This paper studies how the turn-design of a highly recurrent type of action changes over time. Based on a corpus of video-recordings of German driving lessons, we consider one type of instructions and analyze how the same instructional action is produced by the same speaker (the instructor) for the same addressee (the student) in consecutive trials of a learning task. We found that instructions become increasingly shorter, indexical and syntactically less complex; interactional sequences become more condensed and activities designed to secure mutual understanding become rarer. This study shows how larger temporal frameworks of interpersonal interactional histories which range beyond the interactional sequence impinge on the recipient-design of turns and the deployment of multimodal resources in situ.
2018Tracking Change Over Time in Storytelling Practices: A Longitudinal Study of Second Language Talk-in-Interaction. In Longitudinal Studies on the Organization of Social Interaction, ed. by Pekarek Doehler, Simona, Wagner, Johannes, and Esther González-Martínez, 67–102. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Bisang, Walter
2014 “Overt and Hidden Complexity – Two Types of Complexity and Their Implications”. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 50 (2): 127–143.
Bisang, Walter
2015 “Hidden Complexity – The Neglected Side of Complexity and Its Implications.” Linguistics Vanguard 1 (1): 177–187.
Brennan, Susan E., and Herbert H. Clark
1996 “Conceptual Pacts and Lexical Choice in Conversation.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 22: 1482–1493.
Broth, Mathias, Levin, Lena, and Jakob Cromdal
2017 “Starting Out as Driver. Progression in Instructed Pedal Work.” In Memory Practices and Learning – Interactional, Institutional and Sociocultural Perspectives, ed. by Mäkitalo, Åsa, Linell, Per, and Roger Säljö, 113–142. Charlotte NC: Information Age.
Clark, Herbert H.
1996a “Communities, Commonalities, and Communication.” In Rethinking Linguistic Relativity, ed. by Gumperz, John J., and Stephen C. Levinson, 324–355. Cambridge: CUP.
Clark, Herbert H.
1996bUsing Language. Cambridge: CUP.
Clark, Herbert H., and Catherine R. Marshall
1981 “Definite Reference and Mutual Knowledge.” In Elements of Discourse Understanding, ed. by Joshi, Aravind K., Webber, Bonnie L., and Ivan A. Sag, 10–63. Cambridge: CUP.
Clark, Herbert H., and Deanna Wilkes-Gibbs
1986 “Referring as a Collaborative Process.” Cognition 22: 1–39.
Clark, Herbert H., and Susan A. Brennan
1991 “Grounding in Communication.” In Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition, ed. by Resnick, Lauren B., Levine, John M., and Stephanie D. Teasley, 127–149. Washington: APA Books.
Deppermann, Arnulf, and Axel Schmidt
2016 “Partnerorientierung zwischen Realität und Imagination: Anmerkungen zu einem zentralen Konzept der Dialogtheorie.” Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik 44 (3): 369–405.
Deppermann, Arnulf, and Reinhold Schmitt
2009 ““damit sie mich verstehen”: Genese, Verfahren und recipient design einer narrativen Performance.” In Theatralität des sprachlichen Handelns, ed. by Buss, Mareike, Habscheid, Stephan, Jautz, Sabine, Liedtke, Frank, and Jan-Georg Schneider, 79–112. München: Fink.
Deppermann, Arnulf
2014 ““Don’t Get Me Wrong”: Recipient Design by Using Negation to Constrain an Action’s Interpretation.” In Grammar and Dialogism, ed. by Bücker, Jörg, Günthner, Susanne, and Wolfgang Imo, 15–52. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Deppermann, Arnulf
2015a “When Recipient Design Fails: Egocentric Turn-Design of Instructions in Driving School Lessons Leading to Breakdowns of Intersubjectivity.” Gesprächsforschung – Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 16: 63–101., [URL], accessed June 8, 2018.
Deppermann, Arnulf
2015b “Retrospection and Understanding.” In Temporality in Interaction, ed. by Deppermann, Arnulf, and Susanne Günthner, 57–94. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Deppermann, Arnulf
2016 “La définition comme action multimodale pour des enjeux pratiques: Définir pour instruire à l’auto-école.” Langages 20(4): 83–101.
