This chapter investigates the use of organizational metadiscourse across three different lecturing styles: reading, conversational and rhetorical (Dudley-Evans 1994). Despite the fact that organizational metadiscourse has not traditionally been considered as conveying engagement, we claim that all metadiscourse can perform this function. Although metadiscourse in spoken lectures has received increasing interest in the last decades, to our knowledge there is no study comparing the use of metadiscourse throughout lecturing styles from a multimodal perspective and highlighting engagement. Following Ädel’s (2010) taxonomy and conducting multimodal analyses on a dataset extracted from lectures in Social Sciences at Yale University’s OpenCourseWare, we set out to research organizational metadiscourse instances and demonstrate their multimodal use across lecturing styles and the engagement they convey.
2010 “Just to Give You Kind of a Map of Where We Are Going: A Taxonomy of Metadiscourse in Spoken and Written Academic English.” Nordic Journal of English Studies 9 (2): 69–97.
Artemeva, Natasha, and Janna Fox
2011 “The Writing’s on the Board. The Global and the Local in Teaching Undergraduate Mathematics through Chalk Talk.” Written Communication 28 (4): 345–379.
Bernad-Mechó, Edgar
2017 “Metadiscourse and Topic Introductions in an Academic Lecture: A Multimodal Insight.” Multimodal Communication.
Bernad-Mechó, Edgar
2015 “A Multimodal Discourse Analysis of Linking Metadiscursive Elements in Two Opencourseware Lectures (MOOCs).” Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 212: 61–66.
Bernad-Mechó, Edgar, and Inmaculada Fortanet-Gómez
2017 “Semiotic Modes in the Organization of Lectures in English and in Spanish.” In Professional and Academic Discourse: An Interdisciplinary Perspective (EPiC Series in Language and Linguistics, Volume 2), ed. by Chelo Vargas-Sierra, 224–234.
Brazil, David
1997The Communicative Value of Intonation in English. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cannam, Chris, Christian Landone, and Mark Sandler
2010 “Sonic Visualiser: An Open Source Application for Viewing, Analysing, and Annotating Music Audio Files.” In MM ’10. Proceedings of the 18th ACM International Conference on Multimedia. Firenze, Italy – October 25–29, 2010, 1467–68. New York, NY, USA: ACM.
Chaudron, Craig, and Jack Richards
1986 “The Effect of Discourse Markers on the Comprehension of Lectures.” Applied Linguistics 7: 113–127.
Cochet, Hélène, and Jacques Vauclair
2014 “Deictic Gestures and Symbolic Gestures Produced by Adults in an Experimental Context: Hand Shapes and Hand Preferences.” Laterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain and Cognition 19 (3): 278–301.
Crawford-Camiciottoli, Belinda
2004 “Interactive Discourse Structuring in L2 Guest Lectures: Some Insights from a Comparative Corpus-Based Study.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes 3: 39–54.
2015 “Elaborating Explanations During OpenCourseWare Humanities Lectures: The Interplay of Verbal and Nonverbal Strategies.” In Multimodal Analysis in Academic Settings: From Research to Teaching, ed. by Belinda Crawford-Camiciottoli and Inmaculada Fortanet-Gómez, 144–170. New York: Routledge.
2010 “Metadiscursive Devices in University Lectures.” In Language Use and Language Learning in CLIL Classrooms, ed. by Christiane Dalton-Puffer, Tarja Nikula, and Ute Smit, 213–231. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Deroey, Katrien L. B., and Miriam Taverniers
2011 “A Corpus-Based Study of Lecture Functions.” Moderna Språk 105 (2): 1–22.
Dudley-Evans, Tony
1994 “Variations in the Discourse Patterns Favoured by Different Disciplines and Their Pedagogical Implications.” In Academic Listening: Research Perspectives, ed. by John Flowerdew, 146–158. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fogarty-Bourget, Chloë G., Natasha Artemeva, and Janna Fox
2019 “Gestural Silence: An Engagement Device in the Multimodal Genre of the Chalk Talk Lecture.” In Engagement in Professional Genres, ed. by Carmen Sancho Guinda, 277–295. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Fortanet-Gómez, Inmaculada, and Ma Noelia Ruiz-Madrid
2014 “Multimodality for Comprehensive Communication in the Classroom: Questions in Guest Lectures.” Ibérica 28: 203–224.
