Cover not available
Part of
Technology Mediated Service Encounters
Edited by Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Lucía Fernández-Amaya and María de la O Hernández-López
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 300] 2019
► pp. 97–120

Chapter 4
Globalizing politeness?

Towards a globalization-sensitive framework of mediated service encounters

Call centres have grown exponentially since the early 1990s, effectively replacing face-to-face with telephonic and other types of mediated service provision (Holman et al. 2007; Income Data Services 2005). Drawing on observations, interviews and documentary data from offshore and onshore call centres in four national contexts, Scotland, Denmark, Hong Kong and the Philippines, this study analyses the speech style prescribed to call centre agents and finds that while there are some local adaptations, it is remarkably similar across all four locations. This appears to be the case even though the language of the service interaction varies across the locations. On the basis of these findings, it is argued that the upsurge of call centres – and more generally globalization – has led to a homogenization of service as linguistically constructed. The study argues for engagement with industry stakeholders to consider in greater depth cultural sensitivities and the extent to which this globally prescribed call centre speech style accords with local politeness conventions.
Keywords: call centre, globalization, politeness
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Politeness in call centres
  • 3.Data and analytic methods
  • 4.Globalizing the language of service encounters: Institutional prescriptions
    • 4.1Active listening
    • 4.2Making the customer feel understood
    • 4.3Avoiding jargon
    • 4.4Signposting
    • 4.5Empathizing
    • 4.6Small talk
  • 5.Adopting and resisting globalized prescriptions: employee practices
  • 6.Conclusions
  • References
Published online: 10 January 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.300.04hul
References (44)
References
Androutsopoulos, Jannis 2010. Localizing the global on the participatory web. In Coupland, Nikolas (Ed.), The handbook of language and globalization (pp. 203–231). Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Archer, Dawn and Jagodziński, Piotr 2015. Call centre interaction: A case of sanctioned face attack? Journal of Pragmatics, 76, 46–66.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ashforth, Blake E. and Humphrey, Ronald H. 1993. Emotional labor in service roles: The influence of identity. Academy of Management Review, 18(1), 88–115.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bain, Peter and Taylor, Paul 2000. Entrapped by the “Electronic Panopticon”? Worker resistance in the call centre. New Technology, Work, and Employment, 15(1), 2–18.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blommaert, Jan 2010. The Sociolinguistics of Globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003. A commentary: A sociolinguistics of globalization Journal of Sociolinguistics, 7, 607–23.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bousfield, Derek 2008. Impoliteness in Interaction. Amsterdam: Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Gillian and Yule, George 1983. Discourse Analysis. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope and Levinson, Stephen C. 1987. Politeness: Some universals in language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cameron, Deborah 2008. Talk from the top down. Language and Communication, 28(2), 143–155.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003. Globalizing communication. In Aitchison, J. and Lewis, D. M. (Eds.), New Media Language (pp. 27–35). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2000. Styling the worker: Gender and the commodification of language in the globalized service economy. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 4(3), 323–347.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coupland, Nikolas 2010. Introduction: Sociolinguistics in the global era. In Coupland, Nikolas (Ed.), The Handbook of Language and Globalization (pp. 1–27). Malden, MA and Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan 1996. Towards an anatomy of impoliteness. Journal of Pragmatics, 25(3), 349–367.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Durbin, Susan 2006. Gender, skills and careers in UK call centres. In Connell, Julia and Burgess, John (Eds.), Developments in the call centre industry: Analysis, changes and challenges (pp. 117–135). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Economidou-Kogetsidis, Maria 2005. ‘Yes, Tell me Please, What Time is the Midday Flight from Athens Arriving?’: Telephone Service Encounters and Politeness. Intercultural Pragmatics, 2(3), 253–273.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eelen, Gino 2001. A Critique of politeness theories. Manchester: St. Jerome Publishing.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman 1989. Language and Power. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Félix-Brasdefer, J. César 2015. The language of service encounters: A pragmatic-discursive approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fredsted, Elin 2005. Politeness in Denmark: Getting to the Point. In Hickey, Leo and Stewart, Miranda (Eds.), Politeness in Europe, (pp. 159–173). London: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Haugh, Michael 2014. (Im)politeness Implicatures. Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2011. Epilogue: culture and norms in politeness research. In Kadar, D. Z and Mills, Sara. (Ed.), Politeness in East Asia (pp. 252–264). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hernández-López, María de la O and Fernández-Amaya, Lucía. (Eds). 2015. A multidisciplinary approach to service encounters. Leiden: Brill.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holman, David 2003. Phoning in sick? An overview of employee stress in call centres. Journal of Leadership and Organization Development, 24(3), 123–30.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holman, David, Batt, Rosemary, and Holtgrewe, Ursula. 2007. The global call center report: International perspectives on management and employment. Ithaca, NY: Authors.Google Scholar
Hultgren, Anna Kristina 2017. Vocatives as rationalized politeness: Theoretical insights from emerging norms in call centre service encounters. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 21(1), 90–111.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011. The global diffusion of a call centre speech style. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 15(1), 36–64.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008. Linguistic regulation and interactional reality: A sociolinguistic study of call centre service transactions. DPhil thesis, University of Oxford.Google Scholar
Isosävi, J. and Lappalainen, H. 2015. First names at Starbucks: a clash of cultures? In Norrby, C. and Wide, C. (Eds.), Address practice as social action. European perspectives (pp. 97–118). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kasper, G. 1990. Linguistic politeness: Current research issues. Journal of Pragmatics, 14: 193–218.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kiełkiewicz-Janowiak A. and Pawelczyk J. 2008. Gender stereotypes and globalised customer service communication in Poland. In Santaemilia, J. and Bou, P. (Eds.), Gender and sexual identities in transition: International perspectives (pp. 76–100). Cambridge: Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Kiełkiewicz-Janowiak A. and Pawelczyk, J. 2004. Globalization and customer service communication at Polish call centres. In Duszak, A. and Okulska, U. (Eds.), Speaking from the margin: Global English from a European perspective (pp. 225–238). Frankfurt am Main/New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Locher, M. A. and Graham, S. L. 2010. Introduction to interpersonal pragmatics. In Locher, M. A. and Graham, S. L. (Eds.), Interpersonal Pragmatics (pp. 1–13). Berlin, Germany: Mouton.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Márquez Reiter, R. 2011. Mediated business interactions: Intercultural communication between speakers of Spanish. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Merritt, M. 1976. On question following questions in service encounters. Language in Society 5: 315–357.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mills, S. 2003. Gender and politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norrby, C. and Hajek, J. 2011. Language policy in practice: What happens when Swedish IKEA and HandM take “you” on? In Norrby, C. and Hajek, J. (Eds), Uniformity and Diversity in Language Policy: Global Perspectives (pp. 242–257). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Norrby, C. and Wide, C. (Eds.) 2015. Address practice as social action. European perspectives. London: Palgrave Macmillan.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sifianou, M. and A. Tzanne 2018. The impact of globalisation on brief Greek service encounters. Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 134, pp. 163–172.Google Scholar
Sifianou, M. 2013. The impact of globalisation on politeness and impoliteness. Journal of Pragmatics, 55, 86–102.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, H. 2008. Culture, Communication and Politeness Theory (2nd edition). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Stewart, M. 2005. Politeness in Britiain: ‘It’s only a Suggestion…’ In Hickey, L. and Stewart, M. (Eds.) Politeness in Europe (pp. 116–129). London: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Watts, R. J. 2003. Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Woydack, J, and Rampton, B. 2015. Text trajectories in a multilingual call centre: The linguistic ethnography of a calling script. Tilburg Papers in Culture Studies, 124, 1–24.Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Orthaber, Sara
2023. Technologically Mediated Interaction. In (Im)politeness at a Slovenian Call Centre [Advances in (Im)politeness Studies, ], ► pp. 43 ff. DOI logo
Orthaber, Sara
2023. On (Im)politeness. In (Im)politeness at a Slovenian Call Centre [Advances in (Im)politeness Studies, ], ► pp. 11 ff. DOI logo
Tovar, Johanna
2022. Current trends and the way forward on call center research in a post-covid world. Sociolinguistic Studies 16:1 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.