Deppermann, Arnulf
2018 “Instructional Practices in Driving Lessons in German: Differential Uses of Declaratives and Imperatives.” International Journal of Applied Linguistics.
Fischer, Kerstin
2016Designing Speech for a Recipient. The Roles of Modeling, Alignment and Feedback in So-Called “Simplified Registers”. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Goodwin, Charles
1979 “The Interactive Construction of a Sentence in Natural Conversation.” In Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology, ed. by Psathas, George, 97–121. New York: Irvington.
Goodwin, Charles
2017Cooperative Action. Cambridge: CUP.
Halliday, Michael A. K., and Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen
2014Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar. 4th ed. New York: Routledge.
1995 “Aspects of Recipient Design in Expert Advice-Giving on Call-in Radio.” Discourse Processes 19 (2): 219–238.
Isaacs, Ellen A., and Herbert H. Clark
1987 “References in Conversations between Experts and Novices.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 116 (1): 26–37.
Linell, Per
2009Rethinking Language, Mind, and World Dialogically: Interactional and Contextual Theories of Human Sense-Making. Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
Maynard, Douglas W.
1989 “Perspective-Display Sequences in Conversation.” Western Journal of Speech Communication 53: 91–113.
Mondada, Lorenza
2015 “The Facilitator’s Task of Formulating Citizens’ Proposals in Political Meetings: Orchestrating Multiple Embodied Orientations to Recipients.” Gesprächsforschung 16: 1–62., accessed June 8, 2018. [URL].
Mondada, Lorenza
2018 “Multiple Temporalities of Language and Body in Interaction: Challenges for Transcribing Multimodality.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 51 (1), 85–106.
Pekarek Doehler, Simona, and Evelyne Pochon-Berger
2015 “The Development of L2 Interactional Competence: Evidence from Turn-Taking Organization, Sequence Organization, Repair Organization and Preference Organization.” In Usage-Based Perspectives on Second Language Learning, ed. by Cadierno, Teresa, and Søren W. Eskildsen, 233-–267. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Pekarek Doehler, Simona, and Virginie Fasel Lauzon
2015 “Documenting Change across Time: Longitudinal and Cross-Sectional CA Studies of Classroom Interaction.” In Handbook of Classroom Interaction, ed. by Markee, Numa, 409–424. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell.
Pickering, Martin J., and Garrod, Simon
2004 “Toward a Mechanistic Psychology of Dialogue.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27: 169–225.
Sacks, Harvey, and Emanuel A. Schegloff
1979 “Two Preferences in the Organization of Reference to Persons in Conversation and Their Interaction.” In Everyday Language, ed. by Psathas, George, 15–21. New York: Center for the Study of Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis.
Sacks, Harvey, Schegloff, Emanuel A., and Gail Jefferson
1974 “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation.” Language 50(4): 696–735.
Sacks, Harvey
1992Lectures on Conversation. 2 Vols. Oxford: Blackwell.
Schegloff, Emanuel A.
1972 “Notes on a Conversational Practice: Formulating Place.” In Studies in Social Interaction, ed. by Sudnow, David N., 75–119. New York: The Free Press.
Schegloff, Emanuel A.
1987 “Recycled Turn Beginnings: A Precise Repair Mechanism in Conversation’s Turn-Taking Organization.” In Talk and Social Organization, ed. by Button, Graham, and John Robert E. Lee, 70–85. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
1971[1945]. “On Multiple Realities.” In his Collected papers I: The Problem of Social Reality, 207–259. Den Hague: Nijhoff.
Schütz, Alfred
1974[1932]. Der sinnhafte Aufbau der sozialen Welt. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Selting, Margret
et al 2009 “Gesprächsanalytisches Transkriptionssystem 2 (GAT 2).” Gesprächsforschung – Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 10: 353–402. [URL], accessed June 8, 2018.
Sidnell, Jack
2014 “The Architecture of Intersubjectivity Revisited.” In Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Anthropology, ed. by Enfield, Nick, Kockelman, Paul, and Jack Sidnell, 364–399. Cambridge: CUP.
Svennevig, Jan
2015 “Én porsjon om gangen. Multimodal koordinering i samtaler med andrespråksbrukere.” In Det tredje språket. Multimodale studier av interkulturell kommunikasjon i kunst, skole og samfunnsliv, ed. by Engebretsen, Martin, 196–211. Kristiansand: Portal.
