Chapter published in:
Engagement in Professional Genres
Edited by Carmen Sancho Guinda
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 301] 2019
► pp. 2946
References
Anthony, Laurence
2014AntConc (Version 3.4.3 w) [Computer Software]. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. http://​www​.antlab​.sci​.waseda​.ac​.jp/
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad, and Edward Finegan
1999Longman Grammar of Written and Spoken English. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Bitchener, John, and Helen Basturkmen
2006 “Perceptions of the Difficulties of Postgraduate L2 Thesis Students Writing the Discussion Section.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes 5 (1): 4–18. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chang, Yu-Ying, and John M. Swales
1999 “Informal Elements in English Academic Writing: Threats or Opportunities for Advanced Non-native Speakers.” In Writing: Texts, Processes and Practices, ed. by Christopher N. Candlin, and Ken Hyland, 145–167. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Hyland, Ken
2001 “Bringing in the Reader: Addressee Features in Academic Articles.” Written Communication 18 (4): 549–574. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2002 “What Do They Mean? Questions in Academic Writing.” Text 22 (4): 529–557. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004aDisciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
2004b “Disciplinary Interactions: Metadiscourse in L2 Postgraduate Writing.” Journal of Second Language Writing 13 (2): 133–151. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004c “Patterns of Engagement: Dialogic Features and L2 Undergraduate Writing.” In Analysing Academic Writing: Contextualized Frameworks, ed. by Louise Ravelli and Robert A. Ellis, 5–23. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
2005aMetadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
2005b “Representing Readers in Writing: Student and Expert Practices.” Linguistics and Education 16 (4): 363–377. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005c “Stance and Engagement: A Model of Interaction in Academic Discourse.” Discourse Studies 7: 173–192. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012Disciplinary Identities: Individuality and Community in Academic Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2015Academic Publishing: Issues and Challenges in the Construction of Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hyland, Ken, and Carmen Sancho Guinda
eds. 2012Stance and Voice in Written Academic Genres. Basingstoke, U.K.: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hyland, Ken, and Feng (Kevin) Jiang
2016 ““We Must Conclude That…”: A Diachronic Study of Academic Engagement.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes 24: 29–42. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ivanič, Roz
1998Writing and Identity: The Discoursal Construction of Identity in Academic Writing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ivanič, Roz, and David Camps
2001 “I Am How I Sound: Voice as Self-Representation in L2 Writing.” Journal of Second Language Writing 10 (1): 3–33. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Koutsantoni, Dimitra
2004 “Attitude, Certainty and Allusions to Common Knowledge in Scientific Research Articles.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes 3 (2): 163–182. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lafuente-Millán, Enrique
2014 “Reader Engagement across Cultures, Languages and Contexts of Publication in Business Research Articles.” International Journal of Applied Linguistics 24 (2): 201–223. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lancaster, Zak
2014 “Exploring Valued Patterns of Stance in Upper-Level Student Writing in the Disciplines.” Written Communication 31 (1): 27–57. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016 “Expressing Stance in Undergraduate Writing: Discipline-Specific and General Qualities.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes 23: 16–30. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Joseph J., and Lydia Deakin
2016 “Interactions in L1 and L2 Undergraduate Student Writing: Interactional Metadiscourse in Successful and Less-Successful Argumentative Essays.” Journal of Second Language Writing 33: 21–34. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martínez, Iliana A.
2005 “Native and Non-Native Writers’ Use of First Person Pronouns in the Different Sections of Biology Research Articles in English.” Journal of Second Language Writing 14 (3): 174–190. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McGrath, Lisa, and Maria Kuteeva
2012 “Stance and Engagement in Pure Mathematics Research Articles: Linking Discourse Features to Disciplinary Practices.” English for Specific Purposes 31 (3): 161–173. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Opfer, V. Darleen, and David Pedder
2011 “Conceptualizing Teacher Professional Learning.” Review of Educational Research 81: 376–407.. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Paltridge, Brian, and Sue Starfield
2007Thesis and Dissertation Writing in a Second Language: A Handbook for Supervisors. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ryshina-Pankova, Marianna
2011 “Developmental Changes in the Use of Interactional Resources: Persuading the Reader in FL Book Reviews.” Journal of Second Language Writing 20 (4): 243–256. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Swales, John M.
1990Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Swales, John M., Ummul K. Ahmad, Yu-Ying Chang, Daniel Chavez, Dacia F. Dressen, and Ruth Seymour
1998 “Consider This: The Role of Imperatives in Scholarly Writing.” Applied Linguistics 19 (1): 97–121. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Swales, John M., and Christine B. Feak
2012Academic Writing for Graduate Students: Essential Tasks and Skills. 3rd ed.. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Paul
1999 “Exploring the Contexts of Writing: Interviews with PhD Supervisors.” In Issues in EAP Writing Research and Instruction, ed. by Paul Thompson, 37–54. Reading, U.K.: Centre for Applied Language Studies, University of Reading.Google Scholar
Webber, Pauline
1994 “The Function of Questions in Different Medical Journal Genres.” English for Specific Purposes 13 (3): 257–268. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yasuda, Sachiko
2011 “Genre-Based Tasks in Foreign Language Writing: Developing Writers’ Genre Awareness, Linguistic Knowledge, and Writing Competence.” Journal of Second Language Writing 20 (2): 111–133. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Hyland, Ken & Hang (Joanna) Zou
2022. Pithy Persuasion: Engagement in 3 Minute Thesis Presentations. Applied Linguistics 43:1  pp. 21 ff. Crossref logo
Paltridge, Brian
2020. Engagement and reviewers’ reports on submissions to academic journals. Journal of English for Research Publication Purposes 1:1  pp. 4 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 01 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.