Part of
Language and Violence: Pragmatic perspectives
Edited by Daniel N. Silva
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 279] 2017
► pp. 130
Ahmed, Sara
2004The Cultural Politics of Emotion. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Anchimbe, Eric, and Richard Janney
2011 “Postcolonial Pragmatics: An Introduction.” Journal of Pragmatics 43: 1451–1459. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ariel, Mira
2010Defining Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Austin, John L.
1962How to do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bach, Kent, and Robert Harnish
1979Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Basso, Renato, Luisando Souza, Roberta Pires de Oliveira, and Ronald Taveira
2009Semântica [Semantics]. Florianópolis: UFSC.Google Scholar
Berger, Bennett
1986 “Foreword.” In Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience, Goffman, Erving, xi–xiv. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
Bianchi, Claudia
2004 “Semantics and Pragmatics: The Distinction Reloaded.” In The Semantics/Pragmatics Distinction, ed. by Claudia Bianchi, 1–11. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Borutti, Silvana
1984 “Pragmatics and its Discontents.” Journal of Pragmatics 8: 437–447. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bousfield, Derek, and Jonathan Culpeper
2008 (eds.) Special Issue 4/2. Journal of Politeness Research.Google Scholar
Bousfield, Derek, and Miriam A. Locher
(eds.) 2008Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bousfield, Derek
2008Impoliteness in Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Briggs, Charles
2005 “Communicability, Racial Discourse, and Disease.” Annual Review of Anthropology 34: 269–291. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007a “Mediating Infanticide: Theorizing Relations between Narrative and Violence.” Cultural Anthropology 22(3): 315–356. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007b “Anthropology, Interviewing, and Communicability in Contemporary Social Life.” Current Anthropology, 48(4): 551–580. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen Levinson
1987 [1978]Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith
1997Excitable Speech: a Politics of the Performative. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Caldeira, Teresa
2000City of Walls: Crime, Segregation and Citizenship in São Paulo. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Cavell, Stanley
1976Must We Mean What We Say? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cicourel, Aaron
1987 “On John R. Searle’s Intentionality.” Journal of Pragmatics 11: 641–660. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cogswell, David
1996Chomsky for Beginners. Danbury: For Beginners LLC.Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan
2011Impoliteness: Using language to cause offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Damasio, Antonio
1999The Feeling of What Happens: Body and Emotion in the Making of Consciousness. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar
Daniel, E. Valentine
1998 “The Limits of Culture.” In In Near Ruins: Cultural Theory at the End of the Century, ed. by Nicholas B. Dirks, 67–91. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
1996Charred Lullabies: Chapter in an Anthropology of Violence. Princeton: Princeton University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Das, Veena
2007Life and Words: Violence and the Descent into the Ordinary. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Davis, Steven
(ed.) 1991Pragmatics: A Reader. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques
1988 “Signature Event Context.” In Limited Inc. Chicago: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Dowson, Thomas A.
2000 “Why Queer Archaeology? An introduction.” World Archaeology 32 (2):161–165. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dreyfus, Hubert L.
(1993) Heidegger’s Critique of the Husserl/ Searle Account of Intentionality. Social Research 60 (1):17–38.Google Scholar
Duranti, Alessandro
(2014) The Anthropology of Intentions: Language in a World of Others. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Giffney, Noreen
2004 “Denormatizing Queer Theory: More than (Simply) Lesbian and Gay Studies”. Feminist Theory 5 (1):73–78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Girard, René
1972Violence and the Sacred. Baltimore: John Hopkins.Google Scholar
Grice, Paul
1957 “Meaning.” The Philosophical Review 67: 377–388. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1989 “Logic and Conversation.” In Studies in the Way of Words, 22–40. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Haberland, Hartmut, and Jacob L. Mey
1977 “Editorial: Linguistics and pragmatics.” Journal of Pragmatics 1(1): 1–12. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halperin, David
1995Saint Foucault: Towards a Gay Hagiography. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hanks, William
1996Language and Communicative Practices. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
2002 “Exemplary Natives and What They Know.” In Paul Grice's Heritage, ed. by Giovanna Cosenza, 203–230. Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
2005 “Explorations in the Deictic Field.” Current Anthropology 46: 191–220. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haviland, John B.
Ilari, Rodolfo
2000 “Semântica e pragmática. Duas formas de descrever e explicar a significação. [Semantics and Pragmatics. Two Forms of Describing and Explaining Signification]” Revista de Estudos da Linguagem 9(1): 109–162. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kasher, Asa
(ed.) 1998Pragmatics: Critical Concepts, vols. I–VI. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
1994 “Pragmatics and Rationality.” In The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, ed. by Ronald Asher, and Joy Simpson, 3280–3282. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Ladegaard, Hans
2009 “Pragmatic Cooperation Revisited: Resistance and Non-Cooperation as a Discursive Strategy in Asymmetrical Discourses.” Journal of Pragmatics 41: 649–666. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, Charles R. III
1990 “If He Hollers Let Him Go: Regulating Racist Speech on Campus.” Duke Law Journal 1990 (3):431–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey
1983Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Levi, Primo
1987 “Se questo è un uomo. [If this Is a Man]” In Opere. Torino: Einaudi.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen
1983Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Louro, Guacira L.
