Chapter published in:
Science Communication on the Internet: Old genres meet new genres
Edited by María-José Luzón and Carmen Pérez-Llantada
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 308] 2019
► pp. 131151
References

References

Bolter, Jay D., and Richard Grusin
2002Remediation: Understanding New Media. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Engberg, Jan, and Carmen D. Maier
2015 “Exploring the Hypermodal Communication of Academic Knowledge beyond Generic Structures.” In Discourse In and Through the Media: Recontextualizing and Reconceptualizing Expert Discourse, ed. by Marina Bondi, Silvia Cacchiani, and Davide Mazzi, 46–65. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
2019 “Researchers’ Move from Page to Screen: Addressing the Effects of the Video Article Format upon Academic User Engagement and Knowledge Building Processes.” In Engagement in Professional Genres: Deference and Disclosure ed. by Carmen Sancho Guinda, 179–195. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, Lothar
1985Kommunikationsmittel Fachsprache: eine Einführung. 2 ed, Forum für Fachsprachenforschung, 1. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Hyland, Ken
2009Academic Discourse: English in a Global Context. London/New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Iedema, Rick
2003 “Multimodality, Resemiotization: Extending the Analysis of Discourse as Multi-semiotic Practice.” Visual Communication 2 (1): 29–57. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kalverkämper, Hartwig
1990 „Gemeinsprache und Fachsprachen – ein Plädoyer für eine integrierende Sichtweise.“ I Deutsche Gegenwartsprache. Jahrbuch des Instituts für deutsche Sprache 1989, ed. by Gerhard Stickel, 88–133. Berlin / New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Keil, Frank C.
2003 “Categorisation, causation, and the limits of understanding.” Language and Cognitive Processes 18 (5–6): 663–692. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011 “The Problem of Partial Understanding.” In Current Trends in LSP Research. Aims and Methods, ed. by Margrethe Petersen, and Jan Engberg, 251–274. Frankfurt a.M.: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Kress, Gunther
2010Multimodality: A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kress, Gunther, and Theo Van Leeuwen
2001Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Maier, Carmen D., and Jan Engberg
2013 “Tendencies in the Multimodal Evolution of Narrator’s Types and Roles in Research Genres.” In Narratives in Academic and Professional Genres, ed. by Maurizio Gotti, and Carmen Sancho Guinda, 149–173. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2014 “Tendencies of Multimodal Gradations in Academic Genres Network.” In Reflections upon Genre. Encounters between Literature, Knowledge and Emerging Communicative Conventions, ed. by Jan Engberg, Carmen D. Maier, and Ole Togeby, 113–145. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
2016 “Challenges in the New Multimodal Environment of Research Genres: What Future do Articles of the Future Promise Us?” In Genre Studies around the Globe. Beyond the Three Traditions, ed. by Natascha Artemeva, and Aviva Freedman, 225–250. Edmonton: Inkshed Publications.Google Scholar
Norris, Sigrid, and Carmen D. Maier
2014 “Concluding remarks.” In Interactions, Images and Texts. A Reader in Multimodality, ed. by Sigrid Norris, and Carmen D. Maier, 381–382. Boston / Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Picton, Aurélie, and Pascaline Dury
2017 “Diastratic Variation in Language for Specific Purposes.” In Multiple Perspectives on Terminological Variation, ed. by Patrick Drouin, Aline Francœur, John Humbley, and Aurélie Picton, 57–80. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rozenblit, Leonid, and Frank C. Keil
2002 “The Misunderstood Limits of Folk Science: An illusion of Explanatory Depth.” Cognitive Science 26: 521–562. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Appendix: Material

Meyer, Erin
2015 “Getting to Sí, Ja, Oui, Hai, and Da. How to Negotiate across Cultures.” Harvard Business Review 93 (11): 74–80.Google Scholar
Brooks, Alison W.
2015 “Emotions and the Art of Negotiation.” Harvard Business Review 93 (12): 57–64.Google Scholar
Zak, Paul J.
2017 “The Neuroscience of Trust.” Harvard Business Review 95 (1): 84–90.Google Scholar
Interview
Controlling Your Emotions During a Negotiation. Accessed December 20, 2015. https://​hbr​.org​/video​/4650021133001​/controlling​-your​-emotions​-during​-a​-negotiation
Video with graphics & explanatory voice-over
Webinar. Neuroscience of Trust