Chapter 10
The representation of science and technology in genres of Vatican discourse
Pope Francis’s encyclical Laudato Si’ as a case study
The study presented in this chapter focuses on the discursive representations of science and technology embedded in Laudato Si’, an instance of a traditional print genre in the process of becoming digitalized. The study describes the epistemic discursive activity organized by two genre sets, with Laudato Si’ occupying a place in both. The first genre set, which we have labelled the “science/technology genre set,” has functioned for almost a century as a discursive vehicle supporting an intertextual chain of uptake and recontextualization used in developing an evolving body of institutional knowledge and collective argumentation regarding science and technology, knowledge and argumentation that eventually emerged in Laudato Si’. The second digital genre set, which we refer to as the “launch-day genre set” was employed to rapidly disseminate Laudato Si’ around the world. As well, we characterize Laudato Si’ as an instance of a “hybrid genre,” a genre combining certain affordances of digital communication with valued residual features of an antecedent genre and its traditional print text.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Background
- 2.1The genre of the papal encyclical
- 2.2
Laudato Si’ and the plea for an integral ecology
- 2.3Pontifical academy of sciences
- 3.Theoretical perspectives
- 3.1Rhetoric: A contemporary view
- 3.2A social conception of genre
- 3.2.1Digital genres
- 3.2.2Uptake and recontextualization
- 3.3Representations of science/technology
- 4.Method
- 5.Findings
- 5.1The representation of science/technology in Laudato Si’
: A genealogy
- 5.2
Laudato Si’
: The encyclical genre as part of two genre sets
- 5.2.1The launch-day genre set
- 5.2.2Internet-posted textual responses to Laudato Si’
- 5.2.3Laudato Si’:
An instance of a hybrid genre
- 6.Conclusion
-
Notes
-
References
-
Appendix: Corpus of analysis
References (39)
Aristotle
1960 The Rhetoric of Aristotle. (
L. Cooper, trans.). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Austriaco, Nicanor P. G.
2015 “
The Relationship between Science and Religion according to ‘Laudato Si’’.”
BioLogos. Last accessed June 15, 2019.
[URL]
Bauer, Martin W., and George Gaskell
1999 “
Towards a Paradigm for Research on Social Representations.”
Journal of the Theory of Social Behaviour 29 (2): 163–186.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bazerman, Charles
1994 “
Systems of Genres and the Enactment of Social Intentions.” In
Genre and the New Rhetoric, ed. by
Aviva Freedman, and
Peter Medway, 79–101. Bristol, PA: Taylor and Francis.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bazerman, Charles
1988 Shaping Written Knowledge: The Genre and Activity of the Experimental Article in Science. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bhatia, Vijay K.
2016 “
Genre as Interdiscursive Performance in Public Space.” In
Genre and the Performance of Publics, ed. by
Mary Jo Reiff, and
Anis Bawarshi, 25–42. Boulder, CO: Utah State University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Billig, Michael
1988 Arguing and Thinking: A Rhetorical Approach to Social Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Burke, Kenneth
1969 A Rhetoric of Motives. Berkeley: University of California Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Crowston, Kevin, and Marie Williams
2000 “
Reproduced and Emergent Genres of Communication on the World Wide Web.”
Information Society 16 (3): 201–215.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Devitt, Amy
1991 “
Intertextuality in Tax Accounting: Generic, Referential, and Functional.” In
Textual Dynamics for the Professions: Historical and Contemporary Studies of Writing in Professional Communities, ed. by
Charles Bazerman, and
James Paradis, 335–57. Madison, WN: University of Wisconsin Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Freadman, Anne
2002 “
Uptake.” In
The Rhetoric and Ideology of Genre, ed. by
Richard Coe,
Lorelei Lingard, and
Tatiana Teslenko, 39–5. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Graham, Scott, and Brandon Whelan
2008 “
Mode, Medium, and Genre: A Case Study of Decisions in New-media Design.”
Journal of Business and Technical Communication 22 (1): 65–91.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Grim, John
2015 “
President’s Corner.”
Teilhard Perspective 48 (1): 1–5. Last accessed June 15, 2019.
