Cover not available
Part of
Language and Violence: Pragmatic perspectives
Edited by Daniel N. Silva
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 279] 2017
► pp. 141–168

Chapter 6
Free speech, hate speech, and hate beards

Language ideologies of Dutch populism

This paper explores the discourse and verbal strategies of the Dutch ‘Freedom Party’ (PVV), an islamophobic populist party that emerged in the first decade of the twenty-first century. In particular, it focuses on the linguistic ideologies implicit in PVV discourse, arguing that PVV spokespersons systematically construe their own utterances as mere words, and hence as deserving state protection; and the utterances of others as acts, and more specifically as acts of violence, deserving repression or prosecution. This asymmetric linguistic ideology may help us to explore empirical and normative questions concerning violence in language. In particular, the question of violence and responsibility is discussed on the basis of Norwegian Anders Breivik’s 2011 murderous assault on Norwegian social democrats, which explicitly appealed to PVV leader Wilders and his views on Islam.
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • 1.Genealogy of Dutch populism
  • 2.The ideology of the Freedom Party
  • 3.The language of the Freedom Party
  • 4.The hate speech trial and the Breivik assaults
  • 5.Speech acts and violence
  • Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 9 November 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.279.07lee
References (20)
References
Ayse. 2003. Scheherazades Tochter: Von meinen eigenen Eltern zum Tode verurteilt [Sheherazades Daughter: Condemned to Death by my Own Parents ]. Berlin: Ullstein. (Dutch translation Ayse: Op de vlucht voor eerwraak [Fleeing Honor Killing]. Amsterdam: Lunsingh Sijthoff, 2005).Google Scholar
Berman, Paul. 2009. The Flight of the Intellectuals. New York: Melville House Publishing.Google Scholar
Bosma, Martin. 2011. De schijn-élite van de valse munters: Drees, extreem rechts, nuttige idioten, Groep Wilders en ik [The Fake Elite of Counterfeiters: Drees, the Extreme Right, Useful Idiots, the Group-Wilders and Me]. Amsterdam: Prometheus.Google Scholar
Breivik, Anders. 2011. 2083: A European Declaration of Independence. Manifesto. Google Scholar
Bruijn, Hans de. 2010. Geert Wilders in debat: over de framing en reframing van een politieke boodschap [Geert Wilders in Debate: On the Framing and Reframing of a Political Message]. Den Haag: LEMMA.Google Scholar
Buruma, Ian. 2006. Murder in Amsterdam. Harmondsworth: Penguin Press.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1997. Excitable Speech: A Politics of the Performative. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Harrison, Tony. 2007. Collected Film Poetry. London: Faber & Faber.Google Scholar
Kuitenbrouwer, Jan. 2010. De woorden van Wilders en hoe ze werken [Wilders’s Words and How They Work]. Amsterdam: De Bezige Bij.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. 2004. Don’t Think of an Elephant! Know your Values and Frame the Debate. White River Junction: Chelsea Green Publishing.Google Scholar
Leezenberg, Michiel. 2008. “Verschwörungstheorie ‘Eurabia’ [Conspiracy Theory ‘Eurabia’].” INAMO: Berichte und Analysen zu Politik und Gesellschaft des Nahen und Mittleren Ostens 53: 67.Google Scholar
. 2013. “Power in Speech Actions.” In Pragmatics of Speech Actions, ed. by Marina Sbisà and Ken Turner, 279–281. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. “Discursive Violence and Responsibility: Notes on the Pragmatics of Dutch Populism.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 3 (1): 200–228. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mulder, Eildert. 2012. Anders Breivik is niet alleen [Anders Breivik is not alone]. Zoetermeer: Meinema.Google Scholar
Searle, John. 2010. Making the Social World: The Structure of Human Civilization. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun. 2008. “Elite discourse and institutional racism.” In Transnational Perspective on Culture, Policy and Education. Redirecting Cultural Studies in Neoliberal Times, ed. by Cameron McCarthy and Cathryn Teasley, 93–111. New York: Lang.Google Scholar
Veraart, Wouter. 2010. “Beledigen kan alleen in context: Kanttekeningen bij het ‘beledigen islam arrest’ van 10 maart 2009 [Offending can only be done in Context: Notes on the ‘Offending Islam’ Judgment].” Nederlands Juristenblad, 85 (12): 724–730.Google Scholar
Woltering, Robbert, and Michiel Leezenberg. 2010. De Koran voor beginners [The Quran for Beginners]. Amsterdam: Prometheus.Google Scholar
Ye’or, Bat. 1985. The Dhimmi: Christians and Jews under Islam. Madison: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press.Google Scholar
2005. Eurabia: The Euro-Arab Axis. Madison: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

French, Brigittine M.
2020. Maledictive Language: Arguments and Conflict. In The International Encyclopedia of Linguistic Anthropology, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Leezenberg, Michiel
2015. Discursive violence and responsibility. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 3:1 ► pp. 200 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.