A medical debate of “heated pamphleteering” in the early eighteenth
century
This chapter probes into the controversy of smallpox
inoculation that followed soon after the novel method was introduced into
England and culminated in the second decade of the eighteenth century.
Polemical argumentation displays verbal aggression, and irony and sarcasm
take the upper hand in interpersonal language use that bursts into personal
insults in a pamphlet that serves as data for the empirical part. The method
of analysis is qualitative discourse analysis in a multi-layered contextual
frame in accordance with the historical pragmatic approach. The analysis
shows how transgressions of the prevailing norms are exploited and presents
a far cry from the recommended Royal Society style of writing science as
well as from the more rhetorical way of argumentation favoured in
contemporary polite society; even an old pattern of scholastic argumentation
is revived to poke fun at the target.
Article outline
- 1.Conflict discourse in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries
- 2.Data, research questions and methods
- 3.The pragmatic space of aggressive language use
- 4.A brief history of smallpox literature
- 5.Main protagonists and what they wrote
- 6.Norms of medical writing in the eighteenth century
- 6.1Norm 1: Royal Society “plain” style
- 6.2Norm 2: Rhetorical eloquence
- 6.3Norm 3: Scholastic argumentation with moral concerns
- 7.Exploiting the norms with meaning reversals
- 7.1Setting the scene
- 7.2From general to personal accusations
- 7.3Demeaning professional skills and experience
- 7.4Language issues
- 7.5Modification of a classical argumentation pattern
- 7.6National feelings: Us versus them
- 8.Conclusions
-
Notes
-
Sources
-
References
References (63)
Sources
Anon. 1721. A
Letter to a Friend in the Country, Attempting a Solution of the
Scruples & Objections of a Conscientious or Religious Nature,
commonly made against the New Way of receiving the Small
Pox. Boston, New England.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Anon. 1722. A
Vindication of the Ministers of Boston, from the Abuses &
Scandals, lately cast upon them, in Diverse Printed
Papers. Boston, New England.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Arbuthnot, John (attribution
in ECCO). 1722. Mr.
Maitland’s account of inoculating the small pox, vindicated, from
Dr. Wagstaffe’s misrepresentations of the practice; with some
remarks on Mr. Massey’
sermon. London.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Arbuthnot, John. 1712. John
Bull still in his senses: Being the third part of Law is a
bottomless-pit. Printed from a manuscript found in the cabinet of
the famous Sir Humphry Polesworth: and publish’d, (as well as the
two former parts) by the author of the New
Atlantis. London: John Morphew.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Byfield, Timothy. 1695. A
Short Discourse on the Rise, Nature, and Management of the
Small-Pox, and All Putrid Fevers: Occasioned by the death of Our
Late Incomparable Queen: Together With a Philosophical Account of an
Excellent Remedy for These and Many Other
Diseases. London: John Harris.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
ECCO. Eighteenth
Century Collections Online
(ECCO). Online: [URL].
ECCO TCP (Text
Creation
Partnership). Online: [URL].
EMEMT. = Early Modern English Medical
Texts. 2010. Compiled
by Irma Taavitsainen, Päivi Pahta, Turo Hiltunen, Martti Mäkinen, Ville Marttila, Maura Ratia, Carla Suhr, and Jukka Tyrkkö. DVD
with EMEMT Presenter software by Raymond
Hickey. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jenner, Edward. 1798. An
inquiry into the causes and effects of the variolæ
vaccinæ. London: Sampson.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jurin, James. 1724. An
account of the success of inoculating the small pox in Great
Britain. London: J. Peele.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Maitland, Charles / (attribution
to Arbuthnot, John in
ECCO). 1722. A
Vindication of the Ministers of Boston, from the Abuses &
Scandals, lately cast upon them, in Diverse Printed
Papers. London.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Philaretes. 1602. Work
for chimney-sweepers or a warning for
tobacconists. London: T. Este.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Power, Henry. 1664. Experimental
Philosophy In Three Books: Containing New Experiments Microscopical,
Mercurial,
Magnetical. London: T. Roycroft.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Quincy, John. 1721. The
Dispensatory of the Royal College of Physicians in
London. London: Royal College of Physicians of London.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sprat, Thomas. 2003
[1667]. The History of the Royal Society of
London, for the Improving of Natural
Knowledge. Original printed by T. R. for J.
Martyn, London. (Facsimile of the 1667 edition, Whitefish, MT,
Kessinger.)![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Thacher, Thomas. 1677/8. A
Brief Rule, Introductory note
by Henry P. Viets. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press 1937.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
References
Archer, Dawn. 2015. “Slurs,
Insults, (Backhanded) Compliments and Other Strategic Facework
Moves.” Language
Sciences 52: 82–97. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Austin, John L. 1962. How
to Do Things with Words. The William Jones Lectured Delivered at
Harvard University in
1955. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad, and Edward Finegan. 1999. Longman
Grammar of Spoken and Written
English. London: Longman.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Carrell, Jennifer Lee. 2004. The
Speckled Monster: A Historical Tale of Battling
Smallpox. New York: Plume, the Penguin group.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Culpeper, Jonathan. 2011. Impoliteness:
Using Language to Cause
Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Culpeper, Jonathan, and Jane Demmen. 2011. “Nineteenth-century
English Politeness: Negative Politeness, Conventional Indirect
Requests and the Rise of Individual
Self.” Journal of Historical
Pragmatics 12 (1): 49–81.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Davenport, Romola, Jane Satchell, Max Shaw-Taylor, Matthew William Leigh. 2018. “The
Geography of Smallpox in England Before Vaccination: A Conundrum
Resolved.” Social Science &
Medicine 206: 75–85. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fritz, Gerd. 2010. “Controversies.” In Historical
Pragmatics, Handbooks of
Pragmatics, Vol.
8, ed. by Andreas H. Jucker, and Irma Taavitsainen, 451–481. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fitzmaurice, Susan. 2016. “Sincerity
and the Moral Reanalysis of Politeness in Late Modern English:
Semantic Change and Contingent
Polysemy.” In Studies
in the History of the English Language VII: Generalizing vs.
Particularizing Methodologies in Historical Linguistic
Analysis, ed. by D. Chapman, C. Moore, and M. Wilcox, 173–202. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hill, Wayne F., and Cynthia J. Öttchen. 1991. Shakespeare’s
Insults: Educating your
Wit. London: Vermilion.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Leech, Geoffrey. 2014. The
Pragmatics of
Politeness. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lehto, Anu. 2019. “Public
Health.” In Late
Modern English Medical Texts: Writing Medicine in the Eighteenth
Century, ed. by Irma Taavitsainen, and Turo Hiltunen, 307–315. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lynch, Jack. 2004. Samuel
Johnson’s Insults. New York: Levenger Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McIntosh, Carey. 1998. The
Evolution of English Prose 1700–1800: Style, Politeness, and Print
Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
ODNB. = Oxford
Dictionary of National
Biography. 2004. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Online: [URL].![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
OED Online
(Oxford English
Dictionary). 2018. Oxford University Press, July 2018.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ratia, Maura, 2011. Texts
“Con and Pro”: The Early Modern Medical Controversy over
Tobacco. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique de Helsinki.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ratia, Maura. 2019. “Specific
Treatises:
Diseases.” In Late
Modern English Medical Texts: Writing Medicine in the Eighteenth
Century, ed. by Irma Taavitsainen, and Turo Hiltunen, 243–249. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Raymond, Joad. 2003. Pamphlets
and Pamphleteering in Early Modern
Britain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sampson, George.1970. The
Concise Cambridge History of English
Literature, 3rd
ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Shapin, Steven. 1996. The
Scientific
Revolution. Chicago: Chicago University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Searle, John. 1979. Expression
of
Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Shuttleton, David. 2007. Smallpox
and the Literary Imagination,
1660–1820. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Suhr, Carla. 2011. Publishing
for the Masses: Early Modern English Witchcraft
Pamphlets. Helsinki:Société Néophilologique de Helsinki.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Taavitsainen, Irma. 2002. “Variation
and Formularity: Prefatory Materials in Early Scientific
Writing.” In Of
Dyuersitie & Change of Langage, ed.
by Katja Lenz, and Ruth Möhlig, 290–304. Heidelberg: C. Winter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Taavitsainen, Irma. 2009. “The
Pragmatics of Knowledge and Meaning: Corpus Linguistic Approaches to
Changing Thought-styles in Early Modern Medical
Discourse.” In Corpora:
Pragmatics and Discourse Papers from the 29th International
Conference on English Language Research on Computerized Corpora
(ICAME 29), ed. by Andreas H. Jucker, Daniel Schreier, and Marianne Hundt, 37–62. Amsterdam: Rodopi.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Taavitsainen, Irma, and Andreas H Jucker. 2010. “Expressive
Speech Acts and Politeness in Eighteenth-century
English.” In Eighteenth-Century
English: Ideology and Change, ed.
by Raymond Hickey, 159–181. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Taavitsainen, Irma and Päivi Pahta. 1998. “Vernacularisation of Medical Writing in English: A Corpus-based Study of Scholasticism.” Early Science and Medicine 3 (2): 157–185. Special issue ed. by William Crossgrove, Margaret Schleissner and Linda E. Voigts. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Taavitsainen, Irma, and Gerold Schneider. 2019. “Scholastic
Argumentation in Early English Medical Writing and Its Afterlife:
New Corpus
Evidence.” In From
Data to Evidence, ed.
by Carla Suhr, Terttu Nevalainen, and Irma Taavitsainen, 191–221. Leiden: Brill.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Van Dijk, Teun A. 1995. “Critical
Discourse
Analysis.” In The
Handbook of Discourse Analysis, 2nd
ed., ed. by Deborah Tannen, Heidi E. Hamilton, and Deborah Schiffrin, 446–485. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Van Eemeren, Frans H., Rob Grootendorst, Sally Jackson, and Scott Jacobs. 1997. “Argumentation.” In Discourse
as Structure and Process, ed.
by Teun A. van Dijk, 208–229. London: Sage Publications.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Valle, Ellen. 1999. A
Collective Intelligence: The Life Sciences in the Royal Society as a
Scientific Discourse Community
1665–1965. Turku: University of Turku.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Viets, Henry P. 1937. A
Brief Rule, 1677/8, Introductory note to
Thomas
Thacher. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Werlich, Egon. 1982. A
Text Grammar of English, 2nd
ed. Heidelberg: Quelle & Meyer.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Williams, Graham. 2018. Sincerity
in Medieval English Language and
Literature. London: Palgrave Macmillan/ Springer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Hiltunen, Turo & Irma Taavitsainen
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.