Constructing ordinariness in online commenting in Hebrew and Finnish
This chapter studies how ‘ordinariness’ and mostly ‘ordinary’ are being constructed in on-line commenting in Hebrew and Finnish. Starting with the premise that “being ordinary” is dynamically and co-operatively constructed, we adopt the notion of “positioning” to account for the ways ordinary commenters position third parties as ordinary and thus “do being ordinary” and the accountability related to it. The study relies on corpus-based methods: using corpora of commenting in each language, the equivalents of ‘ordinary’, i.e. tavallinen (Finnish), ragil and pashut (Hebrew), are identified and the attitudinal meanings implied by their collocations are examined. The findings indicate that both Hebrew and Finnish commenters position ordinary people in the contexts of politics and politicians, social injustice, social norms, moral and ethics. Culture-specific contexts include military service and orthodox/secular conflicts in Hebrew, self- and other- positioning as having positive qualities coupled with the feeling of being excluded from society in Finnish.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Commenting and mediatization
- 3.Ordinariness
- 4.Positioning
- 5.Data and methods
- 5.1Methodological rationale
- 5.2The Hebrew data
- 5.3The Finnish data
- 6.Similar categories in the Hebrew and the Finnish data
- 6.1Ordinary people vs. politicians and politics
- 6.2Social injustices: State vs. ordinary
- 6.3Ordinary citizen, social norms and control
- 6.4Moral and ethics of the ordinary person
- 7.Specific categories in the Hebrew data
- 8.Specific categories in the Finnish data
- 9.Conclusion
-
Notes
-
References
References
Bail, Christopher A.
2008 “
The Configuration of Symbolic Boundaries against Immigrants in Europe.”
American Sociological Review 73:37–59.


Bös, Birte and Sonja Kleinke
2017 “
Publicness and Privateness.” In
Pragmatics of Social Media. ed. by
Christian R. Hoffmann, and
Wolfram Bublitz, 83–121. Berlin/Boston: Mouton de Gruyter.


Charaudeau, Patrick
2011 Réflexions pour l’analyse du discours populiste.
Mots. Les langages du politique 97.
[URL]
Couldry, Nick, and Andreas Hepp
2013 “
Conceptualizing Mediatization: Contexts, Traditions, Arguments.”
Communication Theory 23 (3): 191–202.


Couldry, Nick, and Andreas Hepp
2016 The Mediated Construction of Reality. Oxford: Polity Press.

Davies, Bronwyn and Rom Harré
1990 “
Positioning: The Discursive Production of Selves.”
Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 20 (1): 43–63.


Ekström, Mats, Fornäs, Johan, Jansson, André and Anne Jerslev
2016 “
Three Tasks for Mediatization Research: Contributions to an Open Agenda.”
Media, Culture & Society 38 (7): 1090–1108.


Fairclough, Norman
1992 Discourse and Social Change. London: Polity Press.

Fairclough, Norman
1995 Media Discourse. London: Edward Arnold.

Fetzer, Anita
2000 “
Negotiating Validity Claims in Political Interviews”.
Text 20: 1–46.


Fetzer, Anita and Peter Bull
This volume "
Quoting Ordinary People in Prime Minister’s Questions".

Fetzer, A. and Weizman, E.
2018 “
Ordinariness in Mediated Political Discourse”.
Discourse and Society 29 (5): 1–19.

Fetzer, Anita, Elda Weizman and Lawrence Berlin
Garfinkel, Harold
1967 Studies in Ethnomethodology. New Jersey: Prentice Hill.

Goffman, Erving
1990 [1959] The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. London: Penguin.

Gruber, Helmut
This volume. “
Are Austrian presidential Candidates Ordinary People? Results of an Analysis of Candidates’ Self-Presentation Strategies on Twitter during the 2016 Austrian Presidential Campaign”
Harré, Rom and Luk van Langenhove
(eds.) 1999 Positioning Theory: Moral Contexts of International Action, Oxford: Blackwell.

Izre’el, Shlomo
. 2005. “
Corpus Linguistics and Lexical Grammar – or: Are new Methods in Lexicology Useful or Do They Cause Harm?” In
Samaritan, Hebrew and Aramaic Studies Presented to Professor Abraham Tal ed. by Moshe Bar-Asher and
Moshe Florentin, 335–359. Jerusalem: The Bialik Instituite
2005 335–359. [in Hebrew]

Johansson, Marjut
2006 “
Constructing Objects of Discourse in the Broadcast Political Interview.”
Journal of Pragmatics, Volume 38, Issue 2: 216–229.


Johansson, Marjut
2017 “
Everyday Opinions in News Discussion Forums: Public Vernacular Discourse.”
Discourse, Context & Media 19: 5–12.


Johansson, Marjut, Jantunen, Jarmo H., Heimo, Anne, Ahonen, Mirka, and Veronika Laippala
2018.”
Verkkokeskustelujen kansa. Korpusavusteinen diskurssianalyysi Suomi24-keskustelupalstasta [People of discussion forums. Corpus-assisted discourse analysis of Finland24-discussion forum].”
Sananjalka [
Journal of the Finnish Language Society ]
60
.

Kilgarriff, Adam, Vit Baisa, Jan Bušta, Miloš Jakubíček, Vojtěch Kovář, Jan Michelfeit, Pavel Rychlý, Vit Suchomel
2014 “
The Sketch Engine: Ten Years On”.
Lexicography: Journal of ASIALEX 1,1: 7–36.


Krotz, Friedrich
2014 “
Mediatization as a Mover in Modernity: Social and Cultural Change in the Context of Media Change.” In:
Mediatization of Communication, ed. by
Knut Lundby, 131–162. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter.

Livingstone, Sonia
2009 “
On the Mediation of Everything: ICA Presidential Address 2008.”
Journal of Communication 59: 1–18.


Livnat, Zohar
This volume. "You bring the steaks, I'll bring the salad". “Presenting Ordinariness in PM Netanyahu's Public Talks.”
Lunt, Peter, and Sonia Livingstone
2016 “
Is ‘Mediatization’ the New Paradigm for our Field? A Commentary on Deacon and Stanyer 2014, 2015) and Hepp, Hjarvard and Lundby 2015).”
Media, Culture & Society 38, 3: 462–470.


Papacharissi, Zizi
2010 A Private Sphere. Democracy in a Digital Age.
Cambridge, UK & Malden, USA: Polity Press.

Papacharissi, Zizi
2014 “
On Networked Publics and Private Spheres in Social Media.” In
The Social Media Handbook, ed. by
Theresa Senft, and
Jeremy, T. M., Hunsinger, 109–119. London/New York: Routledge.

Sacks, Harvey
1984 “
On Doing ‘Being Ordinary’.” In
Structures of Social Action, ed.
by J. M Atkinson and
J. Heritage, 413–429. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Scannell, Paddy
1991 “
Introduction: The Relevance of Talk.” In
Broadcast Talk, ed. by
Paddy Scannell, 1–13. London: Sage.

Scannell, Paddy
1996 Radio, Television & Modern Life. Oxford: Blackwell.

Sinclair, John M.
1991 “Words and Phrases.” Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. 70–75. Oxford: OUP.

Sinclair, John M.
2003 Reading Concordances: An Introduction. London: Longman.

Sinclair, John M.
2004 Trust the Text: Language, Corpus and Discourse. London: Routledge.

Sperber, Dan and Deirdre Wilson
1981 "
Irony and the Use-Mention Distinction". In
Radical Pragmatics, ed. by
Peter Cole, 295–318. New York: Academic Press.

Trampus, Mitja and Novak, Blaz
2012 “
The Internals of an Aggregated Web News Feed”.
Proceedings of 15th Multiconference on Information Society
.
[URL], acc. 3 July 2018.

Turner, Graeme
2010 Ordinary People and the Media. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Van Dijk, Teun
2006 “
Ideology and Discourse Analysis”.
Journal of Political Ideologies 11, 11: 115–140.

.


Weizman, Elda
2011–2012 “
Positioning in Context: A Scale of Directness.”
Xelkat Lashon 43–44: 331–345. (in Hebrew)

Weizman, Elda and Anita Fetzer
Weizman, Elda and Dori-Hacohen, Gonen
2017 “
On-Line Commenting on Opinion Editorials: A Cross-Cultural Examination of Face Work in the Washington Post (USA) and NRG (Israel).”
Discourse, Context & Media 19: 39–48.


Weizman, Elda and Anita Fetzer
2018 “
Constructing Ordinariness in Online Journals: A Corpus-Based Study in the Israeli context”.
Israel Studies in Language and Society 11(1): 23–48.

Wilson, Deidre and Dan Sperber
1992 "
On Verbal Irony",
Lingua 87: 77–90.


Cited by
Cited by 2 other publications
Weizman, Elda & Anita Fetzer
2021.
The discursive construction of accountability for communicative action to citizens: A contrastive analysis across Israeli and British media discourse.
Intercultural Pragmatics 18:5
► pp. 605 ff.

Xie, Chaoqun, Francisco Yus & Hartmut Haberland
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 march 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.