Chapter 9
Negation and straw man fallacy in French election debates 1974–2012
Article outline
- 9.1Introduction: Negation and argumentation
- 9.2Negation in pragmatics: Enunciation theory and in discourse analysis
- 9.3Argumentation by negation and the straw man fallacy
- 9.4Refutations in the presidential election debates 1974 to 2012: Global scene and generic features
- 9.4.1Refuting the collective voice or the opponent’s argument
- 9.5The straw man fallacies in the presidential debates
- 9.5.1Negation used for straw man attacks
- 9.5.1.1Francois Mitterrand versus Valéry Giscard d’Estaing 1974: straw man attacks on socialist demons, arrogance, cowardliness and lack of compassion
- 9.5.1.2François Mitterrand versus Valéry Giscard d’Estaing 1981: Attacks on dogmatic socialism hostile to profit and a poorly conducted economy.
- 9.5.1.3François Mitterrand versus Jacques Chirac 1988: Attacks on socialist program as based on wishes and the right-wing compliance to the extreme right party
- 9.5.1.4Jacques Chirac versus Lionel Jospin 1995: Attacks on arrogant attitudes, obsolete methods and political immaturity
- 9.5.1.5Nicolas Sarkozy versus Ségolène Royal 2007: Attacks on immorality, weak nerves, arrogance and left-wing dogmatism
- 9.5.1.6Nicolas Sarkozy versus Francois Hollande 2012: Attacks on disuniting the people, on lies and arrogance
- 9.5.2Defence against straw man attacks
- 9.6Synthesis and discussion
- 9.6.1Generalities
- 9.6.2Straw man attacks and facts
- 9.6.3Right-wing and left-wing straw man negations and differences between candidates
- 9.6.4Straw man and political ideas
- 9.6.5Straw man and personal attitudes and character
- 9.7Conclusion
-
Notes
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Cohen-Achdut, Miri & Leon Shor
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.