Lexis and grammar as complementary discourse systems for expressing stance and evaluation
Although ‘stance’ and ‘evaluation’ are closely related theoretical constructs, stance is normally investigated through corpus-based methods focusing on the use of lexico-grammatical features, while evaluative language, being regarded as more context-dependent, has been investigated through the use of particular words and phrases in individual texts. This study explores the possibility that these two linguistic systems are partially complementary, with some registers relying on lexico-grammatical stance features and others on evaluative lexis. We compare the linguistic discourse styles of three opinionated/persuasive web registers: ‘Opinion Blogs’ (OB), ‘Reviews’ (RV), and ‘Descriptions-with-intent-to-Sell’ (DS). We show that OB and RV use grammatical stance devices more but DS considerably less than most other web registers. However, our detailed study of the lexical keywords found in these three registers reveals the opposite pattern of use.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.The corpus for analysis
- 3.The grammatical expression of stance in opinion/persuasion web registers
- 3.1A survey of lexico-grammatical stance features in English
- 3.2Lexico-grammatical stance in opinion blogs, reviews, and descriptions-with-intent-to-sell
- 4.The lexical expression of evaluation in opinion blogs, reviews, and descriptions-with-intent-to-sell
- 5.Discussion and conclusion
-
Acknowledgements
-
Note
-
References
References
Biber, Douglas
1988 Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.


Biber, Douglas
2006b “
Stance in Spoken and Written University Registers.”
Journal of English for Academic Purposes 5: 97–116.


Biber, Douglas
2015 “
Stance and Grammatical Complexity: An Unlikely Partnership Discovered through Corpus Analysis.”
Corpus Linguistics Research 1: 1–19.


Biber, Douglas, Jesse Egbert, and Mark Davies
2015 “
Exploring the Composition of the Searchable Web: A Corpus-Based Taxonomy of Web Registers.”
Corpora 10: 11–45.


Biber, Douglas, and Jesse Egbert
2016 “
Register Variation on the Searchable Web: A Multi-Dimensional Analysis.”
Journal of English Linguistics 44: 95–137.

Biber, Douglas, and Jesse Egbert
2018 Register Variation Online. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Biber, Douglas, and Edward Finegan
1988 “
Adverbial Stance Types in English.”
Discourse Processes 11: 1–34.


Biber, Douglas, and Edward Finegan
1989 “
Styles of Stance in English: Lexical and Grammatical Marking of Evidentiality and Affect.”
Text 9: 93–124.


Biber, Douglas, and Bethany Gray
2016 Grammatical Complexity in Academic English: Linguistic Change in Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.


Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad, and Edward Finegan
1999 Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.

Biber, Douglas, and Meixiu Zhang
2018 Expressing evaluation without grammatical stance: Informational persuasion on the web.
Corpora 13: 97–123.

Chafe, Wallace L., and Johanna Nichols
(eds.) 1986 Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Charles, Maggie
2006 “
The Construction of Stance in Reporting Clauses: A Cross-Disciplinary Study of Theses.”
Applied Linguistics 27: 492–518.


Charles, Maggie
2007 “
Argument or Evidence? Disciplinary Variation in the Use of the Noun that Pattern in Stance Constructions.”
English for Specific Purposes 26: 203–218.


Egbert, Jesse, Douglas Biber, and Mark Davies
2015 “
Developing a Bottom-Up, User-Based Method of Web Register Classification.”
Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. (Currently available through Advanced Access:
[URL])

Fitzmaurice, Susan M.
2004 “
Subjectivity, Intersubjectivity and the Historical Construction of Interlocutor Stance: From Stance Markers to Discourse Markers.”
Discourse Studies 6 (4): 427–448.


Gray, Bethany, and Douglas Biber
2013 “
Current Conceptions of Stance.” In
Stance and Voice in Written Academic Genres, ed. by
Ken Hyland, and
Carmen Sancho Guinda, 15–33. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Gray, Bethany, and Douglas Biber
2014 “
Stance Markers.” In
Corpus Pragmatics: A Handbook, ed. by
Karin Aijmer, and
Christoph Rühlemann, 219–248. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hunston, Susan
1993 “
Evaluation and Ideology in Scientific Writing.” In
Register Analysis: Theory and Practice, ed. by
Mohsen Ghadessy, 57–73. London: Pinter.

Hunston, Susan
1994 “
Evaluation and Organization in a Sample of Written Academic Discourse.” In
Advances in Written Text Analysis, ed. by
Malcolm Coulthard, 191–218. London: Routledge.

Hunston, Susan
2004 “
Counting the Uncountable: Problems of Identifying Evaluation in a Text and in a Corpus.” In
Corpora and Discourse, ed. by
Alan Partington,
John Morley, and
Louann Haarman, 157–188. Bern: Peter Lang.

Hunston, Susan
2011 Corpus Approaches to Evaluation: Phraseology and Evaluative Language. New York, NY: Routledge.

Hunston, Susan, and John Sinclair
2000 “
A Local Grammar of Evaluation.” In
Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse, ed. by
Susan Hunston, and
Geoff Thompson, 74–101. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hunston, Susan, and Geoff Thompson
2000 Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hyland, Ken
1996 “
Writing without Conviction? Hedging in Science Research Articles.”
Applied Linguistics 17 (4): 433–454.


Hyland, Ken
2005 “
Stance and Engagement: A Model of Interaction in Academic Discourse.”
Discourse Studies 7 (2): 173–192.


Hyland, Ken, and Giuliana Diani
(eds.) 2009 Academic Evaluation: Review Genres in University Settings. London: Palgrave Macmillan.


Hyland, Ken, and Carmen Sancho Guinda
(eds) 2013 Stance and Voice in Written Academic Genres. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Labov, William
1984 “
Intensity.” In
Meaning, Form and Use in Context: Linguistic Applications, ed. by
Deborah Schiffrin, 43–70. Washington: Georgetown University Press.

Martin, J. R.
2000 “
Beyond Exchange: Appraisal Systems in English.” In
Evaluation in Text, ed. by
Susan Hunston, and
Geoff Thompson, 142–175. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Martin, J. R., and Peter R. R. White
2005 Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Mauranen, Anna, and Marina Bondi
(eds.) 2003 “
Evaluation in Academic Discourse.” Special issue of
Journal of English for Academic Purposes 2 (4).


Ochs, Eleanor, and Bambi Schieffelin
1989 “
Language Has a Heart.”
Text 9 (1): 7–25.


Palmer, Frank R.
1986 Mood and Modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Scott, Mike, and Christopher Tribble
Taboada, Maite, and Jack Grieve
2006 “
Analyzing Appraisal Automatically.” In
Proceedings of AAAI Spring Symposium on Exploring Attitude and Affect in Text, 158–161.

Taboada, Maite, Julian Brooke, Milan Tofiloski, Kimberly Voll, and Manfred Stede
2011 “
Lexicon-Based Methods for Sentiment Analysis.”
Computational Linguistics 37: 267–307.


Thompson, Geoff, and Laura Alba-Juez
Cited by
Cited by 3 other publications
Curry, Niall & Pascual Pérez-Paredes
Dontcheva-Navratilova, Olga, Martin Adam, Renata Povolná & Radek Vogel
2020.
Persuasive Strategies Across the Academic, Business, Religious and Technical Discourses. In
Persuasion in Specialised Discourses,
► pp. 39 ff.

Larsson, Tove
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 march 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.