Part of
Engagement in Professional Genres
Edited by Carmen Sancho Guinda
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 301] 2019
► pp. 341358
References
Ädel, Annelie, and Anna Mauranen
2010 “Metadiscourse: Diverse and Divided Perspectives.” Nordic Journal of English Studies 9 (2): 1–11.Google Scholar
Austin, Manila
2009 “Embracing the Voice of the Customer. The Transformational Power of Listening.”In Pfeiffer Annual, Leadership Development, ed. by David Dotlich, Peter Cairo, Stephen Rhinesmith and Ron Meeks, 246–267. San Francisco: Pfeiffer.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mijail
1986The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays, ed. by Michael Holquist. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Bhatia, Vijay Kumar
1993Analysing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Breeze, Ruth, Maurizio Gotti, and Carmen Sancho Guinda
eds. 2014Interpersonality in Legal Genres. Bern: Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brodie, Roderick, Linda Hollebeek, Biljana Juriü and Ana Iliü
2011Customer Engagement Conceptual Domain, Fundamental Propositions, and Implications for Research. Journal of Service Research, 14, 252–271. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
COMETVAL (Corpus Multilingüe en Turismo, Universitat de Valencia)
2011–2014: [URL])
Dafouz Milne, Emma
2008 “The Pragmatic Role of Textual and Interpersonal Metadiscourse Markers in the Construction and Attainment of Persuasion: A Cross-Linguistic Study of Newspaper Discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics 40 (1): 95–113. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Norman
1992Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Gotti, Maurizio, and Carmen Sancho Guinda
eds. 2013Narratives in Professional and Academic Genres. Bern: Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Michael, and Ruqaya Hasan
1989Language, Context, and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social-Semiotic Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hiltunen, Turo
2010 “ ‘There Are Good Reasons for This’: Disciplinary Variation in the Use of Existential There Constructions in Academic Research Articles.” In Constructing Interpersonality: Multiple Perspectives on Written Academic Genres, ed. by Rosa Lorés-Sanz, Pilar Mur-Dueñas, and Enrique Lafuente-Millán, 181–204. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Hsu, Shih-Yun, Ning Dehuang, and Arch Woodside
2009 “Storytelling Research of Consumers’ Self-Reports of Urban Tourism Experiences in China.” Journal of Business Research 62 (12): 1223–1254. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyland, Ken
1998 “Persuasion and Context: The Pragmatics of Academic Metadiscourse”. Journal of Pragmatics 30: 437–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2000Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing. London: Longman.Google Scholar
2001a “Bringing in the Reader: Addressee Features in Academic Writing.” Written Communication 18 (4): 549–574. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyland, Ken and Polly Tse
2004 “Metadiscourse in Academic Writing: A Reappraisal”. Applied Linguistics 25: 156–177. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyland, Ken
2005 “Stance and Engagement: A Model of Interaction in Academic Discourse.” Discourse Studies 7 (2): 172–193. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005bMetadiscourse. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
2008 “Disciplinary Voices. Interactions in Research Writing.” English Text Construction 1 (1): 5–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koutsantoni, Dimitra
2009 “Persuading Sponsors and Securing Funding: Rhetorical Patterns in Grant Proposals.” InAcademic Writing, ed. by Maggie Charles, Diane Pecorari, and Susan Hunston, 37–57. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Lerman, Katrina, and Manila Austin
2006What Companies Gain from Listening: the Effect of Community Membership on Members’ Attitudes and Behavior in Relation to the Sponsoring Company. Watertown, MA: Communispace.Google Scholar
Lorés Sanz, Rosa
2011 “The Construction of the Author’s Voice in Academic Writing: The Interplay of Cultural and Disciplinary Factors.” Text & Talk 31 (2): 173–193. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015 “Interculturality in EAP Research: Proposals, Experiences, Applications and Limitations.” In English for Academic Purposes: Approaches and Implications, ed. by Paul Thompson, and Giuliana Diani, 173–193. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Marketing Science Institute
2010Research Priorities. Boston, MA.Google Scholar
Martin, James Robert
1985 “Process and Text: Two Aspects of Human Semiosis”. In Systemic Perspectives on Discourse, ed. by James Benson and William Greaves, Vol. 1. Norwood, NJ: AblexGoogle Scholar
Martin, James R.