[URL]
Hajer, Marteen
2006 “
Doing Discourse Analysis: Coalitions, Practices, Meaning.” In
Words Matter in Policy and Planning, ed. by
Margo van den Brink, and
Tamara Metze, 65–74. Utretch, The Netherlands: Kovvinkliijk Nederlands Aardrijkskundig Genootschap.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hall, Stuart
1997 Representation: Culture Representation and Signifying Practices. London, UK: Sage.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Herring, Susan
2013 “
Discourse in Web 2.0: Familiar, Reconfigured and Emergent.” In
Discourse 2.0: Language and New Media, ed. by
Deborah Tannen, and
Anna Marie Trester, 1–25. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hesse-Biber, Sharlene, and Patricia Leavy
2008 Handbook of Emergent Methods. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hulme, Mike
2009 Why We Disagree about Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jamieson, Kathleen M.
1975 “
Antecedent Genre as Rhetorical Constraint.”
Quarterly Journal of Speech 61: 406–415.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Linell, Per
1998 “
Discourse across Boundaries: On Recontextualizations and the Blending of Voices in Professional Discourse.”
Texts 18 (2): 143–157.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Luzón, María-José
2013 “
Public Communication of Science in Blogs: Recontextualizing Scientific Discourse for a Diversified Audience.”
Written Communication 30 (4): 428–457.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mehlenbacher, Ashley R.
2019 “
Registered Reports: Genre Evolution and the Research Article.”
Written Communication 36 (1): 38–67.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Miller, Carolyn R.
1984 “
Genre as Social Action.”
Quarterly Journal of Speech 70: 151–167.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Miller, Carolyn R.
2016 “
Genre Innovation: Evolution, Emergence, or Something Else?”
The Journal of Media Innovations 3 (2): 4–19.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Moscovici, Serge
1963 “
Attitudes and Opinions.”
Annual Review of Psychology 14: 231–260.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mosher, Steven
2015 “
Do the Pope and I Live on the Same Planet?”
New York Post.
July 05. Last accessed June 15, 2019.
[URL]
Potter, John
1996 Representing Reality: Discourse, Rhetoric and Social Construction. London, UK: Sage.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Smart, Graham
2011 “
Argumentation across Web-based Organizational Discourses: The Case of Climate Change.” In
Handbook of Communication in Organisations and Professions, ed. by
Srikant Sarangi, and
Christopher Candlin, 363–386. Berlin, DE: Mouton de Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Smart, Graham, and Matthew Falconer
forthcoming. “
The Uptake and Recontextualization of Climate-change Science within ‘Denialist’ Cultural Communities.” In
Genres of the Climate Debate ed. by
Christel Sunesen,
H. Bildsøe, and
Sune Auken Berlin, Germany de Gruyter
The Catholic Encyclopaedia
2017 “
Encyclicals.” N.p.n. Nashville: HarperCollins.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Appendix: Corpus of analysis
Pope Benedict XVI
2006,
November 06.
Address to the Pontifical Academy of Science.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pope Benedict XVI
2010,
October 28.
Address to the Pontifical Academy of Science.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pope Benedict XVI
2012,
November 08.
Address to the Pontifical Academy of Science.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pope Francis
2015 Laudato Si’, on Care for our Common Home. Huntington, IN: Our Sunday Visitor.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pope John Paul II
1979,
November 10.
Address to the Pontifical Academy of Science.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pope John Paul II
1990,
October 29.
Address to the Pontifical Academy of Science.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pope John Paul II
1992,
October 31.
Address to the Pontifical Academy of Science.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pope Paul VI
1964,
October 03.
Address to the Pontifical Academy of Science.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pope Paul VI
1966,
April 23.
Address to the Pontifical Academy of Science.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (2)
Cited by 2 other publications
Falconer, Matthew
2024.
The Discursive Boundary Work of Recontextualizing Science for Policy: Opening the Black Box of an Organization’s Genre System and Intermediary Genre Sets.
Written Communication 41:3
► pp. 383 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Falconer, Matthew A.
2023.
Transforming Data on the Boundaries of Science and Policy: The Council of Canadian Academies’ Rhetorical Repertoire. In
Applied Data Science [
Studies in Big Data, 125],
► pp. 147 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.