Chapter 1
Networking engagement in professional practices
Towards an integrative view
In this chapter I revisit the concept of metadiscursive engagement, track its major courses of research up to date, and discuss the interpersonal and discursive assumptions it entails. In light of these assumptions, I draw connections among the different contributions to this volume, present a networked picture of engagement resulting from their different understandings, and finally pinpoint challenges and emerging issues. The global and open vision of engagement offered here not only intends to bring together the three major theoretical frameworks resorted to in this volume (i.e. the Appraisal System, the Hylandian Metadiscourse Model and Multimodality), but also to suggest relating them with the idea of ‘distance’ between sender and addressee, explored by both the Appraisal System itself and the pragmatic theories of Proximisation and Politeness.
Article outline
- 1.Overview: Framing research on professional engagement
- 1.1Meaning-making resources and theoretical eclecticism
- 2.Issues arising: Research directions and challenges
- 2.1Interpersonal assumptions
- 2.2Discursive assumptions
- 3.Broadening the notion: Engagement envisaged as (di)stance
- 4.Closing reflections
-
Notes
-
References
References
Ädel, Annelie
2010 “
Just to Give You Kind of a Map of Where We Are Going: A Taxonomy of Metadiscourse in Spoken and Written Academic English”.
Nordic Journal of English Studies 9 (2): 69–97.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ädel, Annelie, and Anna Mauranen
2010 “
Metadiscourse: Diverse and Divided Perspective.”
Nordic Journal of English Studies 9 (2): 1–40.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Artemeva, Natasha, and Aviva Freedman
eds. 2006 Rhetorical Genre Studies and Beyond. Winnipeg, MB, Canada: Inkshed Publications.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Aull, Laura L., Dineth Bandarage, and Meredith R. Miller
2017 “
Generality in Student and Expert Epistemic Stance: A Corpus Analysis of First-Year, Upper Level, and Published Academic Writing.”
Journal of English for Academic Purposes 26: 29–41.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bakhtin, Mikhail Mikhailovich
1981 The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Translated by
Caryl Emerson, and
Michael Holquist. Ed. by
Michael Holquist. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bamford, Julia, and Marina Bondi
eds. 2006 Managing Interaction in Professional Discourse: Intercultural and Interdiscoursal Perspectives. Rome: Officina Edizioni.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bhatia, Vijay K.
1993 Analysing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings. London: Longman.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bhatia, Vijay K.
1994 “
Generic Integrity in Professional Discourse.” In
Text and Talk in Professional Contexts, ed. by
Britt-Louise Gunnarsson,
Per Linell, and
Bengt Nordberg, 61–76. Uppsala, Sweden: ASLA, Skriftserie 6.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bhatia, Vijay K.
1995 “
Genre Mixing in Professional Communication: The case of ‘private intentions’ v. ‘socially recognised purposes’.” In
Explorations in English for Professional Communication, ed. by
Paul Bruthiaux,
Tim Boswood, and
Bertha Du-Babcock, 1–19. Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bhatia, Vijay K.
1997 “
Genre-mixing in Academic Introductions.”
English for Specific Purposes 16 (3): 181–196.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bhatia, Vijay K.
2004 Worlds of Written Discourse: A Genre-Based View. London: Continuum.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Biber, Douglas, and Bethany Gray
2016 Grammatical Complexity in Academic English: Linguistic Change in Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Breeze, Ruth
2012 Rethinking Academic Writinf Pedagogy for the European University. Amsterdam/New York: Rodopi.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Charteris-Black, Jonathan
2014 “
Political Style.” In
The Cambridge Handbook of Stylistics, ed. by
Peter Stockwell and
Sara Whiteley, 536–557. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cockcroft, Robert, Susan Cockcroft, Craig Hamilton, and Laura Hidalgo Downing
2014 [1995] Persuading People: An Introduction to Rhetoric. Houndmills, Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Du Bois, John
2007 “
The Stance Triangle.” In
Stancetaking in Discourse, ed. by
Robert Englebretson, 139–182. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Edmonds, Ernest, Lizzie Miller, and Matthew Connell
2006 “
On Creative Engagement.”