Hyland, Ken
2005Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing. London, England: Continuum.
Kendon, Adam
1967 “Some Functions of Gaze Direction in Social Interaction.” Acta Psychologica 26: 22–63.
Kendon, Adam
1988 “How Gestures Can Become like Words.” In Crosscultural Perspectives in Nonverbal Communication, ed. by Fernando Poyatos, 131–141. Toronto: Hogrefe.
Lee, Joseph J., and Nicholas C. Subtirelu
2015 “Metadiscourse in the Classroom: A Comparative Analysis of EAP Lessons and University Lectures.” English for Specific Purposes 37: 52–62.
Manusov, Valerie, and Miles L. Patterson
2006The SAGE Handbook of Nonverbal Communication. London: Sage.
Mauch, Matthias, and Simon Dixon
2014 “pYin: A Fundamental Frequency Estimator Using Probabilistic Threshold Distributions.” In 2014 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). May4–9 Florence, Italy, 659–663.
Mauranen, Anna
2001 “Reflexive Academic Talk: Observations from MICASE.” In Corpus Linguistics in North America: Selections from the 1999 Symposium, ed. by Rita C. Simpson and John M. Swales, 165–178. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.
McNeill, David
1992Hand and Mind: What Gestures Reveal about Thought. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
Norris, Sigrid
2004Analyzing Multimodal Interaction. A Methodological Framework. New York: Routledge.
Norris, Sigrid
2011Identity in (Inter)action. Introducing Multimodal Interaction Analysis. Göttingen: De Gruyter Mouton.
Pérez-Llantada, Carmen
2005 “Instruction and Interaction in an American Lecture Class.” The ESPecialist 26: 205–227.
Pérez-Llantada, Carmen, and Gibson Ferguson
eds2006English as a Glocalization Phenomenon: Observations from a Linguistic Microcosm. València: Universitat de València.
Querol-Julián, Mercedes
2011Evaluation in Discussion Sessions of Conference Paper Presentations: A Multimodal Approach. Saarbrücken: LAP Lambert Academic Publishing.
Querol-Julián, Mercedes, and Blanca Arteaga-Martínez
2019 “Silence and Engagement in the Multimodal Genre of Synchronous Videoconferencing Lectures. The Case of Didactics in Mathematics.” In Engagement in Professional Genres, ed. by Carmen Sancho Guinda, 297–319. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Wittenburg, Peter, Hennie Brugman, Albert Russel, Alex Klassmann, and Han Sloetjes
2006 “ELAN: A Professional Framework for Multimodality Research.” In Proceedings of LREC 2006, Fifth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation.
Yang, Wenhsien
2014 “Stance and Engagement: A Corpus-Based Analysis of Academic Spoken Discourse across Science Domains” LSP Journal – Language for Specific Purposes, Professional Communication, Knowledge Management and Cognition 5 (1): 62–78.
Young, Lynne
1994 “University Lectures – Macro-Structure and Micro-Features.” In Academic Listening: Research Perspectives, ed. by John Flowerdew, 159–176. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cited by
Cited by 5 other publications
Aguilar-Pérez, Marta & Sarah Khan
2022. Metadiscourse use when shifting from L1 to EMI lecturing: implications for teacher training. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching 16:4-5 ► pp. 297 ff.
Bernad-Mechó, Edgar
2023. Multimodal (Inter)action Analysis for the study of lectures: active and passive uses of metadiscourse. Multimodal Communication 12:1 ► pp. 7 ff.
Qin, Yongli & Ping Wang
2021. How EFL Teachers Engage Students: A Multimodal Analysis of Pedagogic Discourse During Classroom Lead-Ins. Frontiers in Psychology 12
Xu, Hui
2024. Variation mechanisms of metadiscourse verb patterns in English journal articles from intra- and interdisciplinary perspectives. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences 9:1
Ädel, Annelie
2021. Reflections on Reflexivity in Digital Communication: Towards a Third Wave of Metadiscourse Studies. In Metadiscourse in Digital Communication, ► pp. 37 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.