Chapter published in:
Reference and Identity in Public Discourses
Edited by Ursula Lutzky and Minna Nevala
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 306] 2019
► pp. 251280
References

References

Androutsopoulos, Jannis
2010 “Localizing the Global on the Participatory Web.” In The Handbook of Language and Globalization, ed. by Nick Coupland, 203–231. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013 “Online Data Collection.” In Data Collection in Sociolinguistics: Methods and Applications, ed. Christine Mallinson, Becky Childs, and Gerard van Herk, 236–250. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Badyda, Ewa, and Lucyna Warda-Radys
2018 “W żartach, ale na serio – odwołania do polskiej rzeczywistości politycznej w toponimii fikcyjnego kraju San Escobar.” Język Polski 3: 49–64.Google Scholar
Bednarek, Monika
2005 “Frames Revisited – the Coherence-Inducing Function of Frames.” Journal of Pragmatics 37 (5): 685–705. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bös, Birte, Sonja Kleinke, Sandra Millon, and Nuria Hernandez
(eds) 2018The Discursive Construction of Identities On- and Offline. Personal – group – collective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary, and Kira Hall
2005 “Identity and Interaction: A Sociocultural Linguistic Approach.” Discourse Studies 7 (4–5): 585–614. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Burghardt, Manuel
2015 “Tools for the Analysis and Visualization of Twitter Language Data.” 10plus1: Living Linguistics 1. Available online at https://​epub​.uni​-regensburg​.de​/35669/ (accessed 15 April 2019).
Busse, Dietrich
2012Frame-Semantik. Ein Kompendium. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Choi, Su Young, and Younghan Cho
2017 “Generating Counter-Public Spheres Through Social Media: Two Social Movements in Neoliberalised South Korea.” Javnost – The Public 24 (1): 15–33. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Czerwiński, Maciej, Paweł Nowak, and Renata Przybylska
(eds) 2010Język IV Rzeczypospolitej. Lublin: UMCS.Google Scholar
Entman, Robert
1993 “Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm.” Journal of Communication 43 (4): 51–58. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Ash
2016 “Stance and Identity in Twitter Hashtags.” Language at Internet 13 (1). Available online at https://​www​.languageatinternet​.org​/articles​/2016​/evans (accessed 15 April 2019).
Fauconnier, Gilles, and Mark Turner
2003The Way We Think. Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Fraas, Claudia
2013 “Frames – ein qualitativer Zugang zur Analyse von Sinnstrukturen in der Online-Kommunikation.” In Die Dynamik sozialer und sprachlicher Netzwerke, ed. by Barbara Frank-Job, Alexander Mehler, and Tilman Stutter, 259–283. Wiesbaden: VS. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fraas, Claudia, Stefan Meier, and Christian Pentzold
2010 “Konvergenz an den Schnittstellen unterschiedlicher Kommunikationsformen: Ein Frame-basierter analytischer Zugriff.” In Neue Medien – Neue Formate. Ausdifferenzierung und Konvergenz in der Medienkommunikation, ed. by Hans-Jürgen Bucher, Thomas Gloning, and Katrin Lehnen, 227–256. Frankfurt a. M., New York: Campus.Google Scholar
Fraas, Claudia, and Christian Pentzold
2008 “Online-Diskurse – Theoretische Prämissen, methodische Anforderungen und analytische Befunde.” In Methoden der Diskurslinguistik. Sprachwissenschaftliche Zugänge zur transtextuellen Ebene, ed. by Jürgen Spitzmüller, and Ingo Warnke, 287–322. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015 “Big Data vs. Slow Understanding? Voraussetzungen und Vorgehen computergestützter Analyse transmedialer multimodaler Diskurse.” Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik 43 (1): 112–133.Google Scholar
Fraser, Nancy
1990 “Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy.” Social Text 25 (26): 56–80. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Glaser, Barney, and Anselm Strauss
1967The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
Głowiński, Michał
2009Nowomowa i ciągi dalszy: szkice dawne i nowe. Kraków: Universitas.Google Scholar
Halavais, Alexander
2014 “Structure of Twitter: Social and Technical.” In Twitter and Society, ed. by Katrin Weller, Axel Bruns, Jean Burgess, Merja Mahrt, and Cornelius Puschmann, 29–42. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Hardaker, Claire, and Mark McGlashan
