Chapter published in:
Fixed Expressions: Building language structure and social action
Edited by Ritva Laury and Tsuyoshi Ono
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 315] 2020
► pp. 4170
References

References

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
2010Imperatives and Commands. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Briggs, Charles L., and Richard Bauman
1992 “Genre, Intertextuality, and Social Power.” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 2 (2): 131–72. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan, and Paul Hopper
(eds) 2001Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chafe, Wallace L.
(ed.) 1980The Pear Stories: Cognitive, Cultural, and Linguistic Aspects of Narrative Production. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Clancy, Patricia M.
1980 “Referential Choice in English and Japanese Narrative Discourse.” In The Pear Stories: Cognitive, Cultural, and Linguistic Aspects of Narrative Production, ed. by Wallace L. Chafe, 127–202. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Clancy, Patricia M., Sandra A. Thompson, Ryoko Suzuki, and Hongyin Tao
1996 “The Conversational Use of Reactive Tokens in English, Japanese, and Mandarin.” Journal of Pragmatics 26 (3): 355–387. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clancy, Patricia M., Noriko Akatsuka, and Susan Strauss
1997 “Deontic Modality and Conditionality in Discourse.” In Directions in Functional Linguistics, ed. by Akio Kamio, 19–58. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
1981Language Universals and Linguistic Typology: Syntax and Morphology. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Corrigan, Roberta, Edith A. Moravcsik, Hamid Ouali, and Kathleen M. Wheatley
(eds) 2009Formulaic Language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Devitt, Amy J.
1989Standardizing Written English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Drew, Paul, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
(eds) 2014Requesting in Social Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Erman, Britt, and Beatrice Warren
2000 “The Idiom Principle and the Open Choice Principle.” Text 20 (1): 29–62. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J.
1974 “Pragmatics and the Description of Discourse.” In Pragmatics II, ed. by Siegfried J. Schmidt, 83–104. Munich: Fink.Google Scholar
1979 “On Fluency.” In Individual Differences in Language Ability and Language Behavior, ed. by C. J. Fillmore, D. Kempler, and W. S. Y. Wang, 85–102. New York: Academic Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J., Paul Kay, and Mary Catherine O’Connor
1988 “Regularity and Idiomaticity in Grammatical Constructions: The Case of Let Alone.” Language 64 (3): 501–538. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy
1981 “Typology and Functional Domains.” Studies in Language 5 (2):163–193. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Günthner, Susanne, and Hubert Knoblauch
1995 “Culturally Patterned Speaking Practices: The Analysis of Communicative Genres.” Pragmatics 5 (1): 1–32. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K., and Ruqaiya Hasan
1985Language, Context, and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social-semiotic Perspective. Victoria, Australia: Deakin University Press.Google Scholar
Hinds, John
1982Ellipsis in Japanese. Carbondale: Linguistic Research.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J.
1987 “Emergent Grammar.” In Berkeley Linguistics Society 13: General Session and Parasession on Grammar and Cognition, ed. by Jon Aske, Natasha Berry, Laura Michaelis, and Hana Filip, 139–157.Google Scholar
2012 “Emergent Grammar.” In The Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis, ed. by J. P. Gee, and M. Handford, 301-314. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J., and Elizabeth C. Traugott
2003Grammaticalization, Second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kuroda, S-Y.
1965 Generative Grammatical Studies in the Japanese Language . Ph.D. Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Langacker, Ronald W.
2008Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Laury, Ritva
2018 “The Finnish Verb Repeat Response: Its Emergence and Its Nature as a Formulaic Expression.” Journal of Pragmatics 123: 139–150. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Laury, Ritva, Tsuyoshi Ono, and Ryoko Suzuki
2019 “Questioning the Clause as a Crosslinguistic Unit in Grammar and Interaction.” Studies in Language, 43 (2): 364–401. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Linell, Per
2005The Written Language Bias in Linguistics: Its Nature, Origins and Transformations. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Longacre, Robert E.
1996The Grammar of Discourse. New York: Plenum Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Matsumoto, Yoshiko
2001 “Silent Reference in Japanese Discourse: Another Look at 'Zero-anaphora' in Japanese.” A talk given at Japanese Linguistics Workshop ‘From Discourse to Grammar: Directions in Japanese Linguistics’ , Stanford University.
Nakayama, Toshihide, and Kumiko Ichihashi-Nakayama
1997 “Japanese kedo: Discourse Genre and Grammaticization.” In Japanese/Korean Linguistics 6, ed. by H. Sohn, and J. Haig, 607–618. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Nariyama, Shigeko
2003Ellipsis and Reference Tracking in Japanese. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Okamoto, Shigeko
1991 “Nominal Tautologies in Japanese: X wa X, X ga X, and X mo X.Proceedings of the 17th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 218–229. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ono, Tsuyoshi, and Kimberly Jones
2008 “Conversation and Grammar: Approaching So-called Conditionals in Japanese.” In Japanese Applied Linguistics: Discourse and Social Perspectives, ed. by J. Mori, and A. Ohta, 21–51. London: Continuum International.Google Scholar
Ono, Tsuyoshi, and Ryoko Suzuki
1992 “Word Order Variability in Japanese Conversation: Motivations and Grammaticization.” Text 12: 429–445. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2018 “The Use of Frequent Verbs as Reactive Tokens in Japanese Everyday Talk: Formulaicity, Florescence, and Grammaticization.” Journal of Pragmatics 123: 209–219. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ono, Tsuyoshi, and Sandra A. Thompson
1997 “Deconstructing 'Zero Anaphora'.” BLS 23: 481–491. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003 “Japanese (w)atashi/ore/boku: They’re Not Just Pronouns.” Cognitive Linguistics 14 (4): 321–347. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009 “Fixedness in Japanese Adjectives in Conversation: Toward a New Understanding of a Lexical (Part-of-speech) Category.” In Formulaic Language, ed. by Roberta Corrigan, Edith Moravcsik, Hamid Ouali, and Kathleen Wheatley, 117–145. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017 “Negative Scope, Temporality, and Clause Structure in Japanese and English Conversation.” Studies in Language 41 (3): 543–576. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ono, Tsuyoshi, Sandra A. Thompson, and Yumi Sasaki
2012 “Japanese Negotiation through Emerging Final Particles in Everyday Talk.” Discourse Processes 49: 243–272. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ono, Tsuyoshi, Sandra A. Thompson, and Ryoko Suzuki
2000 “The Pragmatic Nature of the So-called Subject Marker ga in Japanese: Evidence from Conversation.” Discourse Studies 2 (1): 55–84. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pawley, Andrew, and Francis H. Syder
1983 “Natural Selection in Syntax: Notes on Adaptive Variation and Change in Vernacular and Literary Grammar.” Journal of Pragmatics 7 (5): 551–579. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Payne, Thomas E.
1997Describing Morphosyntax: A Guide for Field Linguists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Radford, Andrew
2009Analysing English Sentences: A Minimalist Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rossi, Giovanni
2015 The Request System in Italian Interaction . Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Radboud.
Sadock, Jerrold M., and Arnold M. Zwicky
1985 “Speech Act Distinctions in Syntax.” In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, ed. by Timothy Shopen, 155–196. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A.
1996 “Some Practices for Referring to Person in Talk-in-interaction: A Partial Sketch of a Systematics.” In Studies in Anaphora, ed. by Barbara A. Fox, 437–486. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Scheibman, Joanne
2002Point of View and Grammar: Structural Patterns of Subjectivity in American English Conversation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Selting, Margret
1997 “Sogenannte Ellipsen als interaktiv relevante Konstruktionen? Ein neuer Versuch über die Reichweite und Grenzen des Ellipsenbegriffs für die Analyse gesprochener Sprache in Interaktionen.” In Syntax des gesprochenen Deutsch, ed. by Peter Schlobinski, 117–156. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi
1990The Languages of Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Suzuki, Ryoko
1998 “From a Lexical Noun to an Utterance-final Pragmatic Particle: Wake .” In Studies in Japanese grammaticalization, ed. by Toshio Ohori, 67–92. Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar
1999a Grammaticization in Japanese: A Study of Pragmatic Particle-ization . Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara.
1999b “Mutifuncitonality: The Developmental Path of the Quotative tte in Japanese.” In Cognition and Function in Language, ed. by Barbara A. Fox, Dan Jurafsky, and Laura A. Michaelis, 50–64. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
2006 “How Does ‘Reason’ Become Less and Less Reasonable?: Pragmatics of the Utterance-final wake in Conversational Discourse.” In Emotive Communication in Japanese, ed. by Satoko Suzuki, 35–51. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007 “(Inter)subjectification in the Quotative tte in Japanese Conversation: Local Change, Utterance-ness and Verb-ness.” Historical Changes in Japanese: With Special Focus on Subjectivity and Intersubjectivity, Journal of Historical Pragmatics 8 (2): 207–237. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011 “A Note on the Emergence of Quotative Constructions in Japanese Conversation.” In Subordination in Conversation, ed. by Ritva Laury and Ryoko Suzuki, 149–164. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tanabe, Toshifumi, Masahito Takahashi, and Kosho Shudo
2014 “A Lexicon of Multiword Expressions for Linguistically Precise, Wide-coverage Natural Language Processing.” Computer Speech and Language 28 (6): 1317–1339. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tomlin, Russel S.
(ed.) 1987Coherence and Grounding in Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A., Barbara Fox, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
2015Grammar in Everyday Talk: Building Responsive Actions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A., and Ryoko Suzuki
2011 “The Grammaticalization of Final Particles”. In The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization, ed. by Heiko Narrog, and Bernd Heine, 668–680. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tsujimura, Natsuko
2006An Introduction to Japanese Linguistics, Second edition. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wray, Alison
2002Formulaic Language and the Lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yuzawa, Kokichiro
1982Tokugawajidai gengo no kenkyuu [A study of language of Tokugawa period]. Tokyo: Kazama Shobo. (original work published 1936).Google Scholar
Zinken, Jörg
2016Requesting Responsibility: The Morality of Grammar in Polish and English Family Interaction. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar