Cover not available
Part of
Time in Embodied Interaction: Synchronicity and sequentiality of multimodal resources
Edited by Arnulf Deppermann and Jürgen Streeck
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 293] 2018
► pp. 325–350

Chapter 10
Times of rest

Temporalities of some communicative postures

This chapter discusses how multiple time-scales intersect in a particular unit of embodied communicative action, body postures that are held for a moment (beyond the single sequence of talk). These time-scales are the immediate moment and its position within the unfolding interaction sequence (its duration); the personal (‘historical’) relationship among the specific persons adopting it; the workday over whose course the body tires; and the life-course over which a bodily ‘habitus’ is formed. The specific shape of a socially meaningful posture is not only responsive to interactional circumstances and tasks, as well as the relational history of the parties, but also a result of the body’s ongoing adaptations to its own organic needs, a factor taken into account in everyday perceptions and descriptions of postures, but yet to be addressed in interaction research. The posture samples in this chapter are taken from interactions in an auto-shop and a high-school classroom.
Keywords: posture, time-scale, living body, coordination
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2. Posture as a medium of interactional organization
  • 3.The situation scale: Postures, stances, and courses of action
  • 4.The relationship scale
  • 5.Life-scales: Bodies and their days
  • 6.The biographical scale: Habitualization, self-making, aging
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 13 September 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.293.10str
References (42)
References
Balzac, Honoré. 1968[1833]. Théorie de la démarche. La Comédie Humaine (Vol. 19). Paris: Les Editions du Delta.Google Scholar
Bateson, Gregory. 1971. “Communication.” In The Natural History of an Interview (Vol. 95 – Series XV), ed. by McQuown, Norman. Chicago: Micro-fiche. University of Chicago Library.Google Scholar
. 1972. Steps to an Ecology of Mind. New York: Ballantine.Google Scholar
Belo, Jane. 1970[1955]. “The Balinese Temper.” In Traditional Balinese Culture, ed. by Belo, Jane, 84–110. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Birdwhistell, Ray. 1970. Kinesics and Context. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Birdwhistell, Ray L. 1979. “Toward Analyzing American Movement.” In Nonverbal Communication. Readings with Commentary, ed. by Weitz, Shirley, 134–143. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Boas, Franz. 1940. Race, Language and Culture. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1990. The Logic of Practice. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Dreyfus, Hubert L. 1991. Being-in-the-World. A Commentary on Heidegger’s “Being and Time”. Cambridge: The M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Efron, David. 1972[1941]. Gesture, Race and Culture. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Engel, Johann J. 1968[1785]. Ideen zu einer Mimik. Hildesheim: Georg Olms.Google Scholar
Erickson, Frederick, and Jeffrey Schulz. 1977. “When is a Context? Some Issues and Methods in the Analysis of Social Competence.” The Quarterly Newsletter of the Institute for Comparative Human Development 1 (2): 5–10.Google Scholar
Firth, Raymond. 1971. “Postures and Gestures of Respect.” In Échanges et Communications: Mélanges offerts a Claude Lévi-Strauss àl’.Occasion de son 60ėme anniversaire, ed. by Pouillon, Jean, and Pierre Maranda, 188–209. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1963. Behavior in Public Places. New York: The Free.Google Scholar
. 1974. Frame Analysis. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles. 2007. “Participation, Stance and Affect in the Organization of Activities.” Discourse and Society 18 (1): 53–73.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Charles, and Majorie H. Goodwin. 1992. “Context, Activity, and Participation.” In The Contextualization of Language, ed. by Auer, Peter, and Aldo D. Luzio, 77–100. Amsterdam: Benjamins DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Marjorie H., Cekaite, Asta, and Charles Goodwin. 2012. “Emotion as Stance.” In Emotion in Interaction, ed. by Peräkylä, Anssi, and Marja-Leena Sorjonen, 16–41. Oxford: Oxford University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gumperz, John (ed.). 1982. Language and Social Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Heine, B., Claudi, U., and Hünnemeyer, F. 1991. Grammaticalization. A Conceptual Framework. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Heller, Agnes. 1984. Everyday Life. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Alissa, Pinto, Jeannine, and Maggie Shiffrar. 2004. “Experience, Context, and the Visual Perception of Human Movement.” J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 30 (5): 822–835.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kendon, Adam. 1990. Conducting Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 2004. Gesture: Visible Action as Utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C., and Judith Holler. 2014. “The Origin of Human Multi-Modal Communication.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 369 (1651): 20130302.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mauss, Marcel. 1973 [1935]. “The Techniques of the Body.” Economy and Society 2 (1): 70–88.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mayer, Andreas. 2013. Wissenschaft vom Gehen. Die Erforschung der Bewegung im 19. Jahrhundert. Frankfurt am Main: S. Fischer.Google Scholar
McDermott, R., Gospodinoff, K., & Aron, J. (1978). Criteria for an ethnographical adequate description of concerted activities and their contexts. Semiotica, 24(3/4), 245–276.Google Scholar
Mehan, Hugh. 1979. Learning Lessons: Social Organization in the Classroom. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 1962. Phenomenology of Perception. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mead, G. H. 1934. Mind, Self and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mohn, Bina E., and Klaus Amann. 2006. Lernkörper. Kamera-ethnografische Studien zum Schülerjob. DVD. Göttingen: Institut für den wissenschaftlichen Film.Google Scholar
Noland, Carrie. 2009. Agency and Embodiment. Performing Gestures/Producing Culture. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rossano, Federico. 2012. Gaze Behavior in Face-to-Face Interaction. Ph. D. Dissertation: Max-Planck Institut for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen.Google Scholar
Ryle, Gilbert. 1949. The Concept of Mind. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, and Emanuel A. Schegloff. 2002. “Home Position.” Gesture 2 (2): 133–146.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scheflen, Albert E. 1964. “The Significance of Posture in Communication System.” Psychiatry 27 (4): 316–331.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1973. Communicational Structure. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Streeck, Jürgen. 2013. “Interaction and the Living Body.” Journal of Pragmatics 46: 69–90.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017. Self-Making Man. A Day of Action, Life, and Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Streeck, Jürgen, and Jordan, J. Scott. 2009. “Communication as a Dynamical Self-Sustaining System: The Importance of Time-Scales and Nested Contexts.” Communication Theory 19: 448–467.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wollheim, Richard. 1987. Painting as an Art. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (8)

