Cover not available
Part of
Bonding through Context: Language and interactional alignment in Japanese situated discourse
Edited by Risako Ide and Kaori Hata
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 314] 2020
► pp. 173–196

Chapter 8
Micro-bonding moments

Laughter in the joint construction of mutual affiliation in initial-encounter interactions by first and second language speakers of Japanese

| University of Tsukuba
In the present study, I examine the interaction of one pair of participants (a first and second language speaker of Japanese), which is part of a larger corpus of dyadic initial interactional data gathered by video recording pairs of participants asked to participate in a topical discussion task. Bringing to bear on these data a microethnographic methodology, I show some of the functions of laughter deployed by the participants. In particular, the findings of the analyses indicate that, in my data, laughter was used both to indicate the frame or tenor of the interaction, to display an orientation to and interactionally co-constitute a moral order, and to negotiate and coordinate joint participation in a next course of action.
Keywords: getting acquainted, joint laughter, co-determination of action, impropriety, conversation analysis
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Data, participants, methodology
  • 3.Analysis
    • 3.1Co-determination of a course of action
    • 3.2Being naughty
  • 4.Discussion
  • 5.Concluding remarks
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 3 December 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.314.08bus
References (55)
References
Al-Gahtani, Saad, and Roever, Carsten. 2012. “Proficiency and Sequential Organization of L2 Requests.” Applied Linguistics 33 (1): 42–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. “The Development of Requests by L2 Learners of Modern Standard Arabic: A Longitudinal and Cross-sectional Study.” Foreign Language Annals 48 (4): 570–583. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018. “Proficiency and Preference Organization in Second Language Refusals.” Journal of Pragmatics 129: 140–153. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arundale, Robert B. 2010. “Constituting Face in Conversation: Face, Facework, and Interactional Achievement.” Journal of Pragmatics 42 (8): 2078–2105. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bateson, Gregory. 1972. Steps to an Ecology of Mind. New York, NY: Ballantine.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Levinson, Steven C. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bushnell, Cade. 2009. “‘Lego My Keego!’: An Analysis of Language Play in a Beginning Japanese as a Foreign Language Classroom.” Applied Linguistics 30 (1): 49–69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. “Talking the Talk: The Interactional Construction of Community and Identity at Conversation Analytic Data Sessions in Japan.” Human Studies 35 (4): 583–605.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. “Warai no tsuikyu: Ryugakusei mukeno rakugokai niokeru warai o fukumu sogokoi nitsuite [Pursuing laughter: A look at interactional processes including laughter at a rakugo performance for foreign students].” University of Tsukuba Journal of Japanese Language Teaching 29: 19–41.Google Scholar
. 2016, November. “Access denied: Justifying exclusion through invoking the institution.” Presentation at the 42nd Annual International Conference of the Japan Association for Language Teaching (JALT), Nagoya, Japan, November 25–28, 2016.
. 2017a. “She Who Laughs First: Audience Laughter and Interactional Competence at a Rakugo Performance for Foreign Students.” In Interactional Competence in Japanese as an Additional Language, ed. by Tim Greer, Midori Ishida, and Yumiko Tateyama, 81–114. Honolulu, HI: National Foreign Language Resource Center.Google Scholar
. 2017b. Soko, warau toko [That’s where you’re supposed to laugh]. Waraigaku Kenkyu 24: 17–32.Google Scholar
. In preparation. “Letting it pass with a smile: A conversation analytic examination of recipient smiles and laughter in multiparty L2 interactions.”
Bushnell, Cade, and Ide, Risako. 2017. “We laughed, we smiled: A microethnographic examination of smiling and laughter in first-time interactions between L1 and L2 speakers of Japanese.” Presentation at the 15th International Pragmatics Conference, Belfast, Ireland, July 16–21, 2017.
Cekaite, Asta. 2007. “A Child’s Development of Interactional Competence in a Swedish L2 Classroom.” The Modern Language Journal 91 (1): 45–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cekaite, Asta, and Aronsson, Karin. 2005. “Language Play, a Collaborative Resource in Children’s L2 Learning.” Applied Linguistics 26 (2): 169–191. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clift, Rebecca. 2013. “No Laughing Matter: Laughter and Resistance in the Construction of Identity.” In Studies of Laughter in Interaction, ed. by Philip J. Glenn and Elizabeth Holt, 223–236. New York, NY: Bloomsbury Academic. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Erickson, Frederick, and Mohatt, Gerald. 1977. “The Social Organization of Participation Structures in Two Classrooms of Indian Students (Report to the Department of Indian Affairs and Northern Development, Ottawa, Ontario).” ERIC # ED 192935, 46.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold. 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Glenn, Philip J. 2003. Laughter in Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Charles. 1996. “Transparent Vision.” In Interaction and Grammar, ed. by Elinor Ochs, Emanuel. A. Schegloff, and Sandra A. Thompson, 370–404. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2000. “Action and Embodiment within Situated Human Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics 32 (10): 1489–1522. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. “Contextures of Action.” In Embodied Interaction: Language and Body in the Material World, ed. by Jurgen Streeck, Charles Goodwin, and Curtis LeBaron, 182–193. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gradin Franzén, Anna, and Aronsson, Karin. 2013. “Teasing, Laughing and Disciplinary Humor: Staff–Youth Interaction in Detention Home treatment.” Discourse Studies 15 (2): 167–183. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grice, Paul. 1975. “Logic and Conversation.” In Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts, ed. by Peter Cole and Jerry L. Morgan, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gumperz, John. J. 1982. Language and Social Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Haakana, Markku. 2010. “Laughter and Smiling: Notes on Co-occurrences.” Journal of Pragmatics 42: 1499–1512.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haugh, Michael, and Pillet-Shore, Danielle. 2018. “Getting to Know You: Teasing as an Invitation to Intimacy in Initial Interactions.” Discourse Studies 20 (2): 246–269. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ide, Risako, and Bushnell, Cade. 2018. “Melting the Ice: Shotaimen kaiwa niokeru kyomei gensho toshiteno warai no kino [Melting the Ice: The function of laughter as a resonant phenomenon in initial interactions].” In Kikite Kodo no Komyunikeeshon Gaku, ed. by Kazuyo Murata, 235–255. Tokyo: Hitsuzi Shobo.Google Scholar
Iwasaki, S. 2009. “Initiating Interactive Turn Spaces in Japanese Conversation: Local Projection and Collaborative Action.” Discourse Processes 46 (2–3): 226–246. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Iwasaki, Shimako. 2011. The Multimodal Mechanics of Collaborative Unit Construction in Japanese Conversation. In Embodied Interaction: Language and Body in the Material World, ed. by Jurgen Streeck, Charles Goodwin, and Curtis LeBaron, 106–121. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jacknick, Christine. 2013. “‘Cause the Textbook Says…’: Laughter and Student Challenges in the ESL Classroom.” In Studies of Laughter in Interaction, ed. by Philip J. Glenn and Elizabeth Holt, 185–200. New York, NY: Bloomsbury Academic. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, Gail. 1972. “Side Sequences.” In Studies in Social Interaction, ed. by David N. Sudnow, 294–333. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
. 1979. “A Technique for Inviting Laughter and Its Subsequent Acceptance/Declination.” In Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology, ed. by George Psathas, 79–96. New York, NY: Irvington Publishers.Google Scholar
. 1984. “On the Organization of Laughter in Talk about Troubles.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson and John Heritage, 346–369. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 1985. “An Exercise in the Transcription and Analysis of Laughter.” In Handbook of Discourse Analysis, Vol. 3: Discourse and Dialogue, ed. by Teun A. van Dijk, 25–34. London, UK: Academic Press.Google Scholar
. 2004. “Glossary of Transcript Symbols with an Introduction.” In Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, ed. by Gene H. Lerner, 13–31. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, Gail, Sacks, Harvey, and Schegloff, Emanuel. A. 1977. “Preliminary Notes on the Sequential Organization of Laughter.” Pragmatics Microfiche 1 (Fiche 8): A2–D9.Google Scholar
1987. “Notes on Laughter in the Pursuit of Intimacy.” In Talk and social Organisation, ed. by Graham Button and John Lee, 152–205. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Keenan, Elinor O. 1976. “The Universality of Conversational Postulates.” Language in Society 5 (1): 67–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kendon, Adam. 1990. Conducting Interaction: Patterns of Behavior in Focused Encounters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 2004. Gesture: Visible Action as Utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
LeBaron, Curtis. 2006. “Cultural Identity among Mormons: A Microethnographic Study of Family Home Evening.” In From Generation to Generation: Maintaining Cultural Identity Over Time, ed. by Wendy Leeds-Hurwitz, 49–74. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
LeBaron, Curtis, and Streeck, Jurgen. 1997. “Built Space and the Interactional Framing of Experience During a Murder Interrogation.” Human Studies 20 (1): 1–25.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liebscher, Grit, and Dailey-O’Cain, Jennifer. 2013. “Constructing Identities Through Laughter.” In Studies of Laughter in Interaction, ed. by Philp J. Glenn and Elizabeth Holt, 237–254. New York, NY: Bloomsbury Academic. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mehan, Hugh. 1979. Learning Lessons: Social Organization in the Classroom. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mondada, Lorenza. 2011. “The Organization of Concurrent Courses of Action in Surgical Demonstrations.” In Embodied Interaction: Language and Body in the Material World, ed. by Jurgen Streeck, Charles Goodwin, and Curtis LeBaron, 207–226. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ruusuvuori, Johanna, and Peräkylä, Anssi. 2009. “Facial and Verbal Expressions in Assessing Stories and Topics.” Research on Language & Social Interaction 42 (4): 377–394. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey. 1989. “An Analysis of the Course of a Joke’s Telling in Conversation.” In Explorations in the Ethnography of Speaking, ed. by Richard Bauman and Joel Sherzer, 337–353. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1995. Lectures on Conversation (New Ed). Boston: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Schegloff, Emanuel. A., and Jefferson, Gail. 1974. “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-taking for Conversation.” Language 50 (4): 696–735. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stevanovic, Melisa. 2012. “Establishing joint decisions in a dyad.” Discourse Studies, 14(6): 779–803. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stivers, Tanya. 2008. “Stance, Alignment, and Affiliation During Storytelling: When Nodding is a Token of Affiliation.” Research on Language & Social Interaction 41 (1): 31–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stivers, Tanya, and Robinson, Jeffrey. D. 2006. “A Preference for Progressivity in Interaction.” Language in Society 35 (3): 367–392. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Watson, Rod. 1997. “Some General Reflections on ‘Categorization’ and ‘Sequence’ in the Analysis of Conversation.” In Culture in Action: Studies in Membership Categorization Analysis, ed. by Stephen Hester and Peter Eglin, 49–76. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Hänggi, Philipp
2022. Language Choice and the Multilingual Soundscape: Overhearing as a Resource for Recipient-Design in Impromptu First-Time Encounters. Research on Language and Social Interaction 55:4 ► pp. 299 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.