Cover not available
Part of
Positioning the Self and Others: Linguistic perspectives
Edited by Kate Beeching, Chiara Ghezzi and Piera Molinelli
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 292] 2018
► pp. 81–104

Chapter 4
Closeness at a distance

Positioning in Brazilian workplace emails

Social relationships are argued to have a special importance in Brazilian workplaces, as in Brazil generally (Amado and Brasil 1991; Fonseca and Castor 2005; Tanure and Duarte 2005), but scarce attention has been paid to the way such relationships are indexed through language. This research explores the way employees position themselves and others in emails to shape and influence relationships, highlighting how features that are specific to the medium index workplace identities. The analysis of 77 emails from a range of workplaces focuses on phatic aspects occurring frequently in our sample, greetings and closings. Employees used these strategically to emphasise closeness or distance, and with different degrees of formality, fulfilling diverse positioning functions including contesting power, enhancing relationships, or emphasising others’ independence. In addition, the relatively high frequency of greetings and closings compared to findings from other settings appears to confirm the importance claimed for relating at work in Brazil.
Keywords: workplace communication, Brazil, emails, relating at work, greetings and closings, Portuguese
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Literature review
    • 2.1Relating and positioning: The importance of phatic talk
    • 2.2Greetings and closings in emails
    • 2.3Culture and communication in Brazilian workplaces
  • 3.Data and methods
  • 4.Findings: Doing closeness at a distance
    • 4.1Greetings and closings
      • 4.1.1Formality in inside and outside communication
    • 4.2Absence of greetings and closings
      • 4.2.1Absences of greetings and closings in outside communication
      • 4.2.2Absences of greetings and closings in inside communication
    • 4.3Changes over time
  • 5.Conclusion
  • 6.Future research
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 17 July 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.292.04deb
References (51)
References
Amado, Gelles, and Haroldo V. Brasil. 1991. “Organizational Behaviors and Cultural Context: The Brazilian ‘jeitinho’.” International Studies of Management and Organization 21 (3): 38–61.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arundale, Robert B.. 1999. “An Alternative Model and Ideology of Communication for an Alternative to Politeness Theory.” Pragmatics 9: 119–154. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barbosa, Livia Neves de Holanda. 1995. “The Brazilian Jeitinho: An Exercise in National Identity.” In The Brazilian Puzzle: Culture on the Borderlands of the Western World, ed. by David J. Hess, and Roberto da Matta. New York: Columbia University.Google Scholar
Bou-Franch, Patricia. 2011. “Openings and Closings in Spanish Email Conversations.” Journal of Pragmatics, Postcolonial Pragmatics 43 (6): 1772–1785. doi:DOI logo.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary. 2009. “From Stance to Style: Gender, Interaction, and Indexicality in Mexican Immigrant Youth Slang.” In Stance: Sociolinguist Perspectives, ed. by Alexandra Jaffe, 146–170. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary, and Kira Hall. 2005. “Identity and Interaction: A Sociocultural Linguistic Approach.” Discourse Studies 7 (4–5): 585–614. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bunz, Ulla, and Scott W. Campbell. 2004. “Politeness Accommodation in Electronic Mail.” Communication Research Reports 21 (1): 11–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Caldas, Miguel P.. 2006. “Conceptualizing Brazilian Multiple and Fluid Cultural Profiles.” Management Research: The Journal of the Iberoamerican Academy of Management 4 (3): 169–180.Google Scholar
Chejnová, Pavla. 2014. “Expressing Politeness in the Institutional E-Mail Communications of University Students in the Czech Republic.” Journal of Pragmatics 60: 175–192. doi:DOI logo.Google Scholar
Crystal, David. 2001. Language and the Internet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan. 2011. Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
da Matta, Roberto. 1990. For an Anthropology of the Brazilian Tradition, Or, a Virtude está no Meio. Washington, D.C.: Latin American Program, Wilson Center.Google Scholar
. 1997. A Casa e a Rua: Espaço, Cidadania, Mulher e Morte no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: Editorra Rocco.Google Scholar
da Silveira, Rafael Alcadipani, and João Crubelatte. 2007. “The Notion of Brazilian Organizational Culture: Questionable Generalizations and Vague Concepts.” Critical Perspectives on International Business 3 (2): 150–169. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Das, Anupam, and Susan C. Herring. 2016. “Greetings and Interpersonal Closeness: The Case of Bengalis on Orkut.” Language and Communication 47: 53–65. doi:DOI logo.Google Scholar
Farese, Gian Marco. 2015. “Hi vs. Ciao: NSM as a Tool for Cross-Linguistic Pragmatics.” Journal of Pragmatics 85: 1–17. doi:DOI logo.Google Scholar
Fonseca, Carolina Scalise Taques, and Belmiro Valverde Jobim Castor. 2005. “A Influência de Traços da Cultura Brasileira sobre a Comunicação Intra e Intercultural no Setor Automotivo do Paraná .” Publ. UEPG. Ciências Humanas, Ciências Sociais Aplicadas, Linguagem, Letras e Artes, Ponta Grossa 13 (2): 79–92.Google Scholar
Gimenez, Julio C. 2000. “Business E-Mail Communication: Some Emerging Tendencies in Register.” English for Specific Purposes 19 (3): 237–251. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herring, Susan. 1996. “Two Variants of an Electronic Message Schema.” In Computer-Mediated Communication: Linguistic, Social, and Cross-Cultural Perspectives, ed. by Susan C. Herring, 81–106. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hess, David J., and Roberto da Matta. 1995. The Brazilian Puzzle: Culture on the Borderlands of the Western World. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Hofstede, Geert, Adriana V. Garibaldi de Hilal, Sigmar Malvezzi, Betania Tanure, and Henk Vinken. 2010. “Comparing Regional Cultures within a Country: Lessons from Brazil.” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 41 (3): 336–352. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hofstede, Geert, and Geert Jan Hofstede. 2005. Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. New York: McGrawHill.Google Scholar