2004Um corpo estranho. Ensaios sobre sexualidade e teoria queer [An Uncanny Body. Essays on Sexuality and Queer Theory]. Belo Horizonte: Autêntica.Google Scholar
Martins, Helena
2004 “Três Caminhos na Filosofia da Linguagem. [Three Paths in the Philosophy of Language]. In Introdução à Linguística [Introduction to Linguistics], v. 3, ed. by Fernanda Mussalin and Anna Christina Bentes, 439–474. São Paulo: Cortez.Google Scholar
2007 “Metaphor, Skepticism, Understanding.” Ilha do Desterro 53: 109–121.Google Scholar
Matsuda, Mari J.
1989 “Public Response to Racist Speech: Considering the Victim's Story.” Michigan Law Review 87: 2320–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mey, Jacob
2001Pragmatics: An Introduction. 2. ed. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Nancy, Jean-Luc
2005The Ground of the Image. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
Neale, Stephen
1992 “Paul Grice and the Philosophy of Language.” Linguistics and Philosophy 15: 509–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ochs Keenan, Elinor
1976 “The Universality of Conversational Postulates.” Language in Society 5 (1): 67–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oswald, Steve, Didier Maillat, and Louis de Saussure
2016 “Deceptive and Uncooperative Verbal Communication.” In Verbal Communication, ed. by Andrea Rocci, and Louis de Saussure, 509–534. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peirce, Charles
1932Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rajagopalan, Kanavillil
2000 “On Searle [on Austin] on language.” Language and Communication 20(4): 347–391. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2002 “Linguagem e cognição do ponto de vista da linguística crítica. [Language and Cognition from Critical Linguistics’ Point of View].” Veredas 6(2): 85–100.Google Scholar
2005 “Linguistic Pragmatics: A Discipline Bedeviled by its Own History? Implications for Intercultural Studies.” Intercultural Pragmatics 2: 93–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006 “Social Aspects of Pragmatics.” In: Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, ed. by Keith Brown, 2. ed., v. 11, 434–440. Oxford: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010Nova Pragmática [New Pragmatics]. São Paulo: Parábola.Google Scholar
2012 “Pragmatics: The Coming of Age of a Way of Contemplating Language.” Revista de Estudos da Linguagem 20: 29–47 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Recanati, François
2004 “ ‘What is Said’ and the Semantics/Pragmatics Distinction.” In The Semantics/Pragmatics Distinction, ed. by Claudia Bianchi, 45–64. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Rosaldo, Michelle Z.
1982 “The Things we Do with Words: Ilongot Speech Acts and Speech Act Theory in Philosophy.” Language in Society 11: 203–237. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Santos, Boaventura de Sousa, João Arriscado Nunes, and Maria Paula Meneses
2007 “Opening up the Canon of Knowledge and Recognition of Difference.” In Another Knowledge is Possible, XIX–LXII. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Santos, Boaventura de Sousa
2007 “Beyond Abyssal Thinking: From Global Lines to Ecologies of Knowledges.” Review (Fernand Braudel Center) 30 (1): 45–89.Google Scholar
2016 “From the Postmodern to the Postcolonial – and Beyond Both.” In Decolonizing European Sociology: Transdisciplinary Approaches, ed. by Encarnacion Rodriguez, Manuela Boatca, and Sergio Costa, 225–242. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sarangi, Srikant, and Stefaan Slembrouck
1991 “Non-Cooperation in Communication: A Reassessment of Gricean Pragmatics.” Journal of Pragmatics 17: 117–154. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scarry, Elaine
1985The Body in Pain: The Making and Unmaking of the World. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schweitzer, Thomas A.
1995 “Hate Speech on Campus and the First Amendment: Can They Be Reconciled?Connecticut Law Review 27: 493–521.Google Scholar
Searle, John R.
1973 “Austin on Locutionary and Illocutionary Acts.” In Essays on J. L. Austin, ed. by Isaiah Berlin, 141–185. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Searle, John
1969Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1983Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seligmann-Silva, Marcio
2005O local da diferença: ensaios sobre memória, arte, literatura e tradução [The Location of Difference: Essays on Memory, Art, Literature and Translation]. São Paulo: Ed. 34.Google Scholar
Silva, Daniel, Dina Ferreira, and Claudiana Alencar
(eds.) 2014Nova Pragmática: Modos de Fazer [New Pragmatics: Ways of Doing it]. São Paulo: Cortez.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael
2003 “Indexical Order and the Dialectics of Sociolinguistic Life.” Language and Communication 23 (3):193–229. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson
1995Relevance: Communication and Cognition. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
2012Meaning and Relevance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Spivak, Gayatri
1988 “Can the Subaltern Speak?” In Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture, ed. by Rosalind Morris, 271–313. Urbana: University of Illinois Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stuart, Sutherland
1992Irrationality. London: Pinter and Martin Publisher.Google Scholar
Verschueren, Jef
1999Understanding Pragmatics. London: Edward Arnold / New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Wagner, Roy
1981 [1975]The Invention of Culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Walker, Samuel
1994Hate Speech: The History of an American Controversy. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre
2012 “Metarepresentation in Linguistic Communication.” In Meaning and Relevance, Dan Sperber and Deirdre Wilson, 230–257. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig
1953Philosophical Investigations. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Mestre-Mestre, Eva M.
2023. Representation of gender violence in appeal proceedings in Spain. Revista de Llengua i Dret :79  pp. 158 ff. DOI logo
Rowtham, Moyia
2021. Phenomenology as Methodology for Narrating Gender Perceptions on “Linguistic Violence” as Domestic Violence. In Gender and Domestic Violence in the Caribbean [Gender, Development and Social Change, ],  pp. 67 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 september 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.