Chapter published in:
The Construction of Discourse as Verbal Interaction
Edited by María de los Ángeles Gómez González and J. Lachlan Mackenzie
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 296] 2018
► pp. 227–250

Emotion and appraisal processes in language

How are they related?

| Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED), Spain
This study discusses theoretical and methodological aspects of the relationship between appraisal and emotion processes in language/discourse. Taking as my point of departure both Appraisal Theory and Geoff Thompson’s later review thereof, I argue that despite their invaluable illumination of appraisal and emotion processes, these approaches cannot elucidate the complex similarities and differences between appraisal and emotion. I sketch a more interdisciplinary approach that draws not only on functional linguistics but also on linguistic pragmatics and psychological appraisal theories. I then propose a modified version of the functional relationship applied for the analysis of linguistic evaluation in my previous work as a methodological tool for the treatment of emotion in language, clearing the ground for future large-scale qualitative projects on the topic.
Keywords: emotion, evaluation, appraisal theories, emotion systems, component approach to emotions, evaluative/emotive functional relationship (Ev / Em)
Published online: 20 September 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.296.09alb
References

References

Alba-Juez, Laura
2016 “The Variables of the Evaluative Functional Relationship: The Case of Humorous Discourse.” In Metapragmatics of Humor: Current Research Trends, ed. by Leonor Ruiz Gurillo, 11–34. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017 “Evaluation in the Headlines of Tabloids and Broadsheets: A Comparative Study.” In Evaluation in Media Discourse: European Perspectives, ed. by Ruth Breeze, and Inés Olza. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Alba-Juez, Laura, and Salvatore Attardo
2014 “The Evaluative Palette of Verbal Irony.” In Evaluation in Context, ed. by Geoff Thompson, and Laura Alba-Juez, 93–115. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Alba-Juez, Laura, and J. Lachlan Mackenzie
2016 Pragmatics: Cognition, Context and Culture. Madrid: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Alba-Juez, Laura, and Geoff Thompson
2014 “The Many Faces and Phases of Evaluation.” In Evaluation in Context, ed. by Geoff Thompson, and Laura Alba-Juez, 3–23. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bednarek, Monika
2006 “Evaluation and Cognition: Inscribing, Evoking and Provoking Opinion.” In Language and Memory: Aspects of Knowledge Representation, ed. by Hanna Pishwa, 187–221. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008a “‘An Increasingly Familiar Tragedy’: Evaluative Collocation and Conflation.” Evaluation in Text Types. Special Issue of Functions of Language 15 (1): 9–34. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
2008b Emotion Talk across Corpora. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brinton, Bonnie, Matthew P. Spackman, Martin Fujiki, and Jenny Ricks
2007 “What Should Chris Say? The Ability of Children with Specific Language Impairment to Recognize the Need to Dissemble Emotions in Social Situations.” Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 50: 798–811.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dewaele, Jean-Marc
2013 Emotions in Multiple Languages. 2nd ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Dulek, Ronald E., and John S. Fielden
1990 Principles of Business Communication. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Ekman, Paul
1972 “Universals and Cultural Differences in Facial Expressions of Emotions.” In Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, ed. by James K. Cole, 207–283. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
2003 Emotions Revealed: Recognizing Faces and Feelings to Improve Communication and Emotional Life. Revised ed. New York: St. Martin’s Griffin.Google Scholar
Ellsworth, Phoebe C., and Klaus R. Scherer
2003 “Appraisal Processes in Emotion.” In Handbook of the Affective Sciences, ed. by H. Hill Goldsmith, Richard J. Davidson, and Klaus R. Scherer, 572–595. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Englebretson, Robert
2007 Stancetaking in Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Foolen, Ad
2012 “The Relevance of Emotion for Language and Linguistics.” In Moving Ourselves, Moving Others: Motion and Emotion in Intersubjectivity, Consciousness and Language, ed. by Ad Foolen, Ulrike M. Lüdtke, Timothy P. Racine, and Jordan Zlatev, 349–368. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016 “Word Valence and its Effects.” In Emotion in Language, ed. by Ulrike Lüdtke, 241–255. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Frijda, Nico H.
1998 “The Laws of Emotion.” American Psychologist 43 (5): 349–358.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grice, H. Paul
1989 Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Horn, Laurence R.
1972 On the Semantic Properties of Logical Operators in English. Bloomington, IN: Mimeo, Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