Islam, Gazi. 2012. “Between Unity and Diversity: Historical and Cultural Foundations of Brazilian Management.” European Journal of International Management 6 (3): 265–282.Google Scholar
Kankaanranta, Anne. 2006. “‘ Hej Seppo, Could You Pls Comment on This!’ –Internal Email.” Business Communication Quarterly. 69(2): 216–225. doi:DOI logo.Google Scholar
Krivonos, Paul D., and Mark L. Knapp. 1975. “Initiating Communication: What Do You Say When You Say Hello?” Central States Speech Journal 26 (2): 115–125. doi:DOI logo.Google Scholar
Laver, John. 1975. “Communicative Functions of Phatic Communion.” In Organization of Behavior in Face-to-Face Interaction, ed. by Adam Kendon, Richard M. Harris, and Mary Ritchie Key, 215–238. Paris: Mouton.Google Scholar
Lenartowics, Tomasz, and Kendall Roth. 2001. “Does Subculture within a Country Matter? A Cross-Culture Study of Motivational Domains and Business Performance in Brazil.” Journal of International Business Studies 32 (2): 305–325. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen. 1997. “Deixis.” In Concise Encyclopedia of Philosophy of Language, ed. by Peter V. Lamarque, 214–219. Oxford: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
Locher, Miriam, and Richard Watts. 2005. “Politeness Theory and Relational Work”. Journal of Politeness Research 1 (1): 9–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Machili, Ifigeneia. 2014. Writing in the Workplace: Variation in the Writing Practices and Formality of Eight Multinational Companies in Greece. Unpublished PhD Thesis. Bristol: University of the West of England.Google Scholar
Malinowski, Bronislav. 1936. “The Problem of Meaning in Primitive Languages.” In The Meaning of Meaning. A Study of the Influence of Language upon Thought and of the Science of Symbolism, ed. by Charles Kay Ogden and Ivor Armstrong Richards, 296–336. London: Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
McKeown, Jamie, and Qilin Zhang. 2015. “Socio-Pragmatic Influence on Opening Salutation and Closing Valediction of British Workplace Email.” Journal of Pragmatics 85: 92–107. doi:DOI logo.Google Scholar
Motta, Fernando C. Prestes, Rafael Alcadipani da Silveira, and Ricardo B. Bresler. 2000. “O Estrangeiro e o Mundo Organizacional.” In Anais do I Eneo. Curitiba: Anpad.Google Scholar
O’Driscoll, Jim. 2015. “The Medium is the Misdemeanour: Comparing the Offence Potentials of Different Media.” Paper presented at the 14th International Pragmatics Conference (IPrA). University of Antwerp, 26-31 July 2015).
O’Keefe, Hsu, and William M. O’Keefe. 2004. “Business Behaviors in Brazil and the USA: Understanding the Gaps.” International Journal of Social Economics 31 (5/6): 614–622. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pacheco de Oliveira, Lúcia. 2009. “Brazil.” In Handbook of Business Discourse, ed. by Francesca Bargiela-Chiappini, 400–411. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Park, Jung-ran. 2008a. “Linguistic Politeness and Face-work in Computer-mediated Communication, Part 2: An Application of the Theoretical Framework.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 59 (14): 2199–2209. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008b. “Linguistic Politeness and Face-work in Computer-mediated Communication, Part 1: A Theoretical Framework.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 59 (13): 2051–2059. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pearson, Virginia, and Walter G. Stephan. 1998. “Preferences for Styles of Negotiation: A Comparison of Brazil and the US.” International Journal of Intercultural Relations 22 (1): 67–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pérez Sabater, Carmen, Ed Turney, and Begoña Montero Fleta. 2008. “Orality and Literacy, Formality and Informality in Email Communication.” Ibérica 15: 71–88.Google Scholar
Scheyder, Elizabeth C.. 2003. “The Use of Complimentary Closings in E-Mail: American English Examples.” Working Papers in Educational Linguistics 19 (1): 27–42.Google Scholar
Sherblom, John. 1988. “Direction, Function, and Signature in Electronic Mail.” Journal of Business Communication 25 (4): 39–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sledge, Sally, Angela K. Miles, and Samuel Coppage. 2008. “What Role Does Culture Play? A Look at Motivation and Job Satisfaction among Hotel Workers in Brazil.” The International Journal of Human Resource Management 19 (9): 1667–1682. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, Helen. 2005. “Face, (Im)Politeness and Rapport.” In Culturally Speaking: Managing Rapport through Talk across Cultures, ed. by Helen Spencer-Oatey, 11–47. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, Helen, and Peter Franklin. 2009. Intercultural Interaction: A Multidisciplinary Approach to Intercultural Communication. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, Helen. 2013. “Relating at Work: Facets, Dialectics and Face” Journal of Pragmatics 58: 121–137. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tanure, Betania, and Roberto Gonzalez Duarte. 2005. “Leveraging Competitiveness upon National Cultural Traits: The Management of People in Brazilian Companies.” The International Journal of Human Resource Management 16 (12): 2201–2217. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vinagre, Margarita. 2008. “Politeness Strategies in Collaborative E-Mail Exchanges.” Computers and Education 50 (3): 1022–1036. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Waldvogel, Joan. 2007. “Greetings and Closings in Workplace Email.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 12 (2): 456–477. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wolfson, Nessa. 1986. “The Bulge: A Theory of Speech Behavior and Social Distance.” Penn Working Papers in Educational Linguistics 2 (1): 55–83.Google Scholar