Visual Communication 5 (3): 307–322.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Engberg, Jan
2012 “
Specialized Communication and Culture, Practice, Competence, and Knowledge: Implications and Derived Insights.” In
Applied Linguistics Today: Research and Perspectives. Angewandte Linguistik heute: Forschung und Perspektiven, ed. by
Leonard Pon,
Vladimir Karabalic, and
Sanja Cimer, 109–130. Frankfurt a.M.: Peter Lang.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fairclough, Norman
1993 “
Critical Discourse Analysis and the Marketization of Public Discourse: The Universities.
Discourse and Society 4 (2): 133–168.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gambetti, Rossella, and Guendalina Graffigna
2010 “
The Concept of Engagement: A Systematic Analysis of the Ongoing Marketing Debate.”
International Journal of Market Research 52 (6): 801–826.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gotti, Maurizio
2008 Investigating Specialized Discourse. Bern: Peter Lang.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Green, Andrew
2007 “
Are Viewers ‘engaged’ with advertising? Does It Matter?”
WARC Media FAQs, March 2007.
[URL] Last accessed June 2015.
Gunnarsson, Britt-Louise
2009 Professional Discourse. London: Continuum.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Harré, Rom, and van Langenhove, Luk
1999 Positioning Theory: Moral Contexts of Intentional Action. Oxford: Blackwell.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hairston, Maxine, and Michael Keene
2003 [1981] Successful Writing. 5th edn. New York/London: W. W. Norton.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Heath, Robert
2007 “
How Do We Predict Advertising Attention and Engagement?”
University of Bath School of Management Working Paper Series. Paper 09.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Heylighen, Francis, and Jean-Marc Dewaele
1999 Formality of Language: Definition, Measurement and Behavioral Determinants. Internal Report. Center “Leo Apostel” , Free University of Brussels.
[URL]
Hinds, John
1987 “
Reader versus Writer Responsibility: A New Typology.” In
Writing across Languages: Analysis of L2 Text, ed. by
Ulla Connor and
Robert B. Kaplan, 141–152. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hyland, Ken
2001 “
Bringing in the Reader: Addressee Features in Academic Articles.”
Written Communication 18: 549–574.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hyland, Ken
2003 Second Language Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hyland, Ken
2004a [2000] Disciplinary Discourse: Social Interactions in Academic Writing. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hyland, Ken
2004b “
Disciplinary Interactions: Metadiscourse in L2 Postgraduate Writing.”
Journal of Second Language Writing 13: 133–151.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hyland, Ken
2005a Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing. London: Continuum.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hyland, Ken
2005b “
Stance and Engagement: A Model of Interaction in Academic Discourse.”
Discourse Studies 7: 173–192.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hyland, Ken
2008a “
Different Strokes for Different Folks: Disciplinary Variation in Academic Writing.” In
Language and Discipline perspectives on Academic Discourse, ed. by
Kjersti Fløttum, 89–108. Newcsatle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hyland, Ken
2008b “
Constraint versus Creativity: Identity and Disciplinarity in Academic Writing.” In
Commonality and Individuality in Academic Discourse, ed. by
Maurizio Gotti, 25–52. Bern: Peter Lang.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hyland, Ken
2009a Academic Discourse: English in a Global Context. London: Continuum.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hyland, Ken
2009b “
Corpus Informed Discourse Analysis: The Case of Academic Engagement.” In
Academic Writing. At the Interface of Corpus and Discourse, ed. by
Maggie Charles,
Diane Pecorari, and
Susan Hunston, 110–128. London: Continuum.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hyland, Ken
2010 “
Constructing Proximity: Relating to Readers in Popular and Professional Science.”
Journal of English for Academic Purposes 9: 116–127.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hyland, Ken
2011a “
Projecting an Academic Identity in Some reflective Genres.”
