Cover not available
Part of
The Construction of ‘Ordinariness’ across Media Genres
Edited by Anita Fetzer and Elda Weizman
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 307] 2019
► pp. 209–236

Constructing ordinariness in online commenting in Hebrew and Finnish

| Bar-Ilan University, Israel
| Turku University, Finland
This chapter studies how ‘ordinariness’ and mostly ‘ordinary’ are being constructed in on-line commenting in Hebrew and Finnish. Starting with the premise that “being ordinary” is dynamically and co-operatively constructed, we adopt the notion of “positioning” to account for the ways ordinary commenters position third parties as ordinary and thus “do being ordinary” and the accountability related to it. The study relies on corpus-based methods: using corpora of commenting in each language, the equivalents of ‘ordinary’, i.e. tavallinen (Finnish), ragil and pashut (Hebrew), are identified and the attitudinal meanings implied by their collocations are examined. The findings indicate that both Hebrew and Finnish commenters position ordinary people in the contexts of politics and politicians, social injustice, social norms, moral and ethics. Culture-specific contexts include military service and orthodox/secular conflicts in Hebrew, self- and other- positioning as having positive qualities coupled with the feeling of being excluded from society in Finnish.
Keywords: accountability, concordances, computer-mediated genre, corpus-based, ordinariness, ordinary, positioning
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Commenting and mediatization
  • 3.Ordinariness
  • 4.Positioning
  • 5.Data and methods
    • 5.1Methodological rationale
    • 5.2The Hebrew data
    • 5.3The Finnish data
  • 6.Similar categories in the Hebrew and the Finnish data
    • 6.1Ordinary people vs. politicians and politics
    • 6.2Social injustices: State vs. ordinary
    • 6.3Ordinary citizen, social norms and control
    • 6.4Moral and ethics of the ordinary person
  • 7.Specific categories in the Hebrew data
  • 8.Specific categories in the Finnish data
  • 9.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
  • Appendix
Published online: 12 December 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.307.09wei
References (50)
References
Bail, Christopher A. 2008. “The Configuration of Symbolic Boundaries against Immigrants in Europe.” American Sociological Review 73:37–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bös, Birte and Sonja Kleinke 2017. “Publicness and Privateness.” In Pragmatics of Social Media. ed. by Christian R. Hoffmann, and Wolfram Bublitz, 83–121. Berlin/Boston: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Charaudeau, Patrick. 2011. Réflexions pour l’analyse du discours populiste. Mots. Les langages du politique 97. [URL]Google Scholar
Couldry, Nick, and Andreas Hepp 2013. “Conceptualizing Mediatization: Contexts, Traditions, Arguments.” Communication Theory 23 (3): 191–202. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016. The Mediated Construction of Reality. Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Davies, Bronwyn and Rom Harré 1990. “Positioning: The Discursive Production of Selves.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 20 (1): 43–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ekström, Mats, Fornäs, Johan, Jansson, André and Anne Jerslev 2016. “Three Tasks for Mediatization Research: Contributions to an Open Agenda.” Media, Culture & Society 38 (7): 1090–1108. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 1992. Discourse and Social Change. London: Polity Press.Google Scholar
. 1995. Media Discourse. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Fetzer, Anita, 2000. “Negotiating Validity Claims in Political Interviews”. Text 20: 1–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fetzer, Anita and Peter Bull. This volume. "Quoting Ordinary People in Prime Minister’s Questions".Google Scholar
Fetzer, A. and Weizman, E.. 2018. “Ordinariness in Mediated Political Discourse”. Discourse and Society 29 (5): 1–19. Google Scholar
Fetzer, Anita, Elda Weizman and Lawrence Berlin (eds.). 2015. The Dynamics of Political Discourse: Forms and Functions of Follow-Ups. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold. 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology. New Jersey: Prentice Hill.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1990 [1959]. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Gruber, Helmut. This volume. “Are Austrian presidential Candidates Ordinary People? Results of an Analysis of Candidates’ Self-Presentation Strategies on Twitter during the 2016 Austrian Presidential Campaign”
Harré, Rom and Luk van Langenhove (eds.). 1999. Positioning Theory: Moral Contexts of International Action, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hunston, Susan. 2007. “Semantic Prosody Revisted”. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 12, 2, 2:249–268. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Izre’el, Shlomo. 2005. “Corpus Linguistics and Lexical Grammar – or: Are new Methods in Lexicology Useful or Do They Cause Harm?” In Samaritan, Hebrew and Aramaic Studies Presented to Professor Abraham Tal, ed. by Moshe Bar-Asher and Moshe Florentin, 335–359. Jerusalem: The Bialik Instituite, 2005. 335–359. [in Hebrew]Google Scholar
Johansson, Marjut. 2006. “Constructing Objects of Discourse in the Broadcast Political Interview.” Journal of Pragmatics, Volume 38, Issue 2: 216–229. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. “Bravo for this Editorial! Users’ Comments in Discussion Forums.” In Follow-ups in Political Discourse. Explorations across contexts and discourse domains. ed. by Elda Weizman and Anita Fetzer, 83–107. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017. “Everyday Opinions in News Discussion Forums: Public Vernacular Discourse.” Discourse, Context & Media 19: 5–12. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johansson, Marjut, Jantunen, Jarmo H., Heimo, Anne, Ahonen, Mirka, and Veronika Laippala. 2018.”Verkkokeskustelujen kansa. Korpusavusteinen diskurssianalyysi Suomi24-keskustelupalstasta [People of discussion forums. Corpus-assisted discourse analysis of Finland24-discussion forum].” Sananjalka [Journal of the Finnish Language Society ] 60 .Google Scholar
Kilgarriff, Adam, Vit Baisa, Jan Bušta, Miloš Jakubíček, Vojtěch Kovář, Jan Michelfeit, Pavel Rychlý, Vit Suchomel. 2014. “The Sketch Engine: Ten Years On”. Lexicography: Journal of ASIALEX 1,1: 7–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kleinke, Sonja. 2010. “Interactive Aspects of Computer-Mediated Communication. Disagreement in an English and German Public News Group.” In Discourses in Interaction, ed. by Sanna-Kaisa Tanskanen, Marja-Liisa Helasvuo, Marjut Johansson and Mia Raitaniemi, 195–222. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krotz, Friedrich. 2014. “Mediatization as a Mover in Modernity: Social and Cultural Change in the Context of Media Change.” In: Mediatization of Communication, ed. by Knut Lundby, 131–162. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Livingstone, Sonia. 2009. “On the Mediation of Everything: ICA Presidential Address 2008.” Journal of Communication 59: 1–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Livnat, Zohar. This volume. "You bring the steaks, I'll bring the salad". “Presenting Ordinariness in PM Netanyahu's Public Talks.”
Louw, Bill. 1993. “Irony in the Text or Insincerity in the Writer? The Diagnostic Potential of Semantic Prosodies.” In Text and Technology: In Honour of John Sinclair, ed. by Mona Baker, Gill Francis. & Elena Tognini-Bonelli, 157–176. Philadelphia/Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lunt, Peter, and Sonia Livingstone. 2016. “Is ‘Mediatization’ the New Paradigm for our Field? A Commentary on Deacon and Stanyer 2014, 2015) and Hepp, Hjarvard and Lundby 2015).” Media, Culture & Society 38, 3: 462–470. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Papacharissi, Zizi. 2010. A Private Sphere. Democracy in a Digital Age. Cambridge, UK & Malden, USA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
. 2014. “On Networked Publics and Private Spheres in Social Media.” In The Social Media Handbook, ed. by Theresa Senft, and Jeremy, T. M., Hunsinger, 109–119. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Partington, Allen. 2004. ““Utterly content in each other’s company”: Semantic Prosody and Semantic Preference.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 9 (1): 131–156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey. 1984. “On Doing ‘Being Ordinary’.” In Structures of Social Action, ed. by J. M Atkinson and J. Heritage, 413–429. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Scannell, Paddy. 1991. “Introduction: The Relevance of Talk.” In Broadcast Talk, ed. by Paddy Scannell, 1–13. London: Sage.Google Scholar
. 1996. Radio, Television & Modern Life. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sinclair, John M., 1991. “Words and Phrases.” Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. 70–75. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2003. Reading Concordances: An Introduction. London: Longman.Google Scholar
, 2004. Trust the Text: Language, Corpus and Discourse. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan and Deirdre Wilson. 1981. "Irony and the Use-Mention Distinction". In Radical Pragmatics, ed. by Peter Cole, 295–318. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Trampus, Mitja and Novak, Blaz. 2012. “The Internals of an Aggregated Web News Feed”. Proceedings of 15th Multiconference on Information Society . [URL], acc. 3 July 2018.Google Scholar
Turner, Graeme 2010. Ordinary People and the Media. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun. 2006. “Ideology and Discourse Analysis”. Journal of Political Ideologies 11, 11: 115–140.
CrossRef DOI logo with hyperlink to permanent DOI
. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weizman, Elda. 2008. Positioning in Media Dialogue. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011–2012. “Positioning in Context: A Scale of Directness.” Xelkat Lashon 43–44: 331–345. (in Hebrew)Google Scholar
. 2015. “Irony in and through Follow-Ups: Talk and Meta-talk in Online Commenting”. In The Dynamics of Political Discourse, ed. by Anita Fetzer, Elda Weizman and Lawrence Berlin, 173–194, Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weizman, Elda and Anita Fetzer (eds.), 2015. Follow-Ups in Political Discourse: Explorations Across Contexts and Discourse Domains. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weizman, Elda and Dori-Hacohen, Gonen, 2017. “On-Line Commenting on Opinion Editorials: A Cross-Cultural Examination of Face Work in the Washington Post (USA) and NRG (Israel).” Discourse, Context & Media 19: 39–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weizman, Elda and Anita Fetzer. 2018. “Constructing Ordinariness in Online Journals: A Corpus-Based Study in the Israeli context”. Israel Studies in Language and Society 11(1): 23–48.Google Scholar
Wilson, Deidre and Dan Sperber, 1992. "On Verbal Irony", Lingua 87: 77–90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Weizman, Elda & Anita Fetzer
2021. The discursive construction of accountability for communicative action to citizens: A contrastive analysis across Israeli and British media discourse. Intercultural Pragmatics 18:5 ► pp. 605 ff. DOI logo
Xie, Chaoqun, Francisco Yus & Hartmut Haberland
2021. Introduction. In Approaches to Internet Pragmatics [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 318], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.