Chapter published in:
Technology Mediated Service Encounters
Edited by Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Lucía Fernández-Amaya and María de la O Hernández-López
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 300] 2019
► pp. 223–244

Chapter 9. Relational practices on commercial Facebook wall interactions

| Universitat de València, Spain

This chapter explores mediated service encounters in social networking sites, as examples of the new (or reconfigured) forms of social organization and interaction brought about by technology. Social networking sites afford multidirectional communication, i.e. encounters between companies and consumers, as well as interactions among consumers, which are impacting previously stable corporate and consumer roles and are transforming efficiency and sociability management in various ways. This chapter specifically investigates relational practices on commercial Facebook pages. To carry out this research, a reference corpus of commercial wall interactions, comprising over 900 comments, was compiled. A representative sample (n = 290 posts) was quantitatively analyzed to identify consumers’ alignment with the corporation. Drawing on a revised framework of relational work and extant second-order taxonomies of im/politeness, a qualitative analysis unveiled a number of relational practices that emerged in supportive and unsupportive interactions. This chapter unveiled specific interactional patterns and revealed the predominance of both textual and visual relational practices on Facebook.

Keywords: relational work, service encounters, Facebook, wall interactions, im/politeness
Published online: 10 January 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.300.09bou
References

References

Androutsopoulos, Jannis
2014a “Moments of Sharing: Entextualization and Linguistic Repertoires in Social Networking.” Journal of Pragmatics 73: 4–18.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014b “Languaging when Contexts Collapse: Audience Design in Social Networking.” Discourse, Context and Media 4–5: 62–73.Google Scholar
2015 “Networked Multilingualism: Some Language Practices on Facebook and their Implications.” International Journal of Bilingualism 192: 185–205.Google Scholar
Bayyurt, Yasemin, and Ann Bayraktaroğlu
2001 “The Use of Pronouns and Terms of Address in Turkish Service Encounters.” In Linguistic Politeness across Boundaries. The Case of Greek and Turkish, ed. by Ann Bayraktaroğlu, and Maria Sifianou, 209–240. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blum-Kulka, Soshana, Juliane House, and Gabriele Kasper
(eds) 1989 Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Bolander, Brook, and Miriam Locher
2015 “ ‘Peter is a Dumb Nut’: Status Updates and Reactions to them as ‘Acts of Positioning’ in Facebook.” Pragmatics 251: 99–122.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bou-Franch, Patricia
2011 “Openings and Closings in Spanish Email Conversations.” Journal of Pragmatics 43: 1772–1785.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015 “The Genre of Web-Mediated Service Encounters in Not-for-Profit Organizations: Cross-Cultural Study.” In A Multidisciplinary Approach to Service Encounters, ed. by María de la O Hernández-López, and Lucía Fernández-Amaya, 65–86. Leiden: Brill.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bou-Franch, Patricia, and Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich
2014a “Editorial: The Pragmatics of Textual Participation in the Social Media.” Journal of Pragmatics 73: 1–3.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014b “Conflict Management in Massive Polylogues: A Case Study from YouTube.” Journal of Pragmatics 73: 19–36.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2018 “Relational Work in Multimodal Networked Interactions on Facebook.” Internet Pragmatics 1: 134–160.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bou-Franch, Patricia, Nuria Lorenzo-Dus, and Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich
2012 “Social Interaction in YouTube Text-Based Polylogues: A Study of Coherence.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 174: 501–521 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
boyd, danah M., and Nicole B. Ellison
2008 “Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 131: 210–230.Google Scholar
boyd, danah M., and Alice E. Marwick
2011 “Social Privacy in Networked Publics: Teens’ Attitudes, Practices, and Strategies.” Work‐in‐Progress Paper for discussion at the Privacy Law Scholars Conference on June 2, 2011 in Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson
1978 “Universals in Language Usage: Politeness Phenomena.” In Questions and politeness. Strategies in social interaction, ed. by Esther N. Goody, 56–289. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1987 Politeness: Some universals of language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bruxelles, Sylvie, and Catherine Kerbrat-Orecchioni
2004 “Coalitions in Polylogues.” Journal of Pragmatics 36: 75–113.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, Deborah
2000 “Styling the Worker: Gender and the Commodification of Language in the Globalized Service Economy.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 4: 323–347.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001 Working with Spoken Discourse. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Castells, Manuel
2000 “Toward a Sociology of the Network Society.” Contemporary Sociology 295: 693–699.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan
2005 “Impoliteness and Entertainment in the Television Quiz Show the Weakest Link.” Journal of Politeness Research 1: 35–72.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011 Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan. Michael Haugh, and Daniel Kádár