Ibérica 21 (Spring): 9–30.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hyland, Ken
2011b “
Disciplines and Discourses: Social Interactions in the Construction of Knowledge. In
Writing in the Knowledge Society, ed. by
Doreen Starke-Meyerring,
Anthony Paré,
Natasha Artemeva,
Miriam Horne, and
Larissa Yousoubova, 193–214. West Lafayette, IN: Parlor Press
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hyland, Ken
2012 “
Undergraduate Understandings: Stance and Voice in Final Year Reports.” In
Stance and Voice in Written Academic Genres, ed. by
Ken Hyland and
Carmen Sancho Guinda, 134–150. Houndmills, Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hyland, Ken
2017 “
Metadiscourse: What Is It and Where Is It Going?”.
Journal of Pragmatics 113: 16–29.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hyland, Ken
2018 The Essential Hyland. Studies in Applied Linguistics. London: Bloomsbury.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hyland, Ken, and Polly Tse
2004 “
Metadiscourse in Academic Writing: A Reappraisal.”
Applied Linguistics 25 (2): 156–177.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hyland, Ken, and Feng (Kevin) Jiang
2016 “
’We Must Conclude that’…: A Diachronic Study of Academic Engagement.”
Journal of English for Academic Purposes 24: 29–42.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hyland, Ken, and Feng (Kevin) Jiang
2017 “
Is Academic Writing Becoming More Informal?”
English for Specific Purposes 40–51.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jaffe, Alexandra
2009 Stance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jones, Rodney
2014 “
Advertising Culture.” In
The Cambridge Handbook of Stylistics, ed. by
Peter Stockwell and
Sara Whiteley, 520–535. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kastberg, Peter
2007 “
Knowledge Communication: “The Emergence of a Third Order Discipline.” In
Kommunikation in Bewegung: Multimedialer und Multilingualer Wissenstransfer in der Experten-Laien-Kommunikation, ed. by
Claudia Villiger, and
Heidrun Gerzymisch-Arbogast, 7–24. Berlin: Peter Lang.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Knorr-Cetina, Karin D.
1981 The Manufacture of Knowledge. An Essay on the Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kress, Gunther, and Theo van Leeuwen
2006 [1996] Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. 2nd ed. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lane, Janet, and Lange, Ellen
1999 Writing Clearly. An Editing Guide. 2nd edn. Boston: Heinle and Heinle.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lave, Jean, and Etienne Wenger
1991 Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Leech, Geoffrey
2014 The Pragmatics of Politeness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lorenzoni, Irene, Sophie Nicholson-Cole, and Lorraine Whitmarsh
2007 “
Barriers Perceived to Engaging with Climate Change among the UK Public and Their Policy Implications.”
Global Environmental Change 17.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Machin, David
2007 Introduction to Multimodal Analysis. London: Hodder Arnold.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Martin, James R., and Peter R. R. White
2005 The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. Houndmills, Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mauranen, Anna
1993 Cultural Differences in Academic Rhetoric. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mauranen, Anna
2010 “
Discourse Reflexivity - A Discourse Universal? The Case of ELF”
Nordic Journal of English Studies 9 (2): 13–40.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Molino, Alessandra
2010 “
Personal and Impersonal Authorial References: A Contrastive Study of English and Italian in Linguistics Research Articles.”
Journal of English for Academic Purposes 9: 86–101.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Norris, Sigrid
2004 Analyzing Multimodal Interaction. A Methodological Framework. New York: Routledge.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
O’Toole, Michael
1994 The Language of Displayed Art. London, UK: Continuum.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pérez-Llantada, Carmen
2010 “
The Discourse Functions of Metadiscourse in Published Academic Writing: Issues of Culture and Language.”
Nordic Journal of English Studies 9 (2): 41–68.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pérez-Llantada, Carmen
2012 Scientific Discourse and the Rhetoric of Globalization: The Impact of Culture and Language. London: Bloomsbury.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pinker, Steven
2014 The Sense of Style. London: Penguin.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ross-Larson, Bruce
1999 Stunning Sentences. New York: W. W. Norton & Co.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sales, Hazel E.
2006 Professional Communication in Engineering. Houndmills, Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sancho Guinda, Carmen
2012a “
Flexibility Features in Patent Writing.”
