In this chapter we examine a formulaic expression in
English, why don’t you + action verb/predicate (=
WDY). We show that WDY is used in
everyday conversation to carry out the social work of giving advice, as in
why don't you try taking it again? We argue that this
construction is a formulaic expression because it is not understood
compositionally: the WDY format does not ask a question,
but proposes a future action that the speaker is recommending that the
recipient undertake. Our chapter explores the implicativeness of
WDY for subsequent talk, and reveals the intricate
relationship between the grammar of WDY and the social work
that it is used to do.
2011 “Soliciting
Accounts with ‘Why’-Interrogatives in
Conversation.” Journal of
Communication 61 (1): 94–119.
Bolinger, Dwight
1976 “Meaning
and Memory.” Forum
Linguisticum 1:1–14.
Butler, Carly W., Jonathan Potter, Susan Danby, Michael Emmison, and Alexa Hepburn
2010 “Advice
Implicative Interrogatives: Building ‘Client-centered Support’ in a
Children’s Helpline.” Social
Psychology
Quarterly 73 (3): 265–287.
Bybee, Joan
2000 “The
Phonology of the Lexicon: Evidence from Lexical
Diffusion.” In Usage-Based
Models of Language, ed.
by Michael Barlow, and Suzanne Kemmer, 65–85. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Bybee, Joan
2001 “Frequency
Effects on French
Liaison.” In Frequency
and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure, ed.
by Joan L. Bybee, and Paul J. Hopper, 337–359. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
2006 “From
Usage to Grammar: The Mind’s Response to
Repetition.” Language 82 (4): 529–551.
Bybee, Joan
2010Language,
Usage and
Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bybee, Joan
2015Language
Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bybee, Joan, Richard File-Muriel, and Ricardo Napoleao de Souza
2016 “Special
Reduction: A Usage-based
Approach.” Language and
Cognition 8: 421–446.
Bybee, Joan, and William Pagliuca
1987 “The
Evolution of Future
Meaning.” In Papers
from the 7th International Conference on Historical
Linguistics, ed.
by Anna Giacalone Ramat, Onofrio Carruba, and Giuliano Bernini, 109–122. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Bybee, Joan, and Joanne Scheibman
1999 “The
Effect of Usage on Degrees of Constituency: The Reduction of
don’t in
English.” Linguistics 37 (4): 575–596.
Chafe, Wallace
1994Discourse,
Consciousness, and Time: The Flow and Displacement of Conscious
Experience in Speaking and
Writing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Corrigan, Roberta, Edith Moravcsik, Hamid Ouali, and Kathleen Wheatley
(eds)2009Formulaic
Language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth
2001 “Interactional
Prosody: High onsets in Reason-for-the-call
Turns.” Language in
Society 30, 29–53.
2004b“Prosodische
Stilisierungen im
Gespräch (Prosodic stylizations
in conversation).” In Zwischen
Literatur und Anthropologie: Diskurse, Medien,
Performanzen (Between Literature and
Anthropology: Discourses, media,
performances), ed.
by Aleida Assmann, Ulrich Gaier, and Gisela Trommsdorff, 315–337. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
2018Interactional
Linguistics. Studying Language in Social
Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, and Sandra A. Thompson
Forthcoming. “Action
Ascription in Everyday Advice-giving
Sequences.” In Action
Ascription: Interaction in context ed.
by Arnulf Depperman, and Michael Haugh Cambridge Cambridge University Press
Curl, Traci S., and Paul Drew
2008 “Contingency
and Action: A Comparison of Two Forms of
Requesting.” Research on Language and
Social
Interaction 41 (2): 129–153.
Erman, Britt, and Beatrice Warren
2000 “The
Idiom Principle and the Open Choice
Principle.” Text 20 (1): 29–62.
Fillmore, Charles J.
1989 “Grammatical
Construction Theory and the Familiar
Dichotomies.” In Language Processing
in Social Context, ed.
by Rainer Dietrich, and Carl F. Graumann, 17–38. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Fillmore, Charles J., Paul Kay, and Mary C. O’Connor
1988 “Regularity
and Idiomaticity in Grammatical Constructions: The Case of
let
alone.” Language 64, 501–538.
Givón, T.
2001Syntax: An Introduction, Vol. 1. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Günthner, Susanne
1996 “The
Prosodic Contextualization of Moral Work: An Analysis of Reproaches
in
‘why’-Formats.” In Prosody
in Conversation, ed.
by Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, and Margret Selting, 271–302. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2013 “The
Conversation Analytic Approach to
Transcription.” In The
Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed.
by Jack Sidnell, and Tanya Stivers, 57–76. Chichester, UK: John Wiley and Sons.
Heritage, John, and Sue Sefi
1992 “Dilemmas
of Advice: Aspects of the Delivery and Reception of Advice in
Interactions between Health Visitors and First-time
Mothers.” In Talk
at work. Interaction in Institutional
Settings, ed. by Paul Drew, and John Heritage, 359-417. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hopper, Paul
1987 “Emergent
Grammar.” Berkeley Linguistics
Society 13: 139–157.
Hopper, Paul
2004 “The
Openness of Grammatical
Constructions.” Chicago Linguistic
Society 40: 239–256.
1999 “Grammatical
Constructions and Linguistic Generalizations: The What’s X
Doing Y?
Construction.” Language 75: 1–33.
Levinson, Stephen C.
1983Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Levinson, Stephen C.
2013Action formation and ascription. In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidnell, and Tanya Stivers, 103–130. Malden MA: Wiley Blackwell.
2004 “Indexing
‘no news’ with Stylization in
Finnish.” In Sound
Patterns in Interaction. Cross-Linguistic Studies from
Conversation, ed.
by Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, and Cecilia E. Ford, 299–334. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Pawley, Andrew
2007 “Developments
in the Study of Formulaic Language since 1970: A Personal
View.” In Phraseology
and Culture in English, ed.
by Paul Skandera, 3–48. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Pawley, Andrew, and Frances H. Syder
1983 “Two
Puzzles for Linguistic Theory: Nativelike Selection and Nativelike
Fluency.” In Language
and Communication, ed.
by Jack C. Richards, and Richard W. Schmidt, 191–268. London: Longman.
Prince, Ellen
1981 “Toward
a Typology of Given-new
Information.” In Radical
Pragmatics, ed. by Peter Cole, 223–255. New York: Academic Press.
Pudlinski, Christopher
2002 “Accepting
and Rejecting Advice as Competent
Peers.” Discourse
Studies 4, 481–499.
Robinson, Jeffrey
2016 “Accountability
in Social
Interaction.” In Accountability
in Social Interaction, ed.
by Jeffrey Robinson, 1–44. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sag, Ivan, and Mark Liberman
1975 “The
intonational disambiguation of indirect speech
acts.” Chicago Linguistic
Society 11: 487–497.
Shaw, Chloe
2012Advice
Giving in Telephone Interactions between Mothers and their Young
Adult
Daughters. PhD
thesis, Loughborough University.
Shaw, Chloe, and Alexa Hepburn
2013 “Managing
the Moral Implications of Advice in Informal
Interaction.” Research on Language
and Social
Interaction 46 (4): 344–362.
Shaw, Chloe, Jonathan Potter, and Alexa Hepburn
2015 “Advice-implicative
Actions: Using Interrogatives and Assessments to Deliver Advice in
Mundane Conversation.” Discourse
Studies 17 (3): 317–342.
Sinclair, John
1991Corpus,
Concordance,
Collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sorjonen, Marja-Leena, Liisa Raevaara, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
2017”Imperative
Turns at Talk: An
Introduction.” In Imperative
Turns at Talk: The Design of Directives in
Action, ed. by Marja-Leena Sorjonen, Liisa Raevaara, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, 1–24. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Stevanovic, Melisa, and Anssi Peräkylä
2012 “Deontic
Authority in Interaction. The Right to Announce, Propose, and
Decide.” Research on Language and
Social
Interaction 45 (3): 297–321.
Stivers, Tanya, John Heritage, Rebecca K. Barnes, Rose McCabe, Laura Thompson, and Merran Toerien
2017 “Treatment
Recommendations as Actions.” Health
Communication 33 (11): 1335–1344.
Tannen, Deborah
1987a “Repetition
in Conversation as Spontaneous
Formulaicity.” Text 7 (3): 215–243.
Tannen, Deborah
1987b “Repetition
in Conversation: Toward a Poetics of
Talk.” Language 63 (3): 574–605.
Waring, Hansun Zhang
2005 “Peer
Tutoring in a Graduate Writing Center: Identity, Expertise and
Advice Resisting.” Applied
Linguistics 26: 141–168.
Wray, Alison
2002Formulaic
Language and the
Lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wray, Alison
2008Formulaic
Language: Pushing the
Boundaries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wray, Allison, and Michael R. Perkins
1999 “The
Function of Formulaic Language: An
Integrated Model.” Language and
Communication
20: 1–28.
Wulff, Stefanie
2008Rethinking
Idiomaticity: A Usage–based
Approach. London/New York: Continuum.
Wulff, Stefanie
2009 “Converging
Evidence from Corpus and Experimental Data to Capture
Idiomaticity.” Corpus Linguistics and
Linguistics
Theory 5 (1): 131–159.
Cited by
Cited by 5 other publications
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth & Sandra A. Thompson
2022. Action Ascription and Deonticity in Everyday Advice-Giving Sequences. In Action Ascription in Interaction, ► pp. 183 ff.
Steensig, Jakob, Maria Jørgensen, Nicholas Mikkelsen, Karita Suomalainen & Søren Sandager Sørensen
2023. Toward a Grammar of Danish Talk-in-Interaction: From Action Formation to Grammatical Description. Research on Language and Social Interaction 56:2 ► pp. 116 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.