1984 “Toward a New Taxonomy for Pragmatic Inference: Q-Based and R-Based Implicature.” In Meaning, Form, and Use in Context: Linguistic Applications, ed. by Deborah Schiffrin, 11–42. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
2007 “Implicature: Some Basic Oppositions.” In The Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. by Laurence R. Horn, and Gregory Ward, 3–28. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hunston, Susan, and Geoff Thompson
(eds.) 2000 Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Izard, Carroll E.
1977 Human Emotions. New York: Plenum.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Klann-Delius, Gisela
2015 “Emotion in Language.” In Emotion in Language, ed. by Ulrike Lüdtke, 135–156. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
LeDoux, Joseph E.
2000 “Emotion Circuits in the Brain.” Annual Review of Neuroscience 23: 155–184.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C.
1995 “Three Levels of Meaning.” In Grammar and Meaning – Essays in Honour of Sir John Lyons, ed. by Frank R. Palmer, 90–119. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2000 Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lüdtke, Ulrike M.
2012 “Relational Emotions in Semiotic and Linguistic Development: Towards an Intersubjective Theory of Language Learning and Language Therapy.” In Moving Ourselves, Moving Others. Motion and Emotion in Intersubjectivity, Consciousness and Language, ed. by Ad Foolen, Ulrike M. Lüdtke, Timothy P. Racine, and Jordan Zlatev, 305–346. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015 “Introduction: From Logos to Dialogue.” In Emotion in Language, ed. by U. Lüdtke, vii–vxi. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martin, J. R., and Peter R. R. White
2005 The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. Hampshire and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Myers, David G.
2004 Theories of Emotion in Psychology. 7th ed. New York: Worth.Google Scholar
Ortony, Andrew, and Terence J. Turner
1990 “What’s Basic about Emotions?” Psychological Review 97 (3): 315–331.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Panksepp, Jaak
1982 “Toward a General Psychobiological Theory of Emotions.” The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5: 407–467.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Price, Michael
2014 “Profiles in Evolutionary Moral Psychology: Richard Joyce.” Available at https://​evolution​-institute​.org​/article​/profiles​-in​-evolutionary​-moral​-psychology​-richard​-joyce/
Schwarz-Friesel, Monika
2010 “Expressive Bedeutung und E-Implikaturen – Zur Relevanz konzeptueller Bewertungen bei indirekten Sprechakten: Das Streichbarkeitskriterium und seine kognitive Realität.” In Kultura Kak Tekst (Kultur als Text), ed. by William Rudnitzky, 12–27. Moskau: SGT.Google Scholar
2015 “Language and Emotion: The Cognitive Linguistic Perspective.” In Emotion in Language, ed. Ulrike Lüdtke, 157–173. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tomkins, Silvan S.
1962 Affect, Imagery, Consciousness. Vol 1: The negative affects. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Thompson, Geoff
2014 “AFFECT and Emotion, Target-Value Mismatches, and Russian Dolls: Refining the APPRAISAL Model.” In Evaluation in Context, ed. by Geoff Thompson, and Laura Alba-Juez, 47–66. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015a “Emotional Talk, Emotion Talk, and Evaluation.” Presentation given at the Jornada de Investigación Emo-Fundett. Madrid 4 February 2015, later revised in July 2015. Madrid: UNED.Google Scholar
2015b Additional Notes to the Presentation Entitled “Emotional Talk, Emotion Talk, and Evaluation.” Personal e-mail communication 4 July 2015.Google Scholar
Thompson, Geoff, and Laura Alba-Juez
(eds.) 2014 Evaluation in Context. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Geoff, and Susan Hunston
2000 “Evaluation: An Introduction.” In Evaluation in Text, ed. by Susan Hunston, and Geoff Thompson, 1–27. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Van Lancker Sidtis, Diana
2008 “The Relation of Human Language to Human Emotion.” In Handbook of the Neuroscience of Language, ed. by Brigitte Seinner, and Harry A. Whitaker, 199–207. Amsterdam: Elsevier.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wetherell, Margaret
2012 Affect and Emotion: A New Social Science Understanding. London: Sage.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna
2009 “Language and Metalanguage: Key Issues in Emotion Research.” Emotion Review 1 (1): 3–14.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Alba-Juez, Laura & J. Lachlan Mackenzie
2019.  In Emotion in Discourse [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 302], ► pp. 3 ff. Crossref logo
Fronhofer, Nina-Maria
2019.  In Emotion in Discourse [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 302], ► pp. 213 ff. Crossref logo
Sanahuges, Carme & Hortènsia Curell
2020. Responding to Trouble: An Interactional Approach to Empathy In Catalan and English. Corpus Pragmatics 4:4 ► pp. 449 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 01 january 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.