Part of
The Discourse of Indirectness: Cues, voices and functions
Edited by Zohar Livnat, Pnina Shukrun-Nagar and Galia Hirsch
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 316] 2020
► pp. 3958
References
Attardo, Salvatore, and Victor Raskin
1991 “Script Theory Revis(it)ed: Joke Similarity and Joke Representation Model..” Humor 4 (3–4): 293–347. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bezuidenhout Anne
2001 “Metaphor and What is Said: A Defense of a Direct Expression View of Metaphor.” Midwest Studies in Philosophy 25: 156–186. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burke, Kenneth.
1969A grammar of motives. University of California Press.Google Scholar
Camp, Elisabeth
2006 “Contextualism, Metaphor, and What is Said.” Mind and Language 21 (3): 280–309. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 “Sarcasm, Pretense, and the Semantics/Pragmatics Distinction.” Noûs 46: 587–634. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert H., and Richard J. Gerrig
1984 “On the Pretense Theory of Irony.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113(1): 121–126. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Colston, Herbert. L., and Raymond W. Gibbs Jr.
2002 “Are irony and metaphor understood differently?Metaphor and Symbol 17 (1): 57–80.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coulson, Seana
2005 “Sarcasm and the Space Structuring Model.” In The Literal and Nonliteral in Language and Thought, ed. by Seana Coulson, and Barbara Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, 129–144. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Dews, Shelly, and Ellen Winner
1995 “Muting the Meaning: A Social Function of Irony.” Metaphor and Symbolic Activity 10: 3–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1997 “Attributing Meaning to Deliberately False Utterances: The Case of Irony.” In The Problem of Meaning: Behavioral and Cognitive Perspectives, ed. by Charlotte Mandell, and Allyssa McCabe, 377–414. Amsterdam: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1999 “Obligatory Processing of the Literal and Non-Literal Meanings of Ironic Utterances.” Journal of Pragmatics 31, 1579–1599. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dews, Shelly, Joan Kaplan, and Ellen Winner
1995 “Why not Say It Directly? The Social Functions of Irony.” Discourse Processes, 19 (3), 347–367. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dori-Hacohen, Gonen, and Zohar Livnat
2015 “Negotiating Norms of Discussion in the Public Arena: The Use of Irony in Radio Phone-in Programs.” Journal of Communication 65: 909–931. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dynel, Marta
2014a “Isn’t It Ironic? Defining the Scope of Humorous Irony.” Humor 27 (4): 619–639. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014b “Linguistic Approaches to (non)Humorous Irony.” Humor 27 (4): 537–550. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016 “Two Layers of Overt Untruthfulness: When Irony Meets Metaphor, Hyperbole or Meiosis.” Pragmatics and Cognition 23 (2): 259–283. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evans, Vyvyan, and Melanie Green
2006Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction. New Jersey & London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, Gilles, and Mark Turner
2002The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Gal, Noam
2018 “Ironic Humor on Social Media as Participatory Boundary Work.” New Media & Society, 21 (3): 729–749. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garmendia, Joana
2010 “Irony is Critical.” Pragmatics and Cognition 18: 397–421. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, Raymond
1984 “Understanding and Literal Meaning.” Cognitive Science 13: 243–251. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1994The Poetics of Mind: Figurative Thought, Language and Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Giora, Rachel
1995 “On Irony and Negation.” Discourse Processes 19: 239–264. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1997 “Understanding figurative and literal language: The graded salience hypothesis.” Cognitive Linguistics 8 (3): 183–206. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003On our Mind: Salience, Context, and Figurative Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giora, Rachel, and Ofer Fein
1999, “On Understanding Familiar and Less-Familiar Figurative Language.” Journal of Pragmatics 31: 1601–1618. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giora, Rachel
2004 “On the graded salience hypothesis.” Intercultural Pragmatics 1 (1): 93–103. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giora, Rachel, and Helga Kotthoff
1998Report on the Research Project: The Graded Salience Hypothesis of Irony. Lion Foundation. University of Tel Aviv/University of Konstanz.Google Scholar
Glucksberg, Sam
2001Understanding Figurative Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grady, Joseph, Todd Oakley, and Seana Coulson
1999 “Blending and Metaphor.” In Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics, ed. by Raymond W. Gibbs, and Gerard J. Steen, 101–124. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grice, Paul
1975 “Logic and Conversation.” In Syntax and Semantics, Vol 3: Speech Acts, ed. by Peter Cole, and Jerry Morgan, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Grice Paul
1978 “Further Notes on Logic and Conversation.” In Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 9: Pragmatics, ed. by Peter Cole, 113–127. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hatcheon, Linda
1994Irony’s Edge: The Theory and Politics of Irony. London & New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haverkate, Henk
1990 “A speech act analysis of irony.” Journal of pragmatics 14 (1): 77–109. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hirsch, Galia
This volume. “Irony, Humor or Both? The Model Revisited.”
Kihara, Yoshihiki
2005 “The Mental Space Structure of Verbal Irony.” Cognitive Linguistics 16 (3): 513–530. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kotthoff, Helga
2003 “Responding to Irony in Different Contexts: On Cognition in Conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 35: 1387–1411. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson
1980Metaphors We Live By. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lapp, Edgar
1992Linguistik der Ironie. Tubingen: Gunter Narr verlag.Google Scholar
Livnat, Zohar
2004 “On Verbal Irony, Meta-Linguistic Knowledge and Echoic Interpretation.” Pragmatics and Cognition 12 (5): 57–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Livnat, Zohar, and Gonen Dori-Hacohen
2013 “The Effect of Irony in Radio Talk-Back Programs in Israel.” In The Pragmatics of Political Discourse: Explorations across Cultures, ed. by Anita Fetzer, 193–217. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, Robert
1992 “Irony and Universe of Belief.” Lingua 87: 77–90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Muecke, Douglas C.
1969The Compass of Irony. London: Methuen & Co.Google Scholar
Musolff, Andreas
2017 “Irony and Sarcasm in Follow-ups of Metaphorical Slogans.” In Irony in Language Use and Communication, ed. by Angeliki Athanasiadou, and Herbert L. Colston 127–143, Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Noveck, Ira A., Maryse Bianco, and Alain Castry
2001 “The Costs and Benefits of Metaphor.” Metaphor and Symbol 16: 109–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Popa, Mihaela
2009 Figuring the Code: Pragmatic Routes to the Non-Literal . PhD Dissertation, University of Geneva.
2010 “Ironic Metaphor Interpretation.” Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 33: 1–17.Google Scholar
Quintilian
1920–1922The Institutio oratoria of Quintilian. With an English trans. by H. E. Butler. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Raskin, Victor
1985Semantic Mechanisms of Humor. Dordrecht/Boston/Lancaster: D. Reidel.Google Scholar
Reimer, Marga
2013 “Grice on Irony and Metaphor: Discredited by the Experimental Evidence?International Review of Pragmatics 5: 1–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson
1981 “Irony and the Use-Mention Distinction.” In Radical pragmatics, ed. by Peter Cole, 295–318. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1986Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
2004 “Relevance Theory.” In Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. by Laurence Horn, and Gregory Ward, 607–632. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Stern Josef
2000Metaphor in Context. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Tobin, Vera, and Michael Israel
2012 “Irony as a Viewpoint Phenomenon.” In Viewpoint in Language: A Multimodal Perspective, ed. by Barbara Dancygier, and Eve Sweetser, 25–46. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weizman, Elda
2000 “Irony in News Discourse.” In Raphael Nir Jubilee Book – Studies in Communication, Linguistics and Language Teaching, ed. by Ora Schwarzwald, Shoshana Blum-Kulka, and Elite Olshtain, 237–248. Jerusalem: Carmel Publishing House. [In Hebrew.]Google Scholar
2001 “Addresser, Addressee and Target: Negotiating Roles Through Ironic Criticism.” In Negotiation: The Dialogic Question, ed. by Edda Weigand, and Marcelo Dascal, 125–137. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015 “Irony in and through Follow-ups.” In The Dynamics of Political Discourse: Forms and Functions of Follow-ups, ed. by Anita Fetzer, Elda Weizman, and Lawrence Berlin, 259–173. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weizman Elda, and Marcelo Dascal
1991 “On Clues and Cues: Strategies of Text-Understanding.” Journal of Literary Semantics XX/1: 18–30.Google Scholar
Weizman, Elda, and Gonen Dori-Hacohen
2017“Commenting on Opinion Editorials in On-line Journals: A Cross-Cultural Examination of Face Work in the Washington Post (USA) and NRG (Israel).” Discourse . Context & Media 19: 39–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre
2009 “Irony and Metarepresentation.” UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 21: 183–226.Google Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre, and Dan Sperber
1992 “On Verbal Irony.” Lingua 87: 53–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012Meaning and Relevance. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Winner, Ellen
1988The Point of Words: Children’s Understanding of Metaphor and Irony. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Yamanashi. Masa-Aki
1998 “Some Issues in the Treatment of Irony and Related Tropes.” In Relevance Theory: Applications and Implications, ed. by Robyn Carston, and Seiji Uchida, 1–22. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar