Cover not available
Part of
Empirical Studies of the Construction of Discourse
Edited by Óscar Loureda, Inés Recio Fernández, Laura Nadal and Adriana Cruz
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 305] 2019
► pp. 17–42

Chapter 1
Challenges in the contrastive study of discourse markers

The case of then

| University of Gothenburg
I argue that the position of the discourse markers in the utterance should be part of the contrastive analysis on the basis of a corpus case study of then and its Swedish cognate då. The focus for the contrastive analysis has been on then which has been studied both in the left and the right periphery while då has been investigated only in its use in the right periphery. English and Swedish then/då seem to have partly overlapping polysemies reflecting the fact that they are not completely grammaticalized. However, when we take the position of then/då into account there are differences between them reflecting both the uncertain distinction between their uses as discourse marker or modal particle and that languages prefer different strategies.
Keywords: contrastive, English, Swedish, German, then , parallel corpus, right periphery, left periphery grammaticalization
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2. Then in the left and the right periphery
  • 3.The use of then in the left and the right periphery in authentic corpus examples
  • 4. Then in the left periphery
    • 4.1LP then as a connective adverbial stating the consequence of an event or circumstance in the preceding discourse
    • 4.2 Then as a discourse marker indicating that an utterance is a deduction from what has been said in the preceding discourse
    • 4.3 Then as a discourse marker in non-declarative utterances indicating that a request or a question is warranted by the preceding discourse
  • 5. Then in the right periphery
    • 5.1RP then in questions
    • 5.2 Then in assertions expressing modal uncertainty
    • 5.3RP then in requests for action with a mitigating function
    • 5.4RP then commenting on what has been said by adding a modification
    • 5.5RP then with textual functions on the information structure level
    • 5.6Summarising then as a modal particle in the right periphery
  • 6.Some cross-linguistic similarities and differences: A comparison between English then and Swedish då in the right periphery
    • 6.1RP då in questions
      • a. Då in wh-questions
      • b. Då in yes-no questions
      • c. Då in conclusions in the form of declarative sentences
    • 6.2 Då in imperatives with a strengthening or weakening effect
    • 6.3 Då in utterances signalling conclusion
  • 7.German correspondences of English then in final position
    • a. Then translated by denn in questions
    • b. Then in questions having declarative form (indicating a conclusion and a request for confirmation)
    • c. then in imperatives (justified requests)
  • 8.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
  • Appendix
Published online: 6 August 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.305.01aij
References
Aijmer, Karin
2010 “ Then. A Temporal Adverb and a Discourse Marker.” In English Philology and Corpus Studies. A Festschrift in Honour of Mitsunori Imai to Celebrate his Seventieth Birthday, ed. by Shinichori Watanabe, and Yukituri Hosuya, 1–21. Tokyo: Shohakusha.Google Scholar
Altenberg, Bengt
2010 “Conclusive English then and Swedish då. A Corpus-based Contrastive Study.” Languages in Contrast: 102–123. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Altenberg, Bengt, and Karin Aijmer
2000 “The English-Swedish Parallel Corpus: A Resource for Contrastive Research and Translation Studies.” In Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, ed. by Christian Mair, and Marianne Hundt, 15–33. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Altenberg, Bengt, Karin Aijmer, and Mikael Svensson
2001 “The English-Swedish Parallel Corpus: Manual.” Accessed September 10th, 2017. [online: [URL]].
Anscombre, Jean-Claude and Oswald Ducrot
1989 “Argumentativity and Informativity.” In From Metaphysics to Rhetoric, ed. by Michael Meyer, 71–87. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beeching, Kate, and Ulrich Detges
2014 “Introduction.” In Discourse Functions at the Left and Right Periphery: Crosslinguistic Investigations of Language Use and Language Change, ed. by Kate Beeching, and Ulrich Detges, 1–23. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad, and Edward Finegan
1999 The Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Borreguero Zuloaga, Margarita
2014 “Left Periphery in Discourse. Frame Units and Discourse Markers.” In Left Sentence Peripheries in Spanish. Diachronic, Variationist and Comparative Perspectives, ed. by Andreas Dufter, and Álvaro Octavio de Toledo, 345–382. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Borthen, Kaja
2014 “Hva betyr ‘da’, da?.” Norsk Lingvistisk Tidsskrift 32: 257–306.Google Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele
2006 “Discourse Particles and Modal Particles as Grammatical Elements.” In Approaches to Discourse Particles, ed. by Kerstin Fischer, 403–425. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Fraser, Bruce
1996 “Pragmatic Markers.” Pragmatics 6(2): 167–190. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fretheim, Thorsten
2015 “A Relevance-theoretical Perspective on Norwegian Utterance-final Particles da and altså Compared to their English Counterpart then .” In Final Particles, ed. by Sylvie Hancil, Alexander Haselow, and Margje Post, 249–284. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hancil, Sylvie, Alexander Haselow, and Margje Post
(editors) 2015 Final Particles. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hansen, Maj-Britt Mosegaard
1998 The Function of Discourse Particles. A Study with Special Reference to Spoken Standard French. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haselow, Alexander
2011 “Discourse Marker and Modal Particle: The Functions of Utterance-final then in Spoken English.” Journal of Pragmatics 43(14): 3603–3623. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 “Arguing for a Wide Conception of Grammar: The Case of Final Particles in Spoken Discourse.” Folia Linguistica 47(2): 375–424. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul
1991 “On Some Principles of Grammaticalization.” In Approaches to Grammaticalization, ed. by Elizabeth Traugott, and Bernd Heine, 17–35. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lenker, Ursula
2010 Argument and Rhetoric: Adverbial Connectors in the History of English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah
1987 Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stig, Johansson, and Cathrine Fabricius-Hansen
dirs. English-German parallel corpus In Oslo Multilingual Corpus (1999–2008) online [URL]
Sweetser, Eve
1990 From Etymology to Pragmatics. Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C.
2014 “On the Function of the Epistemic Adverbs Surely and No Doubt at the Left and Right Peripheries of the Clause.” In Discourse Functions at the Left and Right Periphery: Crosslinguistic Investigations of Language Use and Language Change, ed. by Kate Beeching, and Ulrich Detges, 72–91. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van der Wouden, Ton, and Ad Foolen
2015 “Dutch Particles in the Right Periphery.” In Final Particles, ed. by Sylvie Hancil, Alexander Haselow, and Margje Post, 221–247. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Ruskan, Anna & Marta Carretero
2021. Chapter 15. A cross-linguistic look at the right periphery. In Pragmatic Markers and Peripheries [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 325], ► pp. 415 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.