Part of
Discourse Markers and (Dis)fluency: Forms and functions across languages and registersLudivine Crible
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 286] 2018
► pp. 177–206
Ludivine Crible
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 286] 2018
► pp. 177–206
Chapter 8Discourse markers in repairs
Article outline
- 8.1Previous approaches to repair
- 8.1.1Reformulation and its markers: The French classics
- 8.1.1.1Charolles & Coltier
- 8.1.1.2Gülich & Kotschi
- 8.1.1.3De Gaulmyn
- 8.1.2Contrastive perspectives on reformulation markers
- 8.1.2.1Rossari
- 8.1.2.2Murillo
- 8.1.2.3 Cuenca and Ciabarri
- 8.1.2.4Auer & Pfänder
- 8.1.3From reformulation to repair: Levelt’s (1983) typology of repair
- 8.1.4Research questions and hypotheses
- 8.1.1Reformulation and its markers: The French classics
- 8.2Data and method
- 8.2.1 Selection criteria
- 8.2.2 Repair category
- 8.2.3Relation to annotated fluencemes
- 8.2.4Intra-annotator agreement
- 8.3Repair categories across languages
- 8.4DMs in repairs
- 8.4.1Position of the DMs
- 8.4.2DM lexemes
- 8.4.3 Potentially Disfluent Functions in repairs
- 8.4.4Specification and enumeration
- 8.5DMs and modified repetitions
- 8.6Summary
- 8.7Interim discussion: Low quantity, high quality?
-
Notes
