Cover not available
Part of
Perspectives on Evidentiality in Spanish: Explorations across genres
Edited by Carolina Figueras Bates and Adrián Cabedo
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 290] 2018
► pp. 125–146

Chapter 6
Prosody, genres and evidentiality in Spanish

The case of “por lo visto”

| University of Valencia. | Val.Es.Co Research Group
The aim of this paper is to present a prosodic analysis of the evidential discourse marker por lo visto (‘apparently’) in six oral discourse genres: everyday conversation, discussion, sociolinguistic interviews, TV talks, parliamentary interventions, and news. The multimedia material used for this study comes from real samples of spontaneous speech; among the sources used are linguistic corpora (Valesco, CORLEC) and TV websites, or the Spanish government’s official site. In the experimental design, 29 records were analysed statistically according to different variables, mainly phonic (TOBI accents, pitch, intensity, speech rate and so on). The results showed that (a) the tonal accent L + H * is predominant in news, political discourse and sociolectal interviews; (b) only the political discourse and sociolectal interview showed examples of por lo visto as an independent intonational phrase; and (c) prosody seemed to differentiate the pragmatic and the core meanings of the evidential por lo visto in genres in which both possibilities coexist (excluding genres in which the examples are only oriented towards the core evidential pole (news) or towards the pragmatic pole (political speech).
Keywords: prosody, genres, evidentiality, por lo visto , Spanish
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2. Selected genres and samples
  • 3.Methodology
    • 3.1Multimedia material
    • 3.2Acoustic and auditory processing of the data
    • 3.3Phonic and descriptive variables
    • 3.4Frequencies and statistical analyses
  • 4.Genre analysis
    • 4.1Phonological study
      • 4.1.1Melodic patterns according the AMH model
      • 4.1.2Tonal accents
      • 4.1.3Break indices and boundary tones
    • 4.2Acoustic analysis
    • 4.3Core meaning versus pragmatic meaning
  • 5.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
Published online: 24 July 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.290.06cab
References (45)
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra. 2004. Evidentiality. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra, and Robert M. W. Dixon. 2014. The Grammar of Knowledge: A Cross-Linguistic Typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Albelda-Marco, Marta. 2015. “Evidentiality in Non-Evidential Languages: Are there Evidentials in Spanish? Introduction.” Journal of Pragmatics 85: 135–137. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, and Susan Conrad. 2009. Register, Genre, and Style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boersma, Paul, and David Weenink. 2016. Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer. Vol. 6.0.15. [URL].
Brenes Peña, Ester. 2005. “La apertura del turno conversacional en el género del debate televisivo.” Español Actual 83: 7–25.Google Scholar
. 2012. “Género, discurso político y descortesía verbal análisis de la influencia de la variante sexo en el parlamento andaluz.” Philologia Hispalensis 26: 59–77.Google Scholar
Briz Gómez, Antonio. 1998. El español coloquial en la conversación: esbozo de pragmagramática. 1st ed.Barcelona: Ariel.Google Scholar
Briz, Antonio. 2013. “Variación pragmática y coloquialización estratégica. El caso de algunos géneros televisivos españoles (la tertulia).” In (Des)Cortesía para el espectáculo: estudios de pragmática variacionista, ed. by Catalina Fuentes, 89–126. Madrid: Arco Libros.Google Scholar
Cabedo Nebot, Adrián, and Pons Bordería, Salvador. 2014. Corpus Val.Es.Co 2.0., accessed 15/02, [URL].
Cabedo Nebot, Adrián. 2007. “Marcas prosódicas del registro coloquial en la conversación”. Cauce: Revista de Filología y su Didáctica (30): 41–56.Google Scholar
Cabedo Nebot, Adrián. 2013. “Sobre prosodia, marcadores del discurso y unidades del discurso en español: evidencias de un corpus oral espontáneo.” Onomázein (28): 201–213. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cantero Serena, Francisco José. 2002. Teoría y análisis de la entonación. UB (Universitat De Barcelona). Vol. 54. Barcelona: Universitat de Barcelona.Google Scholar
Cantero-Serena, Francisco José, and Dolors Font-Rotchés. 2009. “Protocolo para el análisis melódico del habla.” Estudios de Fonética Experimental XVIII: 17–32.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace L., and Johanna Nichols. 1986. Evidentiality, the Linguistic Coding of Epistemology. Norwood NJ: Ablex Publishing.Google Scholar
Cornillie, Bert. 2009. “Evidentiality and Epistemic Modality on the Close Relationship between Two Different Categories.” Functions of Language 16 (1): 44–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. “On the Grammaticalization and (Inter)Subjectivity of Evidential (Semi)Auxiliaries in Spanish.” Theoretical and Empirical Issues in Grammaticalization 77: 55–76.Google Scholar
Cornillie, Bert, and Pedro Gras. 2015. “On the Interactional Dimension of Evidentials: The Case of the Spanish Evidential Discourse Markers.” Discourse Studies 17 (2): 141–161. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cuenca, Maria-Josep, and Maria-Josep Marin. 2012. “Discourse Markers and Modality in Spoken Catalan: The Case of (és) clar.” Journal of Pragmatics 44 (15): 2211–2225. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De la Mota, Carme, and Emma Rodero. 2010. “La demarcación entonativa y el énfasis en la locución de los editores de boletines informativos radiofónicos.” In Actas del XXXIX Simposio Internacional de la Sociedad Española de Lingüística (SEL). Santiago de Compostela: Universidad de Compostela.Google Scholar
Estebas, Eva, and Pilar Prieto. 2010. “Castilian Spanish Intonation.” In Transcription of Intonation of the Spanish Language, ed. by Pilar Prieto and Paolo Roseano, 17–48. München: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
. 2009. “La notación prosódica en español. Una revisión del Sp_ToBI.” Estudios de Fonética Experimental XVIII: 263–283.Google Scholar
Estelles Arguedas, Maria, and Marta Albelda Marco. 2014. “Evidentials, Politeness and Prosody in Spanish: A Corpus Analysis.” Journal of Politeness Research-Language Behaviour Culture 10 (1): 29–62.Google Scholar
Field, Andy P. 2009. Discovering Statistics using SPSS: (and Sex and Drugs and Rock ‘n’ Roll). 3rd ed. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
González-Ramos, Elisa. 2005. “Por lo visto’ y ‘al parecer’: comparación de dos locuciones modales epistémicas de evidencialidad en español actual.” Interlingüística 16 (1): 541–554.Google Scholar
Gregory, M., and S. Carroll. 1978. Language and Situation: Language Varieties and their Social Contexts. London, Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Gries, Stefan Th. 2013. Statistics for Linguistics with R, A Practical Introduction. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harris, S. 2001. “Being Politically Impolite: Extending Politeness Theory to Adversarial Political Discourse.” Discourse & Society 12 (4): 451–472. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hirschberg, Julia, and Diane Litman. 1993. “Empirical Studies on Disambiguation of Cue Phrases.” Computational Linguistics 19: 501–530.Google Scholar
Holmes, Janet. 1988. “Of Course: A Pragmatic Particle in New Zealand Women′s and Men′s Speech.” Australian Journal of Linguistics 2: 49–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koehler, K. J., and K. Larntz. 1980. “An Empirical-Investigation of Goodness-of-Fit Statistics for Sparse Multinomials.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 75 (370): 336–344. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 2000. Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Language, Speech, and Communication. Cambridge, Mass.; London: MIT Press.
Llisterri, Joaquin, María Jesús Machuca, Antonio Ríos, Carme de la Mota, and Montserrat Riera. 2003. “Algunas cuestiones en torno al desplazamiento acentual en español.” In La tonía: dimensiones fonéticas y fonológicas, ed. by E. Herrera, and Pedro Martín-Butragueño, 163–185. México: El Colegio de México, Centro de Estudios Lingüísticos y Literarios (Cátedra Jaime Torres Bodet, Estudios de Lingüística, 4).Google Scholar
Marcos, Mercedes. 2005. “A propósito del marcador por lo visto.” In Palabras, norma, discurso. En memoria de Fernando Lázaro Carreter, ed. by Luis Santos-Río, Julio Borrego-Nieto, Juan Felipe García-Santos, José Gómez-Asencio, and Prieto delosMozos, Emilio, 777–785. Salamanca: Universidad de Salamanca.Google Scholar
Martín Zorraquino, María Antonia, and Estrella Montolío Durán. 1998. Los marcadores del discurso: Teoría y Análisis. Bibliotheca Philologica. Madrid: Arco-Libros.Google Scholar
Martín Zorraquino, María Antonia and José Portolés Lázaro. 1999. “Los marcadores del discurso.” In Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, ed. by Ignacio Bosque and Violeta Demonte. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.Google Scholar
Moreno, Francisco. 2003. “Metodología del proyecto para el estudio sociolingüístico del español de España y de América.” In [URL]
Pierrehumbert, Janet B. 1980. Phonology and Phonetics of English Intonation Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Portolés, José. 2001. Marcadores del discurso. Barcelona: Ariel.Google Scholar
Prieto, Pilar, and Paolo Roseano, eds. 2010. Transcription of Intonation of the Spanish Language. München: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Quilis, Antonio. 1981. Fonética acústica de la lengua española. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
. 1993. Tratado de fonología y fonética españolas. Biblioteca Románica Hispánica. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Roseano, Paolo, and Ana Maria Fernández Planas. 2013. “Transcripció fonètica i fonológica de l’entonació: una proposta d’etiquetatge automàtic.” Estudios de Fonética Experimental XXII: 275–332.Google Scholar
San Martin Nunez, Abelardo, and Silvana Guerrero Gonzalez. 2012. “Impoliteness Strategies in the Chilean Parliamentary Discourse.” Alpha-Revista de Artes Letras y Filosofia (35): 147–168.Google Scholar
Wichmann, Anne. 2009. “Sorry: Prosodic Evidence for Grammaticalization in Progress.” In Corpora and Discourse – and Stuff, ed. by Rhonwen Bowen, Mats Mobärg, and Sölve Ohlander. Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Cabedo Nebot, Adrián & Carolina Figueras Bates
2018. Chapter 1. Evidentiality in discourse. In Perspectives on Evidentiality in Spanish [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 290], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.