Cited by eight other publications

Chen, Rachel S. Y.
2024. Bridging the gap: fostering interactive stimming between non-speaking autistic children and their parents. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience 18 DOI logo
Bovet, Alain
2023. Distance, Closeness and Touch in and as an Improvised Duet Dance: How to “Move a Bit Further Away” with a Partner. Human Studies 46:4 ► pp. 807 ff. DOI logo
Norrthon, Stefan
2023. Cueing in Theatre: Timing and Temporal Variance in Rehearsals of Scene Transitions. Human Studies 46:2 ► pp. 199 ff. DOI logo
Katila, Julia & Kreeta Niemi
2022. Primary schoolboys’ embodied relationships in the classroom. Research on Children and Social Interaction 6:1 DOI logo
Philipsen, Johanne S & Julia Katila
2021. Interkinesthesia in psychotherapy: a resource for exploring body memories and learning new ways of making-a-body. Body, Movement and Dance in Psychotherapy 16:4 ► pp. 302 ff. DOI logo
Harrison, Simon
2020. Through the Magical Pink Walkway: A Behavior Setting’s Invitation to Embodied Sense-Makers. Frontiers in Psychology 11 DOI logo
Katila, Julia & Sanna Raudaskoski
2020. Interaction Analysis as an Embodied and Interactive Process: Multimodal, Co-operative, and Intercorporeal Ways of Seeing Video Data as Complementary Professional Visions. Human Studies 43:3 ► pp. 445 ff. DOI logo
Katila, Julia & Johanne S. Philipsen
2019. The intercorporeality of closing a curtain. Pragmatics & Cognition 26:2-3 ► pp. 167 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.