Chapter published in:
Engagement in Professional Genres
Edited by Carmen Sancho Guinda
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 301] 2019
► pp. 4765
References

References

Abdi, Reza, Manoochehr T. Rizi, and Mansoor Tavakoli
2010 “The Cooperative Principle in Discourse Communities and Genres: A Framework for the Use of Metadiscourse.” Journal of Pragmatics 42: 1669–1679. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Abdollahzadeh, Esmaeel
2011 “Poring over the Findings: Interpersonal Authorial Engagement in Applied Linguistics Papers.” Journal of Pragmatics 43: 288–297. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Allami Hamid and Haleh Serajfard
2012 “Engagement Markers: a Technique for Improving Writing Skills.” Journal of Language, Culture, and Translation 1–1: 71–83.Google Scholar
Baron, Naomi S.
2000Alphabet to E-Mail. How Written English Evolved and Where It’s Heading. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, and Edward Finegan
1989 “Styles of Stance in English: Lexical and Gramatical Marking of Evidentiality and Affect.” Text 9 (1): 93–124. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad, and Edward Finegan
1999Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Carrió-Pastor, María Luisa, and Ruth Muñiz Calderón
2010 “Variations in Business English Letters Written by Spanish Learners.” Revista de Lenguas para Fines Específicos 15–16: 39–56.Google Scholar
2012 “Lexical Variations in Business E-mails Written by Non-Native Speakers of English.” LSP Professional Communication, Knowledge Management and Cognition 3: 4–13.Google Scholar
2013 “Variation of English Business E-mails in Asian Countries.” Ibérica 26: 55–76.Google Scholar
2015 “A Contrastive Analysis of Metadiscourse Features in Business E-mails Written by Non-Native Speakers of English.” Procedia, Social and Behavioral Sciences 173: 214–221. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carrió-Pastor, María Luisa
2015 “Identification of Rhetorical Moves in Business Emails Written by Indian Speakers of English.” In Digital Business Discourse, ed. by Erika Darics, 226–242. London: Palgrave-MacMillan.Google Scholar
Cheung, Ming
2011 “Sales Promotion Communication in Chinese and English: A Thematic Analysis.” Journal of Pragmatics 43: 1061–1079. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dafouz, Emma
2008 “The Pragmatic Role of Textual and Interpersonal Metadiscourse Markers in the Construction and Attainment of Persuasion: A Cross-linguistic Study of Newspaper Discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics 40: 95–113. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Darics, Erika
ed. 2015Digital Business Discourse. London: Palgrave-MacMillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Stephen
2010 “Business as Usual: The Use of English in the Professional World in Hong Kong.” English for Specific Purposes 29: 153–167. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gillaerts, Paul, and Freek Van de Velde
2010 “Interactional Metadiscourse in Research Article Abstracts.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes 9: 128–139. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Giménez, Julio C.
2000 “Business E-mail Communication: Some Emerging Tendencies in Register.” English for Specific Purposes 19: 237–251. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001 “Ethnographic Observations in Cross-Cultural Business Negotiations Between Non-Native Speakers of English: An Exploratory Study.” English for Specific Purposes 20: 169–193. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K.
1994An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Hunston, Susan
1993 “Evaluation and Ideology in Scientific Writing.” In Register Analysis: Theory and Practice, ed. by M. Ghadessy, 57–73. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
1994 “Evaluation and Organization in a Sample of Written Academic Discourse.” In Advances in Written Text Analysis, ed. by M. Coulthard, 191–218. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hunston, Susan, and Geoff Thompson
eds. 2000Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hyland, Ken
1998 “Persuasion and Context: The Pragmatics of Academic Metadiscourse.” Journal of Pragmatics 30: 437–455. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2000Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing. London: Longman.Google Scholar
2005 “Stance and engagement: a model of interaction in academic discourse.” Discourse Studies 7 (2): 173–192. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hyland, Ken, and Polly Tse
2004 “Metadiscourse in Academic Writing: A Reappraisal.” Applied Linguistics 25: 156–177. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kankaraanta, Anne
2005 “Hej Seppo, Could Pou Pls Comment on This!Internal Email Communication in Lingua Franca English in a Multinational Company. Jyväskylä, Finland: Jyväskylä University Printing House.Google Scholar
Koutsantoni, Dimitra
2004 “Attitude, Certainty and Allusions to Common Knowledge in Scientific Research Articles.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes 3: 163–182. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lafuente-Millán, Enrique
2014 “Reader Engagement across Cultures, Languages and Contexts of Publication in Business Research Articles.” International Journal of Applied Linguistics 24 (2): 201–223. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marković, Jelena M.
2013 “Engagement Markers in Introductory Textbooks.” Komunikacija i kultura online, IV-4: 36–51.Google Scholar
Martin, James R., and Peter R. R. White
2005The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. London: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mei, Wu Siew
2007 “The Use of Engagement Resources in High and Low-Rated Undergraduate Geography Essays.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes 6: 254–271. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Morrison, Terry, Wayne A. Conaway, and George A. Borden
1994Kiss, Bow or Shake Hands. How to Do Business in Sixty Countries. Holbrook, Mass.: Adams Media Corporation.Google Scholar
Mur Dueñas, Pilar
2010 “Attitude Markers in Business Management Research Articles: A Cross-Cultural Corpus-Driven Approach.” International Journal of Applied Linguistics 19: 50–72. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011 “An Intercultural Analysis of Metadiscourse Features in Research Articles Written in English and in Spanish.” Journal of Pragmatics 43: 3068–3079. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Olsen, Leslie A., and Thomas N. Huckin
1991Technical Writing and Professional Communication. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Rogerson-Revell, Pamela
2007 “Using English for International Business: A European Case Study.” English for Specific Purposes 26: 103–120. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Scott, Mick
2009WordSmith Tools. Birmingham: Lexical Analysis Software.Google Scholar
Sheldon, Elena
2011 “Rhetorical Differences in RA Introductions Written by English L1 and L2 and Castilian Spanish L1 Writers.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes 10: 238–251. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Swales, John M., and Amy Burke
2003 “ ‘It’s Really Fascinating Work’: Differences in the Evaluative Adjectives across Academic Registers.” In Corpus Analysis, Language Structure and Language Use, ed. by P. Leistyna, and C. F. Meyer, 1–18. New York: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Thompson, Geoff
2001 “Interaction in Academic Writing: Learning to Argue with the Reader.” Applied Linguistics 22 (1): 58–78. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
White, Peter R. R.
2001 “Appraisal: An Overview.” The Appraisal Website. Accessed June 29, 2015. http://​www​.grammatics​.com​/appraisal​/appraisalguide​/unframed​/appraisal​-overview​.htm.