Part of
Politeness in Nineteenth-Century Europe
Edited by Annick Paternoster and Susan Fitzmaurice
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 299] 2019
► pp. 75106
References (61)
Primary sources
Gioja, Melchiorre, 1798. Quadro politico di Milano, 2nd edn. Milan: Pirotta e Maspero.Google Scholar
. 1820. Nuovo galateo di Melchiorre Gioja, autore del Trattato Del merito e delle ricompense, 2 volumes. Milan: Pirotta.Google Scholar
. 1832 [1827]. Nuovo galateo di M.G. Edizione diligentemente eseguita sull’ultima dell’autore, 2 volumes. Lugano: Ruggia, Firenze: Ricordi.Google Scholar
. 1833 [1796]. Dissertazione di M.G. sul problema quale dei governi liberi meglio convenga alla felicità dell’Italia, 3rd edn. Lugano: Ruggia.Google Scholar
. 1853 [1802, 1822]. Il primo e il nuovo galateo. Turin: Pomba.Google Scholar
References
Albertoni, Ettore A. 1990. “Aspetti del pensiero politico di Melchiorre Gioja”. In Melchiorre Gioja 1767–1829. Politica, società, economia tra riforme e Restaurazione, Atti del convegno di studi, Piacenza, 5–7 aprile 1990, ed. by Carlo Capra, 27–48. Piacenza: Tip. Le. Co.Google Scholar
Battaglia, Salvatore, Edoardo Sanguineti, and Giovanni Ronco. 1961. Grande dizionario della lingua italiana. Turin: Utet.Google Scholar
Bax, Marcel. 2011. “An Evolutionary Take on (Im)Politeness. Three Broad Developments in the Marking out of Socio-proxemic Space”. In Understanding Historical (Im)politeness, ed. by Marcel Bax and Dániel Z. Kádár, 255–282. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 12: 1–2. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bax, Marcel, and Dániel Z. Kádár. 2011. “The Historical Understandings of Historical (Im)Politeness: Introductory Notes”. In Understanding Historical (Im)Politeness, ed. by Marcel Bax, and Dániel Z. Kádár, 1–24. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 12: 1–2. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Botteri, Inge. 1990. “Dalla «grazia» alla «ragion sociale»: il «Nuovo galateo» di Melchiorre Gioja”. In Melchiorre Gioja 1767–1829. Politica, società, economia tra riforme e Restaurazione. Atti del convegno di studi, Piacenza, 5–7 aprile 1990, ed. by Carlo Capra, 157–201. Piacenza: Tip. Le. Co.Google Scholar
. 1999. Galateo e galatei. La creanza e l’istituzione della società nella trattatistica tra antico regime e stato liberale. Rome: Bulzoni.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen Levinson. 1978. Politeness. Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Capra, Carlo. 1978. L’ età rivoluzionaria e napoleonica in Italia (1796–1815). Turin: Loescher.Google Scholar
Condorcet, Nicolas J. A. 1969 [1794]. Abbozzo di un quadro storico dei progressi dello spirito umano. Turin: Einaudi.Google Scholar
Della Casa, Giovanni. 1817 [1558]. Galateo ovvero de’ costumi. Bassano: Remondini.Google Scholar
Eelen, Gino. 2001. A Critique of Politeness. Manchester: St Jerome.Google Scholar
Eemeren, Frans H. van, and Robert Grootendorst. 1992. Argumentation, Communication and Fallacies. A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
. 2004. A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The Pragma-Dialectical Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Eemeren, Frans H. van, Peter Houtlosser, and Francisca A. Snoeck Henkemans. 2007. Argumentative Indicators in Discourse. A Pragma-Dialectical Study. Amsterdam: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Freeman, James B. 2005. Acceptable Premises: An Epistemic Approach to an Informal Logic Problem. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ghiringhelli, Robertino. 1990. “La formazione di Melchiorre Gioja nella Piacenza di fine Settecento: gli anni al Colleggio Alberoni (1784–1793)”. In Melchiorre Gioja 1767–1829. Politica, società, economia tra riforme e Restaurazione. Atti del convegno di studi, Piacenza, 5–7 aprile 1990, ed. by Carlo Capra, 63–80. Piacenza: Tip. Le. Co.Google Scholar
Gipper, Andreas. 2011. “Dal giovin signore al Cittadino Borghese. Melchiorre Gioja, il Nuovo Galateo e la filosofia francese”. In Vie Lombarde e Venete. Circolazione e trasformazione dei saperi letterari nel Sette-Ottocento fra l’Italia settentrionale e l’Europa transalpina, ed. by Helmut Meter, and Furio Brugnolo, 27–40. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E. 1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hübler, Alex, and Ulrich Busse. 2012. “Introduction.” In Investigations into the Meta-Communicative Lexicon of English. A Contribution to Historical Pragmatics, ed. by Ulrich Busse and Axel Hübler, 1–16. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H. 2011. “Positive and Negative Face as Descriptive Categories in the History of English”. In Understanding Historical (Im)Politeness, ed. by Marcel Bax and Dániel Z. Kádár, 178–197. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 12: 1–2. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kay, Paul. 2004. “Pragmatic Aspects of Grammatical Constructions”. In The Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. by Laurence R. Horn, and Gregory Ward, 675–700. Malden, Oxford, Carlton: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Meriggi, Marco. 2002. Gli stati italiani prima dell’Unità. Una storia istituzionale. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
O’Driscoll, Jim. 2010. “Epilogue”. In Historical (Im)Politeness, ed. by Jonathan Culpeper, and Dániel Z. Kádár, 265–287. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Ossola, Carlo. 2012. “Civilizzazione e ragione sociale”. In Letteratura italiana e canone dei classici (L’età romantica), ed. by Carlo Ossola, and Giacomo Jori, 3–5. Turin: Utet.Google Scholar