Pekarek Doehler, Simona, Wagner, Johannes, and González-Martínez, Esther
(Eds.)2018Longitudinal Studies on the Organization of Social Interaction. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Wagner, Johannes, Pekarek Doehler, Simona, and Esther González-Martínez
2018 “Longitudinal Research on the Organization of Social Interaction: Current Developments and Methodological Challenges”, In Longitudinal Studies on the Organization of Social Interaction, ed. byPekarek Doehler, Simona, Wagner, Johannes, and Esther González-Martínez, 3–35. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Cited by
Cited by 30 other publications
Balaman, Ufuk
2022. Conceptualizing Conversation Analytic Language Teacher Education. In Conversation Analytic Language Teacher Education in Digital Spaces, ► pp. 15 ff.
2021. Early Responses: An Introduction. Discourse Processes 58:4 ► pp. 293 ff.
Deppermann, Arnulf & Simona Pekarek Doehler
2021. Longitudinal Conversation Analysis - Introduction to the Special Issue. Research on Language and Social Interaction 54:2 ► pp. 127 ff.
Deppermann, Arnulf & Axel Schmidt
2021. Micro-Sequential Coordination in Early Responses. Discourse Processes 58:4 ► pp. 372 ff.
Deppermann, Arnulf & Axel Schmidt
2021. How Shared Meanings and Uses Emerge Over an Interactional History:Wabi Sabiin a Series of Theater Rehearsals. Research on Language and Social Interaction 54:2 ► pp. 203 ff.
2023. Spheres of interest: Space and social cognition in Phola deixis. Open Linguistics 9:1
Helmer, Henrike
2020. How Do Speakers Define the Meaning of Expressions? The Case of Germanx heißt y(“x means y”). Discourse Processes 57:3 ► pp. 278 ff.
Helmer, Henrike
2021. Humorous or occasioned instructions: Learning the “shoulder check” in theoretical and practical driving lessons. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 31:1 ► pp. 109 ff.
Ingebrand, Elias, Christina Samuelsson & Lars-Christer Hydén
2022. A person living with dementia learning to navigate an iPad: a case study. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology 17:5 ► pp. 570 ff.
2020. Common Ground in Demonstrative Reference: The Case of Mano (Mande). Frontiers in Psychology 11
Kornfeld, Laurenz & Giovanni Rossi
2023. Enforcing Rules During Play: Knowledge, Agency, and the Design of Instructions and Reminders. Research on Language and Social Interaction 56:1 ► pp. 42 ff.
Mondada, Lorenza
2021. How Early can Embodied Responses be? Issues in Time and Sequentiality. Discourse Processes 58:4 ► pp. 397 ff.
Norrthon, Stefan
2021. Framing in theater rehearsals. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice 15:2
Norrthon, Stefan & Axel Schmidt
2023. Knowledge Accumulation in Theatre Rehearsals: The Emergence of a Gesture as a Solution for Embodying a Certain Aesthetic Concept. Human Studies 46:2 ► pp. 337 ff.
Pekarek Doehler, Simona & Ufuk Balaman
2021. The Routinization of Grammar as a Social Action Format: A Longitudinal Study of Video-Mediated Interactions. Research on Language and Social Interaction 54:2 ► pp. 183 ff.
Schmidt, Axel & Arnulf Deppermann
2023. On the Emergence of Routines: An Interactional Micro-history of Rehearsing a Scene. Human Studies 46:2 ► pp. 273 ff.
Stevanovic, Melisa
2021. Monitoring and evaluating body knowledge: metaphors and metonymies of body position in children’s music instrument instruction. Linguistics Vanguard 7:s4
Szczepek Reed, Beatrice
2023. ‘Go on keep going’: The instruction of sustained embodied activities. Discourse Studies 25:5 ► pp. 692 ff.
Taleghani-Nikazm, Carmen, Veronika Drake, Andrea Golato & Emma Betz
2024. “Five” or “ten”: analysing a co-operative correction in Muay Thai coaching. Sports Coaching Review 13:1 ► pp. 107 ff.
[no author supplied]
2021. Fundamentals of Sociopragmatics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ► pp. 13 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.