Chapter published in:
Empirical Studies of the Construction of Discourse
Edited by Óscar Loureda, Inés Recio Fernández, Laura Nadal and Adriana Cruz
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 305] 2019
► pp. 253–270

Processing implicit and explicit causality in Spanish

| *EAN University
| **Heidelberg University
As a basic discourse relation, causality can be made explicit by means of an argumentative connective, but it can also be implicitly expressed. In the latter case, experimental evidence shows that causality is highly predictable in discourse and can be easily inferred. Therefore, the question arises as to the actual contribution of causal connectives to utterance processing. We addressed this issue in an eye tracking reading experiment, and compared how the presence or absence of the Spanish causal connective por tanto affects processing in its role as procedural guide. The results suggest that making the connective explicit in a consecutive relation already inferable from the meaning of the lexical expressions in the utterances slows down processing. In this sense, the nature of connectives as procedural guides (Relevance Theory, see Blakemore 1987) might be nuanced, since the extent to which a connective determines processing varies depending on the type of discourse relation at issue.
Keywords: causal relations, implicit causality, explicit causality, connectives, processing, procedural meaning
Published online: 06 August 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.305.09nad
References

References

Almela, Ramón, Pascual Cantos, Álvaro Sánchez, Ramón Sarmiento, and Moisés Almela
2005 Frecuencias del español. Diccionario y estudios léxicos y morfológicos. Madrid: Universitas.Google Scholar
Anscombre, Jean-Claude, and Oswald Ducrot
1994 La argumentación en la lengua. Translated by Julia Sevilla and Marta Tordesillas. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Asr, Fatemeh A., and Vera Demberg
2012 Implicitness of Discourse Relations. Paper presented at the COLING , Mumbai.
Blakemore, Diane
1987 Semantic Constraints on Relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
2002 Relevance and Linguistic Meaning: The Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brehm-Jurish, Eva
2005 “Connective Ties in Discourse: Three ERP-Studies on Causal, Temporal and Concessives Connective Ties, and their Influence on Language Processing.” PhD diss., University of Potsdam.Google Scholar
Briz, Antonio, Salvador Pons, and José Portolés
dirs. Diccionario de partículas discursivas del español (DPDE) Accessed August 16th, 2017 online www​.dpde​.es
Carbonell Olivares, María Soledad
2005 “Estudio semántico-pragmático de las relaciones de contraste y sus marcas en lengua inglesa.” PhD diss., Universitat de València.Google Scholar
Degand, Lisbeth, Lefèvre, Nathalie, and Bestgen, Yves
1999 “The impact of connectives and anaphoric expressions on expository discourse comprehension.” Document Design 1(1): 39–51. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Domínguez García, Noemí
2007 Conectores discursivos en textos argumentativos breves. Madrid: Arco Libros.Google Scholar
Drenhaus, Heiner, Vera Demberg, Judith Köhne, and Francesca Delogu
2014 Incremental and predictive discourse processing based on causal and concessive discourse markers: ERP studies on German and English. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 36th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci), Quebec: 403–409.
Escandell Vidal, María Victoria
2005 La comunicación. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Escandell Vidal Vidal, María Victoria, and Manuel Leonetti
2011 “On the rigidity of procedural meaning.” In Procedural Meaning, ed. by María Victoria Escandell Vidal, Manuel Leonetti, and Aoife Ahern, 81–102. Bingley: Emerald.Google Scholar
Fahrmeir, Ludwig, Thomas Kneib, Stefan Lang, and Brian Marx
2013 Regression. Models, Methods and Applications. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Fraser, Bruce, and Monica Malamud-Makowski
1996 “English and Spanish Contrastive Discourse Markers.” Language Sciences, 18(3–4): 863–881. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hoek, Jet, and Sandrine Zufferey
2015 “Factors Influencing the Implicitation of Discourse Relations across Languages.” Proceedings of the 11th Joint ACL-ISO Workshop on Interoperable Semantic Annotation (ISA-11) , London.
Hyönä, Jukka, Robert Lorch, and Mike Rinck
2003 “Eye Movement Measures to Study Global Text Processing.” In The Mind’s Eye: Cognitive and Applied Aspects of Eye Movement Research, ed. by Jukka Hyönä, Ralph Radach, and Heiner Deubel, 313–334. Amsterdam: Elsevier. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Iten, Corinne
1999 “The Relevance of Argumentation Theory.” UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 11: 41–81.Google Scholar
Just, Marcel A., and Patricia A. Carpenter
1980 “A Theory of Reading: From Eye Fixations to Comprehension.” Psychological Review 87: 329–354. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Köhne, Judith, and Vera Demberg
2013 “The Time-course of Processing Discourse Connectives.” Proceedings of the 35th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci), Berlin: 2760–2766.
Leonetti, Manuel, and Escandell Vidal, María Victoria
2004 “Semántica conceptual / Semántica procedimental”. In Actas del V Congreso de Lingüística General, vol. II, ed. by Milka Villayandre Llamazares, 1727–1738. Madrid: Arco/Libros.Google Scholar
Loureda, Óscar, and Esperanza Acín
2010 “Cuestiones candentes en torno a los marcadores del discurso en español”. In Los estudios sobre marcadores del discurso en español, hoy, ed. by Óscar Loureda, and Esperanza Acín, 7–60. Madrid: Arco Libros.Google Scholar
Loureda, Óscar, Laura Nadal, and Inés Recio Fernández
2016 “Partículas discursivas y cognición. Por tanto y la conexión argumentativa.” Romanistisches Jahrbuch 67(1): 240–254. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mak, Willem M., and Ted Sanders
2012 “The role of causality in discourse processing: Effects of expectation and coherence relations.” Language and Cognitive Processes 28(9): 1414–1437. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martín Zorraquino, M.ª Antonia, and José Portolés
1999 “Los marcadores del discurso.” In Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, directed by Ignacio Bosque, and Violeta Demonte, vol. 3, 4051–4213. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.Google Scholar
Millis, Keith K., and Marcel Just
1994 “The influence of connectives on sentence comprehension.” Journal of Memory and Language 33(1): 128–147. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Moeschler, Jacques
1989 “Pragmatic Connectives, Argumentative Coherence and Relevance”. Argumentation 3: 321–339. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Moeschler, Jacques, and Anne Reboul
1994 Dictionnaire encyclopédique de pragmatique. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Murillo, Silvia
2010 “Los marcadores del discurso y su semántica.” In Los estudios sobre marcadores del discurso en español, hoy, ed. by Óscar Loureda, and Esperanza Acín, 241–280. Madrid: Arco Libros.Google Scholar
Murray, John D.
1997 “Connectives and Narrative Text: The Role of Continuity.” Memory & Cognition, 25(2): 227–236. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nadal, Laura
In Press. Lingüística experimental y contraargumentación: un estudio del conector sin embargo en español. Peter Lang.
Nadal, Laura, Adriana Cruz, Inés Recio, and Óscar Loureda
2016 “El significado procedimental y las partículas discursivas del español: una aproximación experimental.” Revista Signos. Estudios de Lingüística, 49(S1): 52–77. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pickering, Martin J., Mathew J. Traxler, and Mathew W. Crocker
2000 “Ambiguity Resolution in Sentence Processing: Evidence against Likelihood.” Journal of Memory and Language, 43: 447–475. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Portolés, José
2001 [1998] Marcadores del discurso. Barcelona: Ariel.Google Scholar
2004 Pragmática para hispanistas. Madrid: Síntesis.Google Scholar
Rayner, Keith
1998 “Eye Movements in Reading and Information Processing: 20 Years of Research.” Psychological Bulletin 124(3): 372–422. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Recio, Inés, Laura Nadal, and Óscar Loureda
2018 ”On Argumentative Relations in Spanish: Experimental Evidence on the Grammaticalization of Cause-consequence Discourse Markers.” In Discourse Markers in Grammaticalization and Constructionalization: new Issues in the Study of Language Change, ed. by Salvador Pons Bordería, and Óscar Loureda, 384–409. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Reichle, Erik D., Keith Rayner, and Alexander Pollatsek
2003 “The E-Z Reader Model of Eye-Movement Control in Reading: Comparisons to other Models.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26: 445–526. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rudolph, Elisabeth
1996 Contrast: Adversative and Concessive Relations and their Expressions in English, German, Spanish, Portuguese on Sentence and Text Level. New York/Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, Ted J. M.
2005 “Coherence, causality and cognitive complexity in discourse.” In Proceedings/Acts SEM-05, First International Symposium on the exploration and modeling of meaning, ed. by Michel Aurnague, Myriam Bras, Anne Le Draoulec and Laure Vieu, 105–114.Google Scholar
Sanders, Ted J. M., and Leo Noordman
2000 “The Role of Coherence Relations and Their Linguistic Markers in Text Processing.” Discourse Processes 29(1): 37–60. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, Ted J. M., Wilbert Spooren, and Leo Noordman
1992 “Toward a Taxonomy of Coherence Relations.” Discourse Processes 15: 1–35. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sandra, Dominiek
2009 “Experimentation.” In Cognition and Pragmatics, ed. by Dominiek Sandra, Jan-Ola Östman, and Jef Verschueren, 157–299. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Silfhout, Gerdineke, Jacqueline Evers-Vermeul, and Ted Sanders
2015 “Connectives as Processing Signals: How Students Benefit in Processing Narrative and Expository Texts”. Discourse Processes 52(1). 47–76. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zunino, Gabriela
2014 “Cognitive Perspectives On Discourse Processing: Causality and Counter-Causality.” Signos Lingüísticos 10: 154–171.Google Scholar
Zunino, Gabriela, Valeria Abusamra, and Alexander Raiter
2011 “Articulación entre conocimiento del mundo y conocimiento lingüístico en la comprensión de relaciones causales y contracausales: el papel de las partículas conectivas”. Forma y Función 25: 15–34.Google Scholar