1990 “Literacy in Science: Learning to Handle Text as Technology.” In Literacy for a Changing World, ed. by Frances Christie. Victoria: Australian Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar
1992English Text: System and Structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morgan, Michael and Nigel Hemmington
2008 “From Foodservice to Food Experience?” Introduction to the Topical Papers. Journal of Foodservice 19: 108–110.Google Scholar
Mur Dueñas, Pilar
2013 “Spanish Scholars’ Research Article Publishing Process in English-medium Journals: English Used as a Lingua Franca?Journal of English as a Lingua Franca 2 (2): 315–340. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014 “ ‘The Main Contribution of This Study Is…’: An Analysis of Statements of Contribution in English Published Research Articles and L2 Manuscripts.” Journal of Writing Research 5: 271–283. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Osman, Hanaa, Nick Johns, and Peter Lugosi
2014 “Commercial Hospitality and Destination Experiences: McDonald’s and Tourists’ Consumption of Space.” Tourism Management 42: 238–247. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prahalad, Coimbatore, and Venkat Ramaswamy
2004 “Co-creating Unique Value with Customers.” Strategy & Leadership 32 (3): 4–9. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sancho Guinda, Carmen, Maurizio Gotti, and Ruth Breeze
2014 “Framing Interpersonality in Law Contexts.” In Interpersonality in Legal Genres, ed. by Ruth Breeze, Maurizio Gotti, and Carmen Sancho Guinda, 9–35. Bern: Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Suau-Jiménez, Francisca
2010La Traducción Especializada (en inglés y español en géneros de economía y empresa). Madrid: Arco Libros.Google Scholar
2012a “Páginas Web Institucionales de Promoción Turística: El Uso Metadiscursivo Interpersonal en Inglés y Español.” In Discurso Turístico e Internet, ed. by Julia Sanmartín, 125–154. Madrid: Iberoamericana/Vervuert.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012b “El Turista 2.0 Como Receptor de la Promoción Turística: Estrategias Lingüísticas e Importancia de Su Estudio.” PASOS. Revista de Turismo y Patrimonio Cultural 6 (4): 143–154. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014 “Dialogic Voices of Writers and Readers in Traveller Forums through Interpersonality.” In Dialogicity in Written Specialised Genres, ed. by Luz Gil-Salom, and Carmen Soler-Monreal, 137–163. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016a “What Can the Construction of Stance and Engagement Voices in Traveller Forums and Tourism Promotional Websites Bring into a Cultural, Cross-Generic and Disciplinary View of Interpersonality?Ibérica, 31: 199–220.Google Scholar
Suau-Jiménez, Francisca, and Rosana Dolón Herrero
2007 “The Importance of Metadiscourse in the Genre ‘Promotion of Touristic Services and Products’: Differences in English and Spanish.” In Languages for Specific Purposes: Searching for Common Solutions, ed. by Dita Galová, 71–79. Newcastle, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Suau-Jiménez, Francisca, and María Labarta Postigo
2017 “El Discurso Interpersonal en la Guía Turística en Español y Alemán y Su Importancia para la TraducciónNormas, 7(1): 204–223. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swales, John
1993 “Genre and Engagement.” Revue Belge de Philologie et de l’Histoire, 71: 687–698. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vázquez, Ignacio, and Diana Giner
2009 “Writing with Conviction: The Use of Boosters in Modelling Persuasion in Academic Discourses.” Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses 22, 219–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Watson, Pamela, Michael Morgan, and Nigel Hemmington
2008 “Online Communities and the Sharing of Extraordinary Restaurant Experiences.” Journal of Foodservice 19 (6): 289–302. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
White, Peter R. R.
2003 “Beyond Modality and Hedging: A Dialogic View of the Language of Intersubjective Stance.” Text 23 (2): 2594–2598. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
WTO (World Tourism Organization)
2015 Accessed August 29. [URL]
Cited by

Cited by 6 other publications

Bocanegra-Valle, Ana
2023. Engaging in predatory practices: How editors persuade prospective authors. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 93  pp. 117 ff. DOI logo
Cenni, Irene, Patrick Goethals & Camilla Vásquez
2020. A cross-linguistic study of metacommunication in online hotel reviews. Intercultural Pragmatics 17:4  pp. 445 ff. DOI logo
Chen, Shuping, Xiaoyun Han, Anil Bilgihan & Fevzi Okumus
2021. Customer engagement research in hospitality and tourism: a systematic review. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management 30:7  pp. 871 ff. DOI logo
Isti'anah, Arina
2021. Attitudinal Language of Flora and Fauna Discourse on an Indonesian Tourism Website: Appraisal in Ecolinguistics. PAROLE: Journal of Linguistics and Education 11:2  pp. 163 ff. DOI logo
Radovanović, Aleksandra
2022. Patterns and Variation in English Language Discourse. 9th Brno Conference on Linguistics Studies in English,  pp. 105 ff. DOI logo
Santos, Sara, Luísa Fernandes Augusto & Adriana Oliveira
2021. Digital Communication and Dialogism in Official Websites of Tourism Institutions. In Impact of New Media in Tourism [Advances in Hospitality, Tourism, and the Services Industry, ],  pp. 192 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.