Ibérica 24: 185–210.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sancho Guinda, Carmen
2012b “
Proximal Positioning in Students’ Graph Commentaries.” In
Stance and Voice in Written Academic Genres, ed. by
Ken Hyland and
Carmen Sancho Guinda, 166–183. Houndmills, Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sancho Guinda, Carmen
2014 “
Engagement in NTSB Decisions on Aviation Case Appeals.” In
Interpersonality in Legal Genres, ed. by
Ruth Breeze,
Maurizio Gotti, and
Carmen Sancho Guinda, 181–211. Bern: Peter Lang.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sancho Guinda, Carmen
2015 “
Genres on the Move: Currency and Erosion of the Genre Moves Construct.”
Journal of English for Academic Purposes 19: 73–87.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sancho Guinda, Carmen
2016 “
Semiotic Shortcuts: The Graphical Abstract Strategies of Engineering Students.”
Hermes 55: 61–90.
[URL]
Sancho Guinda, Carmen
2017 “
Transmitting Authority in Risk Communication: An Exploration of US Air-Accident Dockets Online.” In
Power, Persuasion and Manipulation in Specialised Genres, ed. by
María Ángeles Orts,
Ruth Breeze, and
Maurizio Gotti, 211–336. Bern: Peter Lang.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sancho Guinda, Carmen, and Ken Hyland
2012 “
Introduction: A Context-Sensitive Approach to Stance and Voice.” In
Stance and Voice in Written Academic Genres, ed. by
Ken Hyland and
Carmen Sancho Guinda, 1–11. Houndmills, Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Simpson, Paul
1993 Language, Ideology and Point of View. London: Routledge.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Strunk, William Jr., and E. B. White
1972 [1959] The Elements of Style. 4th edn. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Swales, John M.
2004 Research Genres: Explorations and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Swales, John M., and Christine B. Feak
1994 Academic Writing for Graduate Students. A Course for Non-native Speakers of English. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sword, Helen
2012 Stylish Academic Writing. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tichy, Henrietta J.
(With
Silvia Fourdrinier).
1988 Effective Writing for Engineers, Managers, Scientists. 2nd edn. New York: Wiley.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Trimble, John R.
2000 [1975] Writing with Style. Conversations on the Art of Writing. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Turk, Christopher, and John Kirkman
1996 [1982] Effective Writing. Improving Scientific, Technical and Business Communication. London: E & FN Spon.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vassileva, Irena
2001 “
Commitment and Detachment in English and Bulgarian Academic Writing.”
English for Specific Purposes 20 (1): 83–102.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wallwork, Adrian
2014a Presentations, Demos, and Training Sessions. New York/Heidelberg/Dordrecht/London: Springer.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wallwork, Adrian
2014b User Guides, Manuals and Technical Writing. New York/Heidelberg/Dordrecht/London: Springer.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wallwork, Adrian
2016 English for Writing Research Papers. 2nd edn. New York/Heidelberg/Dordrecht/London: Springer.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wang, Alex
2006 “
Advertising Engagement: A Driver of Message Involvement in on Message Effects.”
Journal of Advertising Research 46 (4): 355–368.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wenger, Etienne
1998 Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zinsser, William
2006 [1976] On Writing Well. New York: Collins.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zwickle, Adam, and Robyn S. Wilson
2014 “
Construing Risk Implications for Risk Communication.” In
Effective Risk Communication, ed. by
Joseph Árvai and
Louie Rivers, III, 190–203. New York/London: Routledge-Earthscan.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by
Cited by 3 other publications
Alwohaibi, Hala Abdulrahman & Hesham Suleiman Alyousef
2023.
An Investigation of Engagement Resources in the World Cup 2022 Newspaper Articles in the Arab World Media.
Journal of Contemporary Language Research 2:2
► pp. 118 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Sancho Guinda, Carmen
2023.
¿Idiolectos o tecnolectos? Resquicios de impronta personal en la descripción de procedimientos técnicos.
Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 93
► pp. 17 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Sánchez-Jiménez, David & Paulina Meza
2022.
Posicionamiento y dialogicidad en la escritura académica y profesional.
Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 90
► pp. 1 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.