2017 “Introduction.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic Impoliteness, ed. by Jonathan Culpeper, Michael Haugh, and Daniel Kádár, 1–8. London: Palgrave-Macmillan.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Economidou-Kogetsidis, Maria
2005 “ ‘Yes, Tell me Please, What Time is the Midday Flight from Athens Arriving?’ Telephone Service Encounters and Politeness.” Intercultural Pragmatics 2: 253–273.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Norman
1989 Language and power. London: Pearson.Google Scholar
2003 Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Félix-Brasdefer, J. César
2012 “Pragmatic Variation by Gender in Market Service Encounters in Mexico.” In Pragmatic Variation in First and Second Language Contexts: Methodological Issues, ed. by J. César Félix-Brasdefer, and Dale Koike, 17–48. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015 The Language of Service Encounters: A Pragmatic-Discursive Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fernández-Amaya, Lucía, and María de la O. Hernández-López
2015 “Service Encounters and Communication: Why a Multidisciplinary Approach?” In A Multidisciplinary Approach to Service Encounters, ed. by María de la O Hernández-López, and Lucía Fernández- Amaya, 1–10. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Friedrich, Patricia, and Eduardo H. Diniz de Figueiredo
2016 The Sociolinguistics of Digital Englishes. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar
2013 “Introduction: Face, Identity and Im/politeness. Looking Backward, Moving Forwards: From Goffman to Practice Theory.” Journal of Politeness Research 91: 1–33.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015 “Setting the Linguistics Research Agenda for the E- Service Encounters Genre: Natively Digital versus Digitized Perspectives.” In A Multidisciplinary Approach to Service Encounters, ed. by María de la O Hernández- López, and Lucía Fernández-Amaya, 12–43. Leiden: Brill.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2018 “Globalization, Transnational Identities, and Conflict Talk: The Superdiversity and Complexity of the Latino Identity.” Journal of Pragmatics (in press).Google Scholar
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar, and Patricia Bou-Franch
2008 “Cortesía en las páginas web interactivas: El comercio electrónico.” In Cortesía y conversación: de lo escrito a lo oral, ed. by Antonio Briz, Antonio Hidalgo, Marta Albelda, Josefa Contreras, and Nieves Hernández-Flores, 468–487. Valencia, Estocolmo: Universidad de Valencia, Programa EDICE.Google Scholar
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar, Patricia Bou-Franch, and Nuria Lorenzo-Dus
2010 “A Genre- Approach to Im-politeness in a Spanish TV Talk Show: Evidence from Corpus-Based Analysis, Questionnaires and Focus Groups.” Intercultural Pragmatics 74: 689–723.Google Scholar
Gee, James P.
2005 An Introduction to Discourse Analysis: Theory and Method. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Georgakopoulou, Alexandra, and Tereza Spilioti
2016 “Introduction.” In The Routledge Handbook of Language and Digital Communication, ed. by Alexandra Georgakopoulou- and Tereza Spilioti, 1–15. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Georgalou, Mariza
2016 “ ‘I Make the Rules on My Wall’: Privacy and Identity Management Practices on Facebook.” Discourse and Communication 101: 40–64.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haugh, Michael
2010 “Jocular Mockery, Disaffiliation, and Face.” Journal of Pragmatics 42: 2106–2119.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Herring, Susan C.
1996 “Two Variants of an Electronic Message Schema.” In Computer- Mediated Communication: Linguistic, Social and Cross-Cultural Perspectives, ed. by Susan C. Herring, 81–106. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008 “Web Content Analysis: Expanding the Paradigm”. In The International Handbook of Internet Research, ed. by Jeremy Hunsinger, Lisbeth Klastrup, and Matthew Allen, 233–249. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
2013 “Discourse in Web 2.0: Familiar, Reconfigured and Emergent.” In Discourse Web 2. 0: Language in the Media, ed. by Deborah Tannen. and Anne M. Trester, 1–26. Georgetown University Press: Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Hymes, Dell
1974 Foundations in Sociolinguistics: An Ethnographic Approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Ivorra Perez, Francisco M.
2015 “The Impact of Cultural Dimensions on the Engagement Markers of Spanish, British and US Toy Selling Websites.” In A Multidisciplinary Approach to Service Encounters, ed. by María de la O Hernández-López, and Lucía Fernández-Amaya, 142–166. Leiden: Brill.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jewitt, Carey
2016 “Multimodal analysis.” In The Routledge Handbook of Language and Digital Communication, ed. by Alexandra Georgakopoulou- and Tereza Spilioti, 69–84. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kaplan, Andreas M., and Michael Haenlein
2010 “Users of the World, Unite! The Challenges and Opportunities of Social Media.” Business Horizons 53: 59–68.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kerbrat-Orecchioni, Catherine
2006 “Politeness in Small Shops in France.” Journal of Politeness Research 2: 79–103.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, Robin
1973 The Logic of Politeness; or, Minding your p’s and q’s’. In Papers from the Ninth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, ed. by Claudia Corum, T. Cedric Smith-Stark, and Ann. Weiser, 292–305. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Locher, Miriam A., and Watts, Richard J.
2005 “Politeness Theory and Relational Work.” Journal of Politeness Research 11: 9–33.Google Scholar
Lorenzo-Dus, Nuria, Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, and Patricia Bou-Franch
2011 “On-line Polylogues and Impoliteness: The Case of Postings Sent in Response to the Obama Reggaeton Youtube Video.” Journal of Pragmatics 43(10): 2578–2593.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Maíz-Arévalo, Carmen
2015 “Jocular Mockery in Computer-Mediated Communication: A Contrastive Study of a Spanish and English Facebook Community.” Journal of Politeness Research 11(2): 289–327.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
. In press. “Losing Face on Facebook: Linguistic strategies to repair face in a Spanish common interest group.” In Analyzing Digital Discourse: New Insights and Future Directions ed. by Patricia Bou-Franch, and Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich. Palgrave-Macmillan.
Mangold, W. Glynn, and David J. Faulds
2009 “Social Media: The New Hybrid Element of the Promotion Mix.” Business Horizons 52: 357–365.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Márquez Reiter, Rosina
2005 “Complaint Calls to a Caregiver Service Company: The Case of Desahogo.” Intercultural Pragmatics 2: 481–514.Google Scholar
2011 Mediated Business Interactions. Intercultural Communication between Speakers of Spanish. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marquez Reiter, Rosina, and Patricia Bou-Franch
2017 “Impoliteness in Service Encounters.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic Impoliteness, ed. by Jonathan Culpeper, Michael Haugh, and Daniel Kádár, 661–687. London: Palgrave-Macmillan.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Márquez Reiter, Rosina, and M. Elena Placencia
2004 “Displaying Closeness and Respectful Distance in Montevidean and Quiteño Service Encounters.” In Current Trends in the Pragmatics of Spanish, ed. by Rosina Márquez Reiter, and M. Elena Placencia, 121–156. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Márquez Reiter, Rosina, Sara Orthaber, and Daniel Kádár
2015 “Disattending Customer Dissatisfaction on Facebook: A Case Study of a Slovenian Public Transport Company.” In Management and Intercultural Communication: A Collection of Case Studies, ed. by Elizabeth M. Christopher, 108–126. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marwick, Alice E., and danah m. boyd
2011 “I Tweet Honestly, I Tweet Passionately``: Twitter Users, Context Collapse, and the Imagined Audience.” New Media and Society 13: 96–113.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
O’Driscol, James
2017 “Face and (Im)politeness.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic Impoliteness, ed. by Jonathan Culpeper, Michael Haugh, and Daniel Kádár, 89–118. London: Palgrave-Macmillan.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Page, Ruth E.
2012 Stories and Social Media. Identities and Interaction. Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar
Page, Ruth E., David Barton, Johan W. Unger, and Michele Zappavigna, M.
2014 Researching Language and Social Media: A Student Guide. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Palomino Manjón, Patricia
. Service Encounters on Facebook: Linguistic Analysis of Identity, Evaluation and Affiliation. Master’s Thesis, University of Valencia 2017.Google Scholar
Papacharissi, Zizi
2011 “Conclusion: A Networked Self.” In A Networked Self: Identity, Community, and Culture on Social Network Sites, ed. by Zizi Papacharissi, 304–318. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Placencia, M. Elena
2004 “Rapport-Building Activities in Corner Shop Interactions.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 8: 215–245.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Scollon, Ron, and Suzane W. Scollon
2001 Intercultural Communication: A Discourse Approach. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sifianou, Maria
2012 “Disagreements, Face and Politeness.” Journal of Pragmatics 4412: 1554–1564.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sifianou, Maria, and Angeliki Tzane
2018 “The Impact of Globalisation in Brief Service Encounters.” Journal of Pragmatics (in press).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, Helen
2000 Culturally Speaking: Managing Rapport through Talk across Cultures. London/New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Tagg, Caroline, and Phillip Seargeant
2014 “Audience Design and Language Choice in the Construction and Maintenance of Translocal Communities on Social Network Sites.” In The Language of Social Media: Identity and Community on the Internet, ed. by Phillip Seargeant, and Caroline Tagg, 161–185. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016 “Facebook and the Discursive Construction of the Social Network.” In The Routledge Handbook of Language and Digital Communication, ed. by Alexandra Georgakopoulou- and Tereza Spilioti, 339–353. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Terkourafi, Marina
2008 Toward a Unified Theory of Politeness, Impoliteness, and Rudeness. In Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice, ed. by Derek Bousfield, and Miriam A. Locher, 45–74. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Thompson, Kenneth
1998 Moral Panics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Traverso, Versonique
2006 “Aspects of Polite Behaviour in French and Syrian Service Encounters: A Data-Based Comparative Study.” Journal of Politeness Research 2: 105–122.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vasquez, Camilla, and Addie Sayers China
. In press. “From ‘my Manly Husband…’ to ‘…Sitting town to Take a Pee’: The Construction and Deconstruction of Gender in Amazon Reviews.” In Analyzing Digital Discourse: New Insights and Future Directions ed. by Patricia Bou-Franch, and Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich. Palgrave- Macmillan.
Ventola, Eija
2005 “Revisiting the Service Encounter Genre: Some Reflections.” Folia Linguistica 39: 19–43.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zappavigna, Michele
2011 “Ambient Affiliation: A Linguistic Perspective on Twitter.” New Media and Society 135: 788–806.CrossrefGoogle Scholar