García, Noemí
2007 Conectores discursivos en textos argumentativos breves. Madrid: Arco/Libros.Google Scholar
Dominiek, Sandra
2009 “Psycholinguistics”. In Cognition and Pragmatics, ed. by Sandra Dominiek, Jan-Ola Ötsman, and Jef Verschueren, 288–368. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Diccionario de partículas discursivas del espanol , coord. by Antonio Briz, Salvador Pons, and José Portolés, www​.dpde​.es.Google Scholar
Escandell-Vidal, M.ª Victoria
2005 La comunicación. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Escandell Vidal, M.ª Victoria, and Manuel Leonetti
2009 “La expresión del verum focus en español”. Español Actual 92: 11–46.Google Scholar
Fuentes Rodríguez, Catalina
2009 Diccionario de conectores y operadores del español. Madrid: Arco/Libros.Google Scholar
Garcés Gómez, María Pilar
2008 La organización del discurso: marcadores de ordenación y de reformulación. Madrid/Frankfurt: Iberoamericana/Vervuert.Google Scholar
Gast, Volker, and Johan van der Auwera
2011 “Scalar additive operators in the languages of Europe”. Language 87/1: 2–54. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gundel, Jeannette K., and Thorstein Fretheim
2005 “Topic and Focus”. In The Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. by Laurence R. Horn, and Gregory Ward, 175–196. Blackwell Publishing. Blackwell Reference Online.Google Scholar
Holmqvist, Kenneth, Marcus Nystrom, Richard Andersson, Richard Dewhurst, Halszka Jarodzka, and Joost van de Weijer
2011 Eye Tracking. A Comprehensive Guide to Methods and Measures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Just, Marcel A., and Patricia A. Carpenter
1980 “A Theory of Reading: From eye fixations to comprehension”. Psychological Review 87/4: 329–354. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
König, Ekkehard
1991a The Meaning of Focus Particles. A Comparative Perspective. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Loureda, Óscar, and Esperanza Acín
(eds) 2010 Los estudios sobre marcadores del español, hoy. Madrid: Arco/Libros.Google Scholar
Loureda, Óscar, Adriana Cruz, Martha Rudka, Laura Nadal, Inés Recio, and Margarita Borreguero Zuloaga
2015 “Focus Particles in information processing: An experimental study on pragmatic scales with Spanish incluso”. In Focus Particles in the Romance and Germanic Languages. Experimental and Corpus-based Approaches, ed. by Anna-Maria De Cesare, and Cecilia M. Andorno. Linguistic Online 71/2.Google Scholar
Martín Zorraquino, M.ª Antonia, and José Portolés Lázaro
1999 “Los marcadores del discurso”. In Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, ed. by Ignacio Bosque, and Violeta Demonte, vol. 3, 4051–4213. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.Google Scholar
Montolío Durán, Estrella
2001 Conectores de la lengua escrita. Contraargumentativos, consecutivos, aditivos y organizadores de la información. Barcelona: Ariel.Google Scholar
Murillo, Silvia
2010 “Los marcadores y su semántica”. In Los estudios sobre marcadores del español, hoy, ed. by Óscar Loureda, and Esperanza Acín, 241–280. Madrid: Arco/Libros.Google Scholar
Pons Bordería, Salvador
2013 “Un solo tipo de reformulación”. In Cuadernos AISPI 2. Estudios de lenguas y literaturas ibéricas e iberoamericanas: Nuevas tendencias en la lingüística del discurso, ed. by Maria Vittoria Calvi, and Antonio Briz: 151–170.Google Scholar
Portolés, José
2001 [1998] Los marcadores del discurso. Barcelona: ArielGoogle Scholar
2007 “Escalas informativas aditivas. Pruebas del español”. Spanish in Context 4/2: 135–157. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010 “Los marcadores del discurso y la estructura informativa”. In Los estudios sobre marcadores del español, hoy, ed. by Óscar Loureda, and Esperanza Acín, 281–325. Madrid: Arco/Libros.Google Scholar
Rayner, Keith
2009 “Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search”. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 62: 1457–1506. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Real Academia Española. Banco de datos (CORPES XXI)
[online]. Corpus del Español del Siglo XXI (CORPES). http://​www​.rae​.es
Rooth, Mats
1985 Association with Focus. Dissertation. University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Sanders, Ted J. M., Wilbert P. M. S. Spooren, and Leo G. M. Noordman
1992 “Toward a taxonomy of Coherence Relations”. Discourse Processes 15/1: 1–35. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schwenter, Scott A., and Vasishth Shravan
2000 “Absolute and Relative Scalar Particles in Spanish and Hindi”. Proceedings of the 26th Berkeley Linguistic Society Conference 26. Berkeley: 225–233.Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson
1995[1986] Relevance. Communication and Cognition. Cornwall: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Winer, Benjamin J.
1962 Statistical Principles in Experimental Design. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Bello Viruega, Iria
2019.  In Writing History in Late Modern English, ► pp. 260 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 august 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.