Chapter published in:
Legal Pragmatics
Edited by Dennis Kurzon and Barbara Kryk-Kastovsky
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 288] 2018
► pp. 157179
References

References

Belal, Ahmed
2013Principles of the Egyptian Criminal Law: The General Part. Cairo: Dar Al Nahda Al Arabiya.Google Scholar
Blommaert, Jan
2005Discourse: A Critical Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clayman, Steven E.
2001 “Answers and Evasions”. Language in Society 30 (3): 403–442Google Scholar
Drew, Paul, and John Heritage
1992Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold
1967Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Grice, Herbert P.
1975 “Logic and Conversation.” In Studies in Syntax and Semantics III: Speech Acts, eds. P. Cole and J. Morgan. eds. Peter Cole and Jerry L. Morgan, 183–198. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Harris, Sandra
1984 “Questions as a Mode of Control in Magistrates’ Courts.” International Journal of the Sociology of Language 49: 5–27.Google Scholar
1989 “Defendant Resistance to Power and Control in Court.” In Working With Language: A Multidisciplinary Consideration of Language Use in Work Contexts, ed. Hywel Coleman, 132–164. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
1991 “Evasive Action: How Politicians Respond to Questions in Political Interviews.” In Broadcast Talk, ed. Paddy Scannell, 76–99. London: Sage publications.Google Scholar
Haworth, Kate
2006 “The Dynamics of Power and Resistance in Police Interview Discourse.” Discourse and Society 17 (6): 739–759. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013 “Audience Design in the Police Interview: The Interactional and Judicial Consequences of Audience Orientation.” Language in Society 42 (1): 45–69. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heffer, Chris, Frances Rock, and John M. Conley
2013Legal-Lay Communication: Textual Travels in the law. New York, NY; Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Huang, Yan
2017The Oxford Handbook of Pragmatics. UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jeffries, Lesley
2010Critical Stylistics: The Power of English. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kayed, Osama A.
2007Explanation of Criminal Law: Investigations- Criminal Case- the Trial. Cairo: Dar El Nahda El Arabiya.Google Scholar
Komter, Martha L.
2002 “The Suspect’s Own Words: The Treatment of Written Statements in Dutch Courtrooms.” International Journal of Speech Language and the Law 9 (2): 168–192. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003 “The Construction of Records in Dutch Police Interrogations.” Information Design Journal 11 (3): 201–213. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012 “The Career of a Suspect’s Statement: Talk, Text, Context.” Discourse Studies 14 (6): 731–752. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lagally, Klaus
1992 “ArabTEX, a System for Typesetting Arabic”. In The 3rd Conference and Exhibition on Multi-lingual Computing: Arabic and Roman Script. Durham. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Max Plank Institute
2008The Leipzig Glossing Rules: Conventions for Interlinear Morpheme-by-Morpheme Glosses. Available from http://​www​.eva​.mpg​.de​/lingua ​/resources​/glossing​-rules​.php
Rock, Frances
2001 “The Genesis of a Witness Statement.” Forensic Linguistics 8 (2): 44–72.Google Scholar
Rock, Frances, Chris Heffer, and John M. Conley
2013 “Textual Travel in Legal-Lay Communication”. In Legal-Lay Communication: Textual Travels in the Law, eds. Chris Heffer, Frances Rock and John M. Conley, 1–32. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Scoboria, Alan, Giuliana, Mazzoni and Irving, Kirsch
2008 “ ‘Don’t Know’: Responding to Answerable and Unanswerable Questions During Misleading and Hypnotic Interviews”. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 14 (3): 255–265.Google Scholar
Shalaby, Ahmed
2012Asrār muhākamat al-qarn. Cairo: Nahdet Masr.Google Scholar
Sidnell, Jack
2010Conversation Analysis: An Introduction. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Soliman, Shihab
2010Public Prosecution and Its Accusatory and Investigative Authority: A Comparative Study Between Islamic Sharia and Ordinance Law, the Egyptian, French, and Lebanese Law and Some Arab Legislations. Cairo: Dar el Nahda el Arabiya.Google Scholar
Thornborrow, Joanna
2002Power Talk: Language and Interaction in Institutional Discourse. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar