Narrative studies versus pragmatics (of narrative)
This chapter considers the interface between pragmatics and narrative studies, initially with reference to Labovian, conversation analytic (CA) and psycholinguistic approaches to narrative, where common ground is found between these and more properly pragmatic approaches in such topics as tellability and telling rights, along with a shared interest in micro-analytic matters of how tense shifts signal perspective, how discourse markers and repetition mark narrative boundaries and the like. Then it introduces a specifically pragmatic perspective on narrative, considering recurrent functions of stories roughly at the illocutionary level, including both direct and indirect speech acts. This constitutes a top-down, macro-pragmatic perspective on narrative, significantly distinct from CA considerations of epistemic justification for telling or psycholinguistic matters of identity construction.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Getting the story told: The bottom-up perspective
- 3.What stories do: The top-down perspective
- 4.Stories in story slots
- 5.Direct and indirect force for stories
- 6.Tentative conclusions
-
Note
-
References
References (75)
References
Aijmer, Karin. 1987. “
Oh and Ah in English conversation.” In Corpus Linguistics and Beyond, ed. by W. Meijs, 61–86. Amsterdam: Rodopi.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Asher, Nicholas, and Alex Lascarides. 2006. “Indirect Speech Acts.” In.Synthese Indirect Speech Acts – Informatics Homepages Server [URL]![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bamberg, Michael. 2004. “‘I know it may sound mean to say this, but we couldn’t really care less about her anyway’: Form and Functions of ‘Slut-Bashing’ in 15-Year Olds.” Human Development 47: 331–353. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Barthes, Roland. 1966[1975]. “An Introduction to the Analysis of Narrative.” New Literary History 6: 237–272. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bernaerts, Lars. 2010. “Interactions in Cuckoo’s Nest: Elements of a Narrative Speech-Act Analysis.” Narrative 18: 276–299. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad, and Edward Finegan. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Pearson Education.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Capone, Alessandro 2005. “Pragmemes (a Study with Reference to English and Italian).” Journal of Pragmatics 37: 1355–1371. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chafe, Wallace. 1986. “Evidentiality in English Conversation and Academic Writing.” In The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology, ed. by Wallace Chafe, and Johanna Nichols, 261–272. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chafe, Wallace. 1994. Discourse, Consciousness and Time. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chatman, Seymour. 1978. Story and Discourse: Narrative Structure in Fiction and Film. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Culler, Jonathan. 1975. Structuralist Poetics: Structuralism, Linguistics, and the Study of Literature. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Eckert, Penelope. 1989. Jocks and Burnouts: Social Categories and Identity in the High School. New York: Teachers College Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fetzer, Anita 2018 “Discourse Pragmatics: Communicative Action Meets Discourse Analysis.In Pragmatics and Its Interfaces, ed. by Cornelia Ilie, and Neal R. Norrick, 33–57 Amsterdam: John Benjamins.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fleischman, Suzanne. 1990. Tense and Narrativity: From Medieval Performance to Modern Fiction. Austin: University of Texas Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fludernik, Monika. 1996. Towards a ‘Natural’ Narratology. London: Routledge. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fraser, Bruce. 1990. “An Approach to Discourse Markers.” Journal of Pragmatics 14: 383–395.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fraser, Bruce. 1996. “Pragmatic Markers.” Pragmatics 6:167–190. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Genette, Gérard. 1993. Fiction & Diction. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goffman, Erving. 1967. Interaction Ritual. Chicago: Aldine.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goffman, Ervin. 1981. Forms of Talk. Oxford: Blackwell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gordon, Cynthia. 2007. “I just feel horribly embarrassed when she does that’: Constituting a Mother’s Identity.” In Family Talk, ed. by Deborah Tannen, Shari Kendall, and Cynthia Gordon, 49–101. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haugh, Michael, and Jonathan Culpeper.2018 “Integrative Pragmatics and (Im)Politeness theory.” In Pragmatics and Its Interfaces, ed. by Cornelia Ilie, and Neal R. Norrick, 213–239 Amsterdam: John Benjamins.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Heath, Shirley Brice. 1982. “Protean Shapes in Literacy Events: Ever-Shifting Oral and Literate Traditions.” In Spoken and Written Language: Advances in Discourse Processes, vol. 9, ed. by Deborah Tannen, 91–118. Norwood: Ablex.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Heritage, John. 1984. “A Change-of-State Token and Aspects of its Sequential Placement.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by A. J. Maxwell, and John Heritage, 199–345. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Herman, David (ed). 1999. Narratologies: New Perspectives on Narrative Analysis. Columbus: Ohio StateUniversity Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Holmes, Janet. 2018 “Sociolinguistics vs Pragmatics – Where does the Boundary Lie? The Interface between Pragmatics and Conversation Analysis”. In Pragmatics and Its Interfaces, ed. by Cornelia Ilie, and Neal R. Norrick, 11–32 Amsterdam: John Benjamins.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Horn, Lawrence R. 1989. A Natural History of Negation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Hymes Dell. 1974. Foundations of Sociolinguistics. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press [2nd edition. London: Routledge, 2001]![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hymes, Dell. 1974. Foundations in Sociolinguistics: An Ethnographic Approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Johnstone, Barbara. 1987. “He says … so I said’: Verb Tense Alternation and Narrative Depictions of Authority in American English.” Linguistics 25: 33–52.Kearns, Michael. 1999. Rhetorical Narratology. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Labov, William. 1972. Language in the Inner City. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Labov, William, and David Fanshel. 1977. Therapeutic Discourse. New York: Academic Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Labov, William, and Joshua Waletzky. 1967. “Narrative Analysis: Oral Versions of Personal Experience.” In Essays on the Verbal and Visual Arts, ed. by Jean Helm, 12–44. Seattle: University of Washington Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Levinson, Stephen. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Linde, Charlotte. 1993. Life Stories. New York: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mey, Jacob L. 2001. Pragmatics. Blackwell, Oxford.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mithun, Marianne. 1986. “Evidential Diachrony in Northern Iroquoian.” In Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology, ed. by Wallace Chafe and Johanna Nichols, 89–112. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Norrick, Neal R. 1997. “Twice-Told Tales: Collaborative Narration of Familiar Stories.” Language in Society 26: 199–220. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Norrick, Neal R. 2001. “Discourse Markers in Oral Narrative.” Journal of Pragmatics 33: 849–878. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Norrick, Neal R. 2004. “Humor, Tellability and Conarration in Conversation.” Text 24: 79–111. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Norrick, Neal R. 2010. “Listening Practices in Television Interviews.” Journal of Pragmatics 42: 525–543. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Norrick, Neal R. 2014. “It just so happened’: Markers of Focus in Narrative and their Translation.” In Caught in the Middle – Language Use and Translation, ed. byKerstin Kunz et al., 349–357. Saarbrücken: Universaar.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Norrick, Neal R. 2015. “Interjections.” In Corpus Pragmatics, ed. by Karin Aijmer, and Christoph Rühlemann, 249–273. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Norrick, Neal R. 2016. “Narratives in Conversation as Pragmemes.” In Pragmemes and Theories of Language Use, ed. by K. Allan, A. Capone, and I. Kecskes. 149–166. Berlin: Springer.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ochs, Elinor, and Lisa Capps. 2001. Living Narrative: Creating Lives in Everyday Storytelling. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ochs, Elinor, Carolyn Taylor, Dina Rudolph, and Ruth Smith. 1992. “Storytelling as a Theory-Building Activity.” Discourse Processes 15: 37–72.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ong, Walter. 1982. Orality and Literacy: The Technologizing of the World. London: Methuen. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pike, Kenneth L.1954/1967. Language in Relation to a Unified Theory of the Structure of Human Behavior. The Hague: Mouton.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pomerantz, Anita. 1984. “Agreeing and Disagreeing with Assessments. Some Features of Preferred/Dispreferred Turn Shapes” In Structures of Social Action, ed. by John M. Atkinson, and John Heritage, 57–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pratt, Marie Louise. 1977. Toward a Speech Act Theory of Literary Discourse. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Prince, Gerald. 1973. A Grammar of Stories: An Introduction. The Hague: Mouton.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Raymond, Geoffrey, and John Heritage. 2006. “The Epistemics of Social Relations: Owning Grandchildren.” Language in Society 35: 677–705. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rühlemann, Christopher. 2007. Conversation in Context: A Corpus-Driven Approach. London: Continuum.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rühlemann, Christopher, and Brian Clancy. 2018. “Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics.” In Pragmatics and Its Interfaces, ed. by Cornelia Ilie, and Neal R. Norrick, 241–266. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ryave, Alan L. 1978. “On the Achievement of a Series of Stories.” In Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction, ed. by Jim Schenkein, 113–132. New York: Academic Press.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sacks, Harvey. 1984. “On Doing ‘Being Ordinary’.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by J. M. Atkinson, and J. Heritage, 413–429. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sacks, Harvey. 1992. Lectures on Conversation, 2 vols.ed. by Gail Jefferson. Oxford: Blackwell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sadock, Jerrold. 1974. Towards a Linguistic Theory of Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schiffrin, Deborah. 1981. “Tense Variation in Narrative.” Language 57: 45–62. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schiffrin, Deborah. 1986. Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schiffrin, Deborah.1996. “Narrative as Self Portrait: The Sociolinguistic Construction of Identity.” Language in Society 25: 167–203. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Searle, John R. 1969. Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Searle, John R. 1975. “Indirect Speech Acts.” In Syntax and Semantics: Speech Acts, vol. 3, ed. by P. Cole, and J. Morgan, 59–82. New York: Academic Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Searle, John R. 1979. “A Taxonomy of Illocutionary Acts.” In Expression and Meaning, ed. by J. R. Searle, 1–29. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tannen, Deborah. 1987. “Repetition in Conversation: Toward a Poetics of Talk.” Language 63: 574–605.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tannen, Deborah. 1989. Talking voices: Repetition, Dialogue, and Imagery in Conversational Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tannen, Deborah. 2007. “Power Maneuvers and Connection Maneuvers in Family Interaction.” In Family Talk, ed. by Deborah Tannen, Shari Kendall, and Cynthia Gordon, 27–48. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Todorov, Tzvetan.1969. Grammaire du Décaméron. The Hague: Mouton.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Toolan, Michael. 1998. “The Give and Take of Talk, and Caryl Churchill’s Cloud Nine
.” In Exploring the Language of Drama: From Text to Context, 142–160. London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tsiplakou, Stavroula, and Georgios Floros. 2013. “Never Mind the Text Types, Here’s Textual Force: Towards a Pragmatic Reconceptualization of Text Type.” Journal of Pragmatics 45: 119–130. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Watts, Richard, 1981. The Pragmalinguistic Analysis of Narrative Texts: Narrative Co-Operation in Charles Dickens’s Hard times. Tübingen: Narr.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wolfson, Nessa. 1982. CHP, the Conversational Historical Present in American English Narrative. Dordrecht: Foris. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Haugh, Michael & Jonathan Culpeper
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.