2016 “ ‘Real Men Don’t Hate Women’: Twitter Rape Threats and Group Identity.” Journal of Pragmatics 91: 80–93. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Herring, Susan
2013 “Discourse in Web 2.0: Familiar, Reconfigured, and Emergent.” In Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics 2011: Discourse 2.0: Language and New Media, ed. by Deborah Tannen, and Amy Tester, 1–25. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Issel-Dombert, Sandra
2017 “ M. le Président, la prochaine fois, évitez le scooter – Zur Parodierung von Skandalen in der Werbekommunikation im Web 2.0.” Zeitschrift für Angewandte Linguistik 66: 99–119. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Johnstone, Barbara
2016 “Enregisterment: How Linguistic Items Become Linked with Ways for Speaking.” Lang Linguist Compass 10: 632–643. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kirner-Ludwig, Monika
2018 “Great Pretenders: The Phenomenon of Impersonating (Pseudo-)historical Personae in Medieval Blogs, or: Blogging for Someone Else’s Fame?” In The Discursive Construction of Identities On- and Offline. Personal – group – collective, ed. by Birte Bös, Sonja Kleinke, Sandra Mollin and Nuria Hernández, 15–55. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Klemm, Michael, and Sascha Michel
2014 “Big Data – Big Problems? Zur Kombination qualitativer und quantitativer Methoden bei der Erforschung politischer Social-Media-Kommunikation.” In Datenflut und Informationskanäle, ed. by Heike Ortner, Daniel Pfurtscheller, Michaela Rizzolli and Andreas Wiesinger, 83–98. Innsbruck: Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar
Kuckartz, Udo
2012Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. Methoden, Praxis, Computerunterstützung. Weinheim: Beltz.Google Scholar
Liebert, Wolf-Andreas
2003 “Zu einem dynamischen Konzept von Schlüsselwörtern.” Zeitschrift für Angewandte Linguistik 38: 57–83.Google Scholar
Mayring, Philipp
2010Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. Grundlagen und Techniken. Weinheim: Beltz.Google Scholar
Minsky, Marvin
1975 “A Framework for Representing Knowledge.” In The Psychology of Computer Vision, ed. by Patrick Winston, 211–277. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Oakley, Todd, and Seana Coulson
2000 “Blending Basics.” Cognitive Linguistics 11 (3–4): 175–196.Google Scholar
Siever, Christina Margit
2015Multimodale Kommunikation im Social Web: Forschungsansätze und Analysen zu Text-Bild-Relationen. Frankfurt a.M.: Peter Lang. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson
1981 “Irony and the Use-Mention Distinction.” In Radical Pragmatics, ed. by Peter Cole, 295–318. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Strauss, Anselm, and Juliet Corbin
1990 “Grounded Theory Research: Procedures, Canons, and Evaluative Criteria.” Qualitative Sociology 13 (1): 3–21. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Strübing, Jörg
2014Grounded Theory. Zur sozialtheoretischen und epistemologischen Fundierung eines pragmatistischen Forschungsstils. Wiesbaden: Springer.Google Scholar
Tajfel, Henri
1979 “Individuals and Groups in Social Psychology.” British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology 18 (2): 183–190. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thielemann, Nadine
2016 “ Patriotyzm genetyczny, pólka kulturowa and Palikotyzacja X-a: Blends as Catchwords in Polish Political Discourse.” Zeitschrift für Slawistik 61 (1): 74–101. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zappavigna, Michele
2011Discourse of Twitter and Social Media. How We Use Language to Create Affiliation on the Web. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
2018Searchable Talk. Hashtags and Social Media Metadiscourse. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Ziem, Alexander
2008aFrames und sprachliches Wissen. Kognitive Aspekte der semantischen Kompetenz. Berlin, New York: de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008b “Frame-Semantik und Diskursanalyse – Skizze einer kognitionswissenschaftlich inspirierten Methode zur Analyse gesellschaftlichen Wissens.” In Methoden der Diskurslinguistik. Sprachwissenschaftliche Zugänge zur transtextuellen Ebene, ed. by Jürgen Spitzmüller, and Ingo Warnke, 89–116. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar