Cover not available
Part of
Technology Mediated Service Encounters
Edited by Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Lucía Fernández-Amaya and María de la O Hernández-López
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 300] 2019
► pp. 71–96

Chapter 3
Managing verbal and embodied conduct in telephone-mediated service encounters

In telephone-mediated service encounters, there are limits on how parties interact with one another. Speakers are restricted to only verbal (what they say) and aural (what they hear) means of communication. Therefore, a practical problem at the heart of such interactions is how speakers manage embodied conduct, given that they can only hear – rather than see the other person. We investigated how verbal and embodied conduct were managed in a corpus of 63 calls to a New Zealand helpline service where callers (complainants) interact with conciliators (institutional representatives) to complain about, and attempt to resolve disputes with their electricity and gas providers. Using conversation analysis, we document two ways that callers could manage verbal and embodied conduct in a particular type of sequence in these calls.
Keywords: telephone-mediated interaction, conversation analysis, embodied conduct, multi-activity, temporary interactional exits
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Telephone-mediated service encounters
  • 3.Managing engagement and actions in telephone-mediated interaction
  • 4.Sequence organization, questioning and progressivity
  • 5.Methodology
    • 5.1Data
    • 5.2Procedure
  • 6.Analysis
    • 6.1Managing verbal and embodied activity simultaneously
    • 6.2Treating verbal and embodied activity as incompatible
  • 7.Discussion and conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
  • Appendix
Published online: 10 January 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.300.03mat
References (45)
References
Baker, Carolyn, Michael Emmison, and Alan Firth. (eds). 2005. Calling for Help: Language and Social Interaction in Telephone Helplines. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Butler, Carly, Jonathan Potter, Susan Danby, Michael Emmison, and Alexa Hepburn. 2010. “Advice Implicative Interrogatives: Building ‘Client-centred Support’ in a Children’s Helpline.” Social Psychology Quarterly 73: 265–287. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeLand, Michael. 2012. “Suspending Narrative Engagements: The Case of Pick-up Basketball.” The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 642: 96–108. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dewar, Joe. 2011. “Calling to Complain: An Ethnographic and Conversation Analytic Account of Complaints to an Industry Ombudsman”. Unpublished master’s thesis, Victoria University of Wellington.Google Scholar
Edmonds, David Matthew. (2016). “Who Knows What and Who Has the Rights to Know It?: Knowledge and Reality Construction in Interaction.” Unpublished master’s thesis, Victoria University of Wellington.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1981. Forms of Talk. Oxford, U.K: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles. 2007. “Participation, Stance and Affect in the Organization of Activities.” Discourse and Society 18: 53–73.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Charles, and Marjorie Harness Goodwin. 1992. “Context, Activity and Participation.” In The Contextualization of Language, ed. by Peter Auer, and Aldo di Luzio, 77–99. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haddington, Pentti, Tiina Keisanen, Lorenza Mondada, and Maurice Nevile. 2014. “Towards Multiactivity as a Social and Interactional Phenomenon.” In Multiactivity in Social Interaction: Beyond Multitasking, ed. by Pentti Haddington, Tiina Keisanen, Lorenza Mondada, and Maurice Nevile, 3–32. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Hayano, Kaoru. 2014. “Question Design in Conversation”. In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidnell, and Tanya Stivers, 395–414. Chichester, U.K.: Wiley – Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hepburn, Alexa, Sue Wilkinson, and Carly W. Butler. 2014. “Intervening With Conversation Analysis in Telephone Helpline Services: Strategies to Improves Effectiveness”. Research on Language and Social Interaction 47: 239–254. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John, and Steven Clayman. 2010. Talk in Action: Interactions, Identities, and Institutions. Chichester, U.K: Wiley-Blackwell.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John, and Geoffrey Raymond. 2012. “Navigating Epistemic Landscapes: Acquiescence, Agency and Resistance in Responses to Polar Questions.” In Questions: Formal, Functional and Interactional Perspectives, ed. by Jan P. de Ruiter, 179–192. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Robert. 1993. “Hold the phone.” In Talk and Social Structure: Studies in Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis, ed. by Deidre Boden, and Don Zimmerman, 217–231. Cambridge, U.K.: Polity.Google Scholar
Hutchby, Ian, and Robin Wooffitt. 2008. Conversation Analysis. Cambridge, U.K.: Polity.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Gail. 1972. “Side Sequences.” In Studies in Social Interaction, ed. by David Sudnow, 294–233. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
