Chapter 5
Causal relations between discourse and grammar
Because in spoken French and Dutch
The chapter presents a cross-linguistic study of
the subordinating conjunctions parce que in French
and omdat in Dutch (both corresponding to English
because) at the interface between discourse and
grammar. It is argued that causal subordinate conjunctions do not
always mark a causal relation at the discourse level, because they
do not always link two independent utterances or speech-acts. Such
subordinating conjunctions, however, can gain discourse status, when
they are used paratactically; as may be witnessed from accompanying
discourse behavior such as co-occurring discourse markers, filled
pauses, declination reset, etc. Thus, the aim of this study is to
gain deeper insight into the discursive consequences of the
grammatical options of coordination and subordination.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Causal connectives, subjectivity and discourse
- 3.
Parce que in grammar and discourse
- 3.1Microsyntactic and macrosyntactic parce
que
- 3.2Conjunctive and DM parce que in
discourse
- 3.2.1
Parce que
: Prosodic patterns
- 3.2.2
Parce que
: Disfluencies and production phenomena
- 3.2.3
Parce que and co-referential
chains
- 3.2.4
Parce que and turn management
- 3.3
Parce que
: Preliminary conclusion
- 4.V2-omdat in (spontaneous) spoken Dutch
- 4.1The syntactic status of V2-omdat
- 4.2The semantic status of V2-omdat
- 4.3The discourse status of V2-omdat
- 4.4Preliminary conclusion on omdat
- 5.Discussion and conclusion
-
Acknowledgements
-
Notes
-
References
References
Ariel, Mira
2009 “
Discourse,
Grammar,
Discourse.”
Discourse
Studies 11 (1): 5–36.
Brinton, Laurel J.
1996 Pragmatic
Markers in English: Grammaticalization and Discourse
Functions. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Brown, Gillian, and George Yule
1983 Discourse
Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Canestrelli, Anneloes R., Willem M. Mak, and Ted J. M. Sanders
2013 “
Causal
Connectives in Discourse Processing: How Differences in
Subjectivity Are Reflected in Eye
Movements.”
Language and
Cognitive
Processes 28 (9): 1394–1413.
Crible, Ludivine, Liesbeth Degand, and Gaëtanelle Gilquin
Croft, William
2001 Radical
Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological
Perspective. Oxford, Cambridge: Oxford University Press.
Debaisieux, Jeanne-Marie
2002 “
Le
fonctionnement de parce que en français parlé : Étude
quantitative sur
corpus.” In
Romanistische
Korpuslinguistik, Korpora und gesprochene
Sprache, ed.
by
Claus D. Pusch, and
Wolfgang Raible, 349–376. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
Debaisieux, Jeanne-Marie
2004 “
Les
conjonctions de subordination: Mots grammaticaux ou mots de
discours? Le cas de parce
que
.”
Revue de semantique et
pragmatique 15–16: 51–67.
Debaisieux, Jeanne-Marie
2016 “
Toward
a Global Approach to Discourse Uses of Conjunctions in
Spoken French.”
Language
Sciences 58: 79–94.
Degand, Liesbeth
1998 “
Het
ideationele gebruik van want en
omdat: een geval van vrije
variatie.”
Nederlandse
Taalkunde 3: 309–326.
Degand, Liesbeth
2014 “
‘So
very fast very fast then’ Discourse Markers at Left and
Right Periphery in Spoken
French.” In
Discourse
Functions at the Left and Right Periphery: Crosslinguistic
Investigations of Language Use and Language
Change, ed.
by
Kate Beeching, and
Ulrich Detges, 151–178. Studies
in Pragmatics,
Volume 12. Leiden, Boston: Brill.
Degand, Liesbeth
2016 “
Omdat
ik heb tot half één tentamen. Over nevenschikkend omdat in
context.”
Nederlandse
Taalkunde 21 (3): 419–431.
Degand, Liesbeth, and Benjamin Fagard
2012 “
Competing
Connectives in the Causal Domain: French
car and parce
que
.”
Journal of
Pragmatics 44 (2): 154–168.
Degand, Liesbeth, Laurence Martin, and Anne-Catherine Simon
2014 “
LOCAS-F :
Un corpus oral multigenres
annoté.” In
CMLF
2014 – 4ème Congrès Mondial de Linguistique
Française, 2613–2626. Berlin: EDP Sciences.
Degand, Liesbeth, and Henk Pander Maat
2003 “
A
Contrastive Study of Dutch and French Causal Connectives on
the Speaker Involvement
Scale.” In
Usage-Based
Approaches to Dutch, ed.
by
Arie Verhagen, and
Jeroen Maarten van de Weijer, 175–199. Utrecht: Lot.
Degand, Liesbeth, and Anne-Catherine Simon
2009 “
On
Identifying Basic Discourse Units in Speech: Theoretical and
Empirical
Issues.”
Discours 4 [online:
[URL]]
Degand, Liesbeth, and Geertje van Bergen
2018 “
Discourse
Markers as Turn-Transition Devices: Evidence from Speech and
Instant Messaging.”
Discourse
Processes 55 (1): 47–71.
Dehé, Nicole
2017 Parentheticals
in Spoken English. The Syntax-Prosody
Relation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Diessel, Holger, and Katja Hetterle
2011 “
Causal
Clauses: A Cross-Linguistic Investigation of their
Structure, Meaning and
Use.” In
Linguistic
Universals and Language Variation, ed.
by
Peter Siemund, 23–54. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Du Bois, John W.
2003 “
Discourse
and
Grammar.” In
The
New Psychology of Language: Cognitive and Functional
Approaches to Language Structure, ed.
by
Michael Tomasello, 2, 47–87. London: Erlbaum.
Fasold, Ralph
1990 The
Sociolinguistics of Language: Introduction to
Sociolinguistics. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Fischer, Kerstin
2000 “
Discourse
Particles, Turn-Taking, and the Semantics-Pragmatics
Interface.”
Revue de
Sémantique et
Pragmatique 8: 111–137.
Ford, Cecilia E.
1994 “
Dialogic
Aspects of Talk and Writing: Because on the
Interactive-Edited
Continuum.”
Text –
Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of
Discourse 14: 531–554.
Gernsbacher, Morton A.
1997 “
Coherence
Cues Mapping during
Comprehension.” In
Processing
Interclausal Relationships. Studies in the Production and
Comprehension of Text, ed.
by
Jean Costermans, and
Michel Fayol, 3–21. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Goldberg, Adele E.
2006 Constructions
at Work: The Nature of Generalization in
Language. Oxford: University Press.
Groupe
lambda-L.
1975 “
Car,
parce que, puisque.”
Revue
Romane 10: 248–280.
Haeseryn, Walter, Kirsten Romijn, Guido Geerts, Jaap de Rooij, and Maarten van den Toorn
1997 Algemene
Nederlandse spraakkunst. 2nd
ed. Groningen, Deurne: Martinus Nijhoff, Wolters Plantyn.
Hansson, Petra
1999 “
Prosodic
Correlates of Discourse Markers in
Dialogue.” In
ETRW
on Dialogue and
Prosody, Veldhoven, The Netherlands. [online:
[URL].]
Hoffmann, Thomas, and Graeme Trousdale
2013 The
Oxford Handbook of Construction
Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kehler, Andrew
2001 Coherence,
Reference, and the Theory of
Grammar. Chicago: CSLI publications.
Keller, Rudi
1995 “
The
Epistemic
Weil
.” In
Subjectivity
and Subjectivisation. Linguistic
Perspectives, ed.
by
Dieter Stein, and
Susan Wright, 16–30. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kempen, Gerard, and Karin Harbusch
2016 “
Verb-Second
Word Order after German Weil ‘Because’: Psycholinguistic
Theory from Corpus-Linguistic
Data.”
Glossa: A Journal of
General
Linguistics 1 (1).
Kempen, Gerard, and Karin Harbusch
2018 “
A
competitive mechanism selecting verb-second versus
verb-final word order in causative and argumentative clauses
of spoken Dutch: A corpus-linguistic
study.”
Language
Sciences 69: 30–42.
Persoon, Ingrid, Ted Sanders, Hugo Quené, and Arie Verhagen
2010 “
Een
coördinerende omdat-constructie in gesproken Nederlands? –
Tekstlinguïstische en prosodische
aspecten.”
Nederlandse
Taalkunde 15 (3): 259–282.
Sanders, Ted, and Wilbert Spooren
2007 “
Discourse
and Text
Structure.” In
Handbook
of Cognitive Linguistics, ed.
by
Dirk Geeraerts, and
Hubert Cuykens, 916–943. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sanders, Ted, and Wilbert Spooren
Sanders, Ted, and Wilbert Spooren
2013 “
Exceptions
to Rules: A Qualitative Analysis of Backward Causal
Connectives in Dutch Naturalistic
Discourse.”
Text and
Talk 33 (3): 377–398.
Sanders, Ted, and Wilbert Spooren
2014 “
Causality
and Subjectivity in Discourse: The Meaning and Use of Causal
Connectives in Spontaneous Conversation, Chat Interactions
and Written
Text.”
Linguistics 53 (1): 53–92.
Scheffler, Tatjana
2005 “
Syntax
and Semantics of Causal denn in
German.” In
Proceedings
of the 15th Amsterdam
Colloquium, Amsterdam: 215–220.
Schiffrin, Deborah
1987 Discourse
Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schourup, Lawrence
1999 “
Discourse
Markers.”
Lingua 107 (3–4): 227–265.
Simon, Anne Catherine, and Liesbeth Degand
2007 “
Connecteurs
de causalité, implication du locuteur et profils
prosodiques: Le cas de car et de parce
que
.”
French language
studies 17 (3): 323–341.
Simon, Anne Catherine, and George Christodoulides
2016 “
Frontières
prosodiques perçues : corrélats acoustiques et indices
syntaxiques.”
Langue
française 191 (3): 83–106.
Smessaert, Hans, Bert Cornillie, Dagmar Divjak, and Karel van den Eynde
2005 “
Degrees
of Clause Integration: From Endotactic to Exotactic
Subordination in
Dutch.”
Linguistics 43 (3): 471–529.
Spooren, Wilbert, Ted Sanders, Mike Huiskes, and Liesbeth Degand
2010 “
Subjectivity
and Causality: A Corpus Study of Spoken
Language.” In
Empirical
and Experimental Methods in Cognitive/Functional
Research, ed.
by
Sally Rice, and
John Newman, 241–255. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Stede, Manfred
2016 Handbuch
Textannotation: Potsdammer Kommentarkorpus
2.0. Potsdam: Universitätsverlag Potsdam.
Steen, Gerard
2005 “
Basic
Discourse Acts: Towards a Psychological Theory of Discourse
Segmentation.” In
Cognitive
Linguistics: Internal Dynamics and Interdisciplinary
Interaction, ed.
by
Francisco Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, and
Sandra Pena Cervel, 283–312. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Stubbs, Michael
1983 Discourse
Analysis: The Sociolinguistic Analysis of Natural
Language. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Stukker, Ninke, and Ted Sanders
2012 “
Subjectivity
and Prototype Structure in Causal Connectives: A
Cross-Linguistic
Perspective.”
Journal of
Pragmatics 44 (2): 169–190.
Sweetser, Eve
1990 From
Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects
of Semantic
Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Van Eerten, Laura
2007 “
Over
het Corpus Gesproken
Nederlands.”
Nederlandse
Taalkunde 3: 194–215.
Waltereit, Richard
2011 “
Grammaticalization and Discourse.” In
The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization, ed. by
Bernd Heine, and
Heike Narrog. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zufferey, Sandrine
2012 “
‘Car,
parce que, puisque’ Revisited: Three Empirical Studies on
French Causal
Connectives.”
Journal of
Pragmatics 44 (2): 138–153.
Cited by
Cited by 1 other publications
Klumm, Matthias, Anita Fetzer & Evelien Keizer
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.