Paternoster, Annick, and Francesca Saltamacchia. 2017. “(Im)Politeness Rules and (Im)Politeness Formulae: Metadiscourse and Conventionalisation in 19th Century Italian Conduct Books.” In Studies on Language Norms in Context, ed. by Elena Maria Pandolfi, Johanna Miecznikowski, Sabine Christopher, and Alain Kambers, 263–301. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Pollaroli, Chiara, and Andrea Rocci. 2015. “The Argumentative Relevance of Pictorial and Multimodal Metaphor in Advertising”. Journal of Argumentation in Context 4 (2): 158–199. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Raschini, Maria Adelaide. 1968. “L’illuminismo italiano (Muratori, Soave, Gioja, Pietro e Alessandro Verri, Filangieri, Pagano)”. In Grande Antologia Filosofica, ed. by Umberto Padovani, Michele F. Sciacca, and Andrea M. Moschetti, 929–1197. Milan: Marzorati.Google Scholar
Riall, Lucy. 2009. Risorgimento. The history of Italy from Napoleon to Nation-state, New York, Palgrave: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Rigotti, Eddo. 1993. “La Sequenza Testuale. Definizione e procedimenti di analisi con esemplificazioni in lingue diverse”. L’analisi Linguistica e Letteraria 1 (1): 43–148.Google Scholar
. 2008. “Locus a causa finali”. L’analisi Linguistica e Letteraria XVI (Special Issue): 559–576.Google Scholar
. 2009. “Whether and How Classical Topics Can Be Revived in the Contemporary Theory of Argumentation”. In Pondering on Problems of Argumentation, ed. by Frans van Eemeren, and Bart Garssen, 157–178. New York: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rigotti, Eddo, and Sara Cigada. 2004. La comunicazione verbale. Milan: Apogeo.Google Scholar
Rigotti, Eddo, and Sara Greco Morasso. 2009. “Argumentation as an Object of Interest and as a Social and Cultural Resource”. In Argumentation and Education, ed. by Nathalie Muller-Mirza, and Anne Nelly Perret-Clermont, 9–66. New York: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. “Comparing the Argumentum Model of Topics to Other Contemporary Approaches to Argument Schemes: The Procedural and Material Components”. Argumentation 24 (4): 489–512. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rigotti, Eddo, and Andrea Rocci. 2001. “Sens – non-sens – contresens”. Studies in Communication Sciences 2: 45–80.Google Scholar
. 2004. “From Argument Analysis to Cultural Keywords (and Back Again)”. In The Practice of Argumentation, ed. by Frans van Eemeren, and Peter Houtlosser, 903–908. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Rigotti, Eddo, Andrea Rocci, and Sara Greco. 2006. “The semantics of Reasonableness”. In Considering Pragma-Dialectics, ed. by Peter Houtlosser, and Agnes van Rees, 257–274. Mahwah, NJ/London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Rocci, Andrea. 2006. “Pragmatic Inference and Argumentation in Intercultural Communication”. Intercultural Pragmatics 3 (4): 409–442. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017. Modality in Argumentation. A systematic Investigation of the Role of Modalities in the Structure of Arguments with an Application to Italian Modal Expressions. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Rocci, Andrea, and Marcel Danesi. 2009. Global Linguistics: An Introduction. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rocci, Andrea, and Wariss M. Monteiro. 2009. “Cultural Keywords in Arguments. The Case of Interactivity”. Cogency 1 (2): 65–100.Google Scholar
Romagnosi, Gian Domenico. 1835 [1832]. Dell’indole e dei fattori dell’incivilimento. Prato: Stamperia Giusti.Google Scholar
Sciacca, Michele. 1948. La filosofia nell’età del Risorgimento. Milan: Vallardi.Google Scholar
Sofia, Francesca. 1990. “Melchiorre Gioja e la statistica”. In Melchiorre Gioja 1767–1829. Politica, società, economia tra riforme e Restaurazione. Atti del convegno di studi, Piacenza, 5–7 aprile 1990, ed. by Carlo Capra, 249–268. Piacenza: Tip. Le. Co.Google Scholar
Stevenson, Charles. 1937. “The Emotive Meaning of Ethical Terms”. Mind 46 (181): 14–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stubbs, Michael. 1996. Text and Corpus Analysis. Computer-Assisted Studies of Language and Culture. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Tasca, Luisa. 2004. Galatei. Buone maniere e cultura borghese nell’Italia dell’Ottocento. Florence: Le Lettere.Google Scholar
Tommaseo, Niccolò, and Bernardo Bellini. 1861–1879. Dizionario della lingua italiana. Turin: Unione Tipografico-Editrice. Retrieved from [URL]Google Scholar
Vanni, Laura. 2006. Verso un nuovo galateo. Le buone maniere in Italia tra ‘antico’ e ‘nuovo’ regime. Milan: Unicopli.Google Scholar
Vendler, Zeno. 1967. Linguistics in Philosophy. Ithaca / London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Vocabolario degli Accademici della Crusca, quinta impressione. 1863–1923. Florence: Nelle stanze dell’Accademia. Retrieved from [URL]Google Scholar
Von Wright, Georg H. 1963. “Practical Inference”. The Philosophical Review 72 (2): 159–179. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Watts, Richard. 2003. Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005. “Linguistic Politeness Research: Quo Vadis?”. In Politeness in Language, ed. by Richard Watts, Ide Sashiko, and Konrad Ehlich, i–xlvii. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna. 1997. Understanding Cultures through Their Key Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Raymond. 1976. Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Paternoster, Annick
2022. Defining Etiquette. In Historical Etiquette,  pp. 97 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.