. 2004. “Glossary of Transcription Systems with an Introduction.” In Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, ed. by Gene Lerner, 13–31. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Katz, James, and Mark Aakhus. (eds). 2002. Perpetual Contact: Mobile Communication, Private Talk, Public Performance. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kane, Michael, and Randall Engle. 2002. “The Role of Prefrontal Cortex in Working – memory Capacity, Executive Attention, and General Fluid Intelligence: An Individual – differences Perspective.” Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 9: 637–671. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kevoe-Feldman, Heidi. 2015. “Working the Overall Structural Organization of a Call: How Customers use Third-position as Leverage for Gaining Service Representatives’ Assistance in Dealing with Service Problems”. Language and Communication 43: 47–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leung, Fung-Yee. 1997. “The Management of Intrusion in Telephone Calls: A Study of Call – waiting in Cantonese Telephone Conversations”. Unpublished master’s thesis, The University of Hong Kong.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Licoppe, Christian, and Sylvaine Tuncer. 2014. “Attending to a Summons and Putting Other Activities ‘On Hold’: Multiactivity as a Recognisable Interactional Accomplishment.” In Multiactivity in Social Interaction: Beyond Multitasking, ed. by Pentti Haddington, Tiina Keisanen, Lorenza Mondada, and Maurice Nevile, 167–190. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Liddicoat, Anthony. 2009. “Sexual Identity as Linguistic Failure: Trajectories of Interaction in the Heteronormative Language Classroom.” Journal of Language, Identity and Education 8: 191–202. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lindemann, Stephanie, and Anna Mauranen. 2001. “It’s Just Real Messy”: The Occurrence and Function of “Just” in a Corpus of Academic Speech.” English for Specific Purposes 20: 459–475. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maynard, Douglas W., and Nora Cate Schaeffer. 1997. “Keeping the Gate: Declinations of the Request to Participate in a Telephone Survey Interview”. Sociological Methods and Research 26: 34–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mazeland, Harrie. 2004. “Responding to the Double Implication of Telemarketers’ Opinion Queries.” Discourse Studies 6: 95–115. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nevile, Maurice. 2015. “The Embodied Turn in Research on Language and Social Interaction.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 48: 121–151. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Raymond, Geoffrey. 2003. “Grammar and Social Organization: Yes/no Interrogatives and the Structure of Responding.” American Sociological Review 68: 939–967.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Redmayne, Mary. 2013. “New Zealand Adolescents’ Cellphone and Cordless Phone User – habits: Are they at Increased Risk of Brain Tumours Already? A Cross-sectional Study.” Environmental Health 12. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Relieu, Marc. 2010. “Mobile Phone “Work”: Disengaging and Engaging Mobile Phone Activities with Concurrent Activities.” In The Reconstruction of Space and Time: Mobile Communication Practices, ed. by Rich Ling, and Scott Campbell, 215–229. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel. 2002. “Beginnings in the Telephone.” In Perpetual Contact: Mobile Communication, Private Talk, Public Performance, ed. by James Katz, and Mark Aakhus, 284–299. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel, and Harvey Sacks. 1973. “Opening Up Closings.” Semiotica 8: 289–327.
CrossRef DOI logo with hyperlink to permanent DOI
.
Sidnell, Jack. 2014. “Basic Conversation Analytic Methods.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidnell, and Tanya Stivers, 77–99. Chichester, U.K.: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Stivers, Tanya, and Jeffrey Robinson. 2006. “A Preference for Progressivity in Interaction.” Language in Society 35: 367–392. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stokoe, Elizabeth. 2009. “For the Benefit of the Tape”: Formulating Embodied Conduct in Designedly Uni-modal Recorded Police-suspect Interrogations.” Journal of Pragmatics 41: 1887–1904. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sutinen, Marika. 2014. “Negotiating Favourable Conditions for Resuming Suspended Activities.” In Multiactivity in Social Interaction: Beyond Multitasking, ed. by Pentti Haddington, Tiina Keisanen, Lorenza Mondada, and Maurice Nevile, 137–166. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Szymanski, Margaret. 1999. “Re-engaging and Dis-engaging Talk in Activity.” Language in Society 28: 1–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ticca, Anna-Claudia. 2014. “Managing Multiactivity in a Travel Agency: Making Phone Calls While Interacting with Customers.” In Multiactivity in Social Interaction: Beyond Multitasking, ed. by Pentti Haddington, Tiina Keisanen, Lorenza Mondada, and Maurice Nevile, 191–226. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Watson, Jason, and David Strayer. 2010. “Supertaskers: Profiles in Extraordinary Multitasking Ability.” Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 17: 479–485. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weatherall, Ann. 2015. “But Whose Side Are You On?”: Doing Being Independent in Telephone – mediated Dispute Resolution.” In Producing and Managing Restricted Activities: Avoidance and Withholding in Institutional Interaction, ed. by Fabienne Chevalier, and John Moore, 151–179. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
. 2016. “I Need to Get Some Details First”: Record Keeping as a Potential Barrier to Effective Complaint-call Management”. Mediation Theory and Practice 1: 35–58.
CrossRef DOI logo with hyperlink to permanent DOI
Google Scholar
Weatherall, Ann, and Maria Stubbe. 2015. “Emotions in Action: Telephone-mediated Dispute Resolution.” British Journal of Social Psychology 54: 273–290. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Whalen, Marilyn, and Don Zimmerman. 1990. “Describing Trouble: Practical Epistemology in Citizen Calls to the Police.” Language in Society 19: 465–492.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Weatherall, Ann & Fiona Grattan
2024. A Conversation Analytic Study of Calls to Medical Reception for Doctor’s Appointments. Health Communication 39:8 ► pp. 1532 ff. DOI logo
Gasiorek, Jessica, Ann Weatherall & Bernadette Watson
2021. Interactional Adjustment: Three Approaches in Language and Social Psychology. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 40:1 ► pp. 102 ff. DOI logo
Weatherall, Ann
2021. Chapter 1.3. Displaying emotional control by how crying and talking are managed. In How Emotions Are Made in Talk [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 321], ► pp. 77 ff. DOI logo
Arano, Yusuke
2020. Doing reflecting: Embodied solitary confirmation of instructed enactment. Discourse Studies 22:3 